The narrative we knew is not reality...
-
A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness
A COVID-19 prophylaxis? Lower incidence associated with prophylactic administration of ivermectin
Nice try. I know how to read those abstracts. Small sample size, some studies "no statistical difference". MAYBE worth follow up. I hardly call it "controlled" in one study when some subjects were getting hydroxy and a bunch of other drugs.
MAY... Yup, may. How did the hydroxy studies turn out?
But OTOH, you're ragging that the proven 95% effective Pfizer and moderna vaccines are iffy? As to let's try another anti parasitical. Yup, Big Pharma conspiracy.
...But OTOH, you're ragging that the proven 95% effective Pfizer and moderna vaccines are iffy? As to let's try another anti parasitical. Yup, Big Pharma conspiracy.
Btw, Dr Robert Malone,
, has come out and publicly questioned the safety of the vaccine, saying that the spike protein RNA being put in the mRNA vector of the vaccine is potentially dangerous and cytotoxic.So is the vaccine effective? More or less. But effectiveness isn't always coupled with safe.
-
...But OTOH, you're ragging that the proven 95% effective Pfizer and moderna vaccines are iffy? As to let's try another anti parasitical. Yup, Big Pharma conspiracy.
Btw, Dr Robert Malone,
, has come out and publicly questioned the safety of the vaccine, saying that the spike protein RNA being put in the mRNA vector of the vaccine is potentially dangerous and cytotoxic.So is the vaccine effective? More or less. But effectiveness isn't always coupled with safe.
Btw, Dr Robert Malone,
, has come out and publicly questioned the safety of the vaccine, saying that the spike protein RNA being put in the mRNA vector of the vaccine is potentially dangerous and cytotoxic.So is the vaccine effective? More or less. But effectiveness isn't always coupled with safe.
Fair enough- we don't know what the long term effects of the vaccines will be. But cytotoxic? If it was, with several hundred million doses administered- we'd certainly have some inkling if they were "cytotoxic", at least in the short term.
Your body your choice. But for every anti vaxxer who comes down with covid- there's also the chance of a mutation that's going to render the vaccines ineffective.
BTW- The Internet is a blessing and a curse. I'm old enough to remember when the "experimental" polio vaccines came out. The difference being back then everyone with a blog (they didn't exist) could spread misinformation, disinformation and outright crap (magnetism anyone?) about the vaccines. You just lined up and got your shot or sugar cubes. So go ahead- take your chances. You might be lucky and not die. OTOH, my younger brother walked with a limp for the rest of his life- he was one of the lucky ones who only got a mild case of polio.
-
-
-
Except that ivermectin is a generic drug that is off patent; it goes for roughly $4 a pill. Pharmaceutical companies are just like companies in any other industry; their goal is to make a profit. On-patent medicine sells for quite alot more than generic drugs, and can only be made by the pharma company that holds the patent and other companies that they contract out to. Faced with choosing between producing a generic medication for little profit and can be made by anyone, or, selling a medication that can bring in substantially more money and can only be made by the patent holder, what course of action do you think pharmaceutical companies would take? It wouldn't surprise me at all for pharma companies to try to suppress continued research and clinical trials into an off-patent generic drug.
Btw, the fact that a medication starts out as veterinary drug is pretty inconsequential. Many drugs that are developed start out as such until clinical trials demonstrate their usefulness in treating humans. It happens all the time. And using a medicine to treat something that it wasn't originally designed for happens all the time too. Pfizer was a middle of the road pharma company in the 90s until they found out that their failed heart medicine was excellent for giving Baby Boomers erections, and now they're in the top 5 largest pharma companies in the world.
Great- then some pharmaceutical company should be doing a ton of research to see it it works- or not.
Show me a few peer reviewed duplicate studies instead of a guy with an agenda to prove it works- first- and then I might believe it...
Hello? Some people are making one hell of a lot of money selling generic sildenafil of late...
Great- then some pharmaceutical company should be doing a ton of research to see it it works- or not.
Show me a few peer reviewed duplicate studies instead of a guy with an agenda to prove it works- first- and then I might believe it...
Hello? Some people are making one hell of a lot of money selling generic sildenafil of late...
why should they do R&D when your biden puppet canceled covid patents ? Why would they put all that expense into it when they can't get their R&D investments return?
-
Starting with the pecker himself...
Starting with the pecker himself...
-
Starting with the pecker himself...
Starting with the pecker himself...
The lady that thinks demons make you masturbate?
The lady that thinks alien DNA is used in medical treatment?
The lady that thinks the govt is making a vaccine to make people not religious?
The lady that blames medical conditions on witches and demons?
The lady who at best runs an urgicare next to her evangelical church?
What exactly does she deserve an apology for?
Christ, the anti science / anti expert sentiment that's growing in this country is going to be our downfall
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Starting with the pecker himself...
The lady that thinks demons make you masturbate?
The lady that thinks alien DNA is used in medical treatment?
The lady that thinks the govt is making a vaccine to make people not religious?
The lady that blames medical conditions on witches and demons?
The lady who at best runs an urgicare next to her evangelical church?
What exactly does she deserve an apology for?
Christ, the anti science / anti expert sentiment that's growing in this country is going to be our downfall
The lady that thinks demons make you masturbate?
The lady that thinks alien DNA is used in medical treatment?
The lady that thinks the govt is making a vaccine to make people not religious?
The lady that blames medical conditions on witches and demons?
The lady who at best runs an urgicare next to her evangelical church?
What exactly does she deserve an apology for?
Christ, the anti science / anti expert sentiment that's growing in this country is going to be our downfall
Unless of course its people who think women have dicks and balls.
(But we know demons don't cause masturbation. For Woody it's naked pictures of Macaulay Cullkin.)
WSS
-
And now the VA is authorizing Transgenders to have sex change operations at government expense. Meanwhile, thousands of vets get disapproved for service connected ailments. How the fuck is this fair?
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
And now the VA is authorizing Transgenders to have sex change operations at government expense. Meanwhile, thousands of vets get disapproved for service connected ailments. How the fuck is this fair?
And now the VA is authorizing Transgenders to have sex change operations at government expense. Meanwhile, thousands of vets get disapproved for service connected ailments. How the fuck is this fair?
Sometimes- I have to agree with you... A sex change operation should fall under the umbrella of "cosmetic surgery" and AFAIK that's never covered by insurance.
-
Starting with the pecker himself...
The lady that thinks demons make you masturbate?
The lady that thinks alien DNA is used in medical treatment?
The lady that thinks the govt is making a vaccine to make people not religious?
The lady that blames medical conditions on witches and demons?
The lady who at best runs an urgicare next to her evangelical church?
What exactly does she deserve an apology for?
Christ, the anti science / anti expert sentiment that's growing in this country is going to be our downfall
The lady that thinks demons make you masturbate?
The lady that thinks alien DNA is used in medical treatment?
The lady that thinks the govt is making a vaccine to make people not religious?
The lady that blames medical conditions on witches and demons?
The lady who at best runs an urgicare next to her evangelical church?
What exactly does she deserve an apology for?
Christ, the anti science / anti expert sentiment that's growing in this country is going to be our downfall
Took me a bit to connect the dots Woodster. Dr. Devil Sperm... Total fruit loop. How she ever got a medical license in Texas is a mystery to me.. Medical School in Nigeria? Run by a pack of witch doctors?
Munyumba should stick to economics...
And covid vaccines will magnetize you....
-
And now the VA is authorizing Transgenders to have sex change operations at government expense. Meanwhile, thousands of vets get disapproved for service connected ailments. How the fuck is this fair?
And now the VA is authorizing Transgenders to have sex change operations at government expense. Meanwhile, thousands of vets get disapproved for service connected ailments. How the fuck is this fair?
that is just offensive. I guess they figure too many folks in the military aren't sold out lefties. But they figure the trans vote left...
whatever. It's sick and twisted offensive garbage.
-
Btw, Dr Robert Malone,
, has come out and publicly questioned the safety of the vaccine, saying that the spike protein RNA being put in the mRNA vector of the vaccine is potentially dangerous and cytotoxic.So is the vaccine effective? More or less. But effectiveness isn't always coupled with safe.
Fair enough- we don't know what the long term effects of the vaccines will be. But cytotoxic? If it was, with several hundred million doses administered- we'd certainly have some inkling if they were "cytotoxic", at least in the short term.
Your body your choice. But for every anti vaxxer who comes down with covid- there's also the chance of a mutation that's going to render the vaccines ineffective.
BTW- The Internet is a blessing and a curse. I'm old enough to remember when the "experimental" polio vaccines came out. The difference being back then everyone with a blog (they didn't exist) could spread misinformation, disinformation and outright crap (magnetism anyone?) about the vaccines. You just lined up and got your shot or sugar cubes. So go ahead- take your chances. You might be lucky and not die. OTOH, my younger brother walked with a limp for the rest of his life- he was one of the lucky ones who only got a mild case of polio.
Fair enough- we don't know what the long term effects of the vaccines will be. But cytotoxic? If it was, with several hundred million doses administered- we'd certainly have some inkling if they were "cytotoxic", at least in the short term...
Here you go.
-
Here you go.
I don't have the time or inclination to watch 15 minutes of supposed experts yammering. Believe whatever you want to. Don't go near anything that's ferromagnetic either.
If I want to discover the dangers of spike protein RNA, I'm totally capable of doing my own research. One blog with an agenda, that you've brought up multiple times.
For the time being, I've had it with the conspiracy crap, smart assery of one particular poster, and left wing hate on this forum. Adios.
PS- it took me about 3 minutes to figure out this is one guy spewing stuff....
No, there is no evidence the spike protein in the COVID-19 vaccines is cytotoxic. Experts say the spike protein created by the human body after mRNA vaccination is different than the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. “The bottom line is the vaccine spike [protein] isn’t toxic,” said Dr. Carolyn Machamer, a cell biology professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. That’s in part because, according to Machamer, the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 is different than the spike protein created after the administration of the mRNA vaccines.“The vaccine, at least the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccines, the mRNA vaccines, they supply the information to make spike, but it’s not exactly the spike that’s in the virus,” she said.“There are changes that were made on purpose that would prevent the spike protein from being able to undergo binding to the receptor and fusion,” Machamer explained. “And so, all this business about toxicity that has been shown for the real spike protein, the one that doesn't have that block, is totally irrelevant for the vaccine.”
There's plenty more fact check floating around showing that this "cytotoxic" stuff is BUNK from other assorted experts in the cell biology field. I'm not wasting more time than I already have looking into this. I said it earlier- you have one guy throw his opinion up on the Internet- and damn, it takes on a life of it's own. 4 million views- music to the ears of the antivaxxers.
-
https://www.theblaze.com/news/hillary-clinton-leaked-cable-wuhan-lab
Hillary Clinton warned in 2009 of potential 'biological weapons proliferation' in Wuhan lab, leaked cable shows
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login