More Democrat violence. Pa state senate candidate arrested.
-
The only shot ever taken āat Obamaā was when Oscar Hernandez took shots at the White House when Obama wasnāt home.Well how about thatā¦the irony is that Hernandez was a twice deported illegal with prior convictions, not some crazy right winger.
Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez, who shot at the White House in 2011, was not an American citizen. He was a Mexican citizen who was illegally present in the United States, according to U.S. federal prosecutors. While he was raised in Idaho, he had been deported twice in 2008 before returning to the U.S. illegally.
Oh shucks says Woody.
-
Shooting in the vicinity of VP Vance motorcade.
Media ignored.https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX700MzBvOD/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
-
woodpecker - waving hi to no one there like birdie's hero, biden.
-
woodpecker's emotionally violent pecking gets a blowback.
-
Iām a little surprised youāre an outrage porn guy. Sure, thereās plenty of it out there. Thereās gobs of it from the other side too. All you gotta do is click like/share and next thing you know youāre flooded with it. Thatās how algorithms work.Ā
Itāll lead you to think thatās how the world is.
Thatās not how the world is man. In the realm of social media the most outrageous stuff gets the most action. If l dry humped a goat in a Sasquatch costume, that would get a lot of action on social media too. But all youāre seeing is the most extreme in human behavior and it has to be taken with a grain of salt.
-
Iām a little surprised youāre an outrage porn guy. Sure, thereās plenty of it out there. Thereās gobs of it from the other side too. All you gotta do is click like/share and next thing you know youāre flooded with it. Thatās how algorithms work.Ā
Itāll lead you to think thatās how the world is.
Thatās not how the world is man. In the realm of social media the most outrageous stuff gets the most action. If l dry humped a goat in a Sasquatch costume, that would get a lot of action on social media too. But all youāre seeing is the most extreme in human behavior and it has to be taken with a grain of salt.
Iām a little surprised youāre an outrage porn guy. Sure, thereās plenty of it out there. Thereās gobs of it from the other side too. All you gotta do is click like/share and next thing you know youāre flooded with it. Thatās how algorithms work.Ā
Itāll lead you to think thatās how the world is.
Thatās not how the world is man. In the realm of social media the most outrageous stuff gets the most action. If l dry humped a goat in a Sasquatch costume, that would get a lot of action on social media too. But all youāre seeing is the most extreme in human behavior and it has to be taken with a grain of salt.
What youāll need to do is provide evidence that there is just as much political violence on the other side before you begin to rationalize, otherwise whatever you say is pointless.
-
Iām a little surprised youāre an outrage porn guy. Sure, thereās plenty of it out there. Thereās gobs of it from the other side too. All you gotta do is click like/share and next thing you know youāre flooded with it. Thatās how algorithms work.Ā
Itāll lead you to think thatās how the world is.
Thatās not how the world is man. In the realm of social media the most outrageous stuff gets the most action. If l dry humped a goat in a Sasquatch costume, that would get a lot of action on social media too. But all youāre seeing is the most extreme in human behavior and it has to be taken with a grain of salt.
What youāll need to do is provide evidence that there is just as much political violence on the other side before you begin to rationalize, otherwise whatever you say is pointless.
What youāll need to do is provide evidence that there is just as much political violence on the other side before you begin to rationalize, otherwise whatever you say is pointless.
What youāll need to do is suck my left one.
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?Ā
-
What youāll need to do is provide evidence that there is just as much political violence on the other side before you begin to rationalize, otherwise whatever you say is pointless.
What youāll need to do is suck my left one.
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?Ā
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?
Some can be tied to political leanings, others are no different than saying the killer liked Nike shoes, so anyone wearing Nike shoes is prone to violence. The problem in this forum is people on the left automatically assume political leanings have everything to do with violence if it's a conservative, but totally disregard anything that is actually tied to a left movement causing violence. The retards tend to file it under social justice and play some type of victim card. Go ahead and go through some of our posts on violence and see if you can weed out ones that actually aren't tied to being a lefty when we insinuated as much.
Trans people tend to group up over on the left side, and while over 90% of trans is a mental illness, how do you separate being mentally ill or listening to left rhetoric causing people to get violent? You can't just ignore all the left media and left politicians calling for violence and labeling Trump all kinds of names and a threat to democracy.
-
What youāll need to do is provide evidence that there is just as much political violence on the other side before you begin to rationalize, otherwise whatever you say is pointless.
What youāll need to do is suck my left one.
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?Ā
What youāll need to do is suck my left one.
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?Ā
No, what youāll need to do is provide evidence, quotes, from the right that supports your claim.
There is no messiness. Iāve provided clear cut undeniable proof of left wing violence and violence rhetoric.
Now itās your turn.
Youāre struggling to recall the details? I have no doubt you are. -
So we recently had a Trump supporter shot in the back and killed.
I know, I know, Biden supporters got shot in the back by those wacky conservatives too.
-
What youāll need to do is suck my left one.
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?Ā
No, what youāll need to do is provide evidence, quotes, from the right that supports your claim.
There is no messiness. Iāve provided clear cut undeniable proof of left wing violence and violence rhetoric.
Now itās your turn.
Youāre struggling to recall the details? I have no doubt you are.No, what youāll need to do is provide evidence, quotes, from the right that supports your claim.
There is no messiness. Iāve provided clear cut undeniable proof of left wing violence and violence rhetoric.
Now itās your turn.
Youāre struggling to recall the details? I have no doubt you are.No really, l think youād like his work. It largely supports your position. Iām trying to give you ammo here.
You know damn well l donāt do anecdotal-offs. Thatās a game for suckers.Ā
And afterwards you can suck my left one.
-
No, what youāll need to do is provide evidence, quotes, from the right that supports your claim.
There is no messiness. Iāve provided clear cut undeniable proof of left wing violence and violence rhetoric.
Now itās your turn.
Youāre struggling to recall the details? I have no doubt you are.No really, l think youād like his work. It largely supports your position. Iām trying to give you ammo here.
You know damn well l donāt do anecdotal-offs. Thatās a game for suckers.Ā
And afterwards you can suck my left one.
No really, l think youād like his work. It largely supports your position. Iām trying to give you ammo here.
You know damn well l donāt do anecdotal-offs. Thatās a game for suckers.Ā
And afterwards you can suck my left one.
You surprised me. I didnāt think you got as triggered as easily as Woody.
-
I recently heard an interview with a fellow named John Lott with CPRC (Crime Prevention Research Center) and l thought of you. This particular interview dealt with the messiness involved with assigning āsidesā to political violence. I think youāll like his work.Ā
Iām struggling to recall details, but one involved a shooting from a trans individual against some gay folks because this person thought the gay community wasnāt doing enough for trans people. Left on left violence?
Some can be tied to political leanings, others are no different than saying the killer liked Nike shoes, so anyone wearing Nike shoes is prone to violence. The problem in this forum is people on the left automatically assume political leanings have everything to do with violence if it's a conservative, but totally disregard anything that is actually tied to a left movement causing violence. The retards tend to file it under social justice and play some type of victim card. Go ahead and go through some of our posts on violence and see if you can weed out ones that actually aren't tied to being a lefty when we insinuated as much.
Trans people tend to group up over on the left side, and while over 90% of trans is a mental illness, how do you separate being mentally ill or listening to left rhetoric causing people to get violent? You can't just ignore all the left media and left politicians calling for violence and labeling Trump all kinds of names and a threat to democracy.
Some can be tied to political leanings, others are no different than saying the killer liked Nike shoes, so anyone wearing Nike shoes is prone to violence. The problem in this forum is people on the left automatically assume political leanings have everything to do with violence if it's a conservative, but totally disregard anything that is actually tied to a left movement causing violence. The retards tend to file it under social justice and play some type of victim card. Go ahead and go through some of our posts on violence and see if you can weed out ones that actually aren't tied to being a lefty when we insinuated as much.
Trans people tend to group up over on the left side, and while over 90% of trans is a mental illness, how do you separate being mentally ill or listening to left rhetoric causing people to get violent? You can't just ignore all the left media and left politicians calling for violence and labeling Trump all kinds of names and a threat to democracy.
Are you word salading me or do you wanna suck my left one too?
Iām fully aware political violence is a thing. Iām not aware that shoes are involved.Ā
The problem in this forum is that itās become janky and you donāt really have anyone on the left to dispute anything other than Woody, and heās likely become disenchanted.
From a larger standpoint weāre to the point that when a shooting happens, we immediately reach for that personās race. And thatās not a Brownsboard subforum problem, itās a national problem.Ā
Thatās fucked up. Weāre getting hardwired to identify political violence and put it into a box so we can have conversations like this.
It didnāt used to be like this and itās not normal. Itās a divisive factor and we should reject it.
-
No really, l think youād like his work. It largely supports your position. Iām trying to give you ammo here.
You know damn well l donāt do anecdotal-offs. Thatās a game for suckers.Ā
And afterwards you can suck my left one.
You surprised me. I didnāt think you got as triggered as easily as Woody.
-
Some can be tied to political leanings, others are no different than saying the killer liked Nike shoes, so anyone wearing Nike shoes is prone to violence. The problem in this forum is people on the left automatically assume political leanings have everything to do with violence if it's a conservative, but totally disregard anything that is actually tied to a left movement causing violence. The retards tend to file it under social justice and play some type of victim card. Go ahead and go through some of our posts on violence and see if you can weed out ones that actually aren't tied to being a lefty when we insinuated as much.
Trans people tend to group up over on the left side, and while over 90% of trans is a mental illness, how do you separate being mentally ill or listening to left rhetoric causing people to get violent? You can't just ignore all the left media and left politicians calling for violence and labeling Trump all kinds of names and a threat to democracy.
Are you word salading me or do you wanna suck my left one too?
Iām fully aware political violence is a thing. Iām not aware that shoes are involved.Ā
The problem in this forum is that itās become janky and you donāt really have anyone on the left to dispute anything other than Woody, and heās likely become disenchanted.
From a larger standpoint weāre to the point that when a shooting happens, we immediately reach for that personās race. And thatās not a Brownsboard subforum problem, itās a national problem.Ā
Thatās fucked up. Weāre getting hardwired to identify political violence and put it into a box so we can have conversations like this.
It didnāt used to be like this and itās not normal. Itās a divisive factor and we should reject it.
The problem in this forum is that itās become janky and you donāt really have anyone on the left to dispute anything other than Woody, and heās likely become disenchanted.
From a larger standpoint weāre to the point that when a shooting happens, we immediately reach for that personās race. And thatās not a Brownsboard subforum problem, itās a national problem.Ā
ok, I actually read one of your posts. It was inane, not surprised.
this forum is just fine, it would be cool if we had some liberal oriented posters posting legitimate thoughts. But all we get is antagonistic, stupid ass allegations about every single subject brought up. Too bad.
Woodpecker isn't "disenchanted", woodpecker has problems when looking into a mirror, I guess, and antagonizes everybody else to compensate. Always has done the same thing. sick stuff, I think.
Ā Ā and the sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Trump? all white. Pres Trump is white. The sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Reagan, white. The sickos who assassinated JFK and Bobby Kennedy - white.
Two attempts on Pres Gerald Ford - both were white.
The shooter at that baseball game, Sen. Scalise was shot - the shooter was white.
The assassin who murdered Martin Luther King was white. That is one where you could bring racism into it.
so, NO, "we" don't immediately grab at the person's race.
Never mind,Ā
-
The problem in this forum is that itās become janky and you donāt really have anyone on the left to dispute anything other than Woody, and heās likely become disenchanted.
From a larger standpoint weāre to the point that when a shooting happens, we immediately reach for that personās race. And thatās not a Brownsboard subforum problem, itās a national problem.Ā
ok, I actually read one of your posts. It was inane, not surprised.
this forum is just fine, it would be cool if we had some liberal oriented posters posting legitimate thoughts. But all we get is antagonistic, stupid ass allegations about every single subject brought up. Too bad.
Woodpecker isn't "disenchanted", woodpecker has problems when looking into a mirror, I guess, and antagonizes everybody else to compensate. Always has done the same thing. sick stuff, I think.
Ā Ā and the sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Trump? all white. Pres Trump is white. The sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Reagan, white. The sickos who assassinated JFK and Bobby Kennedy - white.
Two attempts on Pres Gerald Ford - both were white.
The shooter at that baseball game, Sen. Scalise was shot - the shooter was white.
The assassin who murdered Martin Luther King was white. That is one where you could bring racism into it.
so, NO, "we" don't immediately grab at the person's race.
Never mind,Ā
ok, I actually read one of your posts. It was inane, not surprised.
this forum is just fine, it would be cool if we had some liberal oriented posters posting legitimate thoughts. But all we get is antagonistic, stupid ass allegations about every single subject brought up. Too bad.
Woodpecker isn't "disenchanted", woodpecker has problems when looking into a mirror, I guess, and antagonizes everybody else to compensate. Always has done the same thing. sick stuff, I think.
Ā Ā and the sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Trump? all white. Pres Trump is white. The sickos who tried to assassinate Pres Reagan, white. The sickos who assassinated JFK and Bobby Kennedy - white.
Two attempts on Pres Gerald Ford - both were white.
The shooter at that baseball game, Sen. Scalise was shot - the shooter was white.
The assassin who murdered Martin Luther King was white. That is one where you could bring racism into it.
so, NO, "we" don't immediately grab at the person's race.
Never mind,Ā
So white people are the problem? Thatās surprising coming from you. This thread is full of surprises.
Attempted Presidential assassinations are a rarity. Well, they used to be. I may have misspoke a bit. Itās not just race we immediately look at. Gender, creed and sexual orientation are in the mix too. Point is weāre hyper focused on assigning a āsideā to blame.Ā
Iām sure youāve noticed that thereās not a lot of good news shared here. You participate in it. This entire forum is like a chain of metaphorical car crashes where everyone sees the worst of human behavior over and over and over again. And itās not just this forum. This seems to be the new norm with political news.
Weāve created an environment where assigning blame and identifying enemies is ānormalā, and itās a daily exercise. Thereās increased anger and divisiveness, and then we wonder why thereās so much political violence? Weāre both old enough to know it didnāt used to be like this.Ā
Itās beating the shit out of our collective psyche.Ā
-
@ibleedbrownĀ I've been posting on the poli board for over a decade. The conversations back then were much better. More leveled. More informed. As MAGA grew (formerly all tea party folks) the level of discord dropped. This drive away many posters, good posters, on both sides of the political spectrum. The board continued it's spiral into the echo chamber you see today.Ā
Years and years ago I attempted to post full, sourced, intelligent posts constantly. I would respond to misinformed threads (climate skepticism, Obama "death panels", etc.) with fully sourced rebuttals. What was the met with more and more frequently? Nonsense. Memes. Tantrums of Google search links. Slurs. Etc.Ā
Throw in the continued cognitive decline of many elderly posters on here and that problem amplifies.Ā
Disenchanted may not be the best term, but 98% of posts on here are trash and absolutely not worth the time. This is a central hub for rage porn, MAGA twitter, right wing rag articles, and more. Ignorance on ignorance.Ā
It's absolutely not worth the time to respond to posts like I used to. This is a fact based on years of responses here. This place is nothing more than showing up to mess with the monkeys in a cage.Ā
It's a damn shame too how much it's fallen off. Just exists as a stain on Browns fans.Ā
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login