January 3 - BALLOT #3 now #13 goes on ..... McCarthy headed for another big LOSS.
-
Not really funny. It shows what a circus this congress is. They can't accomplish a fucking thing.
They don't want to accomplish a thing. Totally out-of-touch with the middle class, influenced by super PACs.
Send 'em a message this November, get a 3rd party President elected.
They don't want to accomplish a thing. Totally out-of-touch with the middle class, influenced by super PACs.
Send 'em a message this November, get a 3rd party President elected.
I would send money to Bernie Sanders if he ran as a third party candidate.
Sanders Cortez would be a ticket that would get the socialists off the fence.
?
WSS
-
I get the dissenter's complaints, but voting against McCarthy is stupid -
coward McConnell set the stage for anger - he won't fight for what's right,
he'll go along the vicious corrupt left/dems.
McCarthy needs to be a hell of a lot tougher a fighter than what he has shown in the past.
but voting against him is stupid. They have made their point.
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
-
Not really funny. It shows what a circus this party is. They can't accomplish a fucking thing.
FIFY
-
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
-
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
The "motion to vacate" specifically. Totally unreasonable for a leader to agree to.
And don't lump me into "you people," you don't even know me.
-
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
-
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
When you gerrymander districts where one party can't lose, you get far right and far left people in DC.
-
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
-
The so called 'Freedom Cauc' only want's special privileges. They are already fucking things up with their stupid fucking games.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
totally wrong again.
I thought mccarthy would get tough, but he won't. So, I change my mind and say to vote AGAINST mccarthy.
I'm sick of the cowards and the rinos.
It's dummies like you that stall any progress.
-
McCarthy is compromised.
Nothing patriotic about him. -
and i think McCarthy has some sway there
-
I can’t wait for the greater good speech.
flush these turds
-
According to the article you posted, McCarty is a demonrat kiss ass, or as they put it, a "Demonrat lite".
The GOP is all flash and noise, but it doesn’t have the willingness to fight meaningfully against a Democrat Party that has become unquestioningly radicalized. McCarthy is, for all intents and purposes, a perfect reflection of the Republican Party as Gaetz described.
So the 19 or 20 Freedom Caucus Rs aren't radicalized? They've got some crazy demands.
It will probably never happen due to the outlandish money both parties have, but the nation should consider non-partisan primaries at the very least. Maybe that could weed out the extremists on both sides...they are the ones holding DC & the nation hostage.
-
No they are not. Not even close. What was once in the middle has gone left. Adhering to basic conservative principles is now what you people call "radical".
What position of theirs would you consider radical? Being anti baby killer? Securing the border?
The "motion to vacate" specifically. Totally unreasonable for a leader to agree to.
And don't lump me into "you people," you don't even know me.
-
-
That's it?
WSS
That's #1 for me.
Why would an elected leader agree to toe such a thin line? It used to be 5 reps could give a "no confidence" vote up, Pelosi ditched it ( I believe, could be wrong).
Now the Freedom Caucus wants it to be one rep? Silly
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
