Skip to content

Training Camp - starts July 29th

The Browns Board
131 11 2.0k 1
  • @dutch-oven said:

    I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle.

    Right. And I've already stated why I don't want him to win the starting job.

    But in reality, if he was worth even 1/3rd of what we traded and paid for him, then in reality he should have no problem beating out a 5th round draft pick that virtually nobody wanted on their team.

    All of the talking heads, the Zac Jacksons, Anthony Limas, Ken Carmens, etc. act and talk like fans....like us. Watson's not the future. We've gotta find out if Sanders is the future so we can decide about drafting a QB in '27, or not. That's thinking and acting like us. The view from 10,000 ft. But the players playing this week's game (hypothetically, we're in the regular season), they're playing to win the game. THIS week's game. They don't give a rats ass about next April's draft. They're working their asses off to win each and every week of THIS season. As is the HC and his staff. And the players see the QB's every freakin' day in practice. They usually know who has shown to be the best QB for the upcoming game. It is the obligation of the HC to put in the guy who gives his team of players the best chance to win the game. THIS game. Not next year's game(s). - Now if the team is losing and a HC deems that a spark is needed...or the team has lost such that they ain't gonna be making the playoffs, then it's more understanding to the players to see what they have in terms of the future beyond this game / season.

    The HC can't give a rats ass what Zac Jackson thinks because the HC's job depends on whether or not he can deliver wins with the team he has right now. Owners are a fickled bunch. They'll spout out a bunch of reasons why the team wasn't good enough to win...and fire the coach anyway.

    M Marvin the Martian wrote on last edited by
    #69

    @orion said:

    Right. And I've already stated why I don't want him to win the starting job.

    But in reality, if he was worth even 1/3rd of what we traded and paid for him, then in reality he should have no problem beating out a 5th round draft pick that virtually nobody wanted on their team.

    All of the talking heads, the Zac Jacksons, Anthony Limas, Ken Carmens, etc. act and talk like fans....like us. Watson's not the future. We've gotta find out if Sanders is the future so we can decide about drafting a QB in '27, or not. That's thinking and acting like us. The view from 10,000 ft. But the players playing this week's game (hypothetically, we're in the regular season), they're playing to win the game. THIS week's game. They don't give a rats ass about next April's draft. They're working their asses off to win each and every week of THIS season. As is the HC and his staff. And the players see the QB's every freakin' day in practice. They usually know who has shown to be the best QB for the upcoming game. It is the obligation of the HC to put in the guy who gives his team of players the best chance to win the game. THIS game. Not next year's game(s). - Now if the team is losing and a HC deems that a spark is needed...or the team has lost such that they ain't gonna be making the playoffs, then it's more understanding to the players to see what they have in terms of the future beyond this game / season.

    The HC can't give a rats ass what Zac Jackson thinks because the HC's job depends on whether or not he can deliver wins with the team he has right now. Owners are a fickled bunch. They'll spout out a bunch of reasons why the team wasn't good enough to win...and fire the coach anyway.

    As an out of town fan: this.

  • sydS syd

    speaking of wr's being cut seems a udfa from some small ass collage Floriea will make the team again this year, who was that that talked shit about small collage guys that go undrafted ? I forgot who , must not be that important of a poster

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #70

    @syd said:

    speaking of wr's being cut seems a udfa from some small ass collage Floriea will make the team again this year, who was that that talked shit about small collage guys that go undrafted ? I forgot who , must not be that important of a poster

    barack-obama-former-us-president.gif

  • @bob806 said:

    I give you credit.

    I just can't handle Cleveland radio sports talk anymore. It's all "good cop vs bad cop," takes. Long gone are guys like Geoff Sindelar, who seemed to have balanced takes.

    Here's the thing (and this is more for the out-of-town Browns fans on here), I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle. Not one guy on The Fan, not one writer, beat reporter, or guy on shows like The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show. There is no "Watson Clique", despite what some unhinged Shadeur fans on-line might say. Any criticisms or critiques on Sanders is considered "hater talk" or even more laughably, racist. I mean, Sanders' competition is another black fellow.

    If/when a local guy says that they think, or have heard, that Watson has the lead, it isn't because they are rooting for this. Zac Jackson and Jason Lloyd have both openly thought the idea of Watson ever playing for the Browns again as a complete waste of time.

    So I think the coverage on this has been balanced. The guy no one wants to start is being talked about - probably accurately - as the guy who most likely is somewhat to solidly in the lead.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #71

    @dutch-oven said:

    Here's the thing (and this is more for the out-of-town Browns fans on here), I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle. Not one guy on The Fan, not one writer, beat reporter, or guy on shows like The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show. There is no "Watson Clique", despite what some unhinged Shadeur fans on-line might say. Any criticisms or critiques on Sanders is considered "hater talk" or even more laughably, racist. I mean, Sanders' competition is another black fellow.

    If/when a local guy says that they think, or have heard, that Watson has the lead, it isn't because they are rooting for this. Zac Jackson and Jason Lloyd have both openly thought the idea of Watson ever playing for the Browns again as a complete waste of time.

    So I think the coverage on this has been balanced. The guy no one wants to start is being talked about - probably accurately - as the guy who most likely is somewhat to solidly in the lead.

    The biggest problem with 100% of that Dutch is in spite of ALL that above - Watson is here with the biggest guaranteed contract we've ever seen at the most important position on this franchise in franchise history. It's a persistent distraction that flares up any time he gets injured/reinjured to the extent he's never going to be that guy that was good or great as a young Pro Bowl QB that erased a late deficit vs Josh Allen's Bills in the playoffs. As I said in this thread yesterday - the earlier version was a million miles ago.

    That Houston franchise has most recently turned an (AP) NFL Rookie of the Year C.J. Stroud into a QB that lacked a lot of confidence and poise in himself. One has to wonder if it's just a mere coincidence or an inevitable destination for the most important position on their franchise. What do they have in common with Cleveland - an ownership that repeatedly didn't understand all that goes into developing a young QB from their very 1st pick David Carr and forward. Okay so what about C.J. Stroud's Rookie of the Year proving there was development Flugel? First, I LIKE the guy and can't imagine he can't get coached back on the right track again. I don't see enough of their games to give an accurate summaty on him. They have very good WRs there for so here's one of the media analysts in the video link sharing what he's seen in Stroud's recent trend of concern there:

  • @bob806 said:

    I give you credit.

    I just can't handle Cleveland radio sports talk anymore. It's all "good cop vs bad cop," takes. Long gone are guys like Geoff Sindelar, who seemed to have balanced takes.

    Here's the thing (and this is more for the out-of-town Browns fans on here), I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle. Not one guy on The Fan, not one writer, beat reporter, or guy on shows like The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show. There is no "Watson Clique", despite what some unhinged Shadeur fans on-line might say. Any criticisms or critiques on Sanders is considered "hater talk" or even more laughably, racist. I mean, Sanders' competition is another black fellow.

    If/when a local guy says that they think, or have heard, that Watson has the lead, it isn't because they are rooting for this. Zac Jackson and Jason Lloyd have both openly thought the idea of Watson ever playing for the Browns again as a complete waste of time.

    So I think the coverage on this has been balanced. The guy no one wants to start is being talked about - probably accurately - as the guy who most likely is somewhat to solidly in the lead.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #72

    @dutch-oven said:

    I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle.

    Well, not that he WANTS him to win the battle:

    โ€œIf you want to, just name Deshaun the starter and letโ€™s get going. Iโ€™m dead serious. Iโ€™m not the only one accepting reality here. Iโ€™m not the only one. Thereโ€™s reality to real Browns fans and then thereโ€™s whateverโ€™s going over the internet. Yeah, you know who I want to start, but I will accept the reality of a first-time head coach, knowing the nature of the business, and needing to win. If a veteran is able to get them in and out of the huddle and knows a little bit more of things, Iโ€™m willing to accept the reality,โ€ Carman said.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    I can't think of one local sports guy who wants Watson to win this battle.

    Well, not that he WANTS him to win the battle:

    โ€œIf you want to, just name Deshaun the starter and letโ€™s get going. Iโ€™m dead serious. Iโ€™m not the only one accepting reality here. Iโ€™m not the only one. Thereโ€™s reality to real Browns fans and then thereโ€™s whateverโ€™s going over the internet. Yeah, you know who I want to start, but I will accept the reality of a first-time head coach, knowing the nature of the business, and needing to win. If a veteran is able to get them in and out of the huddle and knows a little bit more of things, Iโ€™m willing to accept the reality,โ€ Carman said.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #73

    @orion said:

    Well, not that he WANTS him to win the battle:

    โ€œIf you want to, just name Deshaun the starter and letโ€™s get going. Iโ€™m dead serious. Iโ€™m not the only one accepting reality here. Iโ€™m not the only one. Thereโ€™s reality to real Browns fans and then thereโ€™s whateverโ€™s going over the internet. Yeah, you know who I want to start, but I will accept the reality of a first-time head coach, knowing the nature of the business, and needing to win. If a veteran is able to get them in and out of the huddle and knows a little bit more of things, Iโ€™m willing to accept the reality,โ€ Carman said.

    I have zero problems with what Ken Carman says here.

  • @orion said:

    Well, not that he WANTS him to win the battle:

    โ€œIf you want to, just name Deshaun the starter and letโ€™s get going. Iโ€™m dead serious. Iโ€™m not the only one accepting reality here. Iโ€™m not the only one. Thereโ€™s reality to real Browns fans and then thereโ€™s whateverโ€™s going over the internet. Yeah, you know who I want to start, but I will accept the reality of a first-time head coach, knowing the nature of the business, and needing to win. If a veteran is able to get them in and out of the huddle and knows a little bit more of things, Iโ€™m willing to accept the reality,โ€ Carman said.

    I have zero problems with what Ken Carman says here.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by Orion
    #74

    @dutch-oven said:

    I have zero problems with what Ken Carman says here.

    Right. Ken Carmen, you, me, all of us don't want Watson to be the starter. That's because we're allowed to view things through a different lens. A coach can't use that lens until hopes for the playoffs have been extinguished. And as you stated, even if Watson is named the starter, it won't be long before he hurts himself and Shedeur gets to play.

    edit and add: .....perhaps there's still hope. ๐Ÿ™‚

    image.png

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #75

    image.png

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #76

    Yeayyyyyy!!!

    image.png

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #77

    โ€œShedeur was great today. I wasnโ€™t sure, maybe Saturday [he] wouldโ€™ve preferred to be with the ones, and Iโ€™d be [angry] if he wasnโ€™t, because all of our guys should want to be with the ones. Iโ€™ve always said that about Shedeur. But even over the last week or so, Deshaun has played better, heโ€™s looked better, heโ€™s made better decisions. I think some of that grows, like all of us, as they have success. Their confidence grows with the success they have every day,โ€ Monken said.

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #78

    image.png

  • Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by Bob806
    #79

    Regarding the QBs...one thing to consider, maybe it's been posted already-

    It might actually be easier for the Browns to start Watson, then turn to Sanders when that most-likely fails.

    If the Browns drop their first 2 games in Florida, and DW isn't very good, maybe it's SS' turn. I can't imagine our fans being kind to DW if he sucks at the home opener, even if it's one incompletion or interception/sack.

    Starting SS, and if he fails, turning to Watson, well then we've got an even bigger problem. Just my two cents.

  • Regarding the QBs...one thing to consider, maybe it's been posted already-

    It might actually be easier for the Browns to start Watson, then turn to Sanders when that most-likely fails.

    If the Browns drop their first 2 games in Florida, and DW isn't very good, maybe it's SS' turn. I can't imagine our fans being kind to DW if he sucks at the home opener, even if it's one incompletion or interception/sack.

    Starting SS, and if he fails, turning to Watson, well then we've got an even bigger problem. Just my two cents.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #80

    @bob806 said:

    their first 2 games in Florida,

    Yup. It seems like the schedule makers made it easier to start Watson over Sanders with the first 2 games being on the road.

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #81

    1st Depth Chart - Bears game. I'm very happy for Denzel Boston. I was disappointed that we chose Concepcion at #21 and not Boston. But by some strange miracle, there was Boston still on the board for our 2nd round pick. And in hindsight, had we chosen Boston at 21 then for sure Concepcion wouldn't have been there for us in round 2 because a lot of people had Concepcion rated higher than Boston. Not me however. I thought Boston would already be gone before pick 21. It worked out better than I could've imagined. Boston came to us not as a 1st rounder. Without having to live up to the 1st round moniker. And yet, wanting to prove that he should've been a 1st round pick. And with the camp he's had to this point, he has done and is doing just that.

    I'm envisioning the WR room like this: Jerry Judy, Denzel Boston, Kevin Concepcion, Isaiah Bond....and then one or two guys that are going to have to separate themselves from the pack. One might think that Cedric Tillman might have the inside track, but he just hasn't shown much in his two seasons with the team. So being a veteran might actually be to his detriment.

    Offense

    Position

    1st

    2nd

    3rd

    4th

    5th

    6th

    WR

    Jerry Jeudy

    Tylan Wallace

    Malachi Corley

    LT

    *Spencer Fano

    Dawand Jones

    Jeremiah Byers

    LG

    Zion Johnson

    Zak Zinter

    Kingsley Eguakun

    C

    Elgton Jenkins

    *Parker Brailsford

    Luke Wypler

    RG

    Teven Jenkins

    KT Leveston

    Jack Conley

    RT

    Tytus Howard

    *Austin Barber

    Tyre Phillips

    *Izavion Miller

    WR

    *Denzel Boston

    Cedric Tillman

    Gage Larvadain

    Luke Floriea

    QB

    Deshaun Watson OR Shedeur Sanders

    Dillon Gabriel

    *Taylen Green

    RB

    Quinshon Judkins

    Dylan Sampson

    Raheim Sanders

    Michael Burton (FB)

    Ahmani Marshall

    *Davon Booth

    TE

    Harold Fannin Jr.

    Blake Whiteheart

    Jack Stoll

    Brenden Bates

    *Carsen Ryan

    (*Joe Royer)

    WR

    *KC Concepcion Jr.

    Isaiah Bond

    *Kole Wilson

    Defense

    Position

    1st

    2nd

    3rd

    4th

    5th

    6th

    LDE

    Jared Verse

    Julian Okwara

    *Khordae Sydnor

    Benton Whitley

    LDT

    (Maliek Collins)

    Mike Hall Jr.

    Sam Kamara

    *Tyreak Sapp

    Coziah Izzard

    Patrick Jenkins

    RDT

    Mason Graham

    Kalia Davis

    Adin Huntington

    Elijah Chatman

    Travis Bell

    RDE

    Alex Wright

    Isaiah McGuire

    *Logan Fano

    LB

    Carson Schwesinger

    Nathaniel Watson

    LB

    Quincy Williams

    *Justin Jefferson

    LB

    Easton Mascarenas-Arnold

    Winston Reid

    Edefuan Ulofoshio

    CB

    Tyson Campbell

    Myles Harden

    Damarri Mathis

    Tre Avery

    *Michael Coats Jr.

    *Jeadyn Lukus

    CB

    Denzel Ward

    D'Angelo Ross

    Myles Bryant

    *Nate Evans

    Tyron Herring

    Tyler Hall

    S

    Grant Delpit

    *Emmanuel McNeil-Warren

    Daniel Thomas

    *Zion Washington

    S

    Ronnie Hickman

    Christopher Edmonds

    Donovan McMillon

  • Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #82

    @orion yeah I think Tillman is still under his rookie deal, bigger body, so I think he's safe. Has some upside but injuries have slowed him.

    The potential for a good offense is here again, as the skill guys bring excitement.

  • @orion yeah I think Tillman is still under his rookie deal, bigger body, so I think he's safe. Has some upside but injuries have slowed him.

    The potential for a good offense is here again, as the skill guys bring excitement.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven
    #83

    @bob806 said:

    @orion yeah I think Tillman is still under his rookie deal, bigger body, so I think he's safe. Has some upside but injuries have slowed him.

    The potential for a good offense is here again, as the skill guys bring excitement.

    I just wish we had a legit starting QB.

    I'm not even talking a top notch starting QB, just a veteran who can read defenses, get the offensive players on the same page, and run the offense in a competent way for this season, and some of next until the rookie we draft (I hope) is ready to start sometime in 2027.

    The lack of that is tempering my enthusiasm.

    "Enthusiasms... enthusiasms.... enthusiasms" (Name tthat 80s classic movie)

  • OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Starting QB for Bears game announced: โ€œDeshaun Watson will start this Saturdayโ€™s preseason game, with Shedeur Sanders to start next weekโ€™s game,โ€ the Cleveland Browns announced.

    image.png

  • @bob806 said:

    @orion yeah I think Tillman is still under his rookie deal, bigger body, so I think he's safe. Has some upside but injuries have slowed him.

    The potential for a good offense is here again, as the skill guys bring excitement.

    I just wish we had a legit starting QB.

    I'm not even talking a top notch starting QB, just a veteran who can read defenses, get the offensive players on the same page, and run the offense in a competent way for this season, and some of next until the rookie we draft (I hope) is ready to start sometime in 2027.

    The lack of that is tempering my enthusiasm.

    "Enthusiasms... enthusiasms.... enthusiasms" (Name tthat 80s classic movie)

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #85

    @dutch-oven said:

    I just wish we had a legit starting QB.

    I'm not even talking a top notch starting QB, just a veteran who can read defenses, get the offensive players on the same page, and run the offense in a competent way for this season, and some of next until the rookie we draft (I hope) is ready to start sometime in 2027.

    The lack of that is tempering my enthusiasm.

    "Enthusiasms... enthusiasms.... enthusiasms" (Name tthat 80s classic movie)

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #86

  • @syd said:

    speaking of wr's being cut seems a udfa from some small ass collage Floriea will make the team again this year, who was that that talked shit about small collage guys that go undrafted ? I forgot who , must not be that important of a poster

    barack-obama-former-us-president.gif

    sydS syd wrote on last edited by
    #87

    @tiamat63 said:

    barack-obama-former-us-president.gif

    oh that was you ?

  • sydS syd

    @tiamat63 said:

    barack-obama-former-us-president.gif

    oh that was you ?

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #88

    @syd said:

    oh that was you ?

    I don't know, buddy. I vaguely remember us having a conversation about a small school player and some AI slop videos where we ended up finding some common ground.

    I don't get the time to read the board like I used to, sadly.