Dalvin Cook released by Jets
-
Yeah, but any RB on the roster behind Chubb aren’t going to get the same amount of touches.
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
-
Yeah, but any RB on the roster behind Chubb aren’t going to get the same amount of touches.
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
I think the question is twofold:
1) Is Cook an improvement over an existing RB on the roster?
2) If he is, can he be squeezed into the salary cap?
-
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
I think the question is twofold:
1) Is Cook an improvement over an existing RB on the roster?
2) If he is, can he be squeezed into the salary cap?
I think the question is twofold:
1) Is Cook an improvement over an existing RB on the roster?
2) If he is, can he be squeezed into the salary cap?
My POV... The answers are no and no. We're not demoting any of our guys... Ford, Hunt, or Strong for a guy just a lookin' for a home whose production nose dived.
Cook's 3.2 ypc is marginally better than Hunt's 3.0. but I doubt Berry is interested in bringing in a marginal talent for negligible improvement on the roster. We're NOT cutting Hunt (who knows the playbook and is a terror on short yardage) for a guy off the street.
Really, this Cook love is almost as bad as some guys thinking we should give the (now pretty washed up) Jarvis Landry a ring. ?
-
I'd much, MUCH prefer adding an O-lineman for the play-offs. That helps all our current backs, including Joe!
-
I think the question is twofold:
1) Is Cook an improvement over an existing RB on the roster?
2) If he is, can he be squeezed into the salary cap?
My POV... The answers are no and no. We're not demoting any of our guys... Ford, Hunt, or Strong for a guy just a lookin' for a home whose production nose dived.
Cook's 3.2 ypc is marginally better than Hunt's 3.0. but I doubt Berry is interested in bringing in a marginal talent for negligible improvement on the roster. We're NOT cutting Hunt (who knows the playbook and is a terror on short yardage) for a guy off the street.
Really, this Cook love is almost as bad as some guys thinking we should give the (now pretty washed up) Jarvis Landry a ring. ?
My POV... The answers are no and no. We're not demoting any of our guys... Ford, Hunt, or Strong for a guy just a lookin' for a home whose production nose dived.
Cook's 3.2 ypc is marginally better than Hunt's 3.0. but I doubt Berry is interested in bringing in a marginal talent for negligible improvement on the roster. We're NOT cutting Hunt (who knows the playbook and is a terror on short yardage) for a guy off the street.
Really, this Cook love is almost as bad as some guys thinking we should give the (now pretty washed up) Jarvis Landry a ring. ?
I’d be happier with a Landry signing than a Cook one tbh, our guys besides Cooper and Moore and Njoku have pretty pathetic numbers, and old Landry could give us a couple big first down catches or something, or somebody else doesn’t have to be him (Rashard Higgins?)
-
Thank goodness Kevin is comfortable including TEs in his passing game, because this is a paper-thin WR room now without Moore, who most of the season wasn't much of a factor.
The Browns need to improve the WR unit this coming offseason. Tillman is definitely a work in progress, Bell is a candidate to get cut in training camp, and Moore really should be the #3 option.
-
Thank goodness Kevin is comfortable including TEs in his passing game, because this is a paper-thin WR room now without Moore, who most of the season wasn't much of a factor.
The Browns need to improve the WR unit this coming offseason. Tillman is definitely a work in progress, Bell is a candidate to get cut in training camp, and Moore really should be the #3 option.
Thank goodness Kevin is comfortable including TEs in his passing game, because this is a paper-thin WR room now without Moore, who most of the season wasn't much of a factor.
The Browns need to improve the WR unit this coming offseason. Tillman is definitely a work in progress, Bell is a candidate to get cut in training camp, and Moore really should be the #3 option.
True. That said, he had no choice but to become comfortable using the TEs after we ran out of starters at the WR position. Once Moore left the game, Sauce started covering Njoku and that cooled Njoku's success down. I'm not gonna get too down on Tillman because 2-3 weeks ago he made some big catches to keep drives alive. He can still help us IMO. If we had a veteran QB like Flacco earlier on (instead of DTR/PJ Walker) - some of our young backup/situational WRs would be further along in their development.
If all the starters rest this week, nothing PJ Walker can/will do is going to benefit the WRs learning curve. The passing game is a chaotic mess when Walker plays. I feel bad putting the guy down because I like his attitude and willingness; but he's still going to get out of the pocket and throw back into the middle of the field into traffic inviting the picks. In saying all that, this reality plus an injury to DTR became the REASONS we're celebrating a Joe Flacco success story the last 4-5 weeks...
-
Yeah, but any RB on the roster behind Chubb aren’t going to get the same amount of touches.
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
Then the question is.. Why couldn't Cook beat out Breece Hall for the #1 RB spot? I'm not buying the Jets were so dumb to essentially bench Cook out of spite. FWIW, Hall is averaging a full YPC more than Dalvin behind the same OL.
This could be a similar situation (diminished skills falling off of a cliff) as our Kareem Hunt, who was sitting by the phone until the Browns sent out the Bat Signal when Chubb blew out his knee.
Yeah I hear ya Larry. And then there's how wonderfully that OL was at protecting Aaron Rodgers - shrinking his season to 4 snaps. Cook wasn't brought there to beat out Breece Hall - he was brought there in case Hall gets injured again running behind that line. We're better off just keeping Hunt at this time.
-
I'd much, MUCH prefer adding an O-lineman for the play-offs. That helps all our current backs, including Joe!
I'd much, MUCH prefer adding an O-lineman for the play-offs. That helps all our current backs, including Joe!
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
I'd much, MUCH prefer adding an O-lineman for the play-offs. That helps all our current backs, including Joe!
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
Well we did just sign a vet guard for depth apparently:
-
Any late push should be Oline first. That having been said, Dalvin would be as close to plug n play as you'd get. He would have a great knowledge of the offensive structure, language, pass pro sets, etc etc. The downside would be building chemistry as a runner behind an Oline unfamiliar to him.
Anyone know what his fumble rate is?
-
Put simply, I don't see why he'd get reps over any of the guys in Ford, Hunt, or Strong. Don't forget that Pierre is on the special teams unit and unless I'm sorely mistaken Dalvin ain't lining up for kickoffs. I personally also think Strong in limited action has looked pretty decent.
The only scenario to me that makes logical sense to me is if they believe in the 2ish weeks Cook provides an upgrade over Hunt, which I don't see personally. I suppose if he'd be willing to sign to the PS it'd be a super good upgrade if someone goes down, but I doubt that what's he looking for.
-
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
Well we did just sign a vet guard for depth apparently:
Well we did just sign a vet guard for depth apparently:
Thanks for the update! It can't hurt. We can really use experienced depth on the OL..
-
To answer my own question - Browns have the 3rd most fumbles per game. DC has two lost on 67 carries. Or 1 per 33.5 which would put him towards the league bottom.
For comparison, Joe Mixon has almost 4 times the carries and zero fumbles.
Yeah.... Hard pass. We have enough RBs that struggle holding onto the rock as is.
-
Anytime one of these names comes up people always remember their best seasons but not their most recent ones for some reason. I guess the same would be true for Landry, who worked out for teams and failed to make a roster.
It seemed the same with Shaquille Leonard when the colts dropped him, except going to Philly seemed to give him some kind of resurgence.
-
Any late push should be Oline first. That having been said, Dalvin would be as close to plug n play as you'd get. He would have a great knowledge of the offensive structure, language, pass pro sets, etc etc. The downside would be building chemistry as a runner behind an Oline unfamiliar to him.
Anyone know what his fumble rate is?
Any late push should be Oline first. That having been said, Dalvin would be as close to plug n play as you'd get. He would have a great knowledge of the offensive structure, language, pass pro sets, etc etc. The downside would be building chemistry as a runner behind an Oline unfamiliar to him
if Moore can;t go I would bring cook to play in the slot (and yes over Landry )
-
I'd much, MUCH prefer adding an O-lineman for the play-offs. That helps all our current backs, including Joe!
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
Me too KD! The trouble is - what OL worthy of helping a playoff team are unemployed right now? On the other hand, there may be some promising practice squad guys we could give this type of opportunity to.
It's not like most of us saw Cook's release coming. Maybe another team cuts a O-lineman to save cap space? If that doesn't happen, we are better off saving ours for the post-season.
if Moore can;t go I would bring cook to play in the slot (and yes over Landry )
Landry is retired. He is just in denial about that.
-
To answer my own question - Browns have the 3rd most fumbles per game. DC has two lost on 67 carries. Or 1 per 33.5 which would put him towards the league bottom.
For comparison, Joe Mixon has almost 4 times the carries and zero fumbles.
Yeah.... Hard pass. We have enough RBs that struggle holding onto the rock as is.
To answer my own question - Browns have the 3rd most fumbles per game. DC has two lost on 67 carries. Or 1 per 33.5 which would put him towards the league bottom.
For comparison, Joe Mixon has almost 4 times the carries and zero fumbles.
Yeah.... Hard pass. We have enough RBs that struggle holding onto the rock as is.
In one of our last game day threads @jiggins7919 made a good point along the line of how Cleveland's ball-carriers/Receivers were holding the ball away from their body just inviting fumbles. This was a great point because they do this a lot; and don't think for a second defenses in the playoffs won't be game planning to exploit this. To your very 1st point above, opposing defenses exploited this against the Browns in the regular season. That's my biggest worry on offense heading into the playoffs outside of knowing we can't afford to lose Cooper for any of the matchups ahead.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
Any late push should be Oline first. That having been said, Dalvin would be as close to plug n play as you'd get. He would have a great knowledge of the offensive structure, language, pass pro sets, etc etc. The downside would be building chemistry as a runner behind an Oline unfamiliar to him
if Moore can;t go I would bring cook to play in the slot (and yes over Landry )
if Moore can;t go I would bring cook to play in the slot (and yes over Landry )
This doesn't mean I'm right and you're wrong by any means. That said, the difference would be Corners would be covering Cook as a Slot instead of LBers in the hook zones and/or the flats that typically were assigned to him as a RB. That's not as big of an advantage to Cook as slipping him out in a wheel route, swing pass or even via a fake hand-off where he ends up wide open in the hook zones or the fringes of the flats. IMO, those corners can change direction faster than LBers; especially on a guy that looks like he lost a step. Father time doesn't even need a pursuit angle to catch guys from behind.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login