Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Urologist says for people who voted for Obama...

Urologist says for people who voted for Obama...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
27 Posts 7 Posters 1.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 6k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by VaporTrail
    #18

    And as for the government setting wages, I'm going to need more clarification, I'm still pretty new to this whole realm of healthcare. Non-preferred physicians refers to people that aren't under a PPO, which offers services at a reduced price, does that refer to all private practice doctors, then?

    But here's the part where you said it'd set all government wages.

    Page 127

    10 (😎 PARTICIPATING, NON-PREFERRED

    11 PHYSICIANS.—Those physicians who agree not

    12 to impose charges (in relation to the payment

    13 rate described in section 223 for such physi14

    cians) that exceed the ratio permitted under

    15 section 1848(g)(2)© of the Social Security

    16 Act.

    It refers to this

    http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1848.htm

    © After 1992.—For physicians' services furnished in a year after 1992, the “limiting charge” shall be 115 percent of the recognized payment amount under this part for nonparticipating physicians or for nonparticipating suppliers or other persons.

    Does that mean this has been in place since 1992? Perhaps nothing has changed since then? I could be wrong, but due to the wording here, I'm going to assume this has been what it's like since 1992. If you can point out otherwise, let me know.

    1 Reply Last reply
    ❤
    Quote Reply
    • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 6k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by VaporTrail
      #19

      Page 664

      14 ‘‘(II) DEDICATED ASSIGNMENT

      15 OF ADDITIONAL RESIDENT POSITIONS

      16 TO PRIMARY CARE.—The hospital as

      17 signs all such additional resident posi

      18 tions for primary care residents.

      section iv and v on page 665-667 talks about an increase in the number of resident physicians, and it appears that each hospital has a set limit, for it to get these additional slots, they have to meet criteria listed in this section.

      section vi on 668 discusses when these additional slots need to be added by "the secretary"

      I don't know, I'm not seeing anything where it says that the government chooses where your residency is. Every hospital needs to have resident physicians, and there are only so many available slots. I don't see anything where Uncle Sam tells you where to apply for a residency, he only says where additional residency slots get added.

      Maybe it's on the second section you brought up, but hell, I'm exhausted from trying to translate this shit. But I don't think this section says what your source claimed.

      1 Reply Last reply
      ❤
      Quote Reply
      • shoot S
        • 92 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        S shoot wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Hey VT, before you start freaking out over that, it should be noted that that entire post is a copy-paste from noted right-wing loony asylum www.freerepublic.com, and is full of patently untrue and conspiracy theory bullshit (as I see you're finding out as you read the actual bill and not some Retard's "translation" of it).

        http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ar...l-needs-check-/

        Here's a starter. Plenty of other sites have already debunked most of these claims, you can literally google any of the lines in that email calfox posted and the first 50 results will be information to the contrary. Or you can just trust some crazy freeper.

        DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • S shoot

          Hey VT, before you start freaking out over that, it should be noted that that entire post is a copy-paste from noted right-wing loony asylum www.freerepublic.com, and is full of patently untrue and conspiracy theory bullshit (as I see you're finding out as you read the actual bill and not some Retard's "translation" of it).

          http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ar...l-needs-check-/

          Here's a starter. Plenty of other sites have already debunked most of these claims, you can literally google any of the lines in that email calfox posted and the first 50 results will be information to the contrary. Or you can just trust some crazy freeper.

          DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
          • 28k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
          #21

          @shoot said:

          Hey VT, before you start freaking out over that, it should be noted that that entire post is a copy-paste from noted right-wing loony asylum www.freerepublic.com, and is full of patently untrue and conspiracy theory bullshit (as I see you're finding out as you read the actual bill and not some Retard's "translation" of it).

          http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ar...l-needs-check-/

          Here's a starter. Plenty of other sites have already debunked most of these claims, you can literally google any of the lines in that email calfox posted and the first 50 results will be information to the contrary. Or you can just trust some crazy freeper.

          Vapor. Shoot, used to be called Shit (seriously). He is actually mz the pussy. who was banned from this site. He likes to come back occasionally in this "alias".

          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
          S 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

            @shoot said:

            Hey VT, before you start freaking out over that, it should be noted that that entire post is a copy-paste from noted right-wing loony asylum www.freerepublic.com, and is full of patently untrue and conspiracy theory bullshit (as I see you're finding out as you read the actual bill and not some Retard's "translation" of it).

            http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ar...l-needs-check-/

            Here's a starter. Plenty of other sites have already debunked most of these claims, you can literally google any of the lines in that email calfox posted and the first 50 results will be information to the contrary. Or you can just trust some crazy freeper.

            Vapor. Shoot, used to be called Shit (seriously). He is actually mz the pussy. who was banned from this site. He likes to come back occasionally in this "alias".

            shoot S
            • 92 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            S shoot wrote on last edited by
            #22

            @diehardbrownsfan said:

            Vapor. Shoot, used to be called Shit (seriously). He is actually mz the pussy. who was banned from this site. He likes to come back occasionally in this "alias".

            I have no idea who mz the pussy is, nor do I have any idea what this has to do with anything. The information is either true or it isn't, your ad hominem arguments are dumb.

            W 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • S shoot

              @diehardbrownsfan said:

              Vapor. Shoot, used to be called Shit (seriously). He is actually mz the pussy. who was banned from this site. He likes to come back occasionally in this "alias".

              I have no idea who mz the pussy is, nor do I have any idea what this has to do with anything. The information is either true or it isn't, your ad hominem arguments are dumb.

              Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
              • 39k Posts
              • 9k Reputation
              W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @shoot said:

              I have no idea who mz the pussy is, nor do I have any idea what this has to do with anything. The information is either true or it isn't, your ad hominem arguments are dumb.

              You aren't even similar in style to mz the pussy.

              WSS

              www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
              1 Reply Last reply
              ❤
              Quote Reply
              • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 6k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by VaporTrail
                #24

                See, this is what scares me about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. You guys will come here, posting about the endtimes along with some link of some person with an agenda. You NEED to factcheck this shit! I don't care if it comes from Limbaugh, Beck, Maddow, or Obama himself. It's really scary to see that these people have the power to say something and people will blindly believe it. Hell, I about posted something from Rachel Maddow the other day without doing research on my own, but started looking around and her evidence wasn't as great as she made it out to be, so I didn't. You guys should not take anything, ANYTHING at face value, of course it's going to be twisted in some way. Do some actual research and educate yourself instead of blindly buying into what some pundit's statements.

                @shoot

                I've actually read stuff from politifact, but that site is definitely slanted to the left, so no one here is even going to bother with it. There are hardly any objective sources of information on the internet if you're looking off of politically based websites. I've learned much more about the healthcare bill, reading through this topic, and reading through the bill than I ever would have listening to someone on Fox, MSNBC, or the blogosphere. I'd encourage everyone to do the same.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                  See, this is what scares me about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. You guys will come here, posting about the endtimes along with some link of some person with an agenda. You NEED to factcheck this shit! I don't care if it comes from Limbaugh, Beck, Maddow, or Obama himself. It's really scary to see that these people have the power to say something and people will blindly believe it. Hell, I about posted something from Rachel Maddow the other day without doing research on my own, but started looking around and her evidence wasn't as great as she made it out to be, so I didn't. You guys should not take anything, ANYTHING at face value, of course it's going to be twisted in some way. Do some actual research and educate yourself instead of blindly buying into what some pundit's statements.

                  @shoot

                  I've actually read stuff from politifact, but that site is definitely slanted to the left, so no one here is even going to bother with it. There are hardly any objective sources of information on the internet if you're looking off of politically based websites. I've learned much more about the healthcare bill, reading through this topic, and reading through the bill than I ever would have listening to someone on Fox, MSNBC, or the blogosphere. I'd encourage everyone to do the same.

                  shoot S
                  • 92 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  S shoot wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  @vaportrail said:

                  @shoot

                  I've actually read stuff from politifact, but that site is definitely slanted to the left, so no one here is even going to bother with it. There are hardly any objective sources of information on the internet if you're looking off of politically based websites. I've learned much more about the healthcare bill, reading through this topic, and reading through the bill than I ever would have listening to someone on Fox, MSNBC, or the blogosphere. I'd encourage everyone to do the same.

                  Haha, you say "slanted to the left," I say "in touch with reality" 😆

                  Either way, you're right about Fox/MSNBC etc. People need to stop watching cable news, it's poison.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 6k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    Some of their truth-o-meter stuff about Obama's promises is bullcrap. He extended the patriot act, it's listed as stalled. We're still in Iraq, yet that's omitted from this website. There are quite a few more under the stalled or compromise section that should be under broken, imo. The site's just as biased as any cable news organization.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    ❤
                    Quote Reply
                    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                      • 64k Posts
                      • 8k Reputation
                      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      the stuff I posted is exhausting. I'm sorry I don't have a whole lot of time either...

                      123 trays planted. Still planting. Took break for dinner.

                      I think maybe Shoot is more like Shep. Who knows.

                      But, about your snide comment, She... i mean, Shoot:

                      It was here:

                      http://www.naturalnews.com/026733_health_h...healthcare.html

                      Not some weird right wing nutcase site.

                      I tried to just bring it up. Some of it has merit, I think, some I have no idea.

                      But to say something so ignorant as "NO AVOID ALL NEWS FROM FOX",

                      is really foolish. You are in a minority worshipping the extreme liberal slant of CNN.

                      BTW, Fox rules the ratings, because most Americans want to KNOW that the HELL is

                      REALLY GOING ON.

                      Tell your professor to take a bath, ditch the stinkin pipe, wear some new clothes, and

                      to grow the freakin up, and start being an American.

                      It's too late for you, but maybe it would help other future students of his. 😠

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate