Skip to content

What direction do you choose?

Political Discussion
47 12 915 1
  • @mld-woody said:

    Please tell me that's fake... 

    They're actually doing that? Fucking weird...

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

  • image.png.3f7eb1090ebc7b6984d9a52b16c2cd2c.png

    Doesn't look good for Cheetos. Great job with the racist and sexist attacks. You lose more and more voters. "Fake poles!" - MAGA

  • @mld-woody said:

    Please tell me that's fake... 

    They're actually doing that? Fucking weird...

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    @nickers said:

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    Well sure it is Nickers. That’s a helluva hard turn in to that. Not sure l was prepared for that. 

    I’m not vindictively taking a dig here, l’m a fan of promoting the family unit, but for some folks there’s a “by any means necessary” caveat. Invitro, adoption, lesbian couples and popsicles, whatever.

    Infertility and conservative leanings aren’t mutually exclusive. It’s counterproductive to diss infertile people.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Please tell me that's fake... 

    They're actually doing that? Fucking weird...

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    That's ... Just as bad? 

    So they're mocking couples that want children but can't conceive for whatever medical reasons. 

    That's wild you provided that response like it somehow makes it better 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    This is the far right religious extremist portion of their party having too much influence. No sane person should be anti IVF. But the Bible humpers need to be made at something, I guess. 

    Another "policy" that polls extremely poorly with regular, middle of the road Americans 

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    @nickers said:

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    That's ... Just as bad? 

    So they're mocking couples that want children but can't conceive for whatever medical reasons. 

    That's wild you provided that response like it somehow makes it better 

    @mld-woody said:

    That's ... Just as bad? 

    So they're mocking couples that want children but can't conceive for whatever medical reasons. 

    That's wild you provided that response like it somehow makes it better 

    I don't see that. I think the walz may be gay, he acts that way, constantly, as a stereotype, and with

    tampons in boys rooms, etc etc etc etc etc.

    It is not an indictment of all normal couples who try the extra mile to have children.

  • @nickers said:

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

    @mld-woody said:

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

    And you're a coward little faggot...

  • @mld-woody said:

    Please tell me that's fake... 

    They're actually doing that? Fucking weird...

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    @canton-dawg said:

    They’re mocking people who need IVF to start a family…like Tim Waltz.

    And now they think IVF is a bad thing for couples who actually want to start a family?  Talk about a pack of inconsiderate Cult losers. 

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    Really? That sort of seems mean spirited. 

    I get the gist that republicans are trying to be the “pro-family” party, and l’m all for it. Fostering a community that cares about each other starts with family. It’s how we learn that the well being of the people around us directly affects our own quality of life.

    Their methodology at accomplishing this, at least in this instance, is a little bizarre.

    This is the far right religious extremist portion of their party having too much influence. No sane person should be anti IVF. But the Bible humpers need to be made at something, I guess. 

    Another "policy" that polls extremely poorly with regular, middle of the road Americans 

    @mld-woody said:

    This is the far right religious extremist portion of their party having too much influence. No sane person should be anti IVF. But the Bible humpers need to be made at something, I guess. 

    Another "policy" that polls extremely poorly with regular, middle of the road Americans 

    Yeah the hard right Catholics take a dim view of IVF, but I'd bet that they're in a very small minority.   I won't get into their rationale here.  (Short answer if it's something outside of sex- it's morally wrong)  

  • @nickers said:

    Like Demoquacks mutilating kids and infecting them with degenerate material isnt bizarre?

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

    @mld-woody said:

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

    and you still can't justify your asinine contentions in any discussion.

    just blurb and peck.image.jpeg.1849ac0d0e7be090e96a97daaa401988.jpeg

  • @mld-woody said:

    That's ... Just as bad? 

    So they're mocking couples that want children but can't conceive for whatever medical reasons. 

    That's wild you provided that response like it somehow makes it better 

    I don't see that. I think the walz may be gay, he acts that way, constantly, as a stereotype, and with

    tampons in boys rooms, etc etc etc etc etc.

    It is not an indictment of all normal couples who try the extra mile to have children.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I don't see that. I think the walz may be gay, he acts that way, constantly, as a stereotype, and with

    tampons in boys rooms, etc etc etc etc etc.

    It is not an indictment of all normal couples who try the extra mile to have children.

    You're a fucking moron hahahaha

    I pray that when I'm your age I'm not so frightened and confused by the world around me. 

    "This person did something I think is strange. I think the gays are strange. Therefore that person must be one of the gays!"

    It's amazing how you continue to hit new lows every year 

  • @mld-woody said:

    You're a weird little man living in a strange little world 

    And you're a coward little faggot...

    @nickers said:

    And you're a coward little faggot...

    Powerful words coming from a fragile old man sitting in a booster seat to reach the keyboard. 

    But hey, at least you have slurs. That's one way to spend your last precious few years (months?) on Earth 

  • @mld-woody said:

    This is the far right religious extremist portion of their party having too much influence. No sane person should be anti IVF. But the Bible humpers need to be made at something, I guess. 

    Another "policy" that polls extremely poorly with regular, middle of the road Americans 

    Yeah the hard right Catholics take a dim view of IVF, but I'd bet that they're in a very small minority.   I won't get into their rationale here.  (Short answer if it's something outside of sex- it's morally wrong)  

    @hoorta said:

    Yeah the hard right Catholics take a dim view of IVF, but I'd bet that they're in a very small minority.   I won't get into their rationale here.  (Short answer if it's something outside of sex- it's morally wrong)  

    It's always a minority, but a vocal one. And one that actually influenced decision making. Look know further than the recent decision on Roe

  • again, there is no legit reasoning behind your asinine self-serving ASSumptions.

    no fright. no confusion. Just opinions.

    if you can't handle that, you could always buy yourself a one way ticket to cuba.

  • again, there is no legit reasoning behind your asinine self-serving ASSumptions.

    no fright. no confusion. Just opinions.

    if you can't handle that, you could always buy yourself a one way ticket to cuba.

    @calfoxwc said:

    again, there is no legit reasoning behind your asinine self-serving ASSumptions.

    Cal - "Walz must be gay"

    You're a very stupid man

  • @hoorta said:

    Yeah the hard right Catholics take a dim view of IVF, but I'd bet that they're in a very small minority.   I won't get into their rationale here.  (Short answer if it's something outside of sex- it's morally wrong)  

    It's always a minority, but a vocal one. And one that actually influenced decision making. Look know further than the recent decision on Roe

    @mld-woody said:

    It's always a minority, but a vocal one. And one that actually influenced decision making. Look know further than the recent decision on Roe

    you still bitching that you can't have a federally approved abortion?

    I wouldn't think woodpeckers would have that problem.

    the lack of Constitutionality is why roe was defeated - and it was sent back to the states.

    Constitutional legitimacy or Constitutional violation is the crux of the decision, as it must be.