Skip to content

More Democrat violence. Pa state senate candidate arrested.

Political Discussion
111 9 1.7k 1
  • JaxJ Jax

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Dude, you share a lot of outrage porn. Is this one of those times you don’t actually understand what you’re debating against? Facts can be sprinkled in with outrage porn. They’re not mutually exclusive.

    I don't share outrage porn, I show just how loony the left is. 

    Or maybe how corrupt the left is.

    I don't share to express outrage simpletons, I share so you nutballs stop supporting things that are wrong in this country.

    @jax said:

    I don't share outrage porn, I show just how loony the left is. 

    Or maybe how corrupt the left is.

    I don't share to express outrage simpletons, I share so you nutballs stop supporting things that are wrong in this country.

    Yeah, you do. Shit, you don’t even know that. Ok, that’s where we’re at. 

  • @jax said:

    I don't share outrage porn, I show just how loony the left is. 

    Or maybe how corrupt the left is.

    I don't share to express outrage simpletons, I share so you nutballs stop supporting things that are wrong in this country.

    Yeah, you do. Shit, you don’t even know that. Ok, that’s where we’re at. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Yeah, you do. Shit, you don’t even know that. Ok, that’s where we’re at. 

    Oh shit man, can't have anyone exposing all the bullshit Dems do, we can't just scream racism what else can we do to shut down their speech? Let's label it outrage porn.

    Wouldn't be what you call outrage porn if the left wasn't causing it. Sorry people call it out for what it is. You can still go bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is rainbows and unicorns if you want, just don't vote for this shit.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Yeah, you do. Shit, you don’t even know that. Ok, that’s where we’re at. 

    Oh shit man, can't have anyone exposing all the bullshit Dems do, we can't just scream racism what else can we do to shut down their speech? Let's label it outrage porn.

    Wouldn't be what you call outrage porn if the left wasn't causing it. Sorry people call it out for what it is. You can still go bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is rainbows and unicorns if you want, just don't vote for this shit.

    @jax said:

    Oh shit man, can't have anyone exposing all the bullshit Dems do, we can't just scream racism what else can we do to shut down their speech? Let's label it outrage porn.

    Wouldn't be what you call outrage porn if the left wasn't causing it. Sorry people call it out for what it is. You can still go bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is rainbows and unicorns if you want, just don't vote for this shit.

    Ramble on dude. The left gets its fair share of outrage porn too. It’s probably good that we all know what it looks like. We’ll talk later.

  • @jax said:

    Oh shit man, can't have anyone exposing all the bullshit Dems do, we can't just scream racism what else can we do to shut down their speech? Let's label it outrage porn.

    Wouldn't be what you call outrage porn if the left wasn't causing it. Sorry people call it out for what it is. You can still go bury your head in the sand and pretend everything is rainbows and unicorns if you want, just don't vote for this shit.

    Ramble on dude. The left gets its fair share of outrage porn too. It’s probably good that we all know what it looks like. We’ll talk later.

    @ibleedbrown said:

    wimpy bs

    ibb translation:

    "I refuse to admit I get my liberal wimpy self completely and

    nonsensically involved in discussions I have no idea about"

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    wimpy bs

    ibb translation:

    "I refuse to admit I get my liberal wimpy self completely and

    nonsensically involved in discussions I have no idea about"

    @calfoxwc said:

    ibb translation:

    "I refuse to admit I get my liberal wimpy self completely and

    nonsensically involved in discussions I have no idea about"

    I always appreciate your goofy jabs. Keep up the good work Calf.

  • @jax said:

    Democrats really have become a cesspool

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

  • @jax said:

    Democrats really have become a cesspool

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

    @ibleedbrown said:

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

  • JaxJ Jax

    @ibleedbrown said:

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation. 

    You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet? 

  • JaxJ Jax

    @ibleedbrown said:

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

  • JaxJ Jax

    @ibleedbrown said:

    For you less outrage porn addicted individuals, here’s a version of this that invites honest dialogue. I’ll start with the bill itself, and l’ll post a handy dandy AI synopsis of what it’s all about for you short attention spanners out there. 

    https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2026/0/HF/5140/versions/0/

    It’s probably fair to point out that this has nothing to do with Pennsylvania, but that’s sort of what outrage porn does to someone’s psyche, and we’ll trudge on.

    Yes, there are constituents and therefore representatives who are all for gun control. If l had a loved one who was a victim of gun violence l might be one of them. Thankfully that’s not the case for me, but if you are l get it and l respect your position.

    I grew up in a fairly rural part of Ohio. There were dude’s who had gun racks in trucks with guns right there in the parking lot of my high school. We all carried pocket knives and all of this was normal and l still carry a pocket knife to this day. 

    I’m not a gun guy though, but l might be the most pro 2nd amendment non-gun owner you ever met. I think we the people should have tanks and stealth bombers, in the hands of our well regulated militia of course. The spirit of the second amendment is that we should be able to go toe to toe with our govt if push comes to shove, and we are very far from that.  

    IMG_6608.jpeg

    IMG_6609.jpeg

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    You stormed the Capitol 

  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation. 

    You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet? 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    How is the actual bill bs? It’s literally the proposed legislation. 

    You did show a democrat melting down. That’s the outrage porn aspect. Figured that out yet? 

    Shall not infringe...

    A woman that isn't fit to hold office because she is not only mentally unstable, but is violent.

    Remind me again what the title of this thread is? 

    Besides what do you want to debate, talk about word salads, what exactly do you like about it?

  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    You stormed the Capitol 

    @mld-woody said:

    You stormed the Capitol 

    You burned down cities...

  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    You stormed the Capitol 

    @mld-woody said:

    You stormed the Capitol 

    And? No one is saying that all  folks on the right will always behave themselves.

    What you choose to deny is that you scumbags are at the forefront of political violence. You have been for quite some time now. You know it’s true Woody. 
     

    Per a YouGov poll back in September of 2025, nearly 1 in 4 Liberals believe violence against political opponents is justified. Whereas the rate for Conservatives is much lower with 1 in 33 Republicans believing political violence is justified.

    It’s painfully obvious who the problem iS.

     

  • kill-bush-poster.jpeg.d39656fddd4362b428c79a43a08250b9.jpeg

    In the wake of the Charlie Kirk murder:

    IMG_0596.webp.0e532f9a96a3e76a34718a84ecc67c2e.webp
     

  • @mld-woody said:

    The horror!

    No not really. Not for a Democrat.

    But it would be without a doubt if she was running as a Republican.

    Im sure you can at least agree with me on that.

  • @jax said:

    All bs, however.

    Sticking with the intent of this thread, I showed a democrat screaming out violent rhetoric simply because they didn't get their way, which is typical of the lefts responses.

    Again, some people can't comprehend getting the truth out there and exposing terrible ideas and such from the left is not outrage porn because they don't have any other way to defend what they support.

    If you want to debate gun laws start a new thread instead of misleading what was being posted, which again, was more democratic violent outbursts. 

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    Regardless, you just had the opportunity to debate the actual legislation in MN, and whether you’re for or against it and why. You completely bypassed all of that and went straight for a word salad.

    Are you interested in honest debate or not? We likely align here but you’re too fucked up to even realize that. 

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

    @fy56 said:

    “Word salad” probably the most misused and overused phrase these days.

    His reply was simple, clear and to the point, so I wouldn’t go with the “word salad” argument every time I wasn’t happy with his response.

    They string together endless buzzwords, circular logic, and nonsensical tangents to overwhelm, confuse, and gaslight the listener. [1, 2]

    Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. 

    , confuseCasually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use

    it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary., and gaslight the listener. [Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it Casually, it describes intentionally vague, "fluffy," or excessive speech that uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. People often use it as a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary. a criticism of poor explanations, overly complicated corporate jargon, or rambling commentary.

    I know. The “word salad” gag is more of a running joke at this point.  Probably a tired joke. 

    When used intentionally in a non-ironic fashion it says more about the person saying it than it does about the response they are applying it to. A lack of comprehension, or perhaps a lack of willingness to understand something.