This could be bad news
-
Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
You are joking right? Since there really is no qualification required.
WSS
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
WSS
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
-
But only a black woman. That is racists. Typical of you liberals.
-
Black is fine, woman is fine - but the left will nominate a puppet lefty that will vote however the left tells her to.
Major problem.
activist crap - the left justices break their promises every vote.
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
WSS
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
It's obviously black privilege.
-
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
yeah, like there is one ?
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
WSS
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
-
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?
-
Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board
Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board
I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.
-
Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board
I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.
I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.
I'm disappointed Bacon can't see that. I consider him smarter than the rest of the squad.
WSS
-
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?
Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?
It's a sad thing when being a conservative African American is considered being an Uncle Tom.
-
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?
Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?
Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.
-
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
You're a fucking nut job. First of all, the function of the SC is not to "represent people" that's the Congress' job. Neither do they preside over anyone. They are not there to represent the interest of a class of people.
Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians and interpreters of the Constitution.
-
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
You're a fucking nut job. First of all, the function of the SC is not to "represent people" that's the Congress' job. Neither do they preside over anyone. They are not there to represent the interest of a class of people.
Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians and interpreters of the Constitution.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login