Comey, What an Asshat
-
and we don't agree on what is considered violence
woodpecker refuses to say Laken Riley's name.....
-
@calfoxwc said:
woodpecker refuses to say Laken Riley's name.....
Well ok then, you made that bit up about the praying grandma. No worries, not out of character.
At least you’re actually quoting Woody instead of inserting goofy peck/fart things. Thanks for discussing things intelligently.
-
-
It’s an easy enough concept to prove. All you need are all the names of violent crime offenders and their respective political affiliations. It’ll take some sorting.
Aside from that, all there really is are opinion pieces and anecdotal instances to prove that the left has a greater propensity for violence than the right. You could be correct, but l don’t think anyone here has the time or gumption to unequivocally prove that.
This is akin to the “all righties are racists” argument because some republican made a questionable comment. Maybe righties do have a greater propensity to be racists? But how the heck to you unequivocally prove that? You really can’t without an unreasonable amount of research.
You also get into the area where we don't agree on who is left or right, and we don't agree on what is considered violence
Again, a large portion of this board thinks Jan 6th didn't happen, or it wasn't actually that bad, or it was an inside job / false flag, etc.
If we can't agree on basic reality anymore then what is the point of trying to debate anything?
and we don't agree on what is considered violence
Again, a large portion of this board thinks Jan 6th didn't happen, or it wasn't actually that bad
woodpecker refuses to say Laken Riley's name.....
-
Welcome to the circus @ibleedbrown
-
I buy my underwear at K-Mart
I buy my underwear at K-Mart
You as well, thanks for discussing things intelligently.
-
How much more evidence do you need that the left are violent race baiting ,gaslighting commies?...
Wake up lol..
I just told you, it will take statistics. If the hypothesis is “lefties are more prone to violence than righties”, then you do what any reasonable person would do if the goal is to prove that. You use statistics.
Get the names of all violent offenders over a specific period of time in a specific region. Then figure out their political affiliation, and boom, now you have statistics.
It’s basically an impossible task, which means this is an impossible argument.
I just told you, it will take statistics. If the hypothesis is “lefties are more prone to violence than righties”, then you do what any reasonable person would do if the goal is to prove that. You use statistics.
Get the names of all violent offenders over a specific period of time in a specific region. Then figure out their political affiliation, and boom, now you have statistics.
It’s basically an impossible task, which means this is an impossible argument.
lol Statistics?
We don’t have to show you any stinkin statistics.That’s a cop out. You know it is.
The evidence is glaring.
I’ve presented many examples. It’s your job to prove otherwise. Google is a great place to start.
Violence, wishing or implying death from the left goes way back..
A quote from Demonrat Representative Tim Horrigan…
In a thread relating to the plane crash that killed former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens this week, Halloran wrote, "Just wish Sarah and Levy were on board." The comment appeared to be in reference to Palin and the father of her grandson, Levi Johnston.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-hampshire-lawmaker-resigns-after-dead-palin-comment/
You’re not aware of the recent storming of an ICE office by democrat “lawmakers” (sort of an oxymoron eh?), or perhaps an example of irony …then having the gall to proclaim it was justified ? That is a testament of them being inherently prone to violence.
Like the liberal thug on the street, they believe that they are entitled to it.Now all you have to is provide evidence that a group of Republicans behaved in that manner because of something they didn’t like.
-
I just told you, it will take statistics. If the hypothesis is “lefties are more prone to violence than righties”, then you do what any reasonable person would do if the goal is to prove that. You use statistics.
Get the names of all violent offenders over a specific period of time in a specific region. Then figure out their political affiliation, and boom, now you have statistics.
It’s basically an impossible task, which means this is an impossible argument.
lol Statistics?
We don’t have to show you any stinkin statistics.That’s a cop out. You know it is.
The evidence is glaring.
I’ve presented many examples. It’s your job to prove otherwise. Google is a great place to start.
Violence, wishing or implying death from the left goes way back..
A quote from Demonrat Representative Tim Horrigan…
In a thread relating to the plane crash that killed former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens this week, Halloran wrote, "Just wish Sarah and Levy were on board." The comment appeared to be in reference to Palin and the father of her grandson, Levi Johnston.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-hampshire-lawmaker-resigns-after-dead-palin-comment/
You’re not aware of the recent storming of an ICE office by democrat “lawmakers” (sort of an oxymoron eh?), or perhaps an example of irony …then having the gall to proclaim it was justified ? That is a testament of them being inherently prone to violence.
Like the liberal thug on the street, they believe that they are entitled to it.Now all you have to is provide evidence that a group of Republicans behaved in that manner because of something they didn’t like.
lol Statistics?
We don’t have to show you any stinkin statistics.That’s a cop out. You know it is.
The evidence is glaring.
I’ve presented many examples. It’s your job to prove otherwise. Google is a great place to start.
Violence, wishing or implying death from the left goes way back..
A quote from Demonrat Representative Tim Horrigan…
In a thread relating to the plane crash that killed former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens this week, Halloran wrote, "Just wish Sarah and Levy were on board." The comment appeared to be in reference to Palin and the father of her grandson, Levi Johnston.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-hampshire-lawmaker-resigns-after-dead-palin-comment/
You’re not aware of the recent storming of an ICE office by democrat “lawmakers” (sort of an oxymoron eh?), or perhaps an example of irony …then having the gall to proclaim it was justified ? That is a testament of them being inherently prone to violence.
Like the liberal thug on the street, they believe that they are entitled to it.Now all you have to is provide evidence that a group of Republicans behaved in that manner because of something they didn’t like.
You’re free to form your opinion based on whatever does it for you. I like statistics.
I don’t think we have anyone here anymore who enjoys participating in anecdotal offs, at least from the left perspective. I recall that guy cccjwh would participate in such things. Not my cup of tea, but it was wild watching everyone try their best to rub faces in whatever assholery was going on at the time.
Look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah, well look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah? Well look at what this asshole said..
It was fun to read to a point. I hope you find your dance partner.
-
86 is code for getting rid of or removing…its also can mean assassinating or killing.
In the example you gave of Gaetz, 86’d clearly meant mission accomplished over the removal of McConnell and two others.
I looked it up and found 8646 was also used, calling for the impeachment of Biden. There is no debating its intent.
So now we have 8647. By what means do you suppose they take another shot at removing Trump? (pun intended). To impeach yet again???
So when the Reps, multiple Reps, use it, it means remove or impeach
But when Comey, a former Rep, uses it, then it totally definitely means assassinate?
You're gonna strain something pearl clutching
So when the Reps, multiple Reps, use it, it means remove or impeach
But when Comey, a former Rep, uses it, then it totally definitely means assassinate?
You're gonna strain something pearl clutching
Face palm.
I’ll try again.
86’ d (note the ‘d) was uttered by Gaetz AFTER THE SAID INDIVIDUALS WERE REMOVED, indicating mission accomplished, therefore it couldn’t have possibly meant to assassinate you simpleton.So yes, Comey’s posting of 8647 could be advocating for Trumps death. Comey wasn’t brought in for questioning for nothing other than that. and by what other means would you get rid of Trump at this stage of the game?
Dont be what you accuse Cal of.
-
I buy my underwear at K-Mart
I buy my underwear at K-Mart
so, you find your women's panties at K-Mart.
too much information. I guess you are joining up with the woodpecker to screw up this forum.
-
So when the Reps, multiple Reps, use it, it means remove or impeach
But when Comey, a former Rep, uses it, then it totally definitely means assassinate?
You're gonna strain something pearl clutching
Face palm.
I’ll try again.
86’ d (note the ‘d) was uttered by Gaetz AFTER THE SAID INDIVIDUALS WERE REMOVED, indicating mission accomplished, therefore it couldn’t have possibly meant to assassinate you simpleton.So yes, Comey’s posting of 8647 could be advocating for Trumps death. Comey wasn’t brought in for questioning for nothing other than that. and by what other means would you get rid of Trump at this stage of the game?
Dont be what you accuse Cal of.
Face palm.
I’ll try again.
86’ d (note the ‘d) was uttered by Gaetz AFTER THE SAID INDIVIDUALS WERE REMOVED, indicating mission accomplished, therefore it couldn’t have possibly meant to assassinate you simpleton.So yes, Comey’s posting of 8647 could be advocating for Trumps death. Comey wasn’t brought in for questioning for nothing other than that. and by what other means would you get rid of Trump at this stage of the game?
Dont be what you accuse Cal of.
More than Gaetz on the right have used the term 86
Trump has directly advocated for violence.
Cal is a moron and a politically brainwashed one at that. That's not an accusation. That's fact.
-
I buy my underwear at K-Mart
so, you find your women's panties at K-Mart.
too much information. I guess you are joining up with the woodpecker to screw up this forum.
so, you find your women's panties at K-Mart.
too much information. I guess you are joining up with the woodpecker to screw up this forum.
It’s a reference from the movie Rainman. Good flick if you haven’t seen it.
You turned a little Rainman-ny on us last night. Good to see you snap back into form.
-
lol Statistics?
We don’t have to show you any stinkin statistics.That’s a cop out. You know it is.
The evidence is glaring.
I’ve presented many examples. It’s your job to prove otherwise. Google is a great place to start.
Violence, wishing or implying death from the left goes way back..
A quote from Demonrat Representative Tim Horrigan…
In a thread relating to the plane crash that killed former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens this week, Halloran wrote, "Just wish Sarah and Levy were on board." The comment appeared to be in reference to Palin and the father of her grandson, Levi Johnston.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-hampshire-lawmaker-resigns-after-dead-palin-comment/
You’re not aware of the recent storming of an ICE office by democrat “lawmakers” (sort of an oxymoron eh?), or perhaps an example of irony …then having the gall to proclaim it was justified ? That is a testament of them being inherently prone to violence.
Like the liberal thug on the street, they believe that they are entitled to it.Now all you have to is provide evidence that a group of Republicans behaved in that manner because of something they didn’t like.
You’re free to form your opinion based on whatever does it for you. I like statistics.
I don’t think we have anyone here anymore who enjoys participating in anecdotal offs, at least from the left perspective. I recall that guy cccjwh would participate in such things. Not my cup of tea, but it was wild watching everyone try their best to rub faces in whatever assholery was going on at the time.
Look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah, well look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah? Well look at what this asshole said..
It was fun to read to a point. I hope you find your dance partner.
You’re free to form your opinion based on whatever does it for you. I like statistics.
I don’t think we have anyone here anymore who enjoys participating in anecdotal offs, at least from the left perspective. I recall that guy cccjwh would participate in such things. Not my cup of tea, but it was wild watching everyone try their best to rub faces in whatever assholery was going on at the time.
Look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah, well look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah? Well look at what this asshole said..
It was fun to read to a point. I hope you find your dance partner.
Oh please, spare me the “I need statistics” cop out …because you’re cornered. You and Woody, two peas in a pod.
It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact formed by actual events, not here-say.
Neither of you deniers should need statistics to provide instances that equate to the violence either perpetrated or condoned by leftists since you believe both sides are equal partners in crime.
Look what these assholes said and did:
The guy who attempted to shoot and kill Republicans at a baseball game was a Bernie Sanders supporter.
I highly doubt the Hamas supporter who recently killed two Jews at a museum was a conservative, so you can throw that one out.
The recent democrat “lawmakers” that stormed an ICE facility.
The 2 assassination attempts on Trump? Yep they were lefties.
The “mostly peaceful” George Floyd protests that caused 2 billion in damages? BLM and Antifa. Most likely not conservatives.
The recent unrest at colleges and universities? There again, liberals. It’s always liberals.
Vandalizing Tesla vehicles? Lefties again.
Politicians implying confronting and being violent toward Republicans. It certainly isn’t Republicans.
When did a conservative try to run onto a stage attempting to assault Obama during a speech.
When did conservatives block traffic and disrupt Obama rallies?
-
When did a liberal politician rile up a bunch of liberal citizens to storm the Capitol, attacking police, destroy property and threaten politicians?
Again, this conversation requires going through every instance you think is violence and you think is a liberal and confirming both statements
Equally, we can just say conservatives are more prone to racism. I can make that statement based on racist statements and acts by conservatives. And I don't need any data, according to Gorka.
-
You’re free to form your opinion based on whatever does it for you. I like statistics.
I don’t think we have anyone here anymore who enjoys participating in anecdotal offs, at least from the left perspective. I recall that guy cccjwh would participate in such things. Not my cup of tea, but it was wild watching everyone try their best to rub faces in whatever assholery was going on at the time.
Look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah, well look at what this asshole did!
Oh yeah? Well look at what this asshole said..
It was fun to read to a point. I hope you find your dance partner.
Oh please, spare me the “I need statistics” cop out …because you’re cornered. You and Woody, two peas in a pod.
It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact formed by actual events, not here-say.
Neither of you deniers should need statistics to provide instances that equate to the violence either perpetrated or condoned by leftists since you believe both sides are equal partners in crime.
Look what these assholes said and did:
The guy who attempted to shoot and kill Republicans at a baseball game was a Bernie Sanders supporter.
I highly doubt the Hamas supporter who recently killed two Jews at a museum was a conservative, so you can throw that one out.
The recent democrat “lawmakers” that stormed an ICE facility.
The 2 assassination attempts on Trump? Yep they were lefties.
The “mostly peaceful” George Floyd protests that caused 2 billion in damages? BLM and Antifa. Most likely not conservatives.
The recent unrest at colleges and universities? There again, liberals. It’s always liberals.
Vandalizing Tesla vehicles? Lefties again.
Politicians implying confronting and being violent toward Republicans. It certainly isn’t Republicans.
When did a conservative try to run onto a stage attempting to assault Obama during a speech.
When did conservatives block traffic and disrupt Obama rallies?
Oh please, spare me the “I need statistics” cop out …because you’re cornered. You and Woody, two peas in a pod.
It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact formed by actual events, not here-say.
Neither of you deniers should need statistics to provide instances that equate to the violence either perpetrated or condoned by leftists since you believe both sides are equal partners in crime.
Look what these assholes said and did:
I highly doubt the Hamas supporter who recently killed two Jews at a museum was a conservative, so you can throw that one out.
The 2 assassination attempts on Trump? Yep they were lefties.
The “mostly peaceful” George Floyd protests that caused 2 billion in damages? BLM and Antifa. Most likely not conservatives.
The recent unrest at colleges and universities? There again, liberals. It’s always liberals.
Vandalizing Tesla vehicles? Lefties again.
Politicians implying confronting and being violent toward Republicans. It certainly isn’t Republicans.
When did a conservative try to run onto a stage attempting to assault Obama during a speech.
When did conservatives block traffic and disrupt Obama rallies?
Those are great anecdotal examples FY. Well done. I know assholery when l see it. You’re doing a fine job pointing out instances of assholery.
Again, you are free to have your opinion. This isn’t my battle to prove or disprove. It’s an unprovable thing. In my tongue and cheek way l was trying to convey that.
You could be right. I’m open to that. I like statistics to move my needle. You have seen enough and you don’t need statistics. That’s fine for you.
But if the theory is “lefties are more prone to violence than righties”, then yeah, there is a formula to break that down and l wanna see it. You should thank me for this next level thinking to prove your point.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login