Skip to content

Global Warming/Climate Change Explained

Political Discussion
74 11 2.6k 1
  • @axe said:

    ?

    The rock has been in the same place for over a hundred yrs.

    But your first post insinuates it's been in the same spot for 400 years? Are you saying your first post is incorrect?

    @mld-woody said:

    But your first post insinuates it's been in the same spot for 400 years? Are you saying your first post is incorrect?

    No, I'm saying you are a dumbass. But you'll probably miss that point as well.

  • Excited Comedy GIF - Excited Comedy Laugh GIFs

  • https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/07/18/fact-check-plymouth-rock-not-accurate-gauge-sea-level-rise/10010728002/

    - the rock has been moved and has been in that spot since 1920

    - you can take a picture at low tides

    - records and officials in the area say there has been documented sea level rise since 1620

    Facebook has warped your already gullible and fragile brains 

    Any time one of you post something thinking you're disproving a vast consensus of scientists and academics you're always wrong. And it takes about 30 seconds to show you're wrong. 

    And yet you and your side still love the whole anti academic, anti expert push... Sad stuff 

    @mld-woody said:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/07/18/fact-check-plymouth-rock-not-accurate-gauge-sea-level-rise/10010728002/

    - the rock has been moved and has been in that spot since 1920

    - you can take a picture at low tides

    - records and officials in the area say there has been documented sea level rise since 1620

    The irony is that Obama bought a $15m oceanfront home just 38 miles away from that rock.

    Seems the climate change warrior president wasn't worried much about rising sea levels as well. LOL

    The fact is that if all emissions on the planet would cease tomorrow, nothing would change. 

  • AxeA Axe

    @mld-woody said:

    But your first post insinuates it's been in the same spot for 400 years? Are you saying your first post is incorrect?

    No, I'm saying you are a dumbass. But you'll probably miss that point as well.

    @axe said:

    No, I'm saying you are a dumbass. But you'll probably miss that point as well.

    You have no point. Well, you did, and it was easily proved incorrect. 

    But the little right wing crew has your back, so it's all good. 

    Right wing posters on this board being objectively incorrect about climate change has been a constant here for over a decade. You doing it too is expected. It's always hilarious too when one of you thinks you have some great point too. 

    But no one expects any of you to show any ounce of intelligence, so it's all good. 

  • The constant deflections in this thread are proof enough. If any of you could you'd try to disprove my point. But you can't (maybe if you post some whack job blog like Cal reads). So it's just deflections and insults. Can't even counter one point.

    Again though, no sane person expected you to. The expectations for you all are incredibly low 

  • to many old folks flagellating maybe make the logans run movie into reality ,,problem solved

  • The constant deflections in this thread are proof enough. If any of you could you'd try to disprove my point. But you can't (maybe if you post some whack job blog like Cal reads). So it's just deflections and insults. Can't even counter one point.

    Again though, no sane person expected you to. The expectations for you all are incredibly low 

    @mld-woody said:

    The constant deflections in this thread are proof enough. If any of you could you'd try to disprove my point. But you can't (maybe if you post some whack job blog like Cal reads). So it's just deflections and insults. Can't even counter one point.

    Again though, no sane person expected you to. The expectations for you all are incredibly low 

    Go cry yourself to sleep Greta.. ?

  • sydS syd

    to many old folks flagellating maybe make the logans run movie into reality ,,problem solved

    @syd said:

    to many old folks flagellating maybe make the logans run movie into reality ,,problem solved

    ok jane fonda ... 

  • FUCKYOU

  • sydS syd

    to many old folks flagellating maybe make the logans run movie into reality ,,problem solved

    @syd said:

    to many old folks flagellating maybe make the logans run movie into reality ,,problem solved

    The world would be better served if those under 30 were terminated. Even if it means sparing the life of an idiot like you.

  • @axe said:

    No, I'm saying you are a dumbass. But you'll probably miss that point as well.

    You have no point. Well, you did, and it was easily proved incorrect. 

    But the little right wing crew has your back, so it's all good. 

    Right wing posters on this board being objectively incorrect about climate change has been a constant here for over a decade. You doing it too is expected. It's always hilarious too when one of you thinks you have some great point too. 

    But no one expects any of you to show any ounce of intelligence, so it's all good. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You have no point. Well, you did, and it was easily proved incorrect. 

    But the little right wing crew has your back, so it's all good. 

    Right wing posters on this board being objectively incorrect about climate change has been a constant here for over a decade. You doing it too is expected. It's always hilarious too when one of you thinks you have some great point too. 

    But no one expects any of you to show any ounce of intelligence, so it's all good. 

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

  • @mld-woody said:

    You have no point. Well, you did, and it was easily proved incorrect. 

    But the little right wing crew has your back, so it's all good. 

    Right wing posters on this board being objectively incorrect about climate change has been a constant here for over a decade. You doing it too is expected. It's always hilarious too when one of you thinks you have some great point too. 

    But no one expects any of you to show any ounce of intelligence, so it's all good. 

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    @fy56 said:

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    Well Woody is a typical "Demass"... It's always about being "Right"... Woody loves Communism.. It relieves her of making tough decisions for herself... Its unfortunate no one was around to assign gender for her... She's clearly a "Karen"

  • @fy56 said:

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    Well Woody is a typical "Demass"... It's always about being "Right"... Woody loves Communism.. It relieves her of making tough decisions for herself... Its unfortunate no one was around to assign gender for her... She's clearly a "Karen"

    @nickers said:

    Well Woody is a typical "Demass"... It's always about being "Right"... Woody loves Communism.. It relieves her of making tough decisions for herself... Its unfortunate no one was around to assign gender for her... She's clearly a "Karen"

    You are a very sad old man and I hope you can find some joy in the remaining years you have left on this Earth 

  • @mld-woody said:

    You have no point. Well, you did, and it was easily proved incorrect. 

    But the little right wing crew has your back, so it's all good. 

    Right wing posters on this board being objectively incorrect about climate change has been a constant here for over a decade. You doing it too is expected. It's always hilarious too when one of you thinks you have some great point too. 

    But no one expects any of you to show any ounce of intelligence, so it's all good. 

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    @fy56 said:

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    I disproved the content of the OP. Objectively. That was the point.

  • @nickers said:

    Well Woody is a typical "Demass"... It's always about being "Right"... Woody loves Communism.. It relieves her of making tough decisions for herself... Its unfortunate no one was around to assign gender for her... She's clearly a "Karen"

    You are a very sad old man and I hope you can find some joy in the remaining years you have left on this Earth 

    @mld-woody said:

    You are a very sad old man and I hope you can find some joy in the remaining years you have left on this Earth 

    And you're a young dumb mother fucker brainwashed to the core... Enjoy your miserable life loser...

  • @fy56 said:

    I believe you Woody. 

    But you shouldn't be puffing your chest out because you were able to disprove a rock meme. 

    Try going for the bigger issues rather than just resorting to bashing the source or the messenger.  That's kind of cowardly.

    I disproved the content of the OP. Objectively. That was the point.

    @mld-woody said:

    I disproved the content of the OP. Objectively. That was the point.

    Yes you did. But that was small potatoes. I'd rather see you disprove bigger issues you don't like or disagree with rather than go after the messenger or the source.