A very excellent article on the corruption of Kagan, Sotomayor, and stupid, illiterate Jackson
-
Illiterate?
-
peck
she couldn't answer several legit, basic questions about the law. She couldn't answer what a woman was. Go read up on the subject - you aren't "at work" today. Not that that stops you.
-
peck
she couldn't answer several legit, basic questions about the law. She couldn't answer what a woman was. Go read up on the subject - you aren't "at work" today. Not that that stops you.
she couldn't answer several legit, basic questions about the law. She couldn't answer what a woman was. Go read up on the subject - you aren't "at work" today. Not that that stops you.
.... Illiterate?
Come on cal, say what you really want to say
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
.... Illiterate?
Come on cal, say what you really want to say
Let me guess, you have no intelligent input so he must be a racist? ?
-
so, anyone who thinks woodpecker is a moron, and thinks that obaMao and biden and everyone of their regimes, and jeffries, and schumer, etc, and jackson, are illiterate, must be a racist in the woodpecker's feelings.
-
.... Illiterate?
Come on cal, say what you really want to say
She might be the dumbest person to have ever passed the bar. She was appointed not for her talent or intellect, but because of the color of her skin. I thought that KJP was the worst diversity hire of all time, but Jackson takes the throne.
Shakespeare said that "Brevity is the soul of wit." Jackson is the opposite of that. Her arguments are an unnecessarily verbose slog to read. I usually disagree with Sotomayor and Kagan, but they're both capable of composing a logical argument without resorting to fallacies.
-
.... Illiterate?
Come on cal, say what you really want to say
She might be the dumbest person to have ever passed the bar. She was appointed not for her talent or intellect, but because of the color of her skin. I thought that KJP was the worst diversity hire of all time, but Jackson takes the throne.
Shakespeare said that "Brevity is the soul of wit." Jackson is the opposite of that. Her arguments are an unnecessarily verbose slog to read. I usually disagree with Sotomayor and Kagan, but they're both capable of composing a logical argument without resorting to fallacies.
She might be the dumbest person to have ever passed the bar. She was appointed not for her talent or intellect, but because of the color of her skin. I thought that KJP was the worst diversity hire of all time, but Jackson takes the throne.
Shakespeare said that "Brevity is the soul of wit." Jackson is the opposite of that. Her arguments are an unnecessarily verbose slog to read. I usually disagree with Sotomayor and Kagan, but they're both capable of composing a logical argument without resorting to fallacies.
Yes, that Harvard law grad is stupid because she *checks notes* uses a lot of words
-
She might be the dumbest person to have ever passed the bar. She was appointed not for her talent or intellect, but because of the color of her skin. I thought that KJP was the worst diversity hire of all time, but Jackson takes the throne.
Shakespeare said that "Brevity is the soul of wit." Jackson is the opposite of that. Her arguments are an unnecessarily verbose slog to read. I usually disagree with Sotomayor and Kagan, but they're both capable of composing a logical argument without resorting to fallacies.
Yes, that Harvard law grad is stupid because she *checks notes* uses a lot of words
Yes, that Harvard law grad is stupid because she *checks notes* uses a lot of words
Yes. Have you read any of her arguments? What is your opinion of them? My read is that she uses verbosity to cover up her lack of understanding (kind of like some people here).
-
Yes, that Harvard law grad is stupid because she *checks notes* uses a lot of words
Yes. Have you read any of her arguments? What is your opinion of them? My read is that she uses verbosity to cover up her lack of understanding (kind of like some people here).
Yes. Have you read any of her arguments? What is your opinion of them? My read is that she uses verbosity to cover up her lack of understanding (kind of like some people here).
No, I haven't. And yeah, overly academic / verbose writing is a fucking bore.
I'm saying it's ridiculous to call anyone on SCOTUS dumb, illiterate, etc.
But cal, and others, have a thing on here with left/liberal/progressive women in power (especially when they check other boxes). Honestly I think he's just intimidated
-
Yes. Have you read any of her arguments? What is your opinion of them? My read is that she uses verbosity to cover up her lack of understanding (kind of like some people here).
No, I haven't. And yeah, overly academic / verbose writing is a fucking bore.
I'm saying it's ridiculous to call anyone on SCOTUS dumb, illiterate, etc.
But cal, and others, have a thing on here with left/liberal/progressive women in power (especially when they check other boxes). Honestly I think he's just intimidated
***FART***
you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.
Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.
Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???
but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?
and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.
-
***FART***
you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.
Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.
Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???
but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?
and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.
you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.
Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.
Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???
but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?
and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.
... She graduated Harvard Law...
(And you completely didn't read or comprehend anything I said earlier but I'm not surprised)
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
stupid woodpecker.
"she graduated from Harvard law"
I think she had other students take her tests for her.
She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.
Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden. -
you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.
Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.
Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???
but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?
and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.
... She graduated Harvard Law...
(And you completely didn't read or comprehend anything I said earlier but I'm not surprised)
... She graduated Harvard Law...
So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.
-
... She graduated Harvard Law...
So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.
So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.
The claim wasn't "good at her job" it was about her being "illiterate", "ignorant", "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
stupid woodpecker.
"she graduated from Harvard law"
I think she had other students take her tests for her.
She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.
Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden.stupid woodpecker.
"she graduated from Harvard law"
I think she had other students take her tests for her.
She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.
Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden.And what evidence do you have for that claim?
-
So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.
The claim wasn't "good at her job" it was about her being "illiterate", "ignorant", "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...
"dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...
I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb.
-
"dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...
I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb.
I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb.
I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.
There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb.
I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.
There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly
There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board.
I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.
-
There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board.
I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.
I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.
My first job out of college, I was writing software to calculate mortgages for 127 banks and savings and loans places. Never made a mistake, first time they didn't have an older well experienced programmer to do it. And it was in assembler - a step up from machine language. I worked next to some guy who graduated from a 4 yr program. He programmed in a higher level language, and couldn't cut the mustard. I tried to help him, but he was lost. And it was a simple report generator. He told me one day, a month before he got let go - that his brother had all the tests from their fraternity and he had access to all of them. I guess that is why I figured jackson might have done that.
Her arguments are asinine, and in her interview with congress, she couldn't answer very simple references to legal subjects.
No one here is anti-acedemic. The woodpecker slurs to try to look superior to everyone who isn't gay, trans, or leftie. Never works.
-
So, Sotomayor hammered jackson for a simple ignorant point she made, Barrett hammered her too.
For years, the general consensus on the right has been that Sonia Sotomayor is the most vapid Justice on the Supreme Court, and certainly, there's been plenty of evidence to that effect. Who could forget that time she compared mutilating children under the guise of "gender-affirming care" to taking an aspirin?
But Ketanji Brown Jackson exists, and that means Sotomayor was never long for her throne. Appointed by former President Joe Biden, Jackson infamously claimed she couldn't define what a woman is because she's "not a biologist" during her confirmation hearing, and it's been all downhill from there. More recently, she completely misrepresented the basic facts in a case involving whether parents can opt out of LGBT lessons in school.
Her masterpiece came at the end of June, though. In a dissent involving whether district court judges could issue sweeping nationwide injunctions, Jackson used the phrase "wait for it" like a summer intern before arguing that assessing the law was a "mind-numbing technical query," as if that's not the Supreme Court's purpose. In an unprecedented move, Justice Amy Coney Barrett unleashed on her in response.
That seemed about as bad as it could get, but Jackson is nothing if not persistent in her imbecility. Which brings me to what happened on Tuesday. In a move that I would have never predicted in a million years, aforementioned far-left Justice Sonia Sotomayor took Jackson to task for writing a dissent addressing a question that wasn't even before the court. "
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login