January 3 - BALLOT #3 now #13 goes on ..... McCarthy headed for another big LOSS.
-
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
-
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
The "motion to vacate" specifically. Totally unreasonable for a leader to agree to.
And don't lump me into "you people," you don't even know me.
Karlis Missed -
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
-
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
When you gerrymander districts where one party can't lose, you get far right and far left people in DC.
-
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
-
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
It's dummies like you that stall any progress.
-
McCarthy is compromised.
Nothing patriotic about him. -
and i think McCarthy has some sway there
-
I can’t wait for the greater good speech.
flush these turds
-
Boebert came across as unhinged tonight.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
Crazy demands? Like what? And, like I would ask anybody else, chapter and verse please. I haven't really heard anything crazy or radical. Maybe there's something I'm not aware of.
WSS
-
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
The "motion to vacate" specifically. Totally unreasonable for a leader to agree to.
And don't lump me into "you people," you don't even know me.
-
-
That's it?
WSS
That's #1 for me.
Why would an elected leader agree to toe such a thin line? It used to be 5 reps could give a "no confidence" vote up, Pelosi ditched it ( I believe, could be wrong).
Now the Freedom Caucus wants it to be one rep? Silly
-
That's it?
WSS
That's #1 for me.
Why would an elected leader agree to toe such a thin line? It used to be 5 reps could give a "no confidence" vote up, Pelosi ditched it ( I believe, could be wrong).
Now the Freedom Caucus wants it to be one rep? Silly
That's #1 for me.
Why would an elected leader agree to toe such a thin line? It used to be 5 reps could give a "no confidence" vote up, Pelosi ditched it ( I believe, could be wrong).
Now the Freedom Caucus wants it to be one rep? Silly
I don't think we are talking about two different things are we? I'm just saying with all the improprieties all the rule changes all the ignoring of whatever state election laws were overlooked etc etc and given the fact that some elections we decided on less than half a point and if what I believe to be is the covid hoax made it impossible to conduct a proper election that it's not unreasonable to ask them to do it again. Like the Buffalo Cincinnati game. One may or may not get the result they would be looking for but it's not unreasonable to ask I don't think.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
I give her credit for her passion but I'm surprised this Freedom Caucus gives her the microphone so much. She's the R version of AOC
All those Freedom people are unhinged. Fuck em.
-
That's #1 for me.
Why would an elected leader agree to toe such a thin line? It used to be 5 reps could give a "no confidence" vote up, Pelosi ditched it ( I believe, could be wrong).
Now the Freedom Caucus wants it to be one rep? Silly
I don't think we are talking about two different things are we? I'm just saying with all the improprieties all the rule changes all the ignoring of whatever state election laws were overlooked etc etc and given the fact that some elections we decided on less than half a point and if what I believe to be is the covid hoax made it impossible to conduct a proper election that it's not unreasonable to ask them to do it again. Like the Buffalo Cincinnati game. One may or may not get the result they would be looking for but it's not unreasonable to ask I don't think.
WSS
I don't think we are talking about two different things are we?
WSS
We probably are lol.
One thing has definitely been confirmed, it's party over country.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login