Skip to content

Brady Quinn sucks and always has! Can we please put Derek Anderson back in.

The Browns Board
214 50 13.1k
  • The bigger problem is Braylon Edwards. That dude sucks balls and is intentionally trying to make Quinn look bad. Braylon is a cake eater and a d-bag

  • The bigger problem is Braylon Edwards. That dude sucks balls and is intentionally trying to make Quinn look bad. Braylon is a cake eater and a d-bag

    @hehateobama said:

    The bigger problem is Braylon Edwards. That dude sucks balls and is intentionally trying to make Quinn look bad. Braylon is a cake eater and a d-bag

    Yep. That's exactly what Braylon is doing. Trying to make Quinn look bad while simultaneously making himself look bad, and in a contract year too. The nerve of that guy.

  • @hehateobama said:

    The bigger problem is Braylon Edwards. That dude sucks balls and is intentionally trying to make Quinn look bad. Braylon is a cake eater and a d-bag

    Yep. That's exactly what Braylon is doing. Trying to make Quinn look bad while simultaneously making himself look bad, and in a contract year too. The nerve of that guy.

    @nigeltufnel said:

    Yep. That's exactly what Braylon is doing. Trying to make Quinn look bad while simultaneously making himself look bad, and in a contract year too. The nerve of that guy.

    You can make an argument that he isn't trying to intentionally kill Quinn but nobody can make an case for him not sucking shit. That ship has sailed... He had a chance to be a great receiver and dropped the ball

  • For what it's worth, Reggie Rucker was just on WKNR talking about the Quinn pick. Reggie stated that the INT was squarely on BE. To paraphrase, Reggie said the sight adjustment against the coverage was the route that Quinn threw expecting BE to run and the correct one. BE adjusted his route again after the snap, which is a no no. While as some have said, the inside could have been 6, that isn't seen presnap and you can't adjust to that route after the snap. The reason is because the presnap read (the route Quinn expected BE to be running) requires the ball to be out before that inside read BE ran can be seen. Quinn is already letting the ball go by the time BE makes that move inside.

    That was Reggie's take, for what it's worth.

  • For what it's worth, Reggie Rucker was just on WKNR talking about the Quinn pick. Reggie stated that the INT was squarely on BE. To paraphrase, Reggie said the sight adjustment against the coverage was the route that Quinn threw expecting BE to run and the correct one. BE adjusted his route again after the snap, which is a no no. While as some have said, the inside could have been 6, that isn't seen presnap and you can't adjust to that route after the snap. The reason is because the presnap read (the route Quinn expected BE to be running) requires the ball to be out before that inside read BE ran can be seen. Quinn is already letting the ball go by the time BE makes that move inside.

    That was Reggie's take, for what it's worth.

    Masters said:

    For what it's worth, Reggie Rucker was just on WKNR talking about the Quinn pick. Reggie stated that the INT was squarely on BE. To paraphrase, Reggie said the sight adjustment against the coverage was the route that Quinn threw expecting BE to run and the correct one. BE adjusted his route again after the snap, which is a no no. While as some have said, the inside could have been 6, that isn't seen presnap and you can't adjust to that route after the snap. The reason is because the presnap read (the route Quinn expected BE to be running) requires the ball to be out before that inside read BE ran can be seen. Quinn is already letting the ball go by the time BE makes that move inside.

    That was Reggie's take, for what it's worth.

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

  • Masters said:

    For what it's worth, Reggie Rucker was just on WKNR talking about the Quinn pick. Reggie stated that the INT was squarely on BE. To paraphrase, Reggie said the sight adjustment against the coverage was the route that Quinn threw expecting BE to run and the correct one. BE adjusted his route again after the snap, which is a no no. While as some have said, the inside could have been 6, that isn't seen presnap and you can't adjust to that route after the snap. The reason is because the presnap read (the route Quinn expected BE to be running) requires the ball to be out before that inside read BE ran can be seen. Quinn is already letting the ball go by the time BE makes that move inside.

    That was Reggie's take, for what it's worth.

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    @moonlitknight said:

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

  • @moonlitknight said:

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

    AdaM said:

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

    I have no recollection of asking a question....I have said...give quinn 6 games worth of rope to hang himself..I think due to his play yesterday he now has about a foot of rope so far

  • Can we close this thread please, its foundation is built on manure

    @playgroundlegend said:

    Can we close this thread please, its foundation is built on manure

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    Mechanics looked terrible, he looked skiddish (yes, the line was terrible so I don't blame him) and his arm did look weak. Don't know whether he or Daboll (pathetic playcalling, worse than Carthon) was to blame (I'd say both), but there is definitely cause for concern here.

  • @playgroundlegend said:

    Can we close this thread please, its foundation is built on manure

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    Mechanics looked terrible, he looked skiddish (yes, the line was terrible so I don't blame him) and his arm did look weak. Don't know whether he or Daboll (pathetic playcalling, worse than Carthon) was to blame (I'd say both), but there is definitely cause for concern here.

    mz. said:

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    Mechanics looked terrible, he looked skiddish (yes, the line was terrible so I don't blame him) and his arm did look weak. Don't know whether he or Daboll (pathetic playcalling, worse than Carthon) was to blame (I'd say both), but there is definitely cause for concern here.

    He looked Skiddish? Funny, I didn't know he was Jewish. I thought he was Irish.

  • @playgroundlegend said:

    Can we close this thread please, its foundation is built on manure

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    Mechanics looked terrible, he looked skiddish (yes, the line was terrible so I don't blame him) and his arm did look weak. Don't know whether he or Daboll (pathetic playcalling, worse than Carthon) was to blame (I'd say both), but there is definitely cause for concern here.

    mz. said:

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    mz the pussy now is no time to fall of the BQ Fanwagon.

    you make your bed, you lay in it.

  • @moonlitknight said:

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

    AdaM said:

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

    Why? We (not me, but oh well) as fans didn't do that for DA.............Hell, we couldn't find the pitch forks and torches fast enough and kill our only QB in decades to make the pro-bowl. What's good for the goose, is good for the pretty boy.

  • AdaM said:

    Yeah, and a vet like Delhomme threw 4 picks, next question?

    This was his 4th career start vs one of the best defenses in the NFL people... Lets give the kid at least half a season before shitting on him.

    Why? We (not me, but oh well) as fans didn't do that for DA.............Hell, we couldn't find the pitch forks and torches fast enough and kill our only QB in decades to make the pro-bowl. What's good for the goose, is good for the pretty boy.

    @d-bone said:

    Why? We (not me, but oh well) as fans didn't do that for DA.............Hell, we couldn't find the pitch forks and torches fast enough and kill our only QB in decades to make the pro-bowl. What's good for the goose, is good for the pretty boy.

    No one was calling for DA's head after his 4th start jackass. That happened after he decided to forget how to play QB and toss pick 6's every game.

  • Whatever gets you through the day. Nice unprovoked resort to name calling too.

  • mz. said:

    Sure, the foundation is built on manure, but the sentiment that Quinn looked like absolute dogshit yesterday is something I share.

    mz the pussy now is no time to fall of the BQ Fanwagon.

    you make your bed, you lay in it.

    @lumbergh said:

    mz the pussy now is no time to fall of the BQ Fanwagon.

    you make your bed, you lay in it.

    I've praised and shat upon both Quinn and DA. As I'm sure you're quite aware of.

    Decent try, though.

  • Masters said:

    For what it's worth, Reggie Rucker was just on WKNR talking about the Quinn pick. Reggie stated that the INT was squarely on BE. To paraphrase, Reggie said the sight adjustment against the coverage was the route that Quinn threw expecting BE to run and the correct one. BE adjusted his route again after the snap, which is a no no. While as some have said, the inside could have been 6, that isn't seen presnap and you can't adjust to that route after the snap. The reason is because the presnap read (the route Quinn expected BE to be running) requires the ball to be out before that inside read BE ran can be seen. Quinn is already letting the ball go by the time BE makes that move inside.

    That was Reggie's take, for what it's worth.

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    @moonlitknight said:

    no matter who's fault it was a pick is a pick...there are no asterisks next to the pick stats that say.."not the qb's fault...the receiver was responsible"

    Like I said, for what it's worth.

  • Whatever gets you through the day. Nice unprovoked resort to name calling too.

    @d-bone said:

    Whatever gets you through the day. Nice unprovoked resort to name calling too.

    I'll be sure to note that "jackass" makes your vagina sore so I don't mistakenly do it in the future.

  • In 42 years, I've found in life, that unintelligent people resort to yelling or name calling when they are confronted with a situation that they don't understand. Thank you for proving my experience right.

  • In 42 years, I've found in life, that unintelligent people resort to yelling or name calling when they are confronted with a situation that they don't understand. Thank you for proving my experience right.

    @d-bone said:

    In 42 years, I've found in life, that unintelligent people resort to yelling or name calling when they are confronted with a situation that they don't understand. Thank you for proving my experience right.

    In 42 years you should have also learned that unintelligent people resort to being big blubbering pussies on message boards, like yourself. And also that these same people tend to "take the high road" in response to getting their ass handed to them on said message board.

    Take the Celine Dion CD out of the player, whip the tears from your eyes, and get the fuk over yourself.

  • Actually, Celine's on my ipod.

  • Ok pissyfest over.

    I like your attitude d-bone, I don't REALLY think you're a blubbering vagina. I just wanted to e-fight.