Browns Have #2 Overall Draft Pick
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
If a team needs a great corner? Check
If a team needs speed and a scoring threat on the perimeter of their offense? Check
And YES, he'd play both. It's not like he'd play every down on both units; but the roles fitting situations would be significant. The game vrs the Chargers showed the Browns could relentlessly pressure the passer while their corners could mess up the wet dream. Right now that secondary has forfeit written all over it.
On offense? Do you want a veteran QB interested in coming here? He's going to need some toys that put points on the board and improve matchup dynamics. Knowing the Browns are drafting at #2 after a QB most likely goes 1st - he'd help that!
Filling 2 needs with only 1 draft pick is something to consider. If we're gonna go with let the draft fall to you - I wouldn't HATE this choice at all. We have so many needs on this team we follow.
I'm glad to see LT/OT is one of the areas this draft is supposed to be strong at in a year QB is not (meaning mid-round might be advisable for smart shoppers). Monkey wrench: is Jimmy a smart shopper when it comes to QB?
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
I think he can upgrade Moore in a place his size would be fine.
As for size, if we played Carter at LDE over RTs - Tia brought up a concern that he's only 250 lbs in a discussion we were talking about Carter's shoulder injury.
-
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
I think he can upgrade Moore in a place his size would be fine.
As for size, if we played Carter at LDE over RTs - Tia brought up a concern that he's only 250 lbs in a discussion we were talking about Carter's shoulder injury.
-
Agreed, injury history in college needs to be taken into account.
While we're looking at Abdul, I have to ask how he fits into the defense as a full time player. He's around 250lbs in-season, which can be a bit light for playing edge 4 man fronts. He isn't all that much bigger than Ogbo who has struggled when teams run right at him.
Begs the question, are we going to be mixing in more odd fronts and blended gap schemes to help keep him clean(er) on the edge? Is it possible to use him similar to how Denver used Von early on - he would play the WILL in their "base" even fronts then play edge in passing situations and sub-packages. That last one opens up even more questions... Can Carter function as an off-ball LB? Does that merit investing potentially a top 5 pick in? Will you get them snaps out of him to make an every down difference in that role?
I know we're big on talent first, THEN fit, but when you start to see stability in a coaching staff, the latter tends to become more important.
Legitimate concerns.
Micah Parsons played LB at Penn St. His final year at Penn St, he was 245.
Legitimate concerns.
Micah Parsons played LB at Penn St. His final year at Penn St, he was 245.
Correct, but much like his time in Dallas, he rotates from an off-ball LB to an edge rusher. This helps to protect him in the running game. One of his largest knocks the last few seasons has been the ground he gave up when McCarthy tried parking him as a full time edge.
-
Legitimate concerns.
Micah Parsons played LB at Penn St. His final year at Penn St, he was 245.
Correct, but much like his time in Dallas, he rotates from an off-ball LB to an edge rusher. This helps to protect him in the running game. One of his largest knocks the last few seasons has been the ground he gave up when McCarthy tried parking him as a full time edge.
Correct, but much like his time in Dallas, he rotates from an off-ball LB to an edge rusher. This helps to protect him in the running game. One of his largest knocks the last few seasons has been the ground he gave up when McCarthy tried parking him as a full time edge.
Aside from that, my guess is Garrett will continue to line up over LTs while the other Edge Rusher/DE/LBer would line up across from run blocking RTs. IMO, this makes Jack Sawyer a better fit at 33 overall. I also think we need to know a lot more about the shoulder injury Carter has. For his sake, I hope it's not anything that will stay with him.
-
Correct, but much like his time in Dallas, he rotates from an off-ball LB to an edge rusher. This helps to protect him in the running game. One of his largest knocks the last few seasons has been the ground he gave up when McCarthy tried parking him as a full time edge.
Aside from that, my guess is Garrett will continue to line up over LTs while the other Edge Rusher/DE/LBer would line up across from run blocking RTs. IMO, this makes Jack Sawyer a better fit at 33 overall. I also think we need to know a lot more about the shoulder injury Carter has. For his sake, I hope it's not anything that will stay with him.
Aside from that, my guess is Garrett will continue to line up over LTs while the other Edge Rusher/DE/LBer would line up across from run blocking RTs. IMO, this makes Jack Sawyer a better fit at 33 overall. I also think we need to know a lot more about the shoulder injury Carter has. For his sake, I hope it's not anything that will stay with him.
You might be shocked at the amount of times Myles flips sides by the numbers. I know I was. That doesn't appear to be much of an area he and Schwartz have an issue being flexible in.
I love me some captain Jack, but I have questions about his skills translating to the NFL as a top 50 pick.
-
Aside from that, my guess is Garrett will continue to line up over LTs while the other Edge Rusher/DE/LBer would line up across from run blocking RTs. IMO, this makes Jack Sawyer a better fit at 33 overall. I also think we need to know a lot more about the shoulder injury Carter has. For his sake, I hope it's not anything that will stay with him.
You might be shocked at the amount of times Myles flips sides by the numbers. I know I was. That doesn't appear to be much of an area he and Schwartz have an issue being flexible in.
I love me some captain Jack, but I have questions about his skills translating to the NFL as a top 50 pick.
You might be shocked at the amount of times Myles flips sides by the numbers. I know I was. That doesn't appear to be much of an area he and Schwartz have an issue being flexible in.
I love me some captain Jack, but I have questions about his skills translating to the NFL as a top 50 pick.
Are you discounting his blue-collar work ethic, high intelligence and high character? ?
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
Hunter is amazing - he'd be a great pick. With this qb class, don't be surprised if Hunter goes #1. He's that special, and this qb class isn't.
A trade down still seems likely to me.
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
Hunter is amazing - he'd be a great pick. With this qb class, don't be surprised if Hunter goes #1. He's that special, and this qb class isn't.
A trade down still seems likely to me.
Hunter is amazing - he'd be a great pick. With this qb class, don't be surprised if Hunter goes #1. He's that special, and this qb class isn't.
A trade down still seems likely to me.
I think unless you trade down to #3 for a QB needy NY Giants, we'd better take him right where we are. He won't stay past #3 IMO.
-
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
If a team needs a great corner? Check
If a team needs speed and a scoring threat on the perimeter of their offense? Check
And YES, he'd play both. It's not like he'd play every down on both units; but the roles fitting situations would be significant. The game vrs the Chargers showed the Browns could relentlessly pressure the passer while their corners could mess up the wet dream. Right now that secondary has forfeit written all over it.
On offense? Do you want a veteran QB interested in coming here? He's going to need some toys that put points on the board and improve matchup dynamics. Knowing the Browns are drafting at #2 after a QB most likely goes 1st - he'd help that!
Filling 2 needs with only 1 draft pick is something to consider. If we're gonna go with let the draft fall to you - I wouldn't HATE this choice at all. We have so many needs on this team we follow.
I'm glad to see LT/OT is one of the areas this draft is supposed to be strong at in a year QB is not (meaning mid-round might be advisable for smart shoppers). Monkey wrench: is Jimmy a smart shopper when it comes to QB?
And YES, he'd play both. It's not like he'd play every down on both units; but the roles fitting situations would be significant.
This just sounds so sexy to me. In games where we need weapons on offense, he'd (potentially) be an asset as #2 wide, or in the slot. We already have a lockdown corner in Ward, when he is on the field. We also know he is not gonna be on the field regularly. Enter Hunter. That kind of Swiss army knife ability is unheard of in today's game.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
To give some perspective: you will find me advocating for a tear down if the DW swing for the fences goes awry, which it has. I still wouldn't have any problem with that, and trade our biggest assets for an insane haul of picks. That would include this year's #2.
That not being the case, as it seems, Hunter ticks a lot of boxes on both sides. He's Moneyball without rolling the dice. Easy high value pick.
-
As much as I enjoy theorizing about Madden-esque trading down, isnt Hunter the obvious choice? Generational two-way talent, that fulfills needs at both sides of the ball. I think most agree that you don't solve our QB situation with this years' draft. Sign Cousins, or get Flacco backo as a placeholder.
A good deal of our formerly vaunted O-line is old and in decline, so investing a deal bit of our other draft assets on overhauling that seems like a good investment.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once.
DB's can only cover receivers for so long. Rushing the QB makes your DB's seem better.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
Mel Kiper projects blue chip player to land with Browns in NFL draft
...so who does he predict for us at this point?
-
And YES, he'd play both. It's not like he'd play every down on both units; but the roles fitting situations would be significant.
This just sounds so sexy to me. In games where we need weapons on offense, he'd (potentially) be an asset as #2 wide, or in the slot. We already have a lockdown corner in Ward, when he is on the field. We also know he is not gonna be on the field regularly. Enter Hunter. That kind of Swiss army knife ability is unheard of in today's game.
He definitely fills a need at corner, I have my doubts how much he'll be used at WR too in the NFL honestly. I know he's listed at 6'1 and 185lbs, but he is kind of a thin guy. That or maybe I doubt the Browns could actually figure out how to pull it off...
I wouldn't have a problem with the Browns taking Hunter at #2 at all, but I'd probably still go with Carter to give Myles an honest to dog bookend DE with pass rushing ability for once. I'd be fine with trading down out of #2 and taking CB Will Johnson too, and getting more draft capital for next year's (hopefully) better QB class.
To give some perspective: you will find me advocating for a tear down if the DW swing for the fences goes awry, which it has. I still wouldn't have any problem with that, and trade our biggest assets for an insane haul of picks. That would include this year's #2.
That not being the case, as it seems, Hunter ticks a lot of boxes on both sides. He's Moneyball without rolling the dice. Easy high value pick.
This just sounds so sexy to me. In games where we need weapons on offense, he'd (potentially) be an asset as #2 wide, or in the slot. We already have a lockdown corner in Ward, when he is on the field. We also know he is not gonna be on the field regularly. Enter Hunter. That kind of Swiss army knife ability is unheard of in today's game.
To give some perspective: you will find me advocating for a tear down if the DW swing for the fences goes awry, which it has. I still wouldn't have any problem with that, and trade our biggest assets for an insane haul of picks. That would include this year's #2.
That not being the case, as it seems, Hunter ticks a lot of boxes on both sides. He's Moneyball without rolling the dice. Easy high value pick.
This is my thinking, if he’s there at 2 you take the “generational talent”, kinda like the Myles Garrett draft.
My guess is they’d only want him on offense or defense at the start. That’s gotta be a tough gig to learn both the offense and defensive playbooks as a rookie so they’ll likely have him focus on one or the other, and depending on how that goes he might get some Swiss army opportunities.
-
If there's one OSU player I could veto it'd be Sawyer
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
This just sounds so sexy to me. In games where we need weapons on offense, he'd (potentially) be an asset as #2 wide, or in the slot. We already have a lockdown corner in Ward, when he is on the field. We also know he is not gonna be on the field regularly. Enter Hunter. That kind of Swiss army knife ability is unheard of in today's game.
To give some perspective: you will find me advocating for a tear down if the DW swing for the fences goes awry, which it has. I still wouldn't have any problem with that, and trade our biggest assets for an insane haul of picks. That would include this year's #2.
That not being the case, as it seems, Hunter ticks a lot of boxes on both sides. He's Moneyball without rolling the dice. Easy high value pick.
This is my thinking, if he’s there at 2 you take the “generational talent”, kinda like the Myles Garrett draft.
My guess is they’d only want him on offense or defense at the start. That’s gotta be a tough gig to learn both the offense and defensive playbooks as a rookie so they’ll likely have him focus on one or the other, and depending on how that goes he might get some Swiss army opportunities.
This is my thinking, if he’s there at 2 you take the “generational talent”, kinda like the Myles Garrett draft.
My guess is they’d only want him on offense or defense at the start. That’s gotta be a tough gig to learn both the offense and defensive playbooks as a rookie so they’ll likely have him focus on one or the other, and depending on how that goes he might get some Swiss army opportunities.
BINGO on the 1st line above. The rest seems pretty sensible.
If we look at this team, before Cedric Tilman got a concussion that was so long it had tenure - he and Jerry Jeudy were looking like a very bright future for our young WR Corps. I'm still not all that warm and fuzzy with Eli Moore (and that's where I see some ideal opportunity for a situational role for Hunter to get his feet wet). Just give him a little bit at a time. He's probably going to be running a lot of the same routes he's run throughout most of his prior experience anyway - the only thing that may change is the language/terminology/number system.
Bigger need by a country mile or 2 is our situation with our two 1st round Corners. When Ward doesn't have a concussion or injury - he's as good as it gets. Greg Newsome is a bullseye for opposing passing games - a weakness that won't go away. This is where I see a bigger sudden impact for Hunter - replacing Newsome. Then Newsome can compete with his former Northwestern teammate Cam Mitchell for a reps against the slot receivers. If Ward gets injured we either move Newsome or Mitchell back to the opening -or- stick Emerson back out there putting his hands all over the WR like it's a naked and horny Carrie Underwood... Talk about "Jesus Take the Wheel."
-
If there's one OSU player I could veto it'd be Sawyer
At #2 overall? Even Ohio State fans that appreciate the guy big time don't want him that early. I could see him going somewhere in round 2. Even if he goes Mike Mamula on his 40 time that isn't getting him to #2. He'll probably fall to the Ratbirds somewhere sensible since Van Noy is heading into his mid 30s.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login