Skip to content

Dorsey To Take Over…

The Browns Board
34 16 3.9k 1
  • @flugel said:

    It's ALL going to boil down to Jimmy hiring the right FO people to lean on or the bad hiring and drafting will persist into all these future picks they're about to be trading to acquire.

    And if the same FO is doing all the picking assuming we get a lot of legitimate draft picks in trade, then just rinse and repeat the same old tub of shitwater we now have.

    @texasag1969 said:

    And if the same FO is doing all the picking assuming we get a lot of legitimate draft picks in trade, then just rinse and repeat the same old tub of shitwater we now have.

    Precisely - that's what I'm getting at!  At 60 years of age, I can't tell you how many times I've seen all this before here.  Scapegoats get fired and high 5 are exchanged almost as if there's going to be 2 brain cells suddenly on speaking terms finding all these upgrades galore that has escaped them all this time.  Even worse, players that actually have given us stuff to celebrate and high 5 one another about are the ones they're gonna trade off to do their careless shopping with next.

  • IMG_2585.jpeg

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    IMG_2585.jpeg

    If that wasn't so pathetic we'd have to use a different description, like deplorable or pitiable or, dare I say, Brownian. Brownian motion is the random motion of particles suspended in a medium. Yeah, that's just about right.?

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    IMG_2585.jpeg

    If that wasn't so pathetic we'd have to use a different description, like deplorable or pitiable or, dare I say, Brownian. Brownian motion is the random motion of particles suspended in a medium. Yeah, that's just about right.?

    @texasag1969 said:

    If that wasn't so pathetic we'd have to use a different description, like deplorable or pitiable or, dare I say, Brownian. Brownian motion is the random motion of particles suspended in a medium. Yeah, that's just about right.?

    I can accept Brownian. We may not win things, but at least we have our own adjective. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    If that wasn't so pathetic we'd have to use a different description, like deplorable or pitiable or, dare I say, Brownian. Brownian motion is the random motion of particles suspended in a medium. Yeah, that's just about right.?

    I can accept Brownian. We may not win things, but at least we have our own adjective. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    I can accept Brownian. We may not win things, but at least we have our own adjective. 

    Being a Browns fan is becoming the definition of having Team Stockholm Syndrome!

  • This is really good news as Kevin needs to focus on gameday, game management and that's tough to do when trying to call offensive plays.

    Now he can coach 2 series ahead and be ready to make whatever decision he has to, but based on history, I would suggest to him to go full Costanza and do the opposite of whatever his first instinct is. 

    @d-bone said:

    This is really good news as Kevin needs to focus on gameday, game management and that's tough to do when trying to call offensive plays.

    I agree in the sense that the HC being able to concentrate on managing the football game, strategies, the officials, potential replays, etc. is the preferred set up.  But none of that has anything to do with the current problems.   Wyatt Teller playing this week might help fixing part of a problem (if he's football ready)...but of course now we're without our starting QB, so...

  • Good video on speculation on why Dorsey is taking over play-calling, and how difficult it is to evaluate college QBs when it comes to the draft, which the Browns most likely will be doing this coming April. 

  • The call probably came down from Haslam that something needs to change.

    The old AVP love may be Stefanski love, who knows how the dynamic goes really. Stefanski is just trying to turn crap into wine with the current group.

    @bbedward said:

    The call probably came down from Haslam that something needs to change.

    The old AVP love may be Stefanski love, who knows how the dynamic goes really. Stefanski is just trying to turn crap into wine with the current group.

    This reminds me of the old story about wine and sewage.  If you have a barrel of sewage and add a cup of fine wine, do you have a barrel of fine wine?  No, it's still sewage.  If you have a barrel of fine wine and add a cup of sewage, do you have a barrel of fine wine?  Nope, it has become sewage.

    I think we have a situation when a small amount of sewage has filtered in to our wine. I think we can fix that by next season and why I don't think we have a fire sale situation on our hands. 

  • @bbedward said:

    The call probably came down from Haslam that something needs to change.

    The old AVP love may be Stefanski love, who knows how the dynamic goes really. Stefanski is just trying to turn crap into wine with the current group.

    This reminds me of the old story about wine and sewage.  If you have a barrel of sewage and add a cup of fine wine, do you have a barrel of fine wine?  No, it's still sewage.  If you have a barrel of fine wine and add a cup of sewage, do you have a barrel of fine wine?  Nope, it has become sewage.

    I think we have a situation when a small amount of sewage has filtered in to our wine. I think we can fix that by next season and why I don't think we have a fire sale situation on our hands. 

    @ballpeen said:

    I think we have a situation when a small amount of sewage has filtered in to our wine. I think we can fix that by next season and why I don't think we have a fire sale situation on our hands. 

    Second oldest roster and the Browns are going to have to suck it up and stop kicking Watson's cap hit down the road.

    This isn't a quick fix.