WIMBLEY TO OAKLAND
-
MORT THINKS ITS A THIRD.......http://twitter.com/mortreport/status/10486537917
-
atleast this opens up the possibility of us drafting my favorite player in the draft. Brandon Graham, oh yea I said it. And I hate Michigan
-
Zombo said:
He had 6 1/2 sacks. Big whoop. Matt Roth had four in six games.Wimbley is a serviceable pass rusher. We can do better than serviceable.
Zombo
top 10 stats in the NFL
Roth was cut in the season
HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE diffrence
-
Zombo said:
He had 6 1/2 sacks. Big whoop. Matt Roth had four in six games.Wimbley is a serviceable pass rusher. We can do better than serviceable.
Zombo
One dimensional. He looked like a Retard running after a watermelon trying to cover. I'm not saying he was horrible, but we can do better in the draft. And people let me ask you this, when has Oakland made a good personnel decision?
-
Zombo said:
He had 6 1/2 sacks. Big whoop. Matt Roth had four in six games.Wimbley is a serviceable pass rusher. We can do better than serviceable.
Zombo
top 10 stats in the NFL
Roth was cut in the season
HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE diffrence
top 10 stats in the NFL?
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
-
Good....Wimp needed to go....he didn't fit.
If the reports of a 3rd are correct, I would save we raped them. A decent trade would have been a 5th.
-
top 10 stats in the NFL?
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
-
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
Ok I'll bite. What was Wimbley the top 10 in in terms of stats?
-
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...
For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?
Owned harder
-
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...
For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?
Owned harder
Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...
For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?
Owned harder
I didn't have to come back with anything, that is how dumb that comment was. Then he said I was owned.
We need to sticky this guys posts for a good laugh.
-
your joking right? if its true we got ripped off big time
we could have gotten a 2nd or 3rd at least
A second? Umm......no. a third would be pushing it.
-
picks, picks, picks, picks. picks!
-
if we get a third for him then i'm all for it. keep the picks coming holmgren!
-
Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.
-
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
Wow, you're a jackass
-
He was 38th in the league in sacks.
Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
sacks are not the only single thing in football
owned hard
Please just STFU.
-
Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.
Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.
low, high...if it weren't for context we'd never have a clue what each other really meant.

-
owned
hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?
-
LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.
More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.
LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.
More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.
agreed. i think our boy Rob Ryan is in the room with them too (figuratively).
this invites more complex defensive schemes imo.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login