Skip to content

Conservatives, the new DEI hire

Political Discussion
56 10 955 1
  • JaxJ Jax

    I can't speak for Cysko but you know the main difference here is Cysko isn't following a directive, a policy?

    He's just an individual following his own rules and whatever.

    DEI is a policy set to discriminate.

    @jax said:

    I can't speak for Cysko but you know the main difference here is Cysko isn't following a directive, a policy?

    He's just an individual following his own rules and whatever.

    DEI is a policy set to discriminate.

    Riiiiiight. 

    And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

    At the end of the day, like most things the right gets you all to react to, there's a difference between reality and the fearmongering propaganda you're fed. You've made up your mind on what DEI is and what it means, in a way that aligns with your already held beliefs, and nothing is changing that. It's clear based on what you post here you and others are too far down that rabbit hole and I'm not gonna change your mind. So I'll just point out the hypocrisy as I see it. 

    But you can continue to live in the fantasy world where DEI is the only thing preventing a meritocracy in our country. Where every straight, white male in a position of power is completely based on merit. Where every underrepresented minority in a position of power that you don't like is only there because of the vague, mysterious DEI. Also woke and trans and whatever over words are triggering you. 

  • @jax said:

    I can't speak for Cysko but you know the main difference here is Cysko isn't following a directive, a policy?

    He's just an individual following his own rules and whatever.

    DEI is a policy set to discriminate.

    Riiiiiight. 

    And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

    At the end of the day, like most things the right gets you all to react to, there's a difference between reality and the fearmongering propaganda you're fed. You've made up your mind on what DEI is and what it means, in a way that aligns with your already held beliefs, and nothing is changing that. It's clear based on what you post here you and others are too far down that rabbit hole and I'm not gonna change your mind. So I'll just point out the hypocrisy as I see it. 

    But you can continue to live in the fantasy world where DEI is the only thing preventing a meritocracy in our country. Where every straight, white male in a position of power is completely based on merit. Where every underrepresented minority in a position of power that you don't like is only there because of the vague, mysterious DEI. Also woke and trans and whatever over words are triggering you. 

    @mld-woody said:

    And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

    Well, that's called DEI already.

  • but Woodpecker has his own definitions for words, that way he feels like

    he has a point, other than his beak.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

    Well, that's called DEI already.

    @jax said:

    Well, that's called DEI already.

    You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

    Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

  • but Woodpecker has his own definitions for words, that way he feels like

    he has a point, other than his beak.

    @calfoxwc said:

    but Woodpecker has his own definitions for words, that way he feels like

    he has a point, other than his beak.

    I literally used the definition Jax provided, you senile old man

  • @calfoxwc said:

    but Woodpecker has his own definitions for words, that way he feels like

    he has a point, other than his beak.

    I literally used the definition Jax provided, you senile old man

    @mld-woody said:

    peck peck *fart* peck peck

    and misinterpret it to your own bias. It's all you can do, I guess.

    You're a moron.

  • @jax said:

    Well, that's called DEI already.

    You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

    Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

    Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

    Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

    @jax said:

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

    Surely he/she/bird has no idea. The bird admits he wants the forum shut down, it seems that the whole bunch of posts are designed to raise hell, so the bird can whine about being a "victim".

    It's what leftwing birdbrains do.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

    Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

    @jax said:

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

    You're either really that stupid or you're being purposely dense to avoid the topic (you getting called out by your own definition). 

    Either way seems like a big waste of my time at this point. 

  • @jax said:

    What in the hell are you babbling about now?

    You're either really that stupid or you're being purposely dense to avoid the topic (you getting called out by your own definition). 

    Either way seems like a big waste of my time at this point. 

    @mld-woody said:

    peck peck *fart* peck peck

       your phony grandiose claims are infantile. You need to grow up, if that's possible.