Ponder this...
-
Zombo said:
He's all talk, Hag2 has her hands so firmly around his balls that's the real reason for the lobster look.Zombo
--bonked?
The lobster look is because he's sweating and thinking..."oh god I hope my wife doesn't walk in and see me taking this picture".
Also..she doesnt have her hands on his balls...she carries them around in her purse.....
-
Anderson is 4-7 vs the AFCN (and if you think that sucks remember its the best record of any browns QB since the return)
Also he beat the NFC West champ Seahawks in 2007 and the NFC North champ Giants in 2008 so your playoff record is bullshit too.
You are correct. Holy shit, you actually made a point using stats!!!! I am so fooking proud right now.
Folks he is 4-7 in the AFCN, and 3-11 vs playoffs teams. Lets give a big round of applause to Dumnuts for joining the real world of facts and analysis.
But I wonder Dumnuts, what do you have to say about his 140 YPG avg in 6 of 9 starts last season? What was the reason for that anomaly?
You always seem to avoid those numbers, but we're making progress here, so don't run and hide.
You are correct. Holy shit, you actually made a point using stats!!!! I am so fooking proud right now.
Folks he is 4-7 in the AFCN, and 3-11 vs playoffs teams. Lets give a big round of applause to Dumnuts for joining the real world of facts and analysis.
But I wonder Dumnuts, what do you have to say about his 140 YPG avg in 6 of 9 starts last season? What was the reason for that anomaly?
You always seem to avoid those numbers, but we're making progress here, so don't run and hide.
Of course even when Lum makes a point he manages to show his genius such as this gem in his post "the NFC North champ Giants"
-
All I can remember at the end of DA's "great season" was realizing that all he was doing was throwing it deep and hoping someone on the same team managed to get under it. Thats pretty much what happened if you recall all the circus catches...my personal favorite was BE laying out and having to ROLL 6 yds to get into the endzone. Nevermind the fact he was 10 yards behind the nearest defender...that just shows DA's accuracy issue there. At the end of that season, I was praying the browns moved him in the off season and got something out of him before people realized he wasn't really anything special...which the rest of the world did the following season as he showed really just how average he was.
-
@shepwrite said:
Still the funniest, most ironic thread title: "Brady Quinn Sucks and Always Has! Put Anderson Back In!"you seem pretty upset by it.
hey how come no recap of Lane Adkins' QB breakdown this week? (maybe it wasn't what you wanted to hear???)
-
QUOTE (ATENEARS @ Sep 17 2009, 11:40 AM)
13-14 for a career with 45 TD's and 35 INT's
By the way, he is 13-15, with 43 TDs and 40 turnovers, and a QBR under 70. I truly don't think that is horrible.
By the way, he is 13-15, with 43 TDs and 40 turnovers, and a QBR under 70. I truly don't think that is horrible.
Just out of curiosity, how'd you come up with 13-15? Add in that first Charlie Frye loss of '07? If you are going to do that you probably should add his very first NFL game into the win column to be fair, in fact, he inherited a losing game in both instances but was able to pretty much on his own (at least that's how the local and national media painted it at the time) turn one of them to a win.
-
I keep saying it and will as long as it looms....70% of snaps...if BQ hasn't taken off and shows he is the guy, i don't want him getting that 70% and jacking his salary to elite status.
Am I the only person who feels this way??
Jealous much?
I don't care if they pay him that money or not. It's not MY money; if Lerner wants to throw it away, go ahead.
Anderson cashed in on handful of good starts, as did half the people who came through this org in the past few years. Why not add him to that list.
Jealous much?
I don't care if they pay him that money or not. It's not MY money; if Lerner wants to throw it away, go ahead.
Anderson cashed in on handful of good starts, as did half the people who came through this org in the past few years. Why not add him to that list.
because it isn't just a couple MIL we're talking about here.
i'm assuming you aren't familiar with the specifics of the 70% of snaps Lem. this isn't just some bonus, it's three years of back pay with future escalators guaranteeing he'll have been paid similarly to a QB on a franchise tag since the day he stepped into the league and well into the future. would you give him 2 years of Tom Brady money for 3 starts? then continue to pay him like that sitting on the bench if he later ends up NOT being the guy? it's a little more than wasting Lerner's money>>>it would affect the cap and the entire shape of the team for years to come.
if he deserves it>>>fine. if not, getting those 70% will be worse for the team than you can possibly imagine.
-
By the way, he is 13-15, with 43 TDs and 40 turnovers, and a QBR under 70. I truly don't think that is horrible.
Just out of curiosity, how'd you come up with 13-15? Add in that first Charlie Frye loss of '07? If you are going to do that you probably should add his very first NFL game into the win column to be fair, in fact, he inherited a losing game in both instances but was able to pretty much on his own (at least that's how the local and national media painted it at the time) turn one of them to a win.
Just out of curiosity, how'd you come up with 13-15? .
Yeah, I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 140 yds per game in 6 of 9 last season.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 40 turnovers in 27 games.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 3-11 record vs playoff teams.
You want to know how I came up with 13-15? Count it and prove me wrong.
"I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley -
Just out of curiosity, how'd you come up with 13-15? .
Yeah, I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 140 yds per game in 6 of 9 last season.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 40 turnovers in 27 games.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 3-11 record vs playoff teams.
You want to know how I came up with 13-15? Count it and prove me wrong.
Yeah, I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 140 yds per game in 6 of 9 last season.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 40 turnovers in 27 games.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 3-11 record vs playoff teams.
You want to know how I came up with 13-15? Count it and prove me wrong.
me tinks i knows
It's also sweet how drunky gives credit to DA for the KC game.
-
Violets are blue, and roses are red
Can we all "Rodney King it"
and put this QB shit to bed?
Ponder this...I hate the Broncos nearly as much as I hate the Steelers. Can the BROWNS beat their asses already (5-20 all time)?
Violets are blue, and roses are red
Can we all "Rodney King it"
and put this QB shit to bed?
Ponder this...I hate the Broncos nearly as much as I hate the Steelers. Can the BROWNS beat their asses already (5-20 all time)?
No...we almost never beat Denver..I expect we won't on Sunday as well.
-
I keep saying it and will as long as it looms....70% of snaps...if BQ hasn't taken off and shows he is the guy, i don't want him getting that 70% and jacking his salary to elite status.
Am I the only person who feels this way??
I really don't give a crap as a fan if he makes the 70% mark or not. Maybe it will knock some common sense into the organization and stop sitting 1rd picks on the bench for years while a sixth rounder blows chunks.
I really don't give a crap as a fan if he makes the 70% mark or not. Maybe it will knock some common sense into the organization and stop sitting 1rd picks on the bench for years while a sixth rounder blows chunks.
smartest thing ive read al day, we handled BQ terribly, he should have started his rookie season, even though he was late to camp, he scored more than Frye and DA then. Plus he had all the confidence in the world
-
Just out of curiosity, how'd you come up with 13-15? .
Yeah, I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 140 yds per game in 6 of 9 last season.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 40 turnovers in 27 games.
I didn't expect anyone to call me on the 3-11 record vs playoff teams.
You want to know how I came up with 13-15? Count it and prove me wrong.
You want to know how I came up with 13-15?
yeah I'd like to know.
did you make it up?
-
@shepwrite said:
Let's say it's the same situation: Quinn gets, what? 24 more starts?Fair enough.
No, shep, it's not okay. He's too good looking. He might have me questioning my sexuality after 24 starts. No, shep, we need to nip this plague in the bud lest we revert to the evils of Sodom and Gomorrah.
But if he does continue starting, I can at least call his supporters gay. That makes me straight.
-
Zombo said:
Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?Zombo
Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players.
-
Zombo said:
Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?Zombo
Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players.
He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much.
he's an "it's a process" coach? And that means......?
The coach is methodical? As opposed to......?
The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?
Nice analysis dipshit.
BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. There were 20 runs.
-
He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much.
he's an "it's a process" coach? And that means......?
The coach is methodical? As opposed to......?
The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?
Nice analysis dipshit.
BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. There were 20 runs.
he's an "it's a process" coach?
The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?
Nice analysis dipshit.
BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday.
21 of those were in the 4th Q....dipshit.
He had only 11 passes in the first half, and 14 by the end of the 3rd...that is balanced...but leaning towards the run....dipshit.
Oh well...there I go feeding the animals again.
-
Zombo said:
Different in that the schedule is harder, the roster is not as good, the coaching staff is not capable enough? .... why can't Quinn do what Anderson did in 07?Zombo
Different schedule (on paper it is harder than the 2007 schedule, but really won't know until the games are played).
I would say the offensive weapons are not as good this year (2yr older Lewis, no Winslow, an no JJ). But again, that's just on paper today.
This coaching staff has a different offensive philosophy than the previous (ball/clock control offense vs. a spread score quick offense).
Quinn doesn't have the arm DA has to surprise teams the first time they see him w/ little film to go off of.
Asking why X player can't do what Y player did is always a slippery slope. Every season and every circumstance is different. There is a reason for the saying of "on any given Sunday"....
-
You want to know how I came up with 13-15?
yeah I'd like to know.
did you make it up?
yeah I'd like to know.
did you make it up?
He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.
2006
13 12/03 KC W 31-28 1 0 12 21 57.1 171 8.1 2 1 1 5 95.5 2 44 22.0 0 -- -- 1-0
14 12/07 @ PIT L 7-27 1 1 21 37 56.8 276 7.5 1 1 0 0 78.2 1 4 4.0 0 1 1 1-1
15 12/17 @ BAL L 17-27 1 1 23 32 71.9 223 7.0 2 2 5 41 85.8 -- -- -- -- 1 0 1-2
16 12/24 TB L 7-22 1 1 10 27 37.0 123 4.6 0 4 2 20 12.3 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 1-3
2007
1 09/09 PIT L 7-34 1 0 13 28 46.4 184 6.6 1 1 1 12 65.2 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 1
2 09/16 CIN W 51-45 1 1 20 33 60.6 328 9.9 5 1 0 0 121.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 0
3 09/23 @ OAK L 24-26 1 1 18 37 48.6 248 6.7 1 2 1 24 57.0 2 12 6.0 1 1 0
4 09/30 BAL W 27-13 1 1 10 18 55.6 204 11.3 2 1 0 0 109.5 3 0 0.0 0 -- --
5 10/07 @ NE L 17-34 1 1 22 43 51.2 287 6.7 2 3 3 26 59.0 3 7 2.3 0 -- --
6 10/14 MIA W 41-31 1 1 18 25 72.0 245 9.8 3 0 1 1 142.5 5 13 2.6 1 -- --
7 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
8 10/28 @ STL W 27-20 1 1 18 25 72.0 248 9.9 3 0 2 12 143.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- --
9 11/04 SEA W 33-30 1 1 29 48 60.4 364 7.6 0 1 0 0 75.3 2 21 10.5 0 -- --
10 11/11 @ PIT L 28-31 1 1 16 35 45.7 123 3.5 3 0 0 0 83.4 2 5 2.5 0 -- --
11 11/18 @ BAL W 33-30 1 1 24 38 63.2 274 7.2 0 1 1 5 73.8 4 -4 -1.0 1 -- --
12 11/25 HOU W 27-17 1 1 24 35 68.6 253 7.2 2 1 1 4 96.5 -- -- -- -- 1 0
13 12/02 @ ARI L 21-27 1 1 21 41 51.2 304 7.4 2 2 1 9 71.6 2 10 5.0 0 1 1
14 12/09 @ NYJ W 24-18 1 1 16 29 55.2 185 6.4 2 1 0 0 83.3 3 3 1.0 0 -- --
15 12/16 BUF W 8-0 1 1 9 24 37.5 137 5.7 0 0 1 7 57.1 1 0 0.0 0 -- --
16 12/23 @ CIN L 14-19 1 1 29 48 60.4 251 5.2 2 4 1 7 53.4 1 6 6.0 0 -- --
17 12/30 SF W 20-7 1 1 11 20 55.0 152 7.6 1 1 1 2 75.4 1 0 0.0 0 -- --
2008
1 09/07 DAL L 10-28 1 1 11 24 45.8 114 4.8 1 0 1 0 74.0 4 24 6.0 0 2 0
2 09/14 PIT L 6-10 1 1 18 32 56.3 166 5.2 0 2 2 11 44.5 3 6 2.0 0 -- --
3 09/21 @ BAL L 10-28 1 1 14 37 37.8 125 3.4 1 3 4 26 22.9 2 -1 -0.5 0 1 0
4 09/28 @ CIN W 20-12 1 1 15 24 62.5 138 5.8 1 1 1 11 74.7 4 11 2.8 0 1 0
5 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
6 10/13 NYG W 35-14 1 1 18 29 62.1 310 10.7 2 0 0 0 121.3 4 -2 -0.5 0 1 0
7 10/19 @ WAS L 11-14 1 1 14 37 37.8 136 3.7 1 0 1 2 57.9 3 4 1.3 0 1 0
8 10/26 @ JAC W 23-17 1 1 14 27 51.9 246 9.1 1 0 1 10 95.6 -- -- -- -- 1 0
9 11/02 BAL L 27-37 1 1 17 33 51.5 219 6.6 2 1 1 9 80.2 2 8 4.0 0 -- --
10 11/06 DEN L 30-34 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
11 11/17 @ BUF W 29-27 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
12 11/23 HOU L 6-16 1 0 5 14 35.7 51 3.6 0 1 0 0 17.3 1 0 0.0 0 1 1
13 11/30 IND L 6-10 1 1 16 26 61.5 110 4.2 0 0 3 18 71.0 2 5 2.5 0 1 1
-
yeah I'd like to know.
did you make it up?
He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.
2006
13 12/03 KC W 31-28 1 0 12 21 57.1 171 8.1 2 1 1 5 95.5 2 44 22.0 0 -- -- 1-0
14 12/07 @ PIT L 7-27 1 1 21 37 56.8 276 7.5 1 1 0 0 78.2 1 4 4.0 0 1 1 1-1
15 12/17 @ BAL L 17-27 1 1 23 32 71.9 223 7.0 2 2 5 41 85.8 -- -- -- -- 1 0 1-2
16 12/24 TB L 7-22 1 1 10 27 37.0 123 4.6 0 4 2 20 12.3 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 1-3
2007
1 09/09 PIT L 7-34 1 0 13 28 46.4 184 6.6 1 1 1 12 65.2 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 1
2 09/16 CIN W 51-45 1 1 20 33 60.6 328 9.9 5 1 0 0 121.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 0
3 09/23 @ OAK L 24-26 1 1 18 37 48.6 248 6.7 1 2 1 24 57.0 2 12 6.0 1 1 0
4 09/30 BAL W 27-13 1 1 10 18 55.6 204 11.3 2 1 0 0 109.5 3 0 0.0 0 -- --
5 10/07 @ NE L 17-34 1 1 22 43 51.2 287 6.7 2 3 3 26 59.0 3 7 2.3 0 -- --
6 10/14 MIA W 41-31 1 1 18 25 72.0 245 9.8 3 0 1 1 142.5 5 13 2.6 1 -- --
7 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
8 10/28 @ STL W 27-20 1 1 18 25 72.0 248 9.9 3 0 2 12 143.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- --
9 11/04 SEA W 33-30 1 1 29 48 60.4 364 7.6 0 1 0 0 75.3 2 21 10.5 0 -- --
10 11/11 @ PIT L 28-31 1 1 16 35 45.7 123 3.5 3 0 0 0 83.4 2 5 2.5 0 -- --
11 11/18 @ BAL W 33-30 1 1 24 38 63.2 274 7.2 0 1 1 5 73.8 4 -4 -1.0 1 -- --
12 11/25 HOU W 27-17 1 1 24 35 68.6 253 7.2 2 1 1 4 96.5 -- -- -- -- 1 0
13 12/02 @ ARI L 21-27 1 1 21 41 51.2 304 7.4 2 2 1 9 71.6 2 10 5.0 0 1 1
14 12/09 @ NYJ W 24-18 1 1 16 29 55.2 185 6.4 2 1 0 0 83.3 3 3 1.0 0 -- --
15 12/16 BUF W 8-0 1 1 9 24 37.5 137 5.7 0 0 1 7 57.1 1 0 0.0 0 -- --
16 12/23 @ CIN L 14-19 1 1 29 48 60.4 251 5.2 2 4 1 7 53.4 1 6 6.0 0 -- --
17 12/30 SF W 20-7 1 1 11 20 55.0 152 7.6 1 1 1 2 75.4 1 0 0.0 0 -- --
2008
1 09/07 DAL L 10-28 1 1 11 24 45.8 114 4.8 1 0 1 0 74.0 4 24 6.0 0 2 0
2 09/14 PIT L 6-10 1 1 18 32 56.3 166 5.2 0 2 2 11 44.5 3 6 2.0 0 -- --
3 09/21 @ BAL L 10-28 1 1 14 37 37.8 125 3.4 1 3 4 26 22.9 2 -1 -0.5 0 1 0
4 09/28 @ CIN W 20-12 1 1 15 24 62.5 138 5.8 1 1 1 11 74.7 4 11 2.8 0 1 0
5 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
6 10/13 NYG W 35-14 1 1 18 29 62.1 310 10.7 2 0 0 0 121.3 4 -2 -0.5 0 1 0
7 10/19 @ WAS L 11-14 1 1 14 37 37.8 136 3.7 1 0 1 2 57.9 3 4 1.3 0 1 0
8 10/26 @ JAC W 23-17 1 1 14 27 51.9 246 9.1 1 0 1 10 95.6 -- -- -- -- 1 0
9 11/02 BAL L 27-37 1 1 17 33 51.5 219 6.6 2 1 1 9 80.2 2 8 4.0 0 -- --
10 11/06 DEN L 30-34 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
11 11/17 @ BUF W 29-27 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
12 11/23 HOU L 6-16 1 0 5 14 35.7 51 3.6 0 1 0 0 17.3 1 0 0.0 0 1 1
13 11/30 IND L 6-10 1 1 16 26 61.5 110 4.2 0 0 3 18 71.0 2 5 2.5 0 1 1
He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.
I see where you F'd it up.
He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7.
now run along son. fetch me my morning coffee.
-
He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.
I see where you F'd it up.
He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7.
now run along son. fetch me my morning coffee.
He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7.
Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either.
NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick.
Splits By Wins/Losses G Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck SckY Rate
Losses 7 203 95 46.8 921 4.5 28 5 7 53 26.1 7 12 66 53.8
Wins 3 80 47 58.8 694 8.7 70 4 1 29 36.2 9 2 21 98.6
"I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login