Skip to content

My GOD - the IRS will be bigger than.....

Political Discussion
99 14 2.9k 1
  • @mld-woody said:

    Southern Dems?

    Interesting distinction. Nothing to look into I'm sure

    Oh yea.  All them southern hicks are racists, right woody??

  • @mld-woody said:

    Southern Dems?

    Interesting distinction. Nothing to look into I'm sure

    Go ahead and look….and read.

    Here’s a little gem from DEMOCRATIC President LBJ (a southern Dem).

    https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism-msna305591

    30660AFF-8B9C-4019-B587-46A2824A4422.jpeg

  • “We do not have to destroy America with missiles; America will destroy itself from within."-Nikita Khrushchev

  • “We do not have to destroy America with missiles; America will destroy itself from within."-Nikita Khrushchev

    @diehardbrownsfan1 said:

    “We do not have to destroy America with missiles; America will destroy itself from within."-Nikita Khrushchev

    sadly, that is where we seem to be at today. dangerous times.

  • @diehardbrownsfan1 said:

    “We do not have to destroy America with missiles; America will destroy itself from within."-Nikita Khrushchev

    sadly, that is where we seem to be at today. dangerous times.

    @calfoxwc said:

    sadly, that is where we seem to be at today. dangerous times.

    We’re still the greatest nation in the world.

    we just can’t let a minority dictate to the majority.

  • I'm sure conservatives supported civil rights, a women's right to vote, etc. Because that's definitely the definition of a conservative...

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm sure conservatives supported civil rights, a women's right to vote, etc. Because that's definitely the definition of a conservative...

    Women getting the right to vote happened in 1920. Anyone with a set of balls between their legs were opposed to it. Conservatism played no role back then.

    Conservatives did support Civil Rights, and yes many did not.

    While neither Democrats nor Republicans, liberals nor conservatives, enjoy a completely spotless record on civil rights, conservatives within the Republican Party served historically as defenders of equal opportunity and civil rights. House Republicans such as conservative Hamilton Fish (R-NY) supported federal anti-lynching legislation in 1922, 1937, and 1940, only to have these bills defeated in the Senate by Southern Democrats. In 1934, Oscar De Priest (R-IL), the first black congressman elected in the 20th century and a staunch anti-New Deal conservative, unsuccessfully tried to integrate the House restaurant. In 1947, the Republican-controlled Senate, headed by Robert Taft, refused to seat notorious racist Theodore Bilbo (D-MS) because of intimidation of black voters in the 1946 election.

    Conservatism need not be defined by it's support of civil rights. It is implied.

    That all men are created equal.

     Conservatives believe in the ability of mankind to build a society that respects rights, defends those rights and is also strong enough to repel the forces that would threaten it.

    The 14 amendment was written by Conservatives.

    No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

  • I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard time with this. 

    Conservative has not always equaled Republican. Conservatives fight change, they want the status quo. 

  • I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard time with this. 

    Conservative has not always equaled Republican. Conservatives fight change, they want the status quo. 

    @cccjwh said:

    I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard time with this. 

    Conservative has not always equaled Republican. Conservatives fight change, they want the status quo. 

    Keep moving those goal posts.

  • @cccjwh said:

    I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard time with this. 

    Conservative has not always equaled Republican. Conservatives fight change, they want the status quo. 

    Keep moving those goal posts.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Keep moving those goal posts.

    Seems like you don't understand what the phrase means

  • ZDNmNjU3MTgtZDQyNi00Y2Q1LWFhNjMtODlkYzlm

    Look at these liberals protesting! How awful!

    24McConnell-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&au

    And even more liberals here!

    Because if there's anything we do know, it's that the group calling everything they don't like Communism are definitely liberals

  • just because you are an ardent ignorant smart ass, woodpecker, it doesn't mean you ever make any kind of legitimate point. But be proud, be loud, be the bird you need to be.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Keep moving those goal posts.

    Seems like you don't understand what the phrase means

    @mld-woody said:

    Seems like you don't understand what the phrase means

    More whataboutism 

  • @mld-woody said:

    Seems like you don't understand what the phrase means

    More whataboutism 

    @canton-dawg said:

    More whataboutism 

    You really have problems with understanding words. Because I don't think you understand what that means either.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    More whataboutism 

    You really have problems with understanding words. Because I don't think you understand what that means either.

    @cccjwh said:

    You really have problems with understanding words. Because I don't think you understand what that means either.

    Well tell us what it means then...

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And to further piss on your parade, more Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than Democrats.

    Henry Ford started the 5 day 40 hour work week.

    Those are just off the top of my head.

    So more progressive voted for the Civil Rights Act than conservatives. 

    @cccjwh said:

    So more progressive voted for the Civil Rights Act than conservatives. 

    I don't think you thought this out very well.  The status quo was roe vs wade not that long ago, but according to your logic you have to own the "change" in policy?

  • @canton-dawg said:

    More whataboutism 

    You really have problems with understanding words. Because I don't think you understand what that means either.

    @cccjwh said:

    You really have problems with understanding words. Because I don't think you understand what that means either.

    When you lose the argument…change the words.

  • @cccjwh said:

    So more progressive voted for the Civil Rights Act than conservatives. 

    I don't think you thought this out very well.  The status quo was roe vs wade not that long ago, but according to your logic you have to own the "change" in policy?

    @htownbrown said:

    I don't think you thought this out very well.  The status quo was roe vs wade not that long ago, but according to your logic you have to own the "change" in policy?

    Well conservatives do love to go backwards. There's another win for you guys.

  • @htownbrown said:

    I don't think you thought this out very well.  The status quo was roe vs wade not that long ago, but according to your logic you have to own the "change" in policy?

    Well conservatives do love to go backwards. There's another win for you guys.

    @cccjwh said:

    Well conservatives do love to go backwards. There's another win for you guys.

    Considering the advancements in pregnancy prevention, it could be considered progressive under your definition.  

  • @cccjwh said:

    Well conservatives do love to go backwards. There's another win for you guys.

    Considering the advancements in pregnancy prevention, it could be considered progressive under your definition.  

    @htownbrown said:

    Considering the advancements in pregnancy prevention, it could be considered progressive under your definition.  

    You think taking people's rights away is progressive? You really are a conservative. 

  • @htownbrown said:

    Considering the advancements in pregnancy prevention, it could be considered progressive under your definition.  

    You think taking people's rights away is progressive? You really are a conservative. 

    @cccjwh said:

    You think taking people's rights away is progressive? You really are a conservative. 

    I'm simply following your logic.  So supporting the 2nd amendment is progressive/liberal?  You're all over the place today.