Skip to content

More Democrat violence. Pa state senate candidate arrested.

Political Discussion
111 9 1.7k 1
  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    You stormed the Capitol 

    @mld-woody said:

    You stormed the Capitol 

    And? No one is saying that all  folks on the right will always behave themselves.

    What you choose to deny is that you scumbags are at the forefront of political violence. You have been for quite some time now. You know it’s true Woody. 
     

    Per a YouGov poll back in September of 2025, nearly 1 in 4 Liberals believe violence against political opponents is justified. Whereas the rate for Conservatives is much lower with 1 in 33 Republicans believing political violence is justified.

    It’s painfully obvious who the problem iS.

     

  • kill-bush-poster.jpeg.d39656fddd4362b428c79a43a08250b9.jpeg

    In the wake of the Charlie Kirk murder:

    IMG_0596.webp.0e532f9a96a3e76a34718a84ecc67c2e.webp
     

  • @mld-woody said:

    The horror!

    No not really. Not for a Democrat.

    But it would be without a doubt if she was running as a Republican.

    Im sure you can at least agree with me on that.

  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

    @fy56 said:

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

    I know. The “word salad” gag is more of a running joke at this point.  Probably a tired joke. 

    When used intentionally in a non-ironic fashion it says more about the person saying it than it does about the response they are applying it to. A lack of comprehension, or perhaps a lack of willingness to understand something.

  • @jax said:

    You have no idea what I am a consumer of.

    You post 15 tweets on here a day. We know exactly what you consume...

    @mld-woody said:

    You post 15 tweets on here a day. We know exactly what you consume...

    Sez the guy that has 33,424 posts here?

  • It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next. 

    Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal 

    Around and around we go with you morons. 

  • It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next. 

    Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal 

    Around and around we go with you morons. 

    @mld-woody said:

    It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next. 

    Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal 

    Around and around we go with you morons.

    Thats right Woody because this thread is supposed to be about you violent lunatics.

    You need to keep your people on track.

  • Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?

  • Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?

    @mld-woody said:

    Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?

    Says the asshole who just finished whining about keeping the train of thought.

    The topic here is about deranged liberals Woody.

  • Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?

    @mld-woody said:

    Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?

    Don’t y’all have an orange man you want to shoot?

    A pilgrimage is far less violent.

  • IMG_0933.thumb.jpeg.2deeee6250b8d80160e9794b4b3c95c5.jpeg

  • What did ya say Woody, left wing violence is not a problem?

    Gunman killed after opening fire on Secret Service checkpoint outside White House, officials say

    https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/white-house-gun-shots-north-lawn/

  • sydS syd

    @syd said:

    Nothing to see here. 
    Right Woody?

  • Everywhere democrats are expressing their disappointment.

    Ivanka Trump assassination thwarted.

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYqgzHARru-/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

    IMG_0942.thumb.jpeg.2865ef2b8cb6e33d7e697243d48bf9c2.jpeg