Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. McCoy Might Play

McCoy Might Play

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
16 Posts 11 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • GipsG Gips

    Ratty is a mangini pet and from what we saw of ratty last year and based on the 2 QBs we already sent packing ratty shouldnt even be in the nfl to begin with beyond camp, between pet elam ,pet bowden and pet ratty it really gives me a deja vu feeling about mangini as a suspect evaluator of both talent and good decision making..i may have a hard time trusting or believing in many of his upcoming judgements and decisions...im really in a show me the money kind of mindset with him right now...he himself hasnt proven to the fans or his bosses that he has what it takes yet...and after last season he is very fortunate to have a chance at all...

    As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....

    Bag O'Browns B
    • 160 Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    B Bag O'Browns wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @gips said:

    Ratty is a mangini pet and from what we saw of ratty last year and based on the 2 QBs we already sent packing ratty shouldnt even be in the nfl to begin with beyond camp, between pet elam ,pet bowden and pet ratty it really gives me a deja vu feeling about mangini as a suspect evaluator of both talent and good decision making..i may have a hard time trusting or believing in many of his upcoming judgements and decisions...im really in a show me the money kind of mindset with him right now...he himself hasnt proven to the fans or his bosses that he has what it takes yet...and after last season he is very fortunate to have a chance at all...

    As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....

    I don't think Ratliff is without talent, his arm clearly is NFL caliber. What he's showed us a Browns fans though is basically glimpses of a less good Derek Anderson. Elam also isn't a bad player and in my estimation, surrounding him with other guys who can play will help him out. Bowden is a guy who is a stop gap player all the way. He's getting up there BUT is a NFL LB all the way. What i'm saying is, for the most part these guys can play or in Ratliff's case, show something worth taking a look-see at. Mangini though is FAR from the only coach who does this, most any coach does.

    In order to appreciate the top you have to spend some time at the bottom.
    H BrownsBacker85B 2 Replies Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • B Bag O'Browns

      @gips said:

      Ratty is a mangini pet and from what we saw of ratty last year and based on the 2 QBs we already sent packing ratty shouldnt even be in the nfl to begin with beyond camp, between pet elam ,pet bowden and pet ratty it really gives me a deja vu feeling about mangini as a suspect evaluator of both talent and good decision making..i may have a hard time trusting or believing in many of his upcoming judgements and decisions...im really in a show me the money kind of mindset with him right now...he himself hasnt proven to the fans or his bosses that he has what it takes yet...and after last season he is very fortunate to have a chance at all...

      As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....

      I don't think Ratliff is without talent, his arm clearly is NFL caliber. What he's showed us a Browns fans though is basically glimpses of a less good Derek Anderson. Elam also isn't a bad player and in my estimation, surrounding him with other guys who can play will help him out. Bowden is a guy who is a stop gap player all the way. He's getting up there BUT is a NFL LB all the way. What i'm saying is, for the most part these guys can play or in Ratliff's case, show something worth taking a look-see at. Mangini though is FAR from the only coach who does this, most any coach does.

      Hoss H
      • 133 Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      H Hoss wrote on last edited by
      #7

      @bag-o-browns said:

      glimpses of a less good Derek Anderson.

      Whoa. Wait....is.....is that even possible?? 😁

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • H Hoss

        @bag-o-browns said:

        glimpses of a less good Derek Anderson.

        Whoa. Wait....is.....is that even possible?? 😁

        Bag O'Browns B
        • 160 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        B Bag O'Browns wrote on last edited by
        #8

        @hoss said:

        Whoa. Wait....is.....is that even possible?? 😁

        Ok, a less good version of what DA should be? (circa 2007) Or, perhaps better said, a kid with a big arm who doesn't put the ball where it is needed at points in times.

        In order to appreciate the top you have to spend some time at the bottom.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • B Bag O'Browns

          @gips said:

          Ratty is a mangini pet and from what we saw of ratty last year and based on the 2 QBs we already sent packing ratty shouldnt even be in the nfl to begin with beyond camp, between pet elam ,pet bowden and pet ratty it really gives me a deja vu feeling about mangini as a suspect evaluator of both talent and good decision making..i may have a hard time trusting or believing in many of his upcoming judgements and decisions...im really in a show me the money kind of mindset with him right now...he himself hasnt proven to the fans or his bosses that he has what it takes yet...and after last season he is very fortunate to have a chance at all...

          As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....

          I don't think Ratliff is without talent, his arm clearly is NFL caliber. What he's showed us a Browns fans though is basically glimpses of a less good Derek Anderson. Elam also isn't a bad player and in my estimation, surrounding him with other guys who can play will help him out. Bowden is a guy who is a stop gap player all the way. He's getting up there BUT is a NFL LB all the way. What i'm saying is, for the most part these guys can play or in Ratliff's case, show something worth taking a look-see at. Mangini though is FAR from the only coach who does this, most any coach does.

          BrownsBacker85 BrownsBacker85B
          • 120 Posts
          • 1 Reputation
          BrownsBacker85B BrownsBacker85 wrote on last edited by
          #9

          @bag-o-browns said:

          Elam also isn't a bad player and in my estimation, surrounding him with other guys who can play will help him out.

          Surrounding any player with talent will help them out. If we surrounded every one of our players with talented players our whole team would be amazing.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Earl34 E
            • 1k Posts
            • 11 Reputation
            E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Just like Mary Kay Quinn-er-Cabot to write an article trying to stir up QB controversy. 🙄

            sisky fringoS 1 Reply Last reply
            ❤
            Quote Reply
            • BrownsBacker85B BrownsBacker85

              @bag-o-browns said:

              Elam also isn't a bad player and in my estimation, surrounding him with other guys who can play will help him out.

              Surrounding any player with talent will help them out. If we surrounded every one of our players with talented players our whole team would be amazing.

              Bag O'Browns B
              • 160 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              B Bag O'Browns wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @brownsbacker85 said:

              Surrounding any player with talent will help them out. If we surrounded every one of our players with talented players our whole team would be amazing.

              So Elam sucks? He isn't a guy who makes a lot of big plays but i don't see him as being the weak link in the defense. Adding people who are better than McDonald, is a helpful thing to Elam.

              In order to appreciate the top you have to spend some time at the bottom.
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Pumpkin Eater P
                • 4k Posts
                • 297 Reputation
                P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Ratliff acquired in Braylon Edwards trade? what?

                :neutral_face:
                E 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • P Pumpkin Eater

                  Ratliff acquired in Braylon Edwards trade? what?

                  Earl34 E
                  • 1k Posts
                  • 11 Reputation
                  E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  @pumpkin-eater said:

                  Ratliff acquired in Braylon Edwards trade? what?

                  It was the Mark Sanchez deal...but that never stops the PD from publishing in erratum.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • GipsG Gips

                    Ratty is a mangini pet and from what we saw of ratty last year and based on the 2 QBs we already sent packing ratty shouldnt even be in the nfl to begin with beyond camp, between pet elam ,pet bowden and pet ratty it really gives me a deja vu feeling about mangini as a suspect evaluator of both talent and good decision making..i may have a hard time trusting or believing in many of his upcoming judgements and decisions...im really in a show me the money kind of mindset with him right now...he himself hasnt proven to the fans or his bosses that he has what it takes yet...and after last season he is very fortunate to have a chance at all...

                    As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....

                    sisky fringo sisky fringoS
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 96 Reputation
                    sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on last edited by sisky fringo
                    #14

                    @gips said:

                    As far as wanting to keep 4 QBs and developing both colt and ratliff at the same time are both in my mind the absurd type of babble i have grown to expect out of eric mangini honestly ...having to part with ratty will just be to hard to bare so we will leave his sucky arse leaching the bench and distracting from the development of a guy who could seriously be a starting qb....
                    the only thing holding back the Colt is his own inexperience--the Rat won't hinder him at all as far as i can tell.

                    furthermore he might be a hell of a teammate for all we know.

                    is the Rat still eligible for the PS?

                    hell, the only thing holding back the Colt from starting in 2010 will be the Colt.

                    if and when he's ready nothing will keep him out of the starting lineup. the kid's a winner.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • E Earl34

                      Just like Mary Kay Quinn-er-Cabot to write an article trying to stir up QB controversy. 🙄

                      sisky fringo sisky fringoS
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 96 Reputation
                      sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on last edited by sisky fringo
                      #15

                      @earl34 said:

                      Just like Mary Kay Quinn-er-Cabot to write an article trying to stir up QB controversy. 🙄
                      she's fortunate she didn't post it here...or she'd be drinkin some zombo punch.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • E Earl34

                        @pumpkin-eater said:

                        Ratliff acquired in Braylon Edwards trade? what?

                        It was the Mark Sanchez deal...but that never stops the PD from publishing in erratum.

                        jasont44094 J
                        • 225 Posts
                        • 4 Reputation
                        J jasont44094 wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @earl34 said:

                        It was the Mark Sanchez deal...but that never stops the PD from publishing in erratum.

                        Cabbage Brain does it again. How do most of our reporters not check out any facts, its like they write whatever they want to prover their point; no matter how ridiculess. Its like they're trying to be the first to announce or report a big story ( when there's nothing there ) so they can be recognised and get out of here. But it ends up making them look like idiots, and Cleveland reporting as a joke.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate