Skip to content

Watson Suspended for 11 Games and Fined $5 Million / and a bit OT and back.

The Browns Board
1.3k 59 47.2k 1
  • Please fellas, lets keep this thread on topic.

    It is a Browns thread,thus it should contain only thoughts on Browns football, food recipes, old Corvettes, and guitars. 

    ? 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Please fellas, lets keep this thread on topic.

    It is a Browns thread,thus it should contain only thoughts on Browns football, food recipes, old Corvettes, and guitars. 

    ?

    Or what goes on behind closed doors with Nick and Dutch.

    WSS 

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Please fellas, lets keep this thread on topic.

    It is a Browns thread,thus it should contain only thoughts on Browns football, food recipes, old Corvettes, and guitars. 

    ?

    Or what goes on behind closed doors with Nick and Dutch.

    WSS 

    @westside-steve said:

    Or what goes on behind closed doors with Nick and Dutch.

    WSS 

    LOL! ?

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Please fellas, lets keep this thread on topic.

    It is a Browns thread,thus it should contain only thoughts on Browns football, food recipes, old Corvettes, and guitars. 

    ?

    Or what goes on behind closed doors with Nick and Dutch.

    WSS 

    @westside-steve said:

    Or what goes on behind closed doors with Nick and Dutch.

    WSS 

    oh my george takei .gif

  • Not much to miss here.

  • @orion said:

    I agree.  There's no news emanating from this thread.  Just endless ridiculousness.  Lock it.  Delete it.  Whatever.  And then someone can start a thread when there actually IS news.

    Or don't read it if it offends you so. I don't find it offensive nor do I see any reason to lock it. The only purpose to the thread is whatever tiny incremental updates there are on the situation that's probably the most challenging to the upcoming brownie season of any.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Or don't read it if it offends you so. I don't find it offensive nor do I see any reason to lock it. The only purpose to the thread is whatever tiny incremental updates there are on the situation that's probably the most challenging to the upcoming bronze season of any.

    WSS

    I don't think you'd hurt many feelings if you put this thread to sleep Steve...?

  • 6 games?

  • my guess being the honorable judge sue robinson is taking this long is the amount of games he will get (unless its zero there cant be a appeal ) so what ever the games she recommends either the nflpa or the nfl will appeal and this shit could go on till september

  • sydS syd

    my guess being the honorable judge sue robinson is taking this long is the amount of games he will get (unless its zero there cant be a appeal ) so what ever the games she recommends either the nflpa or the nfl will appeal and this shit could go on till september

    @syd said:

    my guess

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

  • @syd said:

    my guess

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    @orion said:

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

  • @orion said:

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    Isn't this her first decision?  So there's no track record.

  • ~~~●  page 24  ●~~~

    deshawn watson legal issues

    Nothing much new until the judge says something...... and we wait, I guess.  It's Wednesday July 26.

    Guardians Game 97, on this day in major league baseball. 

    And we wait on the judge.                 Steve ?                 😴

  • ~~~●  page 24  ●~~~

    deshawn watson legal issues

    Nothing much new until the judge says something...... and we wait, I guess.  It's Wednesday July 26.

    Guardians Game 97, on this day in major league baseball. 

    And we wait on the judge.                 Steve ?                 😴

    @mjp28 said:

    ~~~●  page 24  ●~~~

    deshawn watson legal issues

    Nothing much new until the judge says something...... and we wait, I guess.  It's Wednesday July 26.

    Guardians Game 97, on this day in major league baseball. 

    And we wait on the judge.                 Steve ?                 😴

    FUCK the TARDIANS!

  • @mjp28 said:

    ~~~●  page 24  ●~~~

    deshawn watson legal issues

    Nothing much new until the judge says something...... and we wait, I guess.  It's Wednesday July 26.

    Guardians Game 97, on this day in major league baseball. 

    And we wait on the judge.                 Steve ?                 😴

    FUCK the TARDIANS!

    @nickers said:

    FUCK the TARDIANS!

    You must be an absolute joy to know in real life.

  • @syd said:

    my guess

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    @orion said:

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    nflpa would sue the hell out of godell if that happened(what ever her findings it is public domain) and the only way godell can not appeal is if she says 0 games 

  • @nickers said:

    FUCK the TARDIANS!

    You must be an absolute joy to know in real life.

    @dutch-oven said:

    You must be an absolute joy to know in real life.

    hahha he has me on ignore I musta hurt his feelings

  • as i said unless the judge sez o games or the nfl and nflpa can come to terms on games Watson vs baker in sep

  • @orion said:

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

    https://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/2022/06/who-is-sue-l-robinson-the-retired-federal-judge-hearing-the-deshaun-watson-disciplinary-case.html?outputType=amp
     

    I posted this a few weeks ago. Like any decent Judge committed to ensuring “due process” which I think is important here given the media smear job 

  • @orion said:

    Who knows...she might have already given her verdict to Roger GoToHell and he's taking HIS sweet time.  (he likes to do that as I recall from Josh Gordon)  Or he told her, NO, go back and rethink that until you come up with a longer suspension.  My understanding is that Roger can approve or over rule her decision.  

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

     Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    WSS

    FYtYGpIXkAAkGy6.jpg.6b53c4f271aa20210a40353ab457f988.jpg  

  • @westside-steve said:

    After dropping the decision in her lap it would be a bad look for the NFL to try to overrule her decision. Anybody have any idea of her track record of decisions before this?

    This decision could wind up having wide-ranging effect on the entire me too movement in which accusations can deep six anybody.

    WSS

    https://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/2022/06/who-is-sue-l-robinson-the-retired-federal-judge-hearing-the-deshaun-watson-disciplinary-case.html?outputType=amp
     

    I posted this a few weeks ago. Like any decent Judge committed to ensuring “due process” which I think is important here given the media smear job 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    https://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/2022/06/who-is-sue-l-robinson-the-retired-federal-judge-hearing-the-deshaun-watson-disciplinary-case.html?outputType=amp
     

    I posted this a few weeks ago. Like any decent Judge committed to ensuring “due process” which I think is important here given the media smear job 

    In a perfect world of course. Just curious because there's a paper trail that is scrutinized whenever someone is nominated to the Supreme Court for example. By the way smear job? What in particular would the smear job be?

    WSS

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    https://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/2022/06/who-is-sue-l-robinson-the-retired-federal-judge-hearing-the-deshaun-watson-disciplinary-case.html?outputType=amp
     

    I posted this a few weeks ago. Like any decent Judge committed to ensuring “due process” which I think is important here given the media smear job 

    In a perfect world of course. Just curious because there's a paper trail that is scrutinized whenever someone is nominated to the Supreme Court for example. By the way smear job? What in particular would the smear job be?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    In a perfect world of course. Just curious because there's a paper trail that is scrutinized whenever someone is nominated to the Supreme Court for example. By the way smear job? What in particular would the smear job be?

    WSS

    Pick a ruling.   Some group will be incited.  Later it will be the center of an agenda so either the candidate or the party wilts