So, man made global warmng- "ice caps are melting! we are all goin to die..." again, NONSENSE
-
-
gulfcoastcommentary.blogspot.com
None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. ... More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science. ... 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s ... -
theheartysoul.com
Apr 17, 2025Earth Day highlights past environmental predictions that didn't come true, reminding us of the power of action over fear. ... April 17, 2025 . AI-assisted. How 18 Earth Day Predictions from 1970 Failed to Stand the Test of Time . Earth Day began in 1970 as a call to action for environmental protection. ... Coastal -
-
justfactsdaily.com
In 1992, Al Gore claimed that "up to 60% of the present population of Florida may have to be relocated" "not long after" the "next few decades" "because of the rising sea level, due to global warming." Since then, the coastal population of Florida grew by 61%. The examples above are just a few among dozens of such failed ...
-
Why, not only will Florida be flooded over by many years ago, they will have suffered a drinking water shortage years ago, too !
This anomaly is know scientifically as "debunkit woodpeckerie".....
-
-
1977 John Wroe, who is described by the kindliest historian we can find as a "foul-mouthed, ugly, dirty lecher," in 1823 inherited the leadership of the Southcottian sect in England when an End-of ...
-
The study found global warming would cause massive sea level rise, flooding of major cities such as New York and enormous super storms. But that's not the first time Hansen made dire sea level rise predictions. In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked Hansen what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in the -
-
-
1977 John Wroe, who is described by the kindliest historian we can find as a "foul-mouthed, ugly, dirty lecher," in 1823 inherited the leadership of the Southcottian sect in England when an End-of ...
-
The study found global warming would cause massive sea level rise, flooding of major cities such as New York and enormous super storms. But that's not the first time Hansen made dire sea level rise predictions. In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked Hansen what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in the-
1977 John Wroe, who is described by the kindliest historian we can find as a "foul-mouthed, ugly, dirty lecher," in 1823 inherited the leadership of the Southcottian sect in England when an End-of ...
-
The study found global warming would cause massive sea level rise, flooding of major cities such as New York and enormous super storms. But that's not the first time Hansen made dire sea level rise predictions. In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked Hansen what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in theThat’s a 7 spot of link vomiting. manic meltdown! Woot!
I’m interested in the Redstate article in the OP. I figured you shared it for a reason but none of us can read it. Help us out Calf!
I’m starting to think you can’t read it yourself. That’s pretty funny if that’s the case. It’s easy enough to disprove that with a little cut and paste job…if you can!
-
-
Btw Woody, propaganda is not always about lies, half truths or misleading information.
It can be factual.
It’s intent is to influence or sway public opinion to your ideology or cause whether factual or not.
Btw Woody, propaganda is not always about lies, half truths or misleading information.
It can be factual.
It’s intent is to influence or sway public opinion to your ideology or cause whether factual or not.
I'm quite acquainted with propaganda and the many approaches given the nonsense that gets posted here
-
What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story.
It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but rather ignored probably in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda.
https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/I’m positive Pecker will find something wrong with your source.
Usually it’s, they’re funded by BIG OIL companies.
I’m positive Pecker will find something wrong with your source.
Usually it’s, they’re funded by BIG OIL companies.
Yeah.... Imagine that...
-
-
1977 John Wroe, who is described by the kindliest historian we can find as a "foul-mouthed, ugly, dirty lecher," in 1823 inherited the leadership of the Southcottian sect in England when an End-of ...
-
The study found global warming would cause massive sea level rise, flooding of major cities such as New York and enormous super storms. But that's not the first time Hansen made dire sea level rise predictions. In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked Hansen what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in theThat’s a 7 spot of link vomiting. manic meltdown! Woot!
I’m interested in the Redstate article in the OP. I figured you shared it for a reason but none of us can read it. Help us out Calf!
I’m starting to think you can’t read it yourself. That’s pretty funny if that’s the case. It’s easy enough to disprove that with a little cut and paste job…if you can!
That’s a 7 spot of link vomiting. manic meltdown! Woot!
I’m interested in the Redstate article in the OP. I figured you shared it for a reason but none of us can read it. Help us out Calf!
I’m starting to think you can’t read it yourself. That’s pretty funny if that’s the case. It’s easy enough to disprove that with a little cut and paste job…if you can!
I think Cal is on their payroll, given he posts every article they post here
But if you told me he only read the headline, got mad, and then rage posted here, I wouldn't be surprised
-
-
But yes, a typical Cal tantrum of Google search link vomit. And you can guarantee he didn't read them all
Actually, this theory of Cal only ever reading headlines makes a lot of sense
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Why in the ever loving fuck would I give Red State, a cesspool of right wing propaganda, any of my money?
Literally everything you've ever posted on climate change I've debunked on this board. The truth stretching, misinterpreting, lying, etc were called out. I'm sure this would be no different. So if you can share whatever is in that article, lmk.
What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story.
It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but perhaps pushed back to latter pages in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda.
https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/What I like to try to do is look for another source to validate the Red State story.
It should have been simple, but it took 3 pages.
A discovery this eye opening should have been 1st page news, but perhaps pushed back to latter pages in order to keep folks like you in line with the climate change agenda.
https://scitechdaily.com/antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades/Just to be clear, this article is referencing the same study that the Red State article was? I can look into it later
(Based on that URL, this has absolutely already come up here before too)
-
But yes, a typical Cal tantrum of Google search link vomit. And you can guarantee he didn't read them all
Actually, this theory of Cal only ever reading headlines makes a lot of sense
But yes, a typical Cal tantrum of Google search link vomit. And you can guarantee he didn't read them all
Actually, this theory of Cal only ever reading headlines makes a lot of sense
I’m convinced that’s what’s happening. I don’t think anyone here has access to Redstate articles, including Calf. He woulda copy/pasted it if so.
-
So, Florida will get FLOODED !!!! and have a WATER SHORTAGE !!! BE SCARED VOTE DEMOCOMMIE !!!lol***************************Sep 14, 2024According to the report, Florida could experience a water supply shortage as early as next year (2025) and it is expected to increase in severity through 2040.
-
So, Florida will get FLOODED !!!! and have a WATER SHORTAGE !!! BE SCARED VOTE DEMOCOMMIE !!!lol***************************Sep 14, 2024According to the report, Florida could experience a water supply shortage as early as next year (2025) and it is expected to increase in severity through 2040.So, Florida will get FLOODED !!!! and have a WATER SHORTAGE !!! BE SCARED VOTE DEMOCOMMIE !!!lol***************************Sep 14, 2024According to the report, Florida could experience a water supply shortage as early as next year (2025) and it is expected to increase in severity through 2040.
I’ll read that right after l read the Redstate article in the OP, right after you paste it for us non-subscribers.
But l don’t think you can because l don’t think you have access to it yourself. Feel free to prove me wrong.
-
But yes, a typical Cal tantrum of Google search link vomit. And you can guarantee he didn't read them all
Actually, this theory of Cal only ever reading headlines makes a lot of sense
I’m convinced that’s what’s happening. I don’t think anyone here has access to Redstate articles, including Calf. He woulda copy/pasted it if so.
I’m convinced that’s what’s happening. I don’t think anyone here has access to Redstate articles, including Calf. He woulda copy/pasted it if so.
It's a great theory. Bravo to you sir
-
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Now, this is an issue that's a tad more complex than just the amount of ice. It's also true that a slightly warmer climate in extremely cold places like Antarctica (and Alaska) can actually increase snowfall, from whence the ice comes. Look at records of temperature and snowfall, and you'll find that snow is generally observed at more moderate temperatures; the really extreme temps, minus 20 and lower, are often found on clear days when there is no insulating blanket of cloud.
But that's not the point. The point is that facts don't really matter to climate scolds. As Issues & Insights points out:
While this is an issue that, at least, can be observed - Antarctica's glaciers are really big and we can measure them - too many of the failed predictions on which the climate scolds base their arguments are not observable or measurable. Why? Because they rely too heavily on garbage-in, garbage-out computer models.
We understand the weather enough to look at patterns and predict the weather 7-10 days out. But climate is a different story, as it is generally accepted that climate works on longer time scales, from tens to hundreds of thousands, millions, and even billions of years.
Climate is also a vast, utterly chaotic system. Deriving computer models to predict long-term climate changes is much like deriving computer models to replace animal testing in pharmaceutical development; the best computer models humans can produce are laughably crude compared to the natural phenomena they attempt to model.
So, “put not thy trust in princes,” or in politicians, nor guys in white lab coats pushing a political agenda, and especially not in loudmouthed, Hamas-supporting Swedish teenagers. They’re pushing an agenda, and it will not work out in your favor; meanwhile, regardless of what people do, the Earth will keep ticking along, following the old feedback loops and patterns it has followed for four and a half billion years now, regardless of what we tiny little humans do. And when we look at actual measurements - actual facts - we find, with routine assurance, that the reality is generally the opposite of what the climate scolds claim.
Here is the article copy and pasted.?
-
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Our southernmost continent is, we’ve been told, the suffocating canary in the global coal mine. The more ice loss in Antarctica, the greater trouble we’re in. So what do we make of a study which found that between 2021 and 2023, there was a record-breaking increase in the Antarctic Ice Sheet?
We mark it down as another in a long line of misses from the global warming zealots.
“Notably, four major glaciers in the Wilkes Land–Queen Mary Land region of East Antarctica reversed their previous pattern of accelerated mass loss from 2011 to 2020 and instead showed significant mass gain during the 2021 to 2023 period,” says an article in SciTechDaily summarizing the report from Tongji University researchers.
How could such an unanticipated event happen?
“The study points to anomalous precipitation as the primary driver, suggesting that natural variability plays a significant role in short-term ice sheet changes,” says climate site Watts Up With That? It also “underscores the complexity of Antarctica’s ice system and the pitfalls of oversimplified climate narratives.”
Forgot to insert this
-
another false claim by a woodpecker or a squirrel.
They say stupid crap then say "prove me wrong" then they refuse to read the proof and.....
It never ends with the left.
I do see "VIP" on the sites I open. I guess I was grandfathered in before they started charging ?
I have never paid for any site, that would be silly.
********************************************
Another Study Confirms: Antarctica Isn't Melting
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
Hamish Pritchard/British Antarctic Survey via AP"Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today." -
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Now, this is an issue that's a tad more complex than just the amount of ice. It's also true that a slightly warmer climate in extremely cold places like Antarctica (and Alaska) can actually increase snowfall, from whence the ice comes. Look at records of temperature and snowfall, and you'll find that snow is generally observed at more moderate temperatures; the really extreme temps, minus 20 and lower, are often found on clear days when there is no insulating blanket of cloud.
But that's not the point. The point is that facts don't really matter to climate scolds. As Issues & Insights points out:
While this is an issue that, at least, can be observed - Antarctica's glaciers are really big and we can measure them - too many of the failed predictions on which the climate scolds base their arguments are not observable or measurable. Why? Because they rely too heavily on garbage-in, garbage-out computer models.
We understand the weather enough to look at patterns and predict the weather 7-10 days out. But climate is a different story, as it is generally accepted that climate works on longer time scales, from tens to hundreds of thousands, millions, and even billions of years.
Climate is also a vast, utterly chaotic system. Deriving computer models to predict long-term climate changes is much like deriving computer models to replace animal testing in pharmaceutical development; the best computer models humans can produce are laughably crude compared to the natural phenomena they attempt to model.
So, “put not thy trust in princes,” or in politicians, nor guys in white lab coats pushing a political agenda, and especially not in loudmouthed, Hamas-supporting Swedish teenagers. They’re pushing an agenda, and it will not work out in your favor; meanwhile, regardless of what people do, the Earth will keep ticking along, following the old feedback loops and patterns it has followed for four and a half billion years now, regardless of what we tiny little humans do. And when we look at actual measurements - actual facts - we find, with routine assurance, that the reality is generally the opposite of what the climate scolds claim.
Here is the article copy and pasted.?
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Now, this is an issue that's a tad more complex than just the amount of ice. It's also true that a slightly warmer climate in extremely cold places like Antarctica (and Alaska) can actually increase snowfall, from whence the ice comes. Look at records of temperature and snowfall, and you'll find that snow is generally observed at more moderate temperatures; the really extreme temps, minus 20 and lower, are often found on clear days when there is no insulating blanket of cloud.
But that's not the point. The point is that facts don't really matter to climate scolds. As Issues & Insights points out:
While this is an issue that, at least, can be observed - Antarctica's glaciers are really big and we can measure them - too many of the failed predictions on which the climate scolds base their arguments are not observable or measurable. Why? Because they rely too heavily on garbage-in, garbage-out computer models.
We understand the weather enough to look at patterns and predict the weather 7-10 days out. But climate is a different story, as it is generally accepted that climate works on longer time scales, from tens to hundreds of thousands, millions, and even billions of years.
Climate is also a vast, utterly chaotic system. Deriving computer models to predict long-term climate changes is much like deriving computer models to replace animal testing in pharmaceutical development; the best computer models humans can produce are laughably crude compared to the natural phenomena they attempt to model.
So, “put not thy trust in princes,” or in politicians, nor guys in white lab coats pushing a political agenda, and especially not in loudmouthed, Hamas-supporting Swedish teenagers. They’re pushing an agenda, and it will not work out in your favor; meanwhile, regardless of what people do, the Earth will keep ticking along, following the old feedback loops and patterns it has followed for four and a half billion years now, regardless of what we tiny little humans do. And when we look at actual measurements - actual facts - we find, with routine assurance, that the reality is generally the opposite of what the climate scolds claim.
Here is the article copy and pasted.?
You’re a good guy Jax, thanks for sharing. I hope you didn’t incur a cost for this but l assume you did. You may have to be the de facto Redstate guy from now on.
I’ve seen this argument before. 4.5 billion years ago the Earth was a cooling ball of lava with a toxic atmosphere that humans couldn’t exist in, so they obviously had no effect on the very different climate at that time. Can’t really argue with that.
I like that the author uses the word “scolds” as a noun.
-
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Our southernmost continent is, we’ve been told, the suffocating canary in the global coal mine. The more ice loss in Antarctica, the greater trouble we’re in. So what do we make of a study which found that between 2021 and 2023, there was a record-breaking increase in the Antarctic Ice Sheet?
We mark it down as another in a long line of misses from the global warming zealots.
“Notably, four major glaciers in the Wilkes Land–Queen Mary Land region of East Antarctica reversed their previous pattern of accelerated mass loss from 2011 to 2020 and instead showed significant mass gain during the 2021 to 2023 period,” says an article in SciTechDaily summarizing the report from Tongji University researchers.
How could such an unanticipated event happen?
“The study points to anomalous precipitation as the primary driver, suggesting that natural variability plays a significant role in short-term ice sheet changes,” says climate site Watts Up With That? It also “underscores the complexity of Antarctica’s ice system and the pitfalls of oversimplified climate narratives.”
Forgot to insert this
Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today.
Nevertheless, climate scolds love to loudly proclaim, "Antarctica is melting!" The problem is, it just ain't so. We have discussed this problem with the climate scolds' focus on the southern island continent before:
Our southernmost continent is, we’ve been told, the suffocating canary in the global coal mine. The more ice loss in Antarctica, the greater trouble we’re in. So what do we make of a study which found that between 2021 and 2023, there was a record-breaking increase in the Antarctic Ice Sheet?
We mark it down as another in a long line of misses from the global warming zealots.
“Notably, four major glaciers in the Wilkes Land–Queen Mary Land region of East Antarctica reversed their previous pattern of accelerated mass loss from 2011 to 2020 and instead showed significant mass gain during the 2021 to 2023 period,” says an article in SciTechDaily summarizing the report from Tongji University researchers.
How could such an unanticipated event happen?
“The study points to anomalous precipitation as the primary driver, suggesting that natural variability plays a significant role in short-term ice sheet changes,” says climate site Watts Up With That? It also “underscores the complexity of Antarctica’s ice system and the pitfalls of oversimplified climate narratives.”
Forgot to insert this
The whole “growing ice sheets” phenomenon could be interpreted a couple different ways in Antarctica. The phenomenon of global warming has been a thing for a few decades and theoretically we’ve been doing things to mitigate it, so this could be seen as a “see guys, the things we are doing are working!” type thing.
-
another false claim by a woodpecker or a squirrel.
They say stupid crap then say "prove me wrong" then they refuse to read the proof and.....
It never ends with the left.
I do see "VIP" on the sites I open. I guess I was grandfathered in before they started charging ?
I have never paid for any site, that would be silly.
********************************************
Another Study Confirms: Antarctica Isn't Melting
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
Hamish Pritchard/British Antarctic Survey via AP"Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today."another false claim by a woodpecker or a squirrel.
They say stupid crap then say "prove me wrong" then they refuse to read the proof and.....
It never ends with the left.
I do see "VIP" on the sites I open. I guess I was grandfathered in before they started charging ?
I have never paid for any site, that would be silly.
********************************************
Another Study Confirms: Antarctica Isn't Melting
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
Hamish Pritchard/British Antarctic Survey via AP"Antarctica, that icy continent that encompasses the South Pole, has been a source of panic for the climate scolds for years. It was, only a few million years ago, covered in temperate forest. Now it's covered in ice, as the world is a chillier place than it once was. Yes, the planet's climate does change, and through most of Earth's history, it's been warmer than it is today."The “VIP” you see on Redstate articles is how you can sign up to be a VIP. We all see it. If you were an actual VIP you would have access to the entire article.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login