ESPN's John Clayton Reporting Holmgren Will Fire Mangini
-
The last time we had a really good scout/personnel guy we had Savage giving us John Dunn and Travis Wilson.
Heck, look at Scott Pioli in KC. Supposedly he was a genius, but it looks like Haley may well be one and done with the talent that Pioli gave him to work with. Their draft was one stinker after another, and picking a 3-4 DE who can't stop the Browns dominate rushing attack #3 overall cant be helping their cause too much.
When Holmgren ran the Seattle drafts, he hit on 37% of the picks. That's a fact. I'm just sayin' that the more voices we have in that draft room the better and we better damn well have someone hired soon who will scout the hell out of the college players. Holmgren ain't it. He's not a scout by trade. He's more of an administrator, which is great, in my opinion.
And Savage ain't gettin' this job. But he did do well to bring in guys like Cribbs, McDonald, and Harrison who were late-round/FA guys. Yes, Wilson was a bust, no question. Savage's downfall was his FA spending, IMO. Crazy money for a lot of guys who didn't contribute here (Baxter, Bentley, Stallworth to name a few).
I just don't trust Holmgren to be the sole operator of the draft. Again, he's a great coach, but he's not Ernie Accorsi either.
When Holmgren ran the Seattle drafts, he hit on 37% of the picks. That's a fact. I'm just sayin' that the more voices we have in that draft room the better and we better damn well have someone hired soon who will scout the hell out of the college players. Holmgren ain't it. He's not a scout by trade. He's more of an administrator, which is great, in my opinion.
And Savage ain't gettin' this job. But he did do well to bring in guys like Cribbs, McDonald, and Harrison who were late-round/FA guys. Yes, Wilson was a bust, no question. Savage's downfall was his FA spending, IMO. Crazy money for a lot of guys who didn't contribute here (Baxter, Bentley, Stallworth to name a few).
I just don't trust Holmgren to be the sole operator of the draft. Again, he's a great coach, but he's not Ernie Accorsi either.
then we need some good scouting.
-
Mangini isn't going anywhere..Clayton is an English major geek who never strapped on the pads.
You think Clayton wasn't slamming Holgrem near the end in Seattle..sure he was..You think MH
would tell Clayton anything..doubtful.
-
I really hope the Crypt Keeper is wrong about this.
I really hope the Crypt Keeper is wrong about this.
i look at john clayton and i can't help to wonder if he spent the first 9 months of his life dodging a wire coat hanger
-
I really hope the Crypt Keeper is wrong about this.
i look at john clayton and i can't help to wonder if he spent the first 9 months of his life dodging a wire coat hanger
i look at john clayton and i can't help to wonder if he spent the first 9 months of his life dodging a wire coat hanger
that's terrible.
-
Mangini isn't going anywhere..Clayton is an English major geek who never strapped on the pads.
You think Clayton wasn't slamming Holgrem near the end in Seattle..sure he was..You think MH
would tell Clayton anything..doubtful.
Mangini isn't going anywhere..Clayton is an English major geek who never strapped on the pads.
You think Clayton wasn't slamming Holgrem near the end in Seattle..sure he was..You think MH
would tell Clayton anything..doubtful.
pete,
I hope you're right. I just don't have a good feeling about it.
I really hope these last two games go our way and the guys continue to fight for EM and themselves.
-
My greatest fear is that Holmgren as GM in Cleveland will be what he was in Seattle: Not very good.
Why was he not a good GM? And he was coaching at the time. I know everyone wants perfection, but it is just not possible. He is the best choice out there.
Why was he not a good GM? And he was coaching at the time. I know everyone wants perfection, but it is just not possible. He is the best choice out there.
I'm not disagreeing with the hire. I think he will be a good leader for the organization. I'm just not sold on his drafting ability. He's not a scout by trade. Nobody argues this. But he is a good evaluator of coaches, no question.
Therefore, I am hoping for the following things:
1) Hire a good personnel director/scout for the draft
2) Work with EM
3) Open up the possibilities of additions to EM's staff that would help (Weis, Zorn, etc.)
4) For Czar Holmgren to tell the PD and other local hacks to stick it
-
If Marty Morningwig is the Browns HC i'm done..mangini took over the most DYSFUNCTIONAL FRANCHISE in the NFL and has clearly made major strides to right this ship..Anyone who doesn't see that is kidding themselves, a Mangini hater or a low watt light bulb.or a dull tool in the shed.
-
Why was he not a good GM? And he was coaching at the time. I know everyone wants perfection, but it is just not possible. He is the best choice out there.
I'm not disagreeing with the hire. I think he will be a good leader for the organization. I'm just not sold on his drafting ability. He's not a scout by trade. Nobody argues this. But he is a good evaluator of coaches, no question.
Therefore, I am hoping for the following things:
1) Hire a good personnel director/scout for the draft
2) Work with EM
3) Open up the possibilities of additions to EM's staff that would help (Weis, Zorn, etc.)
4) For Czar Holmgren to tell the PD and other local hacks to stick it
I'm not disagreeing with the hire. I think he will be a good leader for the organization. I'm just not sold on his drafting ability. He's not a scout by trade. Nobody argues this. But he is a good evaluator of coaches, no question.
Therefore, I am hoping for the following things:
1) Hire a good personnel director/scout for the draft
2) Work with EM
3) Open up the possibilities of additions to EM's staff that would help (Weis, Zorn, etc.)
4) For Czar Holmgren to tell the PD and other local hacks to stick it
Could quite be. I think he did well in the draft.
1999 - Lamar King
2000 - Shaun Alexander and Chris McIntosh
2001 - Steve Hutchinson, Ken Lucas, Orlando Huff, Floyd Womack
2002 - none
So 3 pro bowlers in 4 years? Not including the serviceable players taken in the 4th and above rounds. Not bad considering he was coaching at the time. Compare that with all the other teams and I would say he was in the top 10 for those 4 years. Yes he did draft 2 busts Koren Robinson (pro bowl 05 though) and Jeremy Stevens.
I do agree if he can get someone to look into character a bit more, which I think he will, I think he is going to draft great!
-
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
-
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
Stan..i believe you have an assignment..Great idea Frenchie
-
If Marty Morningwig is the Browns HC i'm done..mangini took over the most DYSFUNCTIONAL FRANCHISE in the NFL and has clearly made major strides to right this ship..Anyone who doesn't see that is kidding themselves, a Mangini hater or a low watt light bulb.or a dull tool in the shed.
If Marty Morningwig is the Browns HC i'm done..mangini took over the most DYSFUNCTIONAL FRANCHISE in the NFL and has clearly made major strides to right this ship..Anyone who doesn't see that is kidding themselves, a Mangini hater or a low watt light bulb.or a dull tool in the shed.
I agree, that's why I cannot imagine why the Walrus wouldn't keep Mangini for at least another year. Holmgren has got to recognize progress when he sees it. And considering the fact that his contract may be for 10 years, it can only help him to give the coach another year. Now, if he were under a 3 year deal, I could see him wanting to get his own guy in here and sprint to the finish. Lerner has let him know with the 10 year deal that he is in it for the long-haul and so he shouldn't be rushed to make rash, uneducated decisions.
How does Morningwig still have job offers in the NFL?
-
I wouldn't be worried if it comes out of Clayton's mouth, but if Schefter says it, then that's when we should start to be worried about Mangini.
-

-
-
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
I think the fact that a blackout was narrowly averted just a few weeks ago was taken by Lerner as a loud and clear message by the fans. Ticket sales and profits are nearly everything to an owner.
He responded by taking away GM duties from Mangini (or at least the power to choose the GM as he did with Kokinis) and bring in Holmgren to do what HOLMGREN thinks needs to be done - not the owner, and not the fans.
-
Christ Mortenson yesterday said Mangini isnt 100% getting fired since he's a Parcells guy and Parcells and Holmgren are close friends and on the same page, so I don't think anyone really knows.
Christ Mortenson yesterday said Mangini isnt 100% getting fired since he's a Parcells guy and Parcells and Holmgren are close friends and on the same page, so I don't think anyone really knows.
Mangini as a "Parcells guy" might be news to Parcells (who was invoked by Holmgren when explaining that firing a coach after 1 year can be justified.)
Mangini's only association was as a Defensive Assistant under Belichick when Belichick was reporting to Parcells.
You could make a better case that Mangini is a "Belichick guy" since the reason Mangini had the defensive assistant job in NYC was because Mangini impressed him as PR Intern and ballboy during his first stint in Cleveland.
You can say what you want about Clayton or anyone in the media but they wouldn't say something like that if they didn't have a source. Whether that source is right is debateable.
-
Christ Mortenson yesterday said Mangini isnt 100% getting fired since he's a Parcells guy and Parcells and Holmgren are close friends and on the same page, so I don't think anyone really knows.
Mangini as a "Parcells guy" might be news to Parcells (who was invoked by Holmgren when explaining that firing a coach after 1 year can be justified.)
Mangini's only association was as a Defensive Assistant under Belichick when Belichick was reporting to Parcells.
You could make a better case that Mangini is a "Belichick guy" since the reason Mangini had the defensive assistant job in NYC was because Mangini impressed him as PR Intern and ballboy during his first stint in Cleveland.
You can say what you want about Clayton or anyone in the media but they wouldn't say something like that if they didn't have a source. Whether that source is right is debateable.
You could make a better case that Mangini is a "Belichick guy" since the reason Mangini had the defensive assistant job in NYC was because Mangini impressed him as PR Intern and ballboy during his first stint in Cleveland.
Mangini is a "Belichick guy". That's a well-known fact. Just because he hates Belichick doesn't mean he's not from his coaching tree. The only thing people are saying is that Mangini and Parcells have a relationship, albeit very loose.
-
Is there anything we (as fans and as members of the Brown's Board) can do to send a message to Holmgren and Lerner that we want EM to be given the chance he deserves? Can the Browns Board pin a thread where we can voice our concern and send it with everyone's comments to their respective offices?
I think the fact that a blackout was narrowly averted just a few weeks ago was taken by Lerner as a loud and clear message by the fans. Ticket sales and profits are nearly everything to an owner.
He responded by taking away GM duties from Mangini (or at least the power to choose the GM as he did with Kokinis) and bring in Holmgren to do what HOLMGREN thinks needs to be done - not the owner, and not the fans.
I think the fact that a blackout was narrowly averted just a few weeks ago was taken by Lerner as a loud and clear message by the fans. Ticket sales and profits are nearly everything to an owner.
He responded by taking away GM duties from Mangini (or at least the power to choose the GM as he did with Kokinis) and bring in Holmgren to do what HOLMGREN thinks needs to be done - not the owner, and not the fans.
Taking away GM duties..geez`Joe thats a reach even for you..I believe I've read somewhere that Mangini and Parcells are close Mangini as is Parcells and Holgrem..Mangini and Reid..Reid and Holgrem.one big happy family.
-
You could make a better case that Mangini is a "Belichick guy" since the reason Mangini had the defensive assistant job in NYC was because Mangini impressed him as PR Intern and ballboy during his first stint in Cleveland.
Mangini is a "Belichick guy". That's a well-known fact. Just because he hates Belichick doesn't mean he's not from his coaching tree. The only thing people are saying is that Mangini and Parcells have a relationship, albeit very loose.
Mangini is a "Belichick guy". That's a well-known fact. Just because he hates Belichick doesn't mean he's not from his coaching tree. The only thing people are saying is that Mangini and Parcells have a relationship, albeit very loose.
I agree. But the notion that Holmgren wouldn't fire Mangini over his better judgement because 10 years ago Mangini reported to Belichick who reported to Parcells and Holmgren likes Parcells is ludicrous.
Holmgren's got his reputation as an NFL decision maker on the line. Furthermore he likely wants 100% credit for bringinig in one of "his guys" - likely someone familiar with the West Coast offense. I don't think he'll be swayed by such a weak association with Parcells. Heck - if Mangini were Parcells' own son I don't think that would influence Holmgren.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login