Ultimatum Time
-
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.
But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
-
Shep, I believe there is a difference that when you walk in McDonalds, and a loud mouth is in there saying, "Try the Big Mac, it's way better than the Double Cheeses Burger" ... as opposed to a guy sniding, "Go to Burger King, the management of this place sucks!"
Somewhere in that anaology you might find why a guy like Inspecta might get banned more-so and over a guy like Lums.
Not to mention the Burger King supporter using McDonalds letterhead and mail system to rally customers away from the establishment, opens a burger joint up next door but can't compete, supports a rival who also couldn't compete, advertises his new place on McDonalds billboard and can't understand why it is removed and reverts back to dissing the management again.
Ironically, the guy is allowed to continue to visit Mcdonalds daily, only being askecd to leave without a scene every now and then ... but yet this management is so bad for not removing the guy who likes Big Mac's better.
Yes, it's very, very odd that if the guy likes Burger King so much, that he waste his time at Mcdonlads.
-
@jadbf said:
Right, it's different because he personally insults you as the management, but people insulting the rest of the members of the board are just fine as long as the genuflect in your direction now and then.Because to make your annalogy correct it's more.
"you people are stupid McDonald's Fags for eating here. I can't believe Fags like you don't understand how good Burger King is"
Wrong, more like "you people are stupid McDonald wimpy burger lovers. I can't believe Fags like you don't understand how good the Big Mac is here at McDonalds"
I happen to like both the Big Mac and the Double cheese burger ... I'm just pissed that both make me fat.
-
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.
But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
Masters said:
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
You nailed it ... So, hows Burger King? I bet they have no such loud mouths, so why you still here?
-
Bottom line is if you don't like it here. Leave. Don't be a pussy and act all put out by one poster. mz the pussy will be the first one to try and get anyone banned if it offends him. Don't let the door hit you in the ass.
-
@jadbf said:
Actually you are 100% correct! I stand corrected.But it still means you prefer to have members who insult other members over having members who EVER question your management style.
That's a cool policy.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
-
Masters said:
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
You nailed it ... So, hows Burger King? I bet they have no such loud mouths, so why you still here?
-
@jadbf said:
Actually you are 100% correct! I stand corrected.But it still means you prefer to have members who insult other members over having members who EVER question your management style.
That's a cool policy.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their xxxxing head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a xxxxing paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the xxxxing bottle.
this is a xxxxing Browns board ... quit being queer.
Don't be so mean.....................Stan-ley.
-
@jadbf said:
Actually you are 100% correct! I stand corrected.But it still means you prefer to have members who insult other members over having members who EVER question your management style.
That's a cool policy.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
So you hate yourself and have driven yourself away? I have to ask, because it was you not too long ago whining and complaining about all the talk about QBs, and how they dominate the board.
-
@jadbf said:
Actually you are 100% correct! I stand corrected.But it still means you prefer to have members who insult other members over having members who EVER question your management style.
That's a cool policy.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
LMAO, that was some funny stuff Satn.
You made me curl up in the corner for a minute and genuflect.
-
Zombo said:
This big gay teary-eyed fast-food-loving drama queen of a thread is still going?Newsflash: The ultimatum didn't work.
Real shocker.
Zombo
--Vikes in two weeks ...stop the gay soap operas before someone see us.
Was anyone actually thinking it would? Pretty sure the person who made the ultimatum didn't think it would, and made that clear in his post.
-
@hiwaygal said:
I wasn't on the board in 2007...but was he scrutinized so closely when he was more or less winning?My guess is NO.
You are right, we won't be micro-analyzing Quinn on a pass-by-pass basis until he starts being inconsistent and unreliable.
I'll be the first to admit, we Browns fans are a fickle bunch. We'll love you as long as you are winning (although everyone makes mistakes now and then)...but when the losing continues and the same mistakes are being made over and over again, we'll turn on you like...well...like dogs on a steak.
Your guess is wrong. DA got cut some slack after the 5 TD game, but there were a couple guys on here still professing their belief that BQ would be the starter by the first game after bye week. He literally was criticized on a pass-by-pass basis that entire season. Lums wasn't around then, guys like Orangenotbrown and myself were saying that people might find DA more difficult to dislodge from the starting spot than they thought and we were accused of slathering ourselves in mangoo (It wasn't lumburgh that started the gay name calling here).
I saw a few guys who were critical of DA from the get-go that 10 win season defending Charlie Frye's inadequacies at the same time... they'll be giving BQ a ton of slack.
-
@jadbf said:
Yep real funny stuff.Whenever you can't actually argue the facts.
Go back to the same ole.
"THIS IS A BROWNS BOARD! Where the men are men and the sheep are scared" mantra or some such.
Woo hoo hilarious.
Oh really, I thought this thread was about Lum's and an ultimatum. I seem to recall that we put that to bed directly to the point. Oh wait ... then it spilled into being about Ghoolie, Rich and their little dog Inspecta too.
Who's going back to the same old?
-
@jadbf said:
Yep real funny stuff.Whenever you can't actually argue the facts.
Go back to the same ole.
"THIS IS A BROWNS BOARD! Where the men are men and the sheep are scared" mantra or some such.
Woo hoo hilarious.
Oh really, I thought this thread was about Lum's and an ultimatum. I seem to recall that we put that to bed directly to the point. Oh wait ... then it spilled into being about Ghoolie, Rich and their little dog Inspecta too.
Who's going back to the same old?
Oh really, I thought this thread was about Lum's and an ultimatum. I seem to recall that we put that to bed directly to the point. Oh wait ... then it spilled into being about Tom V., Rich and their little dog Inspecta too.
If by using Tom V. and Rich as examples of where a hard stance was taken (as opposed to what was done with Lum), then sure, it spilled over into being about them by Inspecta
-
Real or not, letting people pose as Lumberg for a week at a time still sounds like alot of fun.
-
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah
-
Zombo said:
thin-skinned Inspecta got a time out fit for a six-year old.So mz the pussy starts the thread calling it an ultimatum doesn't get banned, however inspecta does because he agrees with the OP?
Sounds more like the mods/admin were the thin skinned ones involved. The slightest critisism of the management earns you a banning, but everything else is cool cause we're all manly men, just don't talk shit about the mods/admin because they aren't really manly men at all, and are actually quite self conscience about their abilities to run this place.
That's what they basically said when they banned inspecta.
Good job boys, as you know actions speak louder than words, and that action spoke VOLUMES.
-
mz. said:
If the powers that be decide to not banish the Lumbergh person/character/puppet/alter ego/whatever, you can go ahead and delete my account. The choice is in your hands, but please take action one way or another.Mike
mz the pussy, would you like for us to Delete your account now? Please advise, we would like to put this 'ultimatum' behind us and move on.
mz the pussy, would you like for us to Delete your account now? Please advise, we would like to put this 'ultimatum' behind us and move on.
If the decision has been made to keep Lumbergh (someone everyne hates, a non-Browns fan and someone who's only goal here is to create bullshit) over me (an admitted putulant child but a real Browns fan and hopefully a contributor here), then go ahead and delete. My life will certainly go on.
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login