Cap and Trade
-
Well, for one thing, I don't agree with him on Afghanistan. But the point you keep bringing up is "change my ass" when, as I pointed out earlier, Obama openly vowed to send more troops to Afghanistan in the campaign. So did McCain. So it's not that he was being disingenuous. It was a campaign pledge that he followed through on - to change the Bush policy on Afghanistan.
And I've never said that Republicans are making him do it, so I don't know where you're getting that. Of course this is his decision.
How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life.
Check out my post on the cap and trade. I wasn't sure if you read the whole thing, I read the summary. And in the last line of the 80,000 page amendment...
Ta da.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to publish a strategic action plan to assist health professionals in preparing for and responding to the impacts of climate change;
How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life.
Check out my post on the cap and trade. I wasn't sure if you read the whole thing, I read the summary. And in the last line of the 80,000 page amendment...
Ta da.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to publish a strategic action plan to assist health professionals in preparing for and responding to the impacts of climate change;
Yeah. That's a good idea. What's your point?
We're going to have some climate change. We can't stop it all. No one is suggesting we can. We're trying to mitigate it. So they're preparing for the impacts that we will have.
I know you think you've caught them being inconsistent here, but you haven't.
-
"How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life."
I don't know what you're getting at here.
-
"How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life."
I don't know what you're getting at here.
"How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life."
I don't know what you're getting at here.
He's doing the same shit that Bush did.
-
-
Really?
-
"How is that change? He's changing America, just not in terms of war. I would say that's a pretty big aspect of life."
I don't know what you're getting at here.
He's doing the same shit that Bush did.
He's doing the same shit that Bush did.
I still don't know what you're talking about. What shit are you talking about?
-
For one, not to send MORE troops to Afghanistan. And don't give me that shit about the Republicans are making him do it. He is ultimately the decision maker. And if that was the case, why isn't he backing down from the Republicans about health care.
Are you going to be saying "he needs more time" 3 years from now?
Siding with a "party" is childish. It's like 5th grade recess.
Well, for one thing, I don't agree with him on Afghanistan. But the point you keep bringing up is "change my ass" when, as I pointed out earlier, Obama openly vowed to send more troops to Afghanistan in the campaign. So did McCain. So it's not that he was being disingenuous. It was a campaign pledge that he followed through on - to change the Bush policy on Afghanistan.
And I've never said that Republicans are making him do it, so I don't know where you're getting that. Of course this is his decision.
Well, for one thing, I don't agree with him on Afghanistan.
Of course in politics one must always advocate the opposite policy to one's opponent but.....
Since he did make that a key camaign issue what would you want him to do now Heck?
WSS
-
Well, Cheney says the Obama admin asked for an
overview of their plan for Afghanistan.
So, Cheney and Bush and staff gave it to them in a meeting.
The Obama admin asked that they keep it quiet. So,
Cheney says they complied to keep it out of politics.
And what Obama has been doing, sure looks like exactly
what Bush and Cheney and co. GAVE THEM.
Iow, the Obama admin has no clue, except for their socialist agenda.
-
-
Well, for one thing, I don't agree with him on Afghanistan.
Of course in politics one must always advocate the opposite policy to one's opponent but.....
Since he did make that a key camaign issue what would you want him to do now Heck?
WSS
Of course in politics one must always advocate the opposite policy to one's opponent but.....
Since he did make that a key camaign issue what would you want him to do now Heck?
WSS
Honestly, I have no specific idea. 99.5% of the people publicly commenting on this don't either. I don't know what's going on on the ground in Afghanistan/Pakistan. I just have a general sense that the goals we want to accomplish need more than 40,000, or even 80,000 troops. I don't think that place is worth the costs, and I don't buy the "safe haven" argument to begin with. They don't need a country to plan this stuff. They need a room or a cave or an apartment in Germany.
So I'm all for keeping up the drone or special forces attacks and some troop level to maintain the intelligence capability to carry out those type of attacks.
Not that this is a good option either. It's just less bad, and from our point of view only.
-
Of course in politics one must always advocate the opposite policy to one's opponent but.....
Since he did make that a key camaign issue what would you want him to do now Heck?
WSS
Honestly, I have no specific idea. 99.5% of the people publicly commenting on this don't either. I don't know what's going on on the ground in Afghanistan/Pakistan. I just have a general sense that the goals we want to accomplish need more than 40,000, or even 80,000 troops. I don't think that place is worth the costs, and I don't buy the "safe haven" argument to begin with. They don't need a country to plan this stuff. They need a room or a cave or an apartment in Germany.
So I'm all for keeping up the drone or special forces attacks and some troop level to maintain the intelligence capability to carry out those type of attacks.
Not that this is a good option either. It's just less bad, and from our point of view only.
Honestly, I have no specific idea. 99.5% of the people publicly commenting on this don't either. I don't know what's going on on the ground in Afghanistan/Pakistan. I just have a general sense that the goals we want to accomplish need more than 40,000, or even 80,000 troops. I don't think that place is worth the costs, and I don't buy the "safe haven" argument to begin with. They don't need a country to plan this stuff. They need a room or a cave or an apartment in Germany.
So I'm all for keeping up the drone or special forces attacks and some troop level to maintain the intelligence capability to carry out those type of attacks.
Not that this is a good option either. It's just less bad, and from our point of view only.
Can't really argue with that.
How badly do you think we've been painted into a corner?
WSS
-
I prefer to leave it to the Commanders on the ground. They know what they need. Obama promised Afganistan would be a priority. I doubt he will keep his word. He seems like a poll junkie to me. Lets just let Al Queda open up their training camps again and have some more terror attacks here. Then we can jump on the fuking merry go round and watch the shit happen over and over again. Americans main problem is that we have short memories and no patience. We want everything to happen now. That is a defeatist attitude when dealing with an enemy. If you think a few thousand special forces can cover an entire mountainous country like Afganistan, you are seriously mistaken.
-
I prefer to leave it to the Commanders on the ground. They know what they need. Obama promised Afganistan would be a priority. I doubt he will keep his word. He seems like a poll junkie to me. Lets just let Al Queda open up their training camps again and have some more terror attacks here. Then we can jump on the fuking merry go round and watch the shit happen over and over again. Americans main problem is that we have short memories and no patience. We want everything to happen now. That is a defeatist attitude when dealing with an enemy. If you think a few thousand special forces can cover an entire mountainous country like Afganistan, you are seriously mistaken.
I prefer to leave it to the Commanders on the ground. They know what they need. Obama promised Afganistan would be a priority. I doubt he will keep his word. He seems like a poll junkie to me. Lets just let Al Queda open up their training camps again and have some more terror attacks here. Then we can jump on the fuking merry go round and watch the shit happen over and over again. Americans main problem is that we have short memories and no patience. We want everything to happen now. That is a defeatist attitude when dealing with an enemy. If you think a few thousand special forces can cover an entire mountainous country like Afganistan, you are seriously mistaken.
Its a joke. We haven't done shit to help, other then the flourishing heroin trade. Do you think it's a coincidence that 90% of the world's opium supply comes out of Afghanistan and our military is there?
"Our objective are to fight and catch terrorists". Still Waiting.........
-
I prefer to leave it to the Commanders on the ground. They know what they need. Obama promised Afganistan would be a priority. I doubt he will keep his word. He seems like a poll junkie to me. Lets just let Al Queda open up their training camps again and have some more terror attacks here. Then we can jump on the fuking merry go round and watch the shit happen over and over again. Americans main problem is that we have short memories and no patience. We want everything to happen now. That is a defeatist attitude when dealing with an enemy. If you think a few thousand special forces can cover an entire mountainous country like Afganistan, you are seriously mistaken.
Its a joke. We haven't done shit to help, other then the flourishing heroin trade. Do you think it's a coincidence that 90% of the world's opium supply comes out of Afghanistan and our military is there?
"Our objective are to fight and catch terrorists". Still Waiting.........
Its a joke. We haven't done shit to help, other then the flourishing heroin trade. Do you think it's a coincidence that 90% of the world's opium supply comes out of Afghanistan and our military is there?
"Our objective are to fight and catch terrorists". Still Waiting.........
I know our military has nothing to do with the heroin trade if that is what you're suggesting. Bush fuked up in Afganistan. We have to take out Al Queda. If you think it's a fantasy, go on believing so. I know better.
-
Its a joke. We haven't done shit to help, other then the flourishing heroin trade. Do you think it's a coincidence that 90% of the world's opium supply comes out of Afghanistan and our military is there?
"Our objective are to fight and catch terrorists". Still Waiting.........
I know our military has nothing to do with the heroin trade if that is what you're suggesting. Bush fuked up in Afganistan. We have to take out Al Queda. If you think it's a fantasy, go on believing so. I know better.
I know our military has nothing to do with the heroin trade if that is what you're suggesting. Bush fuked up in Afganistan. We have to take out Al Queda. If you think it's a fantasy, go on believing so. I know better.
My brother's there man. Medic for the Marines.
-
I know our military has nothing to do with the heroin trade if that is what you're suggesting. Bush fuked up in Afganistan. We have to take out Al Queda. If you think it's a fantasy, go on believing so. I know better.
My brother's there man. Medic for the Marines.
My brother's there man. Medic for the Marines.
So he is a Navy Corpsman. Look, I know there are all sorts of theories, and I damn sure am not in a position to know what the truth is on all this shit. I just hope to god what I think is going on is the right thing, and not some master diabolical plot. And being retired Navy I wish your brother god speed and a safe trip home.
-
My brother's there man. Medic for the Marines.
So he is a Navy Corpsman. Look, I know there are all sorts of theories, and I damn sure am not in a position to know what the truth is on all this shit. I just hope to god what I think is going on is the right thing, and not some master diabolical plot. And being retired Navy I wish your brother god speed and a safe trip home.
So he is a Navy Corpsman. Look, I know there are all sorts of theories, and I damn sure am not in a position to know what the truth is on all this shit. I just hope to god what I think is going on is the right thing, and not some master diabolical plot. And being retired Navy I wish your brother god speed and a safe trip home.
Yes he was in the Navy (I am not sure on the lingo) for 5 years and transfered him to Camp Leguime for Medic training with the Marines.
Just a thought here. Ok, we have this "War on Drugs" here in the US, trillions of dollars spent. But then we don't have a War on Drugs around the world, hence 90% of all heroin being from Afghanistan. We could easily stop it at the source. Let alone that if we took care of it there the Taliban would have zero revenue. Why do you think they are not destroying their crops? Why are they not destroying their funding?
So we go abroad for the "War on Terror" and spend trillions, yet we don't defend our boarders with those same troops here at home.
Sort of a weird dicodemy if you think about it.
-
Honestly, I have no specific idea. 99.5% of the people publicly commenting on this don't either. I don't know what's going on on the ground in Afghanistan/Pakistan. I just have a general sense that the goals we want to accomplish need more than 40,000, or even 80,000 troops. I don't think that place is worth the costs, and I don't buy the "safe haven" argument to begin with. They don't need a country to plan this stuff. They need a room or a cave or an apartment in Germany.
So I'm all for keeping up the drone or special forces attacks and some troop level to maintain the intelligence capability to carry out those type of attacks.
Not that this is a good option either. It's just less bad, and from our point of view only.
Can't really argue with that.
How badly do you think we've been painted into a corner?
WSS
Can't really argue with that.
How badly do you think we've been painted into a corner?
WSS
It's a more intractable problem than Iraq by a good measure, and Iraq is screwed. But at least in Iraq you could buy a lot of people off and convince them not to shoot at you anymore. There's a middle class there, some level of modernity. I don't know what you pin this experiment to in Afghanistan.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login