Skip to content

So, man made global warmng- "ice caps are melting! we are all goin to die..." again, NONSENSE

Political Discussion
137 9 2.2k 2
  • I can't view the article as I am not a Red State VIP but I'm sure it's a lot of the same BS you always spew

    @mld-woody said:

    whine fake news

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

  • @mld-woody said:

    whine fake news

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    @calfoxwc said:

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    @mld-woody said:

    *fart* bitch whine lie moan peck peck peck

    I have never paid any site to belong to it. You nave never once debunked anything other than some guy I posted about, with a lot of other links, apparently not being a scientist or something.

        You are belligerently screwed up. Your stupid wisecracks never prove any point. Shove it up your beak already.

    You have been wrong in nearly every single discussion for years.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    You haven't debunked a goddamn thing in your life Jr...

  • @mld-woody said:

    whine fake news

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    @calfoxwc said:

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    Redstate has gone the subscription route. I can’t read the article either. It’s not a big deal, but it does mean you’ll have to copy/paste their articles if you reasonably expect anyone to read them.

    I subscribe to The Athletic, a subscription based sports news outlet. From time to time l’ll post some of their stuff on the main board and l have to do the same thing: copy and paste. It’s unreasonable of me to expect y’all to buy subscriptions.

    Unless you can’t copy and paste it because you can’t read it yourself. That would be hilarious if so. 

  • @mld-woody said:

    *fart* bitch whine lie moan peck peck peck

    I have never paid any site to belong to it. You nave never once debunked anything other than some guy I posted about, with a lot of other links, apparently not being a scientist or something.

        You are belligerently screwed up. Your stupid wisecracks never prove any point. Shove it up your beak already.

    You have been wrong in nearly every single discussion for years.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I have never paid any site to belong to it. You nave never once debunked anything other than some guy I posted about, with a lot of other links, apparently not being a scientist or something.

        You are belligerently screwed up. Your stupid wisecracks never prove any point. Shove it up your beak already.

    You have been wrong in nearly every single discussion for years.

    We know you don't read all of the articles you post when you throw your little tantrums 

    We also know, further confirmed above, that you don't read, or at least understand, my and other user's posts. 

    If you think nothing you've ever posted about "mmgw" has ever been debunked on here you are living in an alternate reality or the dementia is hitting quick. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    I have never paid any site to belong to it. You nave never once debunked anything other than some guy I posted about, with a lot of other links, apparently not being a scientist or something.

        You are belligerently screwed up. Your stupid wisecracks never prove any point. Shove it up your beak already.

    You have been wrong in nearly every single discussion for years.

    We know you don't read all of the articles you post when you throw your little tantrums 

    We also know, further confirmed above, that you don't read, or at least understand, my and other user's posts. 

    If you think nothing you've ever posted about "mmgw" has ever been debunked on here you are living in an alternate reality or the dementia is hitting quick. 

    @mld-woody said:

    *fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck

       More lies, more insults blah blah blah. I had no idea they were charging now. I guess that means I'll refer to other sites. You don't have the feathers to be honest about anything, and you are wrong about most of your garbage, You've never debunked anything - you just insult and argue nonsense, then claim you won. That's really disingenuous. And you are stinking up this forum, apparently with glee. The ghost of all your ignorant slurs and asinine take on issues is staring you in the beak.

     image.gif.9b6c32df882019a954cb65fc948634c0.gif

  • @mld-woody said:

    *fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck*fart* peck

       More lies, more insults blah blah blah. I had no idea they were charging now. I guess that means I'll refer to other sites. You don't have the feathers to be honest about anything, and you are wrong about most of your garbage, You've never debunked anything - you just insult and argue nonsense, then claim you won. That's really disingenuous. And you are stinking up this forum, apparently with glee. The ghost of all your ignorant slurs and asinine take on issues is staring you in the beak.

     image.gif.9b6c32df882019a954cb65fc948634c0.gif

    @calfoxwc said:

       More lies, more insults blah blah blah. I had no idea they were charging now. I guess that means I'll refer to other sites. You don't have the feathers to be honest about anything, and you are wrong about most of your garbage, You've never debunked anything - you just insult and argue nonsense, then claim you won. That's really disingenuous. And you are stinking up this forum, apparently with glee. The ghost of all your ignorant slurs and asinine take on issues is staring you in the beak.

     image.gif.9b6c32df882019a954cb65fc948634c0.gif

    Cal, I don't think you understand what a slur is. Just like you don't understand what the word gaslighting means. If you want slurs, look at some of your MAGA buddies. 

    Any unbiased individual with half a brain can look at old climate change threads and it'll be pretty clear from that who is being debunked. 

    You've chosen the political angle on a scientific issue. That's idiotic. 

    With you editing all of my posts it's just reinforcing you don't ,/ can't read any of them. I'm assuming the constant "farts" are more of a cry for help with your own home situation. Losing some control in your old age. Depends doing you a solid,?

  • @calfoxwc said:

       More lies, more insults blah blah blah. I had no idea they were charging now. I guess that means I'll refer to other sites. You don't have the feathers to be honest about anything, and you are wrong about most of your garbage, You've never debunked anything - you just insult and argue nonsense, then claim you won. That's really disingenuous. And you are stinking up this forum, apparently with glee. The ghost of all your ignorant slurs and asinine take on issues is staring you in the beak.

     image.gif.9b6c32df882019a954cb65fc948634c0.gif

    Cal, I don't think you understand what a slur is. Just like you don't understand what the word gaslighting means. If you want slurs, look at some of your MAGA buddies. 

    Any unbiased individual with half a brain can look at old climate change threads and it'll be pretty clear from that who is being debunked. 

    You've chosen the political angle on a scientific issue. That's idiotic. 

    With you editing all of my posts it's just reinforcing you don't ,/ can't read any of them. I'm assuming the constant "farts" are more of a cry for help with your own home situation. Losing some control in your old age. Depends doing you a solid,?

    @mld-woody said:

    (crap more crap)

    no, that stuff was never debunked. You just bitches, slurred and whined, then said you debunked.

    That doesn't work, birdie. I'm guess that on one else on this forum will disagree with this definition and applicability of the word "slur" to your posts.

    "

    slur /slûr/
     

    transitive verb

    1. To pronounce indistinctly.
    2. To talk about disparagingly or insultingly.
    3. To pass over lightly or carelessly; treat without due consideration.

    **************************

    and....

    "Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation where one person causes another to doubt their own perceptions, memories, or reality, often leading to confusion and a loss of self-esteem. It typically occurs in relationships where there is an imbalance of power, and the manipulator seeks to control the victim's sense of self."

        So, you argue complete belligerent nonsense, and talk about your being a mod, inferring you want to use your mod powers to screw with people but you aren't allowed to, (see whoreta who has done that far more), and you make belligerent arguments while ignoring anyone else's sources or opinions that tend to justify their points.

    Yes, you slur and gaslight, albeit the term "gaslighting" is a bit strong for your weak bird crap. Let's say you TRY to gaslight, but the rest of us don't fall for it because we are grown up human beings, and you are so screwed up on gender and reality, you can't even say poor Laken Riley's name ONCE.

  • @calfoxwc said:

       More lies, more insults blah blah blah. I had no idea they were charging now. I guess that means I'll refer to other sites. You don't have the feathers to be honest about anything, and you are wrong about most of your garbage, You've never debunked anything - you just insult and argue nonsense, then claim you won. That's really disingenuous. And you are stinking up this forum, apparently with glee. The ghost of all your ignorant slurs and asinine take on issues is staring you in the beak.

     image.gif.9b6c32df882019a954cb65fc948634c0.gif

    Cal, I don't think you understand what a slur is. Just like you don't understand what the word gaslighting means. If you want slurs, look at some of your MAGA buddies. 

    Any unbiased individual with half a brain can look at old climate change threads and it'll be pretty clear from that who is being debunked. 

    You've chosen the political angle on a scientific issue. That's idiotic. 

    With you editing all of my posts it's just reinforcing you don't ,/ can't read any of them. I'm assuming the constant "farts" are more of a cry for help with your own home situation. Losing some control in your old age. Depends doing you a solid,?

    @mld-woody said:

    If you want slurs, look at some of your MAGA buddies. 

    Or he can check out the slurs used by the Libtards.

  • @mld-woody said:

    If you want slurs, look at some of your MAGA buddies. 

    Or he can check out the slurs used by the Libtards.

    @canton-dawg said:

    Or he can check out the slurs used by the Libtards.

    I never had a problem with woodpecker until he started slurring people, ridiculing God and anyone who was a Christian, and ridiculing the story about how I nearly died when I was a kid, etc etc.

        Being hostile to other's opinions and slurring others floats his nest I guess.

  • I think he's just jealous he doesn't have any buddies.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Or he can check out the slurs used by the Libtards.

    I never had a problem with woodpecker until he started slurring people, ridiculing God and anyone who was a Christian, and ridiculing the story about how I nearly died when I was a kid, etc etc.

        Being hostile to other's opinions and slurring others floats his nest I guess.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I never had a problem with woodpecker until he started slurring people, ridiculing God and anyone who was a Christian, and ridiculing the story about how I nearly died when I was a kid, etc etc.

        Being hostile to other's opinions and slurring others floats his nest I guess.

    No need to get wound up. Can you kindly cut and paste the Redstate article? I would like to read it.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Or he can check out the slurs used by the Libtards.

    I never had a problem with woodpecker until he started slurring people, ridiculing God and anyone who was a Christian, and ridiculing the story about how I nearly died when I was a kid, etc etc.

        Being hostile to other's opinions and slurring others floats his nest I guess.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I never had a problem with woodpecker until he started slurring people, ridiculing God and anyone who was a Christian, and ridiculing the story about how I nearly died when I was a kid, etc etc.

        Being hostile to other's opinions and slurring others floats his nest I guess.

    Hahahahahaha

    Holy shit your level of hypocrisy hits new levels each day

    Or you just legitimately are losing your memory / grip on reality 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    so become one. Stop with the excuses already.

    "oh, gosh, I can't see where I am totally wrong - I'm not a member - my hamster ate my homework"

    lol

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story. 

    It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
     A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but perhaps pushed back to latter pages in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda. 
    https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/

  • @mld-woody said:

    Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?

    Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk. 

    What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story. 

    It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
     A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but perhaps pushed back to latter pages in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda. 
    https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/

    @fy56 said:

    What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story. 

    It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
     A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but rather ignored probably in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda.
    https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/

    I’m positive Pecker will find something wrong with your source.

    Usually it’s, they’re funded by BIG OIL companies.

  • Btw Woody, propaganda is not always about lies, half truths or misleading information.

    It can be factual.

    It’s intent is to influence or sway public opinion to your ideology or cause whether factual or not.

  • @fy56 said:

    What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story. 

    It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
     A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but rather ignored probably in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda.
    https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/

    I’m positive Pecker will find something wrong with your source.

    Usually it’s, they’re funded by BIG OIL companies.

    @canton-dawg said:

    I’m positive Pecker will find something wrong with your source.

    Usually it’s, they’re funded by BIG OIL companies.

    Yeah it’s possible. I did a quick search on them and they appear untainted.

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/science-daily/

    ScienceDaily is best known for showcasing the top science news stories from the world's leading universities and research organizations…. Universities

    have come to rely on ScienceDaily to spread news about their scientists' findings to a wider ScienceDaily is best known for showcasing the top science news stories from the world's leading universities and research organizations…. Universities have come to rely on ScienceDaily to spread news about their scientists' findings to a wider audience.

  • Here is one on the ARCTIC.

    What was it? the polar caps were going to melt and Florida, much of America's coast would be flooded by....

    https://climatechangedispatch.com/scientists-affirm-no-the-arctic-is-not-melting-nothing-has-changed-since-1900/

    Scientists Affirm: ‘No, The Arctic Is Not Melting’ … ‘Nothing Has Changed Since 1900’

  • here's some climate suet for the woodpecker:

    While stories like the one below should not dismiss an intelligent discussion about the environmental challenges we face today, this 1989 report does raise legitimate questions about the apocalyptic and absolute predictions promoted by many who support a similar narrative in 2019. From a June 29, 1989, Associated