WIMBLEY TO OAKLAND

[ballpeen]

Good....Wimp needed to go....he didn't fit.

If the reports of a 3rd are correct, I would save we raped them. A decent trade would have been a 5th.

[Athensbuck26]

@kosar_for_president said:

He was 38th in the league in sacks.

Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.

sacks are not the only single thing in football

owned hard

[Kosar_For_President]

@athensbuck26 said:

sacks are not the only single thing in football

owned hard

Ok I'll bite. What was Wimbley the top 10 in in terms of stats?

[ClevelandBigDawg]

@athensbuck26 said:

sacks are not the only single thing in football

owned hard

Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

Owned harder

[Kosar_For_President]

@clevelandbigdawg said:

Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

Owned harder

I didn't have to come back with anything, that is how dumb that comment was. Then he said I was owned.

We need to sticky this guys posts for a good laugh.

[BrownsBacker85]

@athensbuck26 said:

your joking right? if its true we got ripped off big time

we could have gotten a 2nd or 3rd at least

A second? Umm......no. a third would be pushing it.

[sisky fringo]

picks, picks, picks, picks. picks!

[miktoxic]

if we get a third for him then i'm all for it. keep the picks coming holmgren!

[professor_g]

Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.

[D Bone]

@athensbuck26 said:

sacks are not the only single thing in football

owned hard

Wow, you're a jackass

[DieHardBrownsFan]

@athensbuck26 said:

sacks are not the only single thing in football

owned hard

Please just STFU.

[sisky fringo]

@professor_g said:

Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.

low, high...if it weren't for context we'd never have a clue what each other really meant.

[miktoxic]

@athensbuck26 said:

owned

hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?

[roach]

LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.

More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.

[sisky fringo]

@roach said:

LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.

More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.

agreed. i think our boy Rob Ryan is in the room with them too (figuratively).

this invites more complex defensive schemes imo.

[BrownsFan17]

I never thought Wimbley fit well in the 3-4 D so going to Oakland should be a great move for him. I wish him much success. He always had a great attitude while he was here.

[ballpeen]

@miktoxic said:

hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?

I agree buddy!

[calfoxwc]

It doesn't have to be the player SUCKS.. just that the player just doesn't fit into the refined scheme of things.

Could be a player just isn't happy in a 3-4, whatever. If we traded him for less than the Raiders' third round pick this year,

we will have gotten taken on that deal, imho.

Wimbley may not have the burst for going after the passer,....

and there are several terrific 3-4 lb's in this draft.

all said and done, I think the Browns may very well take McClain, or one of a few other lb's in the first round.

This draft is going to be very surprising to us all, I think, and I CAN'T WAIT !

[FloridaBrownsFan]

What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

[Earl34]

@floridabrownsfan said:

What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

I think they weren't going to write a huge article without knowing the compensation. NFL.com says it's a 3rd rounder this year.