Skip to content

Watson's shoulder

The Browns Board
351 34 17.0k 1
  • @nickers said:

    I call DTR "Dont throw!, Run!"

    ? It would have been nice to ask you - how was the game Nicks?  Unfortunately we all watched it and swore in languages that don't even exist yet so... Did you finally stop puking?

    @flugel said:

    ? It would have been nice to ask you - how was the game Nicks?  Unfortunately we all watched it and swore in languages that don't even exist yet so... Did you finally stop puking?

    Tom... I enjoyed being with my Mother,Siblings and other family members... It was great being wit them.. The game... Heh abysmal as it was... I refuse to let that spoil the day... Other wise.. Those GODDD#$%^**^%$#@&!!!!!!!!!!!! Mother$%&((&%$##^!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @gumby73 said:

    It's not like good coaches like Harbaugh & Tomlin can't figured out Stef's offensive system by now.. It still comes down to players executing & it's not NFL physical enough against those 2 teams.

    Even Jim Schwartz thru some questionable wide gaping (DT) fronts that invited out physical'd running results.

    DTR... DeShaun Kizer won a starting job on 1 preseason deep TD pass against 2's & 3's.. We saw all we needed to see of DTR playing against the birds 1's..? 

    The offensive system or the just wing-it, fling-it and hope?   The defense showed up to play very early on; and the home crowd was enjoying it.  However, how long were they getting to rest after they stopped Baltimore?  By the time they intercepted DTR the 1st time, our defense looked gas'd like the big fellers started looking/feeling like they had the type of dead legs you'd see on someone that just ran a 10k.  Baltimore's D remained well rested.  They had a game fitting what they're good at.  Consequently, the execution looked easy after they tired out the strength of our team (Defense).  

    While I like your point about execution, at what point do we lose the players' buy-in to the compatibility of it all?  Asking a rookie QB (that has had very little reps throwing to the starting receivers/TEs and situational role receivers) to throw the ball 36 times where chemistry probably hasn't even been establish on the practice field yet seems overwhelming for a very 1st NFL start at QB.  Baltimore's D remained well rested.  They had a patient game plan fitting what they're good at.  Consequently, the execution looked easy after they tired out the strength of our team (Defense).  Legs get tired there when the time of possession on offense isn't up to snuff.

    While I agree with your comment in bold, did Watson look that much better against Pittsburgh?  They scored 2 TDs on our offense.    In the game thread, I said it way more than once RUN the ball.  That one nice run Ford had that got called back when Cooper held a DB (he didn't need to) - they never went back to it.  

    @flugel said:

     I said it way more than once RUN the ball.  That one nice run Ford had that got called back when Cooper held a DB (he didn't need to) - they never went back to it.  

    That’s been a disturbing trend with Kev, for whatever reason the bastard hates running the ball.

    I watched rookie QB and the Texans beat the Steelers yesterday with slants, screens, and gashed the Stoolers running the ball.

    Somehow I get the feeling Kev needs to take notes.

  • @ghoolie-always-ghoolie said:

    Stefanski isn't calling plays. Depodesta is. Why is this concept so hard for Browns fans to grasp? Depodesta isn't he head coach.

    For a guy that got kicked out of Cub Scouts for eating too many Brownies (and I'm not just talking about chocolate snacks here) - your sniffer's got you hunting again.

    I think the Paralysis by Over-analysis Committee needs to go.  It's like we have 2 Wiley Coyotes in charge of how to get the game and go for the kill.  I can't even watch the replays...

  • @flugel said:

     I said it way more than once RUN the ball.  That one nice run Ford had that got called back when Cooper held a DB (he didn't need to) - they never went back to it.  

    That’s been a disturbing trend with Kev, for whatever reason the bastard hates running the ball.

    I watched rookie QB and the Texans beat the Steelers yesterday with slants, screens, and gashed the Stoolers running the ball.

    Somehow I get the feeling Kev needs to take notes.

    @canton-dawg said:

    That’s been a disturbing trend with Kev, for whatever reason the bastard hates running the ball.

    I watched rookie QB and the Texans beat the Steelers yesterday with slants, screens, and gashed the Stoolers running the ball.

    Somehow I get the feeling Kev needs to take notes.

    ? ? 

  • @flugel said:

      The DESIGN of this offense is a joke. It's not sound and REAL defenses will exploit it easily as we've seen repeatedly. 

       The names keep changing but the results don't.

    It's not like good coaches like Harbaugh & Tomlin can't figured out Stef's offensive system by now.. It still comes down to players executing & it's not NFL physical enough against those 2 teams.

    Even Jim Schwartz thru some questionable wide gaping (DT) fronts that invited out physical'd running results.

    DTR... DeShaun Kizer won a starting job on 1 preseason deep TD pass against 2's & 3's.. We saw all we needed to see of DTR playing against the birds 1's..? 

    @gumby73 said:

    Even Jim Schwartz thru some questionable wide gaping (DT) fronts that invited out physical'd running results.

     The biggest issue wasn't so much the front on the Dline itself, but when we went to gap exchange or our LB"s had to scrape against the read.   They missed quite a few tackles early.   Once that got cleaned up, defense started to settle in after that body shock of a 2nd qtr.  

    @calfoxwc said:

    I think the Browns would have lost this game regardless of the qb - DTR had a terrible day, sure.

    @calfoxwc said:

    DTR would have won last week's game.

    At any point, just don't say dumb shit like this.       You're either oblivious to how good the Titans DEF can be, or just... I don't know - maybe it's autism.

    @flugel said:

    The offensive system or the just wing-it, fling-it and hope?  

     A lot of what was done yesterday was to combat the fact that BLT showed up in quarters instead of their usual 3 deep looks.   Something I didn't expect.   They really took a lot of the vertical stuff and left Njoku and the RB's room to roam, even against RoQuan.   Sadly, DTR went to these options way late, time and time again.   Speaking of, I was getting Dairy Queen when you called, I'll get back to you later bubs.  

     The Jets passed early and often against the Chiefs last night.  For many, that's against 'conventional' wisdom with a struggling QB.   But it worked for them.    Granted, Zach Wilson isn't a rookie, but he isn't good either.   Chiefs ended up blitzing and man coveraged themselves into real trouble and are lucky to have won that game last night.   The best way to help a young QB, is to keep him out of traditional passing situations.   Especially when we consider the trouble our Oline is facing right now.  Trouble that now includes Teller being a liability in straight drop pass pro.  Whatever grades he has been getting for the positive, have been offset by that right there.   

    @canton-dawg said:

    That’s been a disturbing trend with Kev, for whatever reason the bastard hates running the ball.

     Browns have been top 5 every year except one, in NFL rushing attempts under Stef.    The two biggest names above us are teams that use their QB's as the +1 in the running game as the great equalizer.   And we currently sit at 5th in rushing attempts now as well.  

    So.....  yeah.    Hating the run would be having Austin Eckler and Justin Jackson, but only being 28th in rushing attempts.     

    @canton-dawg said:

    I watched rookie QB and the Texans beat the Steelers yesterday with slants, screens, and gashed the Stoolers running the ball.

     Stroud is currently 3rd in YPA/passing.   Yesterday he was just over a 50% clip.   Apart from the backside RPO to Nico on the TD, most of what the Texans did was incredibly similar to what the Niners did and what the Browns tried to do, I presume you saw how many empty sets they ran?  They even hit a stick/out early that DIDN"T go for a pick six.  Crazy shit, huh?       The differences between those 3 teams? - Check pressure rates allowed by the Oline.    *hint, Browns are leading in a not-good way*.     Hell, the Texans passed as much as they ran on 1st and 3rd yesterday.  Wasn't like it was just "DERP, RUN".      Watt was taken care of just enough to not fuck their offensive game plan.  

     NOTHING with this team has changed since week 1 for the positive.   The Oline has become worse because of injury and diminished play from Teller.  The RB situation is what it is because Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves.  I get we wanted to 'look' competitive, and we've seen young QB's have success against the Browns before, but that's generally in incredibly favorable situations.  Such as having the worst DL in the NFL or having an offense that just hands the ball right back over.   

     What's on the coaches has continued to be on the coaches - finding higher percentage throws faster against defenses they're seeing.  Not being too over-reliant or under-reliant on the screen game.  Or worse, as we saw yesterday from Roquan Smith, going for the screen game on later downs when A) he's one of the best in the NFL at eaing them alive and b) it's sort of expected.    That I hold against Stef.  The screen game could have been more prominent on the early downs, but when that is so wrapped up in setting up success passing games off simple concepts and the timing, it's difficult to execute those screens when the routine stuff is a problem.  

     When the Browns win it's  *coaches did good*   when the Browns lose it's *FIRE EVERYBODY*.   This place, and the bulk of the posters here, are no different than anywhere else.  

    Let me make clear though, that's not a current endorsement of Stef, Musgrave and Van Pelt.  There are things they can, and I hope WILL, be doing much better.

    edit:  Money where my mouth was - took Browns team UNDER at 18.5 points yesterday.    Let's be practical here.   But I'm warning all of you, BYE week or not, I'm struggling to see any scenario where this team beats San Fran.   They're healthy and right now the best team in the NFL.   Just hoping for no further personnel losses and an offense that continues to build and show some progression under Watson.    Right now, focus on the AFCN and securing a wild card spot.  Everything else is a cherry on top.  The offensive roster currently isn't ready to contend.  

  • @gumby73 said:

    Even Jim Schwartz thru some questionable wide gaping (DT) fronts that invited out physical'd running results.

     The biggest issue wasn't so much the front on the Dline itself, but when we went to gap exchange or our LB"s had to scrape against the read.   They missed quite a few tackles early.   Once that got cleaned up, defense started to settle in after that body shock of a 2nd qtr.  

    @calfoxwc said:

    I think the Browns would have lost this game regardless of the qb - DTR had a terrible day, sure.

    @calfoxwc said:

    DTR would have won last week's game.

    At any point, just don't say dumb shit like this.       You're either oblivious to how good the Titans DEF can be, or just... I don't know - maybe it's autism.

    @flugel said:

    The offensive system or the just wing-it, fling-it and hope?  

     A lot of what was done yesterday was to combat the fact that BLT showed up in quarters instead of their usual 3 deep looks.   Something I didn't expect.   They really took a lot of the vertical stuff and left Njoku and the RB's room to roam, even against RoQuan.   Sadly, DTR went to these options way late, time and time again.   Speaking of, I was getting Dairy Queen when you called, I'll get back to you later bubs.  

     The Jets passed early and often against the Chiefs last night.  For many, that's against 'conventional' wisdom with a struggling QB.   But it worked for them.    Granted, Zach Wilson isn't a rookie, but he isn't good either.   Chiefs ended up blitzing and man coveraged themselves into real trouble and are lucky to have won that game last night.   The best way to help a young QB, is to keep him out of traditional passing situations.   Especially when we consider the trouble our Oline is facing right now.  Trouble that now includes Teller being a liability in straight drop pass pro.  Whatever grades he has been getting for the positive, have been offset by that right there.   

    @canton-dawg said:

    That’s been a disturbing trend with Kev, for whatever reason the bastard hates running the ball.

     Browns have been top 5 every year except one, in NFL rushing attempts under Stef.    The two biggest names above us are teams that use their QB's as the +1 in the running game as the great equalizer.   And we currently sit at 5th in rushing attempts now as well.  

    So.....  yeah.    Hating the run would be having Austin Eckler and Justin Jackson, but only being 28th in rushing attempts.     

    @canton-dawg said:

    I watched rookie QB and the Texans beat the Steelers yesterday with slants, screens, and gashed the Stoolers running the ball.

     Stroud is currently 3rd in YPA/passing.   Yesterday he was just over a 50% clip.   Apart from the backside RPO to Nico on the TD, most of what the Texans did was incredibly similar to what the Niners did and what the Browns tried to do, I presume you saw how many empty sets they ran?  They even hit a stick/out early that DIDN"T go for a pick six.  Crazy shit, huh?       The differences between those 3 teams? - Check pressure rates allowed by the Oline.    *hint, Browns are leading in a not-good way*.     Hell, the Texans passed as much as they ran on 1st and 3rd yesterday.  Wasn't like it was just "DERP, RUN".      Watt was taken care of just enough to not fuck their offensive game plan.  

     NOTHING with this team has changed since week 1 for the positive.   The Oline has become worse because of injury and diminished play from Teller.  The RB situation is what it is because Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves.  I get we wanted to 'look' competitive, and we've seen young QB's have success against the Browns before, but that's generally in incredibly favorable situations.  Such as having the worst DL in the NFL or having an offense that just hands the ball right back over.   

     What's on the coaches has continued to be on the coaches - finding higher percentage throws faster against defenses they're seeing.  Not being too over-reliant or under-reliant on the screen game.  Or worse, as we saw yesterday from Roquan Smith, going for the screen game on later downs when A) he's one of the best in the NFL at eaing them alive and b) it's sort of expected.    That I hold against Stef.  The screen game could have been more prominent on the early downs, but when that is so wrapped up in setting up success passing games off simple concepts and the timing, it's difficult to execute those screens when the routine stuff is a problem.  

     When the Browns win it's  *coaches did good*   when the Browns lose it's *FIRE EVERYBODY*.   This place, and the bulk of the posters here, are no different than anywhere else.  

    Let me make clear though, that's not a current endorsement of Stef, Musgrave and Van Pelt.  There are things they can, and I hope WILL, be doing much better.

    edit:  Money where my mouth was - took Browns team UNDER at 18.5 points yesterday.    Let's be practical here.   But I'm warning all of you, BYE week or not, I'm struggling to see any scenario where this team beats San Fran.   They're healthy and right now the best team in the NFL.   Just hoping for no further personnel losses and an offense that continues to build and show some progression under Watson.    Right now, focus on the AFCN and securing a wild card spot.  Everything else is a cherry on top.  The offensive roster currently isn't ready to contend.  

    @tiamat63 said:

     The biggest issue wasn't so much the front on the Dline itself, but when we went to gap exchange or our LB"s had to scrape against the read.   They missed quite a few tackles early.   Once that got cleaned up, defense started to settle in after that body shock of a 2nd qtr.  

    At any point, just don't say dumb shit like this.       You're either oblivious to how good the Titans DEF can be, or just... I don't know - maybe it's autism.

     A lot of what was done yesterday was to combat the fact that BLT showed up in quarters instead of their usual 3 deep looks.   Something I didn't expect.   They really took a lot of the vertical stuff and left Njoku and the RB's room to roam, even against RoQuan.   Sadly, DTR went to these options way late, time and time again.   Speaking of, I was getting Dairy Queen when you called, I'll get back to you later bubs.  

     The Jets passed early and often against the Chiefs last night.  For many, that's against 'conventional' wisdom with a struggling QB.   But it worked for them.    Granted, Zach Wilson isn't a rookie, but he isn't good either.   Chiefs ended up blitzing and man coveraged themselves into real trouble and are lucky to have won that game last night.   The best way to help a young QB, is to keep him out of traditional passing situations.   Especially when we consider the trouble our Oline is facing right now.  Trouble that now includes Teller being a liability in straight drop pass pro.  Whatever grades he has been getting for the positive, have been offset by that right there.   

     Browns have been top 5 every year except one, in NFL rushing attempts under Stef.    The two biggest names above us are teams that use their QB's as the +1 in the running game as the great equalizer.   And we currently sit at 5th in rushing attempts now as well.  

    So.....  yeah.    Hating the run would be having Austin Eckler and Justin Jackson, but only being 28th in rushing attempts.     

     Stroud is currently 3rd in YPA/passing.   Yesterday he was just over a 50% clip.   Apart from the backside RPO to Nico on the TD, most of what the Texans did was incredibly similar to what the Niners did and what the Browns tried to do, I presume you saw how many empty sets they ran?  They even hit a stick/out early that DIDN"T go for a pick six.  Crazy shit, huh?       The differences between those 3 teams? - Check pressure rates allowed by the Oline.    *hint, Browns are leading in a not-good way*.     Hell, the Texans passed as much as they ran on 1st and 3rd yesterday.  Wasn't like it was just "DERP, RUN".      Watt was taken care of just enough to not fuck their offensive game plan.  

     NOTHING with this team has changed since week 1 for the positive.   The Oline has become worse because of injury and diminished play from Teller.  The RB situation is what it is because Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves.  I get we wanted to 'look' competitive, and we've seen young QB's have success against the Browns before, but that's generally in incredibly favorable situations.  Such as having the worst DL in the NFL or having an offense that just hands the ball right back over.   

     What's on the coaches has continued to be on the coaches - finding higher percentage throws faster against defenses they're seeing.  Not being too over-reliant or under-reliant on the screen game.  Or worse, as we saw yesterday from Roquan Smith, going for the screen game on later downs when A) he's one of the best in the NFL at eaing them alive and b) it's sort of expected.    That I hold against Stef.  The screen game could have been more prominent on the early downs, but when that is so wrapped up in setting up success passing games off simple concepts and the timing, it's difficult to execute those screens when the routine stuff is a problem.  

     When the Browns win it's  *coaches did good*   when the Browns lose it's *FIRE EVERYBODY*.   This place, and the bulk of the posters here, are no different than anywhere else.  

    Let me make clear though, that's not a current endorsement of Stef, Musgrave and Van Pelt.  There are things they can, and I hope WILL, be doing much better.

    edit:  Money where my mouth was - took Browns team UNDER at 18.5 points yesterday.    Let's be practical here.   But I'm warning all of you, BYE week or not, I'm struggling to see any scenario where this team beats San Fran.   They're healthy and right now the best team in the NFL.   Just hoping for no further personnel losses and an offense that continues to build and show some progression under Watson.    Right now, focus on the AFCN and securing a wild card spot.  Everything else is a cherry on top.  The offensive roster currently isn't ready to contend.  

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

  •  A day after getting blown out 28-3 by the Ravens at home, much of the focus was on how the Browns handled Deshaun Watson’s shoulder injury leading up to the game.

    Here’s our top Brownie Bites from Monday as they head into the bye week.

    The handling of Watson’s shoulder injury over the last week raised questions about the Browns decision making processes leading up to the game. “He knows his body,” Stefanski said Monday. “He's played through serious pain before. Very, very serious injuries. It wasn't a matter of pain tolerance or anything. He just did not feel like he had his full faculties.” According to Stefanski there is no structural problems with Watson’s right shoulder, so that’s good news. The Browns failed in how they handled Baker Mayfield’s injury in 2021. Mayfield said he could and wanted to play but he struggled the remainder of the season and it led to a divorce. Last week the Browns kept listening to Watson tell them he was okay and ready to play despite being unable to throw during practice. Then came Sunday morning and he still couldn’t throw a football. “He didn't throw all week and we had to get to the game and that was the first time he was going to throw to see ultimately how he felt, if he felt like he could drive a throw, those type of things,” Stefanski said. “So he was confident in it. Like I told you guys, he's disappointed but I wouldn't make it any more than that.” Stefanski did not change the gameplan to accommodate rookie Dorian Thompson-Robinson, who appeared ill-equipped to handle the backup role that saw him complete 19 of 36 passes for 121 yards with three interceptions, Stefanski dismissed the notion that better planning for Thompson-Robinson to start would’ve yielded better results. “What happened yesterday was not an issue of not knowing if DTR was going to play,” Stefanski said. “That was not it at all. We just have to coach better and play better.”

  • @ghoolie-always-ghoolie said:

    Stefanski isn't calling plays. Depodesta is. Why is this concept so hard for Browns fans to grasp? Depodesta isn't he head coach.

    Even the Rams HC Sean McVay, admittedly hates walking into a Friday anal dept meeting weekly..

    most 32 coaches, talk this same 'games played/called outcome percentages', BS ?, when asked in press conference's on this same subject 

    https://www.nfl.com/videos/kevin-stefanski-refutes-report-that-he-ll-have-to-hand-over-plans-to-analytics-d

    We do know Stef's holding a play call sheet in his hands for now......... his job, his choice?

    @gumby73 said:

    Even the Rams HC Sean McVay, admittedly hates walking into a Friday anal dept meeting weekly..

    most 32 coaches, talk this same 'games played/called outcome percentages', BS ?, when asked in press conference's on this same subject 

    https://www.nfl.com/videos/kevin-stefanski-refutes-report-that-he-ll-have-to-hand-over-plans-to-analytics-d

    We do know Stef's holding a play call sheet in his hands for now......... his job, his choice?

    we aren’t the only ones prone to weird decisions… 


    I watched Brandon Staley do the analytic thing yesterday afternoon late fourth quarter.  He went for it from his own 40 (his team was up by a score late in the game) he called the Eagles Bush Push or Flock of Bird $hit whatever they call it (sorry not an Iggles fan) 
     

    I wonder if analytics considered the Chargers had a backup center in the game and a QB with a heavily banged non throwing hand - he had visible signs of difficulty taking snaps. 
     

    I wonder if Tony or Mary Kay can ask the question if the analytics are modified when personnel changes.  Like if the tackle is new and the other tackle is struggling with an injury is the sensible thing throwing 40 passes with most of them deep dropbacks? 

  • @tiamat63 said:

     The biggest issue wasn't so much the front on the Dline itself, but when we went to gap exchange or our LB"s had to scrape against the read.   They missed quite a few tackles early.   Once that got cleaned up, defense started to settle in after that body shock of a 2nd qtr.  

    At any point, just don't say dumb shit like this.       You're either oblivious to how good the Titans DEF can be, or just... I don't know - maybe it's autism.

     A lot of what was done yesterday was to combat the fact that BLT showed up in quarters instead of their usual 3 deep looks.   Something I didn't expect.   They really took a lot of the vertical stuff and left Njoku and the RB's room to roam, even against RoQuan.   Sadly, DTR went to these options way late, time and time again.   Speaking of, I was getting Dairy Queen when you called, I'll get back to you later bubs.  

     The Jets passed early and often against the Chiefs last night.  For many, that's against 'conventional' wisdom with a struggling QB.   But it worked for them.    Granted, Zach Wilson isn't a rookie, but he isn't good either.   Chiefs ended up blitzing and man coveraged themselves into real trouble and are lucky to have won that game last night.   The best way to help a young QB, is to keep him out of traditional passing situations.   Especially when we consider the trouble our Oline is facing right now.  Trouble that now includes Teller being a liability in straight drop pass pro.  Whatever grades he has been getting for the positive, have been offset by that right there.   

     Browns have been top 5 every year except one, in NFL rushing attempts under Stef.    The two biggest names above us are teams that use their QB's as the +1 in the running game as the great equalizer.   And we currently sit at 5th in rushing attempts now as well.  

    So.....  yeah.    Hating the run would be having Austin Eckler and Justin Jackson, but only being 28th in rushing attempts.     

     Stroud is currently 3rd in YPA/passing.   Yesterday he was just over a 50% clip.   Apart from the backside RPO to Nico on the TD, most of what the Texans did was incredibly similar to what the Niners did and what the Browns tried to do, I presume you saw how many empty sets they ran?  They even hit a stick/out early that DIDN"T go for a pick six.  Crazy shit, huh?       The differences between those 3 teams? - Check pressure rates allowed by the Oline.    *hint, Browns are leading in a not-good way*.     Hell, the Texans passed as much as they ran on 1st and 3rd yesterday.  Wasn't like it was just "DERP, RUN".      Watt was taken care of just enough to not fuck their offensive game plan.  

     NOTHING with this team has changed since week 1 for the positive.   The Oline has become worse because of injury and diminished play from Teller.  The RB situation is what it is because Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves.  I get we wanted to 'look' competitive, and we've seen young QB's have success against the Browns before, but that's generally in incredibly favorable situations.  Such as having the worst DL in the NFL or having an offense that just hands the ball right back over.   

     What's on the coaches has continued to be on the coaches - finding higher percentage throws faster against defenses they're seeing.  Not being too over-reliant or under-reliant on the screen game.  Or worse, as we saw yesterday from Roquan Smith, going for the screen game on later downs when A) he's one of the best in the NFL at eaing them alive and b) it's sort of expected.    That I hold against Stef.  The screen game could have been more prominent on the early downs, but when that is so wrapped up in setting up success passing games off simple concepts and the timing, it's difficult to execute those screens when the routine stuff is a problem.  

     When the Browns win it's  *coaches did good*   when the Browns lose it's *FIRE EVERYBODY*.   This place, and the bulk of the posters here, are no different than anywhere else.  

    Let me make clear though, that's not a current endorsement of Stef, Musgrave and Van Pelt.  There are things they can, and I hope WILL, be doing much better.

    edit:  Money where my mouth was - took Browns team UNDER at 18.5 points yesterday.    Let's be practical here.   But I'm warning all of you, BYE week or not, I'm struggling to see any scenario where this team beats San Fran.   They're healthy and right now the best team in the NFL.   Just hoping for no further personnel losses and an offense that continues to build and show some progression under Watson.    Right now, focus on the AFCN and securing a wild card spot.  Everything else is a cherry on top.  The offensive roster currently isn't ready to contend.  

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    @canton-dawg said:

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

  • @canton-dawg said:

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    @flugel said:

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    I'm more concerned that the Steelers and Ravens exposed the Browns for being such a Charmin' soft team. 

    I could almost understand this team being a finesse team if they were a really intelligent team, but they show over and over that they aren't a smart team either. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    @flugel said:

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    Hitting the nail on the head here.
     

    Just want to add about Shanny…I watched Niners Cards and you hear a lot about Shanny’s system and play calls.  It is about his players too. The Cards were allergic to the flats all game and didn’t account for CMC.  So he has success and it is back to the well time and time again.  He needs a big play there it is 3 and 7 he gets 9 yards.  He uses his playmakers and calls on them in key situations and senses the confusion and lack of execution on the defenses part to account for the flats and the 49ers best athlete.  It is not Mitchell trying to make that play - he has CMC in there knowing he can beat the defender to the edge. 

    I know it’s tempting sometimes for the smart guys to think of plays- throwing in a wrinkle to break tendencies but sometimes it is just about players and exploiting the opposing teams weakness to account for a player or a physical/athletic mismatch.  
     

  • @westside-steve said:

    I don't really blame the kid for having a bad outing his first game in the NFL against one of the better defenses. It's not like our defense would have performed up to the reputation even with a healthy Watson. But if we are calling plays it require him to take off and run this is what we get. If it's a rotator cuff time to get used to DTR.

    WSS

    There are no excuses in the NFL. Stefanski didn't do DTR any favors, but most of his throws weren't even in the same zip code as the receiver. 

    @berniesuperbowl2 said:

    Stefanski didn't do DTR any favors, but most of his throws weren't even in the same zip code as the receiver. 

    Yeah, he was in way over his head yesterday.  

    @flugel said:

    The defense showed up to play very early on; and the home crowd was enjoying it.  However, how long were they getting to rest after they stopped Baltimore? 

    A key point.  The D was well rested and ready to go against the Titans.  The offense did a good job against a pretty good D.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves. 

    Thank you!   As soon as I turned on the TV and saw our QB, I knew we were screwed and in for a long, painful afternoon.  

  •  What I don't get, is watson was medically cleared to play, but stefunksy held him out. That's after letting/having baker stupidly play with a sling on his shoulder........??

      The ratbirds have the #7 defense in the NFL, per

    https://sportsnaut.com/nfl-defense-rankings/

    seems this hc has no clue, his instincts suck.

    The 49ers are #1...

    followed by the

    #2 Cowboys

    #3 Jets

    #4 Bills

    #5 Browns

    Browns vs 49ners?

    https://sportsnaut.com/nfl-offense-rankings/

    the niners also have...the #1 ranked offense, too.

    going to be one hell of a clash.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    @flugel said:

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    Absolutely Flugs!

    I hate to keep bringing up the Stoolers game but that loss stung, the Browns gave that one away.

    The more I watch this overpaid offense flail around under Stefanski, the more I’m coming to terms that this will probably be another mediocre season.

    If we finish 7-10 I fully expect a HC change.

  • @flugel said:

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    Absolutely Flugs!

    I hate to keep bringing up the Stoolers game but that loss stung, the Browns gave that one away.

    The more I watch this overpaid offense flail around under Stefanski, the more I’m coming to terms that this will probably be another mediocre season.

    If we finish 7-10 I fully expect a HC change.

    @canton-dawg said:

    a HC change.

    for who ? and what front office ?

  • @flugel said:

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    I'm more concerned that the Steelers and Ravens exposed the Browns for being such a Charmin' soft team. 

    I could almost understand this team being a finesse team if they were a really intelligent team, but they show over and over that they aren't a smart team either. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm more concerned that the Steelers and Ravens exposed the Browns for being such a Charmin' soft team. 

    I could almost understand this team being a finesse team if they were a really intelligent team, but they show over and over that they aren't a smart team either. 

    You can always tell the commentators that haven't done their homework when they cover the Browns for the 1st time in a while.  They'll say Cleveland has one of the best Offensive Lines in football, which was accurate at one time.  As much as I think Teller is a good run blocker - he has been an absolute liability in pass pro.  You NEVER give up your inside in pass pro especially when you have a DT lined up on your inside shoulder when your QB is trying to throw a quick pass from the pocket.  That should be a piece of cake if you're a Pro Bowl Guard.  Teller had a few breakdowns in pass pro and last year he got busted for holding more than he should have.  Pocic is playing hurt; and that has him not up to snuff too for a team wanting to win their division or at least compete to do so.  I think Nick Harris is a GOOD Center and an upgrade to an injured Pocic.  Harris is a far better Center than he is as an OG.  Center puts him on the apex and he's very quick at establishing ideal position and leverage when he's snapping the ball.  He's not one to overpower some of the 350lbs+ guys; but sometimes all you have to do in that interior is get there 1st and shield off.  He's very good at that IMO.  He got his football potty training at Center so that's why I don't worry about how he play's OG. The Wypler Snapper can be the backup Guard. Our Tackles are getting beat right out of their stances in pass pro and I don't care if one of them went to Ohio State.  That ain't gonna win anything here if he has more chins than a Chinese phone book. Gotta be able to move in this league or your going to be one of the reasons defenses like Pittsburgh and Baltimore are forcing turnovers and/or scoring TDs on our offense.

  • @flugel said:

    The final drop-back was the fumble for a TD.  In short, the Browns didn't know the enemy and they knew themselves even less. I'm not impressed with this offense.  We're gonna play SF next that has a very organized offense where there's a route receiving tree for those lining up on their perimeter.  The reason that's important is because their offense is predicated on precision, timing, and chemistry. The Browns offense is governed by confusion and who are we.  While we're deciding this Cleveland QBs have been playing Santa Claus to Pittsburgh and Baltimore.

    Maybe this modern game is passing me by. I don't get the sense that teams with offensive coaches that worked with Kyle Shanahan under his dad Mike Shanahan (ie: Sean McVay)or later just under Kyle (Mike McDaniel and Matt LaFleur) have the big time difficulty teaching and orchestrating the offense.  QB Brock Purdy was the very last player drafted in 2022 out of Iowa State.  As a rookie QB Purdy replaced injured starter Jimmy Garoppolo and SF won that game as well as the 8 games Purdy started thereafter.  He actually accomplished this quickly enough to be THE guy ahead of SF's previous 3rd overall pick Trey Lance.  He got them all the way to the NFC Championship. 

    Here the Browns are on offense trying to figure out who they are and where they want to go with things.  How about a philosophy to -set the foundation.  The Browns are better at running the ball instead of passing it.  Foundation set.  Now, COMMIT to it , KICKASS and watch playaction passes work once you do so.

    The window is slamming down on Stefanski before he loses the team whether it's him orchestrating or Front Office Depo overstepping his bounds like our FO did back when they pissed off Kyle Shanahan when he was our OC.

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    Absolutely Flugs!

    I hate to keep bringing up the Stoolers game but that loss stung, the Browns gave that one away.

    The more I watch this overpaid offense flail around under Stefanski, the more I’m coming to terms that this will probably be another mediocre season.

    If we finish 7-10 I fully expect a HC change.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Absolutely Flugs!

    I hate to keep bringing up the Stoolers game but that loss stung, the Browns gave that one away.

    The more I watch this overpaid offense flail around under Stefanski, the more I’m coming to terms that this will probably be another mediocre season.

    If we finish 7-10 I fully expect a HC change.

    Thanks CD!  I'm starting to wonder if Bill Callahan is getting frustrated with all the mathletics/analytics from the Poindexters Committee dictating what the Browns are attempting to do next in lieu of understanding the human performance unfolding in front of them. If National Lampoon is looking for a Revenge of the Revenge of the Nerds sequel - Welcome to Cleveland!

    It's 1 big fart in church!

  • @flugel said:

    Bottom line:  The Offensive Coach/Coaches in charge of the design of this offense, the game planning and the play-calling is failing.  How many years do we need to keep excusing the guy in charge of the offense. Schwartz just got here and they're so much further along.  Our STs Coordinator just started and that's improved.  When you have the right guy in charge - you improve.  When you don't?  Here we are complaining about the offense again.  You don't say...

    I'm more concerned that the Steelers and Ravens exposed the Browns for being such a Charmin' soft team. 

    I could almost understand this team being a finesse team if they were a really intelligent team, but they show over and over that they aren't a smart team either. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm more concerned that the Steelers and Ravens exposed the Browns for being such a Charmin' soft team. 

    I could almost understand this team being a finesse team if they were a really intelligent team, but they show over and over that they aren't a smart team either. 

    If there's 1 thing I can nit-pick about the defense during all of their improvements in games our offense gives them reasonable rest between series - I'd like to see a few more turnovers or strip sacks forced.  The INT for Baltimore is what changed the complexion of that game.  Against Pittsburgh, Highsmith's INT gave Pitt early momentum Cleveland worked hard to reverse.  Then, their kill shot was the strip sack from an untouched Highsmith that caused the football to makes it's way over to the unblocked TJ Watt for the easiest TD they scored all night.  SF won't be studying statistics - they'll be watching film of the Browns vulnerabilities on the edges and even up the middle the Rats exposed.  They don't need numbers or statistics - it's all there on film.  BTW, Kyle Shanahan likes to keep his dad's old school football going so he'll be watching our defense on film and paying attention the the what and why on 3rd downs, short yardage and red zones.  They'll find trends.  They'll watch football and investigate situational responses to get their answers.  

    In all that analytic data they have - I'm not impressed how it prepared the offensive game plan for Pittsburgh.  Old school uses film to study opponents - the Browns don't do this on offense.  That said, Schwartz is old school so we don't have to worry about the mathletics replacing the athletics on that side of the ball just yet.   Belichick gave him his NFL potty training in Cleveland so we're seeing what's possible and just scratching the surface of where they can go. 

  • @tiamat63 said:

     The biggest issue wasn't so much the front on the Dline itself, but when we went to gap exchange or our LB"s had to scrape against the read.   They missed quite a few tackles early.   Once that got cleaned up, defense started to settle in after that body shock of a 2nd qtr.  

    At any point, just don't say dumb shit like this.       You're either oblivious to how good the Titans DEF can be, or just... I don't know - maybe it's autism.

     A lot of what was done yesterday was to combat the fact that BLT showed up in quarters instead of their usual 3 deep looks.   Something I didn't expect.   They really took a lot of the vertical stuff and left Njoku and the RB's room to roam, even against RoQuan.   Sadly, DTR went to these options way late, time and time again.   Speaking of, I was getting Dairy Queen when you called, I'll get back to you later bubs.  

     The Jets passed early and often against the Chiefs last night.  For many, that's against 'conventional' wisdom with a struggling QB.   But it worked for them.    Granted, Zach Wilson isn't a rookie, but he isn't good either.   Chiefs ended up blitzing and man coveraged themselves into real trouble and are lucky to have won that game last night.   The best way to help a young QB, is to keep him out of traditional passing situations.   Especially when we consider the trouble our Oline is facing right now.  Trouble that now includes Teller being a liability in straight drop pass pro.  Whatever grades he has been getting for the positive, have been offset by that right there.   

     Browns have been top 5 every year except one, in NFL rushing attempts under Stef.    The two biggest names above us are teams that use their QB's as the +1 in the running game as the great equalizer.   And we currently sit at 5th in rushing attempts now as well.  

    So.....  yeah.    Hating the run would be having Austin Eckler and Justin Jackson, but only being 28th in rushing attempts.     

     Stroud is currently 3rd in YPA/passing.   Yesterday he was just over a 50% clip.   Apart from the backside RPO to Nico on the TD, most of what the Texans did was incredibly similar to what the Niners did and what the Browns tried to do, I presume you saw how many empty sets they ran?  They even hit a stick/out early that DIDN"T go for a pick six.  Crazy shit, huh?       The differences between those 3 teams? - Check pressure rates allowed by the Oline.    *hint, Browns are leading in a not-good way*.     Hell, the Texans passed as much as they ran on 1st and 3rd yesterday.  Wasn't like it was just "DERP, RUN".      Watt was taken care of just enough to not fuck their offensive game plan.  

     NOTHING with this team has changed since week 1 for the positive.   The Oline has become worse because of injury and diminished play from Teller.  The RB situation is what it is because Chubb is out, and we just so happened to start a raw, rookie 5th round QB on top of it.    Anybody expecting anything less than a physical grind of a loss was fooling themselves.  I get we wanted to 'look' competitive, and we've seen young QB's have success against the Browns before, but that's generally in incredibly favorable situations.  Such as having the worst DL in the NFL or having an offense that just hands the ball right back over.   

     What's on the coaches has continued to be on the coaches - finding higher percentage throws faster against defenses they're seeing.  Not being too over-reliant or under-reliant on the screen game.  Or worse, as we saw yesterday from Roquan Smith, going for the screen game on later downs when A) he's one of the best in the NFL at eaing them alive and b) it's sort of expected.    That I hold against Stef.  The screen game could have been more prominent on the early downs, but when that is so wrapped up in setting up success passing games off simple concepts and the timing, it's difficult to execute those screens when the routine stuff is a problem.  

     When the Browns win it's  *coaches did good*   when the Browns lose it's *FIRE EVERYBODY*.   This place, and the bulk of the posters here, are no different than anywhere else.  

    Let me make clear though, that's not a current endorsement of Stef, Musgrave and Van Pelt.  There are things they can, and I hope WILL, be doing much better.

    edit:  Money where my mouth was - took Browns team UNDER at 18.5 points yesterday.    Let's be practical here.   But I'm warning all of you, BYE week or not, I'm struggling to see any scenario where this team beats San Fran.   They're healthy and right now the best team in the NFL.   Just hoping for no further personnel losses and an offense that continues to build and show some progression under Watson.    Right now, focus on the AFCN and securing a wild card spot.  Everything else is a cherry on top.  The offensive roster currently isn't ready to contend.  

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

    @canton-dawg said:

    God love ya Tia for all the in depth analysis, but I’m a bottom line type of guy.

    I’m specifically calling out the play calling vs the Stoolers.

    Let’s look at those game stats:

    IMG_4915.jpeg

    IMG_4916.jpeg

    Why in the hell would you have Watson drop back and pass forty times, when we were running all over them?

     Unfortunately what you're attempting to do isn't possible.  Because if you're going just of stats alone, as a "bottom line guy", then it'll grieve you to know that the Browns play calls looked like this in the 1st half v PIT.

    18 pass  16 Runs w/o the 2 min drill

     27pass and 18run with the 2 minute drill for the FG before half.

    Out of reference, I wanted to see how the Niners play calls contrasted with ours.  Being that they were week 1, and the coaches would look to that film for a blueprint.  

     18pass 17 runs w/o the 2 min drill

     Once at the 2 minute mark, it was 21pass to 17 run.      They just had more favorable field position to get in FG range.

    San Fran's rushing totals....

    Rushing 188  
    Rushing Attempts 34  
    Yards per rush 5.5  

    You can't just go "Stats" and not ask how we arrived at said stats.  

    The biggest difference?

    - Niners averaged almost a full yard per play more than CLE.

    - Passing averages were 4.6 to 5.9.   So when the Niners went to push the ball downfield, they had more success after setting it up with the running game and short passes.    Which leads to the next stat...

    - 8 Penalties, 4 turnovers and 6 sacks given up by CLE  v 11 Penalties, 1 turnover and 3 sacks given up.

    That's a 4:1 and 2:1 ratio higher.  It isn't sustainable for any team.

     If you want to be the "bottom line" guy of stats that's fine, then you have to be willing to die by the sword you're living on.    The Browns run to pass balance was within 1 play of San Fran before the 2min warning at the end of each half began to tip those in the obvious direction.  I don't think we're willing to argue against the results SF had, despite their self inflicted penalties, they kicked ass.  But they also protected their QB and didn't allow a defensive score.

      If I looked further into it, I'd be willing to wager Houston's stats look incredibly similar.    If the turnovers are FG's at minimum, or at worst NOT a pick 6,  then you're looking at 29ish... pass attempts and a near 10point lead in the 4th qtr. 

      Like I mentioned that Tuesday afterwards, the game boiled down to turnovers and pass protection.   Like we saw against a different opponent this past Sunday, turnovers (including damn near another pick six) and pass protection.     There is one constant in this equation - and it must be fixed by the coaches as much as possible if the personnel simply isn't getting it done.

  • I know the link was posted before, but a bit cleaner: https://apnews.com/article/deshaun-watson-shoulder-injury-cleveland-browns-e0a7c8567b09d32d8b770f1b13feb84a

    I'm sorry man, going into a bye and a huge early game it sits really shitty with me. You had Carr go with a bum shoulder, Burrow with his calf, and a dude medically cleared to play chooses not to. I'm not naive or aloof to the world not being a movie, but tough to swallow.