Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. A very excellent article on the corruption of Kagan, Sotomayor, and stupid, illiterate Jackson

A very excellent article on the corruption of Kagan, Sotomayor, and stupid, illiterate Jackson

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
33 Posts 6 Posters 385 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C calfoxwc

    @mld-woody said:

    ***FART***

    you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.

       Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.

    Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???

    but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?

    and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.

    MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
    • 33k Posts
    • 3k Reputation
    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @calfoxwc said:

    you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.

       Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.

    Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???

    but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?

    and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.

    ... She graduated Harvard Law...

    (And you completely didn't read or comprehend anything I said earlier but I'm not surprised)

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #13

      stupid woodpecker.

      "she graduated from Harvard law"

      I think she had other students take her tests for her.

      She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.

      pjmedia.com.ico

      PJ Media

      https://pjmedia.com › matt-margolis › 2024 › 12 › 04 › justice-ketanji-jackson-makes-a-fool-of-herself-during-oral-arguments-n4934831

      Justice Ketanji Jackson Makes a Fool of Herself During Oral Arguments

      Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden.
      MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

        @calfoxwc said:

        you really are ignorant. There is a another Justice, and he is black. He is also brilliant in his decisions per our Constitution.

           Jackson couldn't answer basic questions on the Constitution. She can't explain what a woman is. Her bitching about all the rest of the Court, is worse than stupid.

        Sure, "criticism of obaMao (and Jackson) is racist" ???

        but criticism of Pres Trump isn't. Don't you feel that Justice Thomas is brilliant?

        and, if you don't feel that Justice jackson is ignorant, explain why.

        ... She graduated Harvard Law...

        (And you completely didn't read or comprehend anything I said earlier but I'm not surprised)

        VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 6k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
        #14

        @mld-woody said:

        ... She graduated Harvard Law...

        So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.

        MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

          @mld-woody said:

          ... She graduated Harvard Law...

          So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.

          MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
          • 33k Posts
          • 3k Reputation
          MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
          #15

          @vaportrail said:

          So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.

          The claim wasn't "good at her job" it was about her being "illiterate", "ignorant", "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...

          Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
          VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • C calfoxwc

            stupid woodpecker.

            "she graduated from Harvard law"

            I think she had other students take her tests for her.

            She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.

            pjmedia.com.ico

            PJ Media

            https://pjmedia.com › matt-margolis › 2024 › 12 › 04 › justice-ketanji-jackson-makes-a-fool-of-herself-during-oral-arguments-n4934831

            Justice Ketanji Jackson Makes a Fool of Herself During Oral Arguments

            Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden.
            MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
            • 33k Posts
            • 3k Reputation
            MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
            #16

            @calfoxwc said:

            stupid woodpecker.

            "she graduated from Harvard law"

            I think she had other students take her tests for her.

            She is a moron, birdbrains of a feather stick together.

            pjmedia.com.ico

            PJ Media

            https://pjmedia.com › matt-margolis › 2024 › 12 › 04 › justice-ketanji-jackson-makes-a-fool-of-herself-during-oral-arguments-n4934831

            Justice Ketanji Jackson Makes a Fool of Herself During Oral Arguments

            Dec 4, 2024Oral arguments are ongoing, and we've already got a cringeworthy claim from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was nominated to the court by Joe Biden.

            And what evidence do you have for that claim?

            Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

              @vaportrail said:

              So did Sashi Brown. Doesn't mean he's good at his job.

              The claim wasn't "good at her job" it was about her being "illiterate", "ignorant", "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...

              VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 6k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
              #17

              @mld-woody said:

              "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...

              I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb. 

              MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
              ❤
              Quote Reply
              • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                @mld-woody said:

                "dumbest person to have ever passed the bar" ...

                I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb. 

                MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                • 33k Posts
                • 3k Reputation
                MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                #18

                @vaportrail said:

                I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb. 

                I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.

                There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly 

                Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                JaxJ VaporTrailV 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                  @vaportrail said:

                  I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb. 

                  I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.

                  There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly 

                  Jax JaxJ One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular Conversation Starter One Month Later Reacting Well Collaborator Week One Done Dedicated First Post
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 4k Reputation
                  JaxJ Jax wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  @mld-woody said:

                  There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board.

                  I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  ❤
                  Quote Reply
                  • JaxJ Jax

                    @mld-woody said:

                    There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board.

                    I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.

                    calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    @jax said:

                    I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.

                    My first job out of college, I was writing software to calculate mortgages for 127 banks and savings and loans places. Never made a mistake, first time they didn't have an older well experienced programmer to do it. And it was in assembler - a step up from machine language. I worked next to some guy who graduated from a 4 yr program. He programmed in a higher level language, and couldn't cut the mustard. I tried to help him, but he was lost. And it was a simple report generator. He told me one day, a month before he got let go - that his brother had all the tests from their fraternity and he had access to all of them. I guess that is why I figured jackson might have done that. 

                    Her arguments are asinine, and in her interview with congress, she couldn't answer very simple references to legal subjects.

                       No one here is anti-acedemic. The woodpecker slurs to try to look superior to everyone who isn't gay, trans, or leftie. Never works.

                    MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                      • 64k Posts
                      • 8k Reputation
                      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      So, Sotomayor hammered jackson for a simple ignorant point she made, Barrett hammered her too.

                      https://redstate.com/bonchie/2025/07/08/ketanji-brown-jackson-says-something-so-stupid-that-her-own-left-wing-colleague-had-to-correct-her-n2191394

                      For years, the general consensus on the right has been that Sonia Sotomayor is the most vapid Justice on the Supreme Court, and certainly, there's been plenty of evidence to that effect. Who could forget that time she compared mutilating children under the guise of "gender-affirming care" to taking an aspirin? 

                      But Ketanji Brown Jackson exists, and that means Sotomayor was never long for her throne. Appointed by former President Joe Biden, Jackson infamously claimed she couldn't define what a woman is because she's "not a biologist" during her confirmation hearing, and it's been all downhill from there. More recently, she completely misrepresented the basic facts in a case involving whether parents can opt out of LGBT lessons in school. 

                      Her masterpiece came at the end of June, though. In a dissent involving whether district court judges could issue sweeping nationwide injunctions, Jackson used the phrase "wait for it" like a summer intern before arguing that assessing the law was a "mind-numbing technical query," as if that's not the Supreme Court's purpose. In an unprecedented move, Justice Amy Coney Barrett unleashed on her in response.

                      That seemed about as bad as it could get, but Jackson is nothing if not persistent in her imbecility. Which brings me to what happened on Tuesday. In a move that I would have never predicted in a million years, aforementioned far-left Justice Sonia Sotomayor took Jackson to task for writing a dissent addressing a question that wasn't even before the court. "

                       
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        I didn't say jackson was not intelligent, she is ignorant. Ignorant of the role of Supreme Court Justices, ignorant of how to handle herself - she has alienated and criticized the rest of the Court, and she is just nasty and wrong.

                        https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/08/supreme-court-hands-trump-wh-a-major-win-and-slaps-down-justice-jackson-again-n2660076

                        Supreme Court Hands Trump White House a Major Win, and Slaps Down Justice Jackson Again

                        MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • C calfoxwc

                          @jax said:

                          I don't think anyone here is anti academic, stop making shit up all the time.

                          My first job out of college, I was writing software to calculate mortgages for 127 banks and savings and loans places. Never made a mistake, first time they didn't have an older well experienced programmer to do it. And it was in assembler - a step up from machine language. I worked next to some guy who graduated from a 4 yr program. He programmed in a higher level language, and couldn't cut the mustard. I tried to help him, but he was lost. And it was a simple report generator. He told me one day, a month before he got let go - that his brother had all the tests from their fraternity and he had access to all of them. I guess that is why I figured jackson might have done that. 

                          Her arguments are asinine, and in her interview with congress, she couldn't answer very simple references to legal subjects.

                             No one here is anti-acedemic. The woodpecker slurs to try to look superior to everyone who isn't gay, trans, or leftie. Never works.

                          MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                          • 33k Posts
                          • 3k Reputation
                          MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          @calfoxwc said:

                          My first job out of college, I was writing software to calculate mortgages for 127 banks and savings and loans places. Never made a mistake, first time they didn't have an older well experienced programmer to do it. And it was in assembler - a step up from machine language. I worked next to some guy who graduated from a 4 yr program. He programmed in a higher level language, and couldn't cut the mustard. I tried to help him, but he was lost. And it was a simple report generator. He told me one day, a month before he got let go - that his brother had all the tests from their fraternity and he had access to all of them. I guess that is why I figured jackson might have done that. 

                          Her arguments are asinine, and in her interview with congress, she couldn't answer very simple references to legal subjects.

                             No one here is anti-acedemic. The woodpecker slurs to try to look superior to everyone who isn't gay, trans, or leftie. Never works.

                          - oh boy, another "cal saved the day and everyone clapped" story that totally happened

                          - THAT is why you think that? Hahaha. Alright cal. A more liberal, woman of color is in power and she's saying things you don't like... So clearly she cheated in college. Riiiiiight

                          - many MAGA posters on this board are incredibly anti academic and anti University. You have been for years and years. Wild y'all are trying to fight it now

                          Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • C calfoxwc

                            I didn't say jackson was not intelligent, she is ignorant. Ignorant of the role of Supreme Court Justices, ignorant of how to handle herself - she has alienated and criticized the rest of the Court, and she is just nasty and wrong.

                            https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/08/supreme-court-hands-trump-wh-a-major-win-and-slaps-down-justice-jackson-again-n2660076

                            Supreme Court Hands Trump White House a Major Win, and Slaps Down Justice Jackson Again

                            MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                            • 33k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            @calfoxwc said:

                            I didn't say jackson was not intelligent, she is ignorant. Ignorant of the role of Supreme Court Justices, ignorant of how to handle herself - she has alienated and criticized the rest of the Court, and she is just nasty and wrong.

                            https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/08/supreme-court-hands-trump-wh-a-major-win-and-slaps-down-justice-jackson-again-n2660076

                            Supreme Court Hands Trump White House a Major Win, and Slaps Down Justice Jackson Again

                            "Nasty".... Ha... Right. Surprised you haven't used your go to yet to call her a slut. 

                            "I said ignorant, not that she's wasn't intelligent" you also called her illiterate 

                            Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Jax JaxJ One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular Conversation Starter One Month Later Reacting Well Collaborator Week One Done Dedicated First Post
                              • 6k Posts
                              • 4k Reputation
                              JaxJ Jax wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1942675046482297299?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1942675046482297299%7Ctwgr%5E4d3194beee22be9b4e6eba4831fd986c778c309d%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/embarrassing-even-liberal-justice-sotomayor-has-remind-ketanji/

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              ❤
                              Quote Reply
                              • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                @calfoxwc said:

                                My first job out of college, I was writing software to calculate mortgages for 127 banks and savings and loans places. Never made a mistake, first time they didn't have an older well experienced programmer to do it. And it was in assembler - a step up from machine language. I worked next to some guy who graduated from a 4 yr program. He programmed in a higher level language, and couldn't cut the mustard. I tried to help him, but he was lost. And it was a simple report generator. He told me one day, a month before he got let go - that his brother had all the tests from their fraternity and he had access to all of them. I guess that is why I figured jackson might have done that. 

                                Her arguments are asinine, and in her interview with congress, she couldn't answer very simple references to legal subjects.

                                   No one here is anti-acedemic. The woodpecker slurs to try to look superior to everyone who isn't gay, trans, or leftie. Never works.

                                - oh boy, another "cal saved the day and everyone clapped" story that totally happened

                                - THAT is why you think that? Hahaha. Alright cal. A more liberal, woman of color is in power and she's saying things you don't like... So clearly she cheated in college. Riiiiiight

                                - many MAGA posters on this board are incredibly anti academic and anti University. You have been for years and years. Wild y'all are trying to fight it now

                                calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                • 64k Posts
                                • 8k Reputation
                                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                @mld-woody said:

                                ***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH

                                Your false accusations are nonsense and make you look like a moron.

                                btw, you're a moron.

                                MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • C calfoxwc

                                  @mld-woody said:

                                  ***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH***FART***PECK***WHINE****SISSYBITCH

                                  Your false accusations are nonsense and make you look like a moron.

                                  btw, you're a moron.

                                  MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                                  • 33k Posts
                                  • 3k Reputation
                                  MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @calfoxwc said:

                                  Your false accusations are nonsense and make you look like a moron.

                                  btw, you're a moron.

                                  Direct quotes are now false accusations?

                                  Haha, you're spiraling 

                                  Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                    @calfoxwc said:

                                    I didn't say jackson was not intelligent, she is ignorant. Ignorant of the role of Supreme Court Justices, ignorant of how to handle herself - she has alienated and criticized the rest of the Court, and she is just nasty and wrong.

                                    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/08/supreme-court-hands-trump-wh-a-major-win-and-slaps-down-justice-jackson-again-n2660076

                                    Supreme Court Hands Trump White House a Major Win, and Slaps Down Justice Jackson Again

                                    "Nasty".... Ha... Right. Surprised you haven't used your go to yet to call her a slut. 

                                    "I said ignorant, not that she's wasn't intelligent" you also called her illiterate 

                                    calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                    • 64k Posts
                                    • 8k Reputation
                                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @mld-woody said:

                                    ***BIRDBITCHFART*** 

                                    She is illiterate. Hadn't read or knew about basic simple legal points congress folks asked her about. She wasn't acquainted with those subjects. 

                                    One one point - 

                                    "Marked by inferiority to an expected standard of familiarity with language and literature."

                                    So, she was far inferior in her reading and understanding of legal language they asked her about. She was NOT familiar with legal points they asked about, not familiar with the legal language they asked about. She had no clue.

                                    You're a moron.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                      @vaportrail said:

                                      I'd encourage you to listen to some of her oral arguments before blindly jumping to her defense. I don't like Kagan, Sotomayor, or Ginsburg's opinions, but I would never call them dumb. 

                                      I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.

                                      There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly 

                                      VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 6k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @mld-woody said:

                                      I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.

                                      There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly 

                                      The letters after my name don't prove that I'm intelligent. You're appealing to authority - X can't be dumb because they obtained a degree from Y

                                      MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      👍
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                                        @mld-woody said:

                                        I would never call any SCOTUS member dumb. Or Harvard Law grad. Come on man.

                                        There's enough anti academic anti University slop on this board. Not that you're doing that exactly 

                                        The letters after my name don't prove that I'm intelligent. You're appealing to authority - X can't be dumb because they obtained a degree from Y

                                        MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                                        • 33k Posts
                                        • 3k Reputation
                                        MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @vaportrail said:

                                        The letters after my name don't prove that I'm intelligent. You're appealing to authority - X can't be dumb because they obtained a degree from Y

                                        No, that's not appeal to authority. That's a recognition of all of the work and intelligence required to get to that point. 

                                        Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                                        hammertimeH VaporTrailV 2 Replies Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                          @vaportrail said:

                                          The letters after my name don't prove that I'm intelligent. You're appealing to authority - X can't be dumb because they obtained a degree from Y

                                          No, that's not appeal to authority. That's a recognition of all of the work and intelligence required to get to that point. 

                                          hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                          • 4k Posts
                                          • 2k Reputation
                                          hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @mld-woody said:

                                          No, that's not appeal to authority. That's a recognition of all of the work and intelligence required to get to that point. 

                                          You really are a moron.

                                          guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          👍
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate