Still laughing over OBJ trade talk?
-
OBJ has a huge day today.
we will see if this post ages well.
Huge? He dropped the biggest key pass to a comeback bid to get back into the game.
-
The conventional wisdom is OBJ will be out after this season. Let's see if he can make some big plays in the playoffs where we'll really need him.
The conventional wisdom is OBJ will be out after this season. Let's see if he can make some big plays in the playoffs where we'll really need him.
One of many wisdoms under development to be sure, but Geez... even I won't go so far as to label Cube "unconventional"...
Now irrationally insecure on the other hand....
-
Zombo said:
Still laughing.
Can't trade that contract.
Sink or swim with him this year, then he's gone.
Z
I wouldn't treat it so caviler, he could cost the Browns a Super Bowl run.
I wouldn't treat it so caviler, he could cost the Browns a Super Bowl run.
3 turnovers on the CLE side of the field yesterday and Baker not seeing Odell on an easy drag for a 1st down, turnover ON downs, all well before Odell and his drop. Which, hilariously enough, I mentioned the casual fan (such as yourself) would use as a lightning rod to ignore the larger issue(s) with this team - injuries and Baker. Because it's easier to just say "ODELL BAD" then to admit this team may have some flaws along with some hurt.
It bothers me that people this dumb actually exist.
-
Baker is not consistent enough for the Browns to overcome injuries.
I don’t think we are anymore special than any other team on the injury front. I watch the Giants each week. No Blake Martinez (for the year) Saquon (mostly out), Peppers (mostly out), their interior line is banged up, Sterling Shepard (mostly out). I’ve named their core and they all have missed time.
Last week I can honestly cite that we lost because of injuries to our secondary…but we weren’t good enough to overcome those (backups and coaching). This week we had our top 3 tackle options at the start of the season all out. Hudson isn’t ready may never be ready. But it changed our play-calling and then we allowed more pressure than usual (QB play and coaching) weren’t good enough to overcome this. The line was not great yesterday…but some of you on here have ZERO understanding of the role a line plays and expect 6/7 seconds every pass play….ain’t happening…but our QB needs it because he isn’t processing reads and making decisions quick enough or flat out not seeing the field well.
Im thankful that Baker has played a big part in bringing this franchise up from the pit of misery and he’s been aided but what I believe is one of the Top 5 setups for a QB (backs, line, WR, coaching). Can anyone here see him string together 3 consistent games in January against great competition? Essentially Protecting the ball, making the reads and executing the offense. My money is on “NO”. The bar is the Super Bowl. Teri Pluto said this an average team. I disagree.
So if this franchise wants to go there…they need to covet 1st round picks a little less and other young talent and find a Rodgers, or a Russ or the next Stafford.
-
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
-
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
Is there some kind of Da Vinci Code in all those little squares at the end of your post that we are suppose to unscramble to make sense of the rest of the words you typed there?
-
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
Coffee Fetcher? Is that code for "football guy?" Same guy who brought OBJ to us?
-
Odell leads the team in targets, I believe someone mentioned? I'll have to trust that because I can't look at up at the moment. However if you have a WR leading the team in targets but a RB who (before last sunday) was leading the team in receiving yards, that tends to indicate an inability to get the WR the ball.
Odell leads the team in targets, I believe someone mentioned? I'll have to trust that because I can't look at up at the moment. However if you have a WR leading the team in targets but a RB who (before last Sunday) was leading the team in receiving yards, that tends to indicate an inability to get the WR the ball.
Do they still count that as "targets" when they're uncatchable? I saw at least one against the Broncos.
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
FWIW, we had a chance to get a bunch of other guys- starting with Ladanian Tomlinson- who happens to be in the HOF. You can play the 20\20 hindsight shoulda game forever. 23 other teams had a shot at Rodgers, EVERY NFL team had multiple chances to draft "The GOAT" Brady.
Allen did you say? Cal loved him- but about no one else. I've only said it around a dozen times. Josh was inaccurate as hell when he came out of Wyoming.
Baker at worst is at least average, or are you pining for the days of Brady Quinn, Johnny Manziel, Brandon Weeden, or Deshone Kizer instead?
-
Odell leads the team in targets, I believe someone mentioned? I'll have to trust that because I can't look at up at the moment. However if you have a WR leading the team in targets but a RB who (before last Sunday) was leading the team in receiving yards, that tends to indicate an inability to get the WR the ball.
Do they still count that as "targets" when they're uncatchable? I saw at least one against the Broncos.
The Browns had a chance to get a Rodgers , Russ, and a Stafford but the “Coffee Fetcher” picked the little one that can’t instead of Josh Allen . Did someone say Baker Mayfield????????????????????????????????????????????????
FWIW, we had a chance to get a bunch of other guys- starting with Ladanian Tomlinson- who happens to be in the HOF. You can play the 20\20 hindsight shoulda game forever. 23 other teams had a shot at Rodgers, EVERY NFL team had multiple chances to draft "The GOAT" Brady.
Allen did you say? Cal loved him- but about no one else. I've only said it around a dozen times. Josh was inaccurate as hell when he came out of Wyoming.
Baker at worst is at least average, or are you pining for the days of Brady Quinn, Johnny Manziel, Brandon Weeden, or Deshone Kizer instead?
Do they still count that as "targets" when they're uncatchable? I saw at least one against the Broncos.
Yup.... special subset... "Off-Targets"
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login