More Democrat violence. Pa state senate candidate arrested.
-
Like I said, a cesspool and you guys like swimming in it.
-
For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/
It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.
Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.
I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day.
I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation.
You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet?
-
For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/
It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.
Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.
I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day.
I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.
Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that.
-
For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/
It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.
Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.
I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day.
I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
You stormed the Capitol
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Like I said, a cesspool and you guys like swimming in it.
Like I said, a cesspool and you guys like swimming in it.
The horror!
(And I'll answer for Jax-- he wouldn't)
-
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation.
You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet?
How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation.
You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet?
Shall not infringe...
A woman that isn't fit to hold office because she is not only mentally unstable, but is violent.
Remind me again what the title of this thread is?
Besides what do you want to debate, talk about word salads, what exactly do you like about it?
-
You stormed the Capitol
You burned down cities...
-
You stormed the Capitol
And? No one is saying that all folks on the right will always behave themselves.
What you choose to deny is that you scumbags are at the forefront of political violence. You have been for quite some time now. You know it’s true Woody.
Per a YouGov poll back in September of 2025, nearly 1 in 4 Liberals believe violence against political opponents is justified. Whereas the rate for Conservatives is much lower with 1 in 33 Republicans believing political violence is justified.
It’s painfully obvious who the problem iS.
-
Like I said, a cesspool and you guys like swimming in it.
The horror!
(And I'll answer for Jax-- he wouldn't)
The horror!
No not really. Not for a Democrat.
But it would be without a doubt if she was running as a Republican.
Im sure you can at least agree with me on that.
-
All bs, however.
Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.
Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.
If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts.
Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.
Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that.
Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.
Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that.
“Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.
His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.
They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]
Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
, confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use
it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
-
Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.
Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that.
“Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.
His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.
They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]
Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
, confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use
it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
“Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.
His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.
They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]
Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
, confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use
it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.
I know. The “word salad” gag is more of a running joke at this point. Probably a tired joke.
When used intentionally in a non-ironic fashion it says more about the person saying it than it does about the response they are applying it to. A lack of comprehension, or perhaps a lack of willingness to understand something.
-
You post 15 tweets on here a day. We know exactly what you consume...
Sez the guy that has 33,424 posts here?
-
It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next.
Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal
Around and around we go with you morons.
-
It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next.
Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal
Around and around we go with you morons.
It's truly astounding the inability you people have to follow a train of thought from one post to the next.
Or it's just an attempt to deflect and derail (a classic on here) because you have no rebuttal
Around and around we go with you morons.
Thats right Woody because this thread is supposed to be about you violent lunatics.
You need to keep your people on track.
-
-
Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?
-
Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?
Says the asshole who just finished whining about keeping the train of thought.
The topic here is about deranged liberals Woody.
-
Don't y'all have a golden idol to take your pilgrimage to?
Don’t y’all have an orange man you want to shoot?
A pilgrimage is far less violent.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login