Skip to content

This could be bad news

Political Discussion
76 13 1.7k
  • Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board

    @baconhound said:

    Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board

    I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.

  • @baconhound said:

    Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board

    I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.

    @canton-dawg said:

    I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism.

    I'm disappointed Bacon can't see that. I consider him smarter than the rest of the squad.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.

    Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.

    WSS

    Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?

    It's a sad thing when being a conservative African American is considered being an Uncle Tom. 

  • @westside-steve said:

    I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.

    Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.

    WSS

    Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?

    Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.

  • image.thumb.png.d0487b5a0bacf8b09d86ed24b75d7b24.png

  • Trump vs Biden: Who Would Win in an MMA Fight? - The MMA Guru

  • @westside-steve said:

    We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....

    You know who you are and you know how  you would react if it were the other way around.

    WSS

    I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex.  You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.

    @baconhound said:

    I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex.  You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.

    You're a fucking nut job.  First of all, the function of the SC is not to "represent people" that's the Congress' job. Neither do they preside over anyone. They are not there to represent the interest of a class of people.

    Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians and interpreters of the Constitution.

  • @baconhound said:

    I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex.  You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.

    You're a fucking nut job.  First of all, the function of the SC is not to "represent people" that's the Congress' job. Neither do they preside over anyone. They are not there to represent the interest of a class of people.

    Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians and interpreters of the Constitution.

    @gorka said:

    Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians of the Constitution.

    Fixed that for ya 😉

  • AxeA Axe

    image.thumb.png.d0487b5a0bacf8b09d86ed24b75d7b24.png

    @axe said:

    image.thumb.png.d0487b5a0bacf8b09d86ed24b75d7b24.png

    That reminded me of this:

    peter2.jpg

  • Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board

    @baconhound said:

    Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board

    Point to it. Call the person out who made this racist comment.  Don't be a pussy.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.?

    Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

    @texasag1969 said:

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

    Tex

    nobody likes you.  I bet your kids just pretend to like you.

    I mean you really are a dick

  • AxeA Axe

    @gorka said:

    Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians of the Constitution.

    Fixed that for ya 😉

    @axe said:

    Fixed that for ya 😉

    I see what you're saying... But the "interpretation" I'm talking about refers to getting rid of any ambiguity and making clear the intentions of the framers of the Constitution. 

  • If a black woman is the best candidate then more power to her.. But should that be the criteria? Should it be the prerequisite for attaining the position?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Boy, did you get fucked up in the head.

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

    @texasag1969 said:

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

    Your comments are perfectly in line with those of any other liberal dipshit, so no one's gonna buy your "I was only being sarcastic" bullshit.

  • AxeA Axe

    If a black woman is the best candidate then more power to her.. But should that be the criteria? Should it be the prerequisite for attaining the position?

    @axe said:

    If a black woman is the best candidate then more power to her.. But should that be the criteria? Should it be the prerequisite for attaining the position?

    Racist!  Eventually someone will slip up. Bacon was right after all!

  • AxeA Axe

    If a black woman is the best candidate then more power to her.. But should that be the criteria? Should it be the prerequisite for attaining the position?

    @axe said:

    If a black woman is the best candidate then more power to her.. But should that be the criteria? Should it be the prerequisite for attaining the position?

    On the left it's always been about quotas over quality, striving for equal outcomes.

    The job of government is to assure equal opportunity for all, NOT equal outcomes.

    I wonder if Biden has looked here...

    Virginia’s new lieutenant governor is a Black Republican woman. That identity is more common than you may think. - The Washington Post

    And other Black Republican women — Jenean Hampton, Jennette Bradley and Jennifer Carroll 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    and some of you need to buy a sense of humor. Never heard of sarcasm?

    Tex

    nobody likes you.  I bet your kids just pretend to like you.

    I mean you really are a dick

    @hammertime said:

    Tex

    nobody likes you.  I bet your kids just pretend to like you.

    I mean you really are a dick

    Considering the source I will take that as a supreme compliment. I aim to piss off pussies and apparently it's working.?

  • .............................................download-15.jpg

    download-16.jpg

  • @hammertime said:

    Tex

    nobody likes you.  I bet your kids just pretend to like you.

    I mean you really are a dick

    Considering the source I will take that as a supreme compliment. I aim to piss off pussies and apparently it's working.?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Considering the source I will take that as a supreme compliment. I aim to piss off pussies and apparently it's working.?

    Woody does get pissed a lot.

    And if your aim here is to piss off regardless of who it is then you are what we thought you were, a troll.