What's up Brownie fans?
-
I agree with other posts here. I would give the article a c+ at best. I noticed you failed to even mention Hillis catching the ball out of the backfield as a threat this week. I n fact you didn't even list him as one of our backs. I know that technically him and Vickers are fullbacks but Hillis will catch and carry the ball. And did you even mention Vickers is one of if not the best Fullback in the league? I didn't see that.
And as for Zombo's post I agree to an extent. I like the differences on this board but at the same time some of you were complete jerks! This guy actually was writing an article and he actually did use some of what people on this board told him. I agree that I wouldn't do research that way. But as a secondary research technique it isn't so bad. And he shared the article when he was done with it. Or at least what he thought was done. I would revise it if I was him. He has received some good feedback on things that he missed.
Sometimes it is annoying how quick you all are to label somebody as an idoit or a douche or a board troller when they actually have a legit reason for visiting or they just want to have a good dialogue. Can't you all just get along? At least a little bit?
-
yeah you can talk smack and all, but the guy came on and asked legitimate questions to get the opinions of browns fans. to completely shit on the guy for that (wrreasel and slowassburn) you make us all look bad. douchebags.
-
I'm gonna have to disagree with one of your opinions. How does your WR/QB passing game get the advantage? You have Danny Amendola starting, he was a UDFA and spent the last 2 season's on practice squad's. I think your underrating MoMass, Robiskie, and Cribbs a bit. Cribbs didn't play special teams last game so he can focus on the WR position, so I wouldn't look at cribbs as just a special teamer. And you dont even mention the TE's Evan Moore and Ben Watson who also play in the slot and split out occasionally, they've been the brightest spot in the passing game. We put MoMass, Robiskie, Moore and Watson on the field with Jake Delhomme at QB....were gonna surprise alot of people this year passing the balls.
I'm gonna have to disagree with one of your opinions. How does your WR/QB passing game get the advantage? You have Danny Amendola starting, he was a UDFA and spent the last 2 season's on practice squad's. I think your underrating MoMass, Robiskie, and Cribbs a bit. Cribbs didn't play special teams last game so he can focus on the WR position, so I wouldn't look at cribbs as just a special teamer. And you dont even mention the TE's Evan Moore and Ben Watson who also play in the slot and split out occasionally, they've been the brightest spot in the passing game. We put MoMass, Robiskie, Moore and Watson on the field with Jake Delhomme at QB....were gonna surprise alot of people this year passing the balls.
I disagree with your point on the WR's. It doesn't matter if Amendola was a UDFA, he has shown more in this league than Robiskie. Until Robiskie proves me wrong, I'll take Amendola any day over him (if not for his ST value alone). And Donnie Avery (or Robinson, take your pick) is every bit of the receiver Massaquoi is. And then we got Mardy Gilyard who should be a deep ball threat. But the Rams are actually pretty crowded at WR this year, despite what you might have heard. We don't have that elite #1 WR right now (neither does Cleveland), but we certainly have an intense fight for roster spots going on, and we got some quality at that position. Your WR core kind of reminds me of our WR core last year. You have a guy or two that showed some promise the previous year, but the rest of the guys are somewhat unknowns when it comes to regular season performance (other than a play or two in a few games). Cribbs could very well help improve the WR position for you guys, but again, he is an unknown for the most part (not a whole lot of time at WR).
But you could certainly make a point about your team being much better at TE. The Rams have basically nothing at TE except for very raw players with no experience, but with some potential. This is one point I failed to mention in the article.
Jake Delhomme could very well turn it around. But he kind of reminds me of Marc Bulger, except not as damaged. Bulger is completely shell-shocked and just no longer has any poise in the pocket, which causes a lot of stupid throws. I hope he works out for you guys, but I would easily take Bradford over Delhomme at this point, hands down. But that's just my opinion. Bradford's ceiling is at a point where Delhomme will never even sniff, we know Delhomme's ceiling (above average QB that can win with a good supporting cast). Bradford will make some rookie mistakes, but he just has a hell of an arm and killer accuracy.
-
yeah you can talk smack and all, but the guy came on and asked legitimate questions to get the opinions of browns fans. to completely shit on the guy for that (wrreasel and slowassburn) you make us all look bad. douchebags.
yeah you can talk smack and all, but the guy came on and asked legitimate questions to get the opinions of browns fans. to completely shit on the guy for that (wrreasel and slowassburn) you make us all look bad. douchebags.
wonder how a Browns fan would be received requesting the same on a rams board??
any volunteers........Gipper?
-
yeah you can talk smack and all, but the guy came on and asked legitimate questions to get the opinions of browns fans. to completely shit on the guy for that (wrreasel and slowassburn) you make us all look bad. douchebags.
wonder how a Browns fan would be received requesting the same on a rams board??
any volunteers........Gipper?
-
I agree with other posts here. I would give the article a c+ at best. I noticed you failed to even mention Hillis catching the ball out of the backfield as a threat this week. I n fact you didn't even list him as one of our backs. I know that technically him and Vickers are fullbacks but Hillis will catch and carry the ball. And did you even mention Vickers is one of if not the best Fullback in the league? I didn't see that.
And as for Zombo's post I agree to an extent. I like the differences on this board but at the same time some of you were complete jerks! This guy actually was writing an article and he actually did use some of what people on this board told him. I agree that I wouldn't do research that way. But as a secondary research technique it isn't so bad. And he shared the article when he was done with it. Or at least what he thought was done. I would revise it if I was him. He has received some good feedback on things that he missed.
Sometimes it is annoying how quick you all are to label somebody as an idoit or a douche or a board troller when they actually have a legit reason for visiting or they just want to have a good dialogue. Can't you all just get along? At least a little bit?
I agree with other posts here. I would give the article a c+ at best. I noticed you failed to even mention Hillis catching the ball out of the backfield as a threat this week. I n fact you didn't even list him as one of our backs. I know that technically him and Vickers are fullbacks but Hillis will catch and carry the ball. And did you even mention Vickers is one of if not the best Fullback in the league? I didn't see that.
And as for Zombo's post I agree to an extent. I like the differences on this board but at the same time some of you were complete jerks! This guy actually was writing an article and he actually did use some of what people on this board told him. I agree that I wouldn't do research that way. But as a secondary research technique it isn't so bad. And he shared the article when he was done with it. Or at least what he thought was done. I would revise it if I was him. He has received some good feedback on things that he missed.
Sometimes it is annoying how quick you all are to label somebody as an idoit or a douche or a board troller when they actually have a legit reason for visiting or they just want to have a good dialogue. Can't you all just get along? At least a little bit?
You're right about Hillis. I don't know why I didn't remember him, because that is someone I wanted the Rams to pick up. I didn't mention Vickers either, but if it makes you fell any better I didn't mention our pro-bowl fullback Mike Kearney either. I must of looked at an out-dated roster, I knew you guys had Harrison and Hardesty, and the roster had the other two RBs I mentioned, but I didn't see Vickers or Hillis on the roster (probably because they were listed at FB).
And your right, it did need some editing, but like I said the one you're looking at is a rough draft.
-
Seriously, I don't make fun of other browns fans for answering this Retard. I am a new yorker and I don't know how you people do it but if someone comes into our stadium with opposing gear we heckle the shit out of them. It isn't anything personal. You know its all in good fun. I don't think stlsportblog will lose any sleep.
Grow a nutsnack browns fans. I can't believe all the feedback just for heckling.
-
yeah you can talk smack and all, but the guy came on and asked legitimate questions to get the opinions of browns fans. to completely shit on the guy for that (wrreasel and slowassburn) you make us all look bad. douchebags.
wonder how a Browns fan would be received requesting the same on a rams board??
any volunteers........Gipper?
wonder how a Browns fan would be received requesting the same on a rams board??
any volunteers........Gipper?
If you went to the board that I frequent there would probably be a few immature posters, followed by some very helpful ones. So no worries, I knew what to expect. All forums are the same.
This is probably my last post (might check back after the game Saturday). But thanks a bunch to those who helped me out. Much apprecieted.
-
Stlsportbarf,
Feel free to comeback once ur team is 0 and 16. Apparently there are some browns fans with man crushes who you maybe able to convert into rams fans.
It has nothing to do with being immature, you penis. Its about being passionate. Your little brownies and comment about us needing luck comment brought this on. Like I said I wouldn't go into some ones house talkin smack and then expecting them not to retort.
-
Stlsportbarf,
Feel free to comeback once ur team is 0 and 16. Apparently there are some browns fans with man crushes who you maybe able to convert into rams fans.
It has nothing to do with being immature, you penis. Its about being passionate. Your little brownies and comment about us needing luck comment brought this on. Like I said I wouldn't go into some ones house talkin smack and then expecting them not to retort.
-
Stlsportbarf,
Feel free to comeback once ur team is 0 and 16. Apparently there are some browns fans with man crushes who you maybe able to convert into rams fans.
It has nothing to do with being immature, you penis. Its about being passionate. Your little brownies and comment about us needing luck comment brought this on. Like I said I wouldn't go into some ones house talkin smack and then expecting them not to retort.
Stlsportbarf,
Feel free to comeback once ur team is 0 and 16. Apparently there are some browns fans with man crushes who you maybe able to convert into rams fans.
It has nothing to do with being immature, you penis. Its about being passionate. Your little brownies and comment about us needing luck comment brought this on. Like I said I wouldn't go into some ones house talkin smack and then expecting them not to retort.
Actually, now that you bring it up, it has everything to do with being immature. On every forum (mine included) there are posters who are mature enough to tell the difference between mild joking and flat out trolling. And there are some members (you) who can't tell the difference. But I'll just leave it at that. You're free to think whatever you want. If mild jabs on a forum bother you that much, then you must have a pretty good life.
but like I said, I knew what to expect. So I'm not gonna hold it against you.
-
And make no mistake about it, I didn't heckle you cause I thought you were a troll. I did it cause you liked the rams. I expected some whitty comments back, but I guess not.
And make no mistake about it, I didn't heckle you cause I thought you were a troll. I did it cause you liked the rams. I expected some whitty comments back, but I guess not.
I misread your tone. But you seem to have a problem with me "coming into your house" and laying down smack...but little do you know that's exactly what the Rams are gonna be doing to the Browns Saturday. I hope your rookie CB's like the smell of burnt rubber.
-
Seriously, I don't make fun of other browns fans for answering this Retard. I am a new yorker and I don't know how you people do it but if someone comes into our stadium with opposing gear we heckle the shit out of them. It isn't anything personal. You know its all in good fun. I don't think stlsportblog will lose any sleep.
Grow a nutsnack browns fans. I can't believe all the feedback just for heckling.
Seriously, I don't make fun of other browns fans for answering this Retard. I am a new yorker and I don't know how you people do it but if someone comes into our stadium with opposing gear we heckle the shit out of them. It isn't anything personal. You know its all in good fun. I don't think stlsportblog will lose any sleep.
Grow a nutsnack browns fans. I can't believe all the feedback just for heckling.
you've got problems kid. what the F does being in NY have to do with the fact that you come off as being a immature prick. i bet you're the type that has a couple of beers (if you're old enough) and starts sprouting beer muscles. i find it hard to believe that someone that has the mentality that you do could root for the browns and not the jets or giants. gotta be a yankee fan, at least your posts lead me to think that way.
BTW you can come out of the closet now. for someone calling people homos, each one of your posts has some reference to man parts i.e. penis, nutsack etc. sounds pretty gay to me.
-
Haha mikt
You are right I am a yankee fan, so kudos to ya. If you ever went to yankee stadium you would know what I'm talkin bout That said did holgrem get together with browns fans. I know he had talked about a nicer and gentler fan but come on man. Its freakin heckling, the homo jokes are all in good fun.
Stay gay
-
I'm gonna have to disagree with one of your opinions. How does your WR/QB passing game get the advantage? You have Danny Amendola starting, he was a UDFA and spent the last 2 season's on practice squad's. I think your underrating MoMass, Robiskie, and Cribbs a bit. Cribbs didn't play special teams last game so he can focus on the WR position, so I wouldn't look at cribbs as just a special teamer. And you dont even mention the TE's Evan Moore and Ben Watson who also play in the slot and split out occasionally, they've been the brightest spot in the passing game. We put MoMass, Robiskie, Moore and Watson on the field with Jake Delhomme at QB....were gonna surprise alot of people this year passing the balls.
I disagree with your point on the WR's. It doesn't matter if Amendola was a UDFA, he has shown more in this league than Robiskie. Until Robiskie proves me wrong, I'll take Amendola any day over him (if not for his ST value alone). And Donnie Avery (or Robinson, take your pick) is every bit of the receiver Massaquoi is. And then we got Mardy Gilyard who should be a deep ball threat. But the Rams are actually pretty crowded at WR this year, despite what you might have heard. We don't have that elite #1 WR right now (neither does Cleveland), but we certainly have an intense fight for roster spots going on, and we got some quality at that position. Your WR core kind of reminds me of our WR core last year. You have a guy or two that showed some promise the previous year, but the rest of the guys are somewhat unknowns when it comes to regular season performance (other than a play or two in a few games). Cribbs could very well help improve the WR position for you guys, but again, he is an unknown for the most part (not a whole lot of time at WR).
But you could certainly make a point about your team being much better at TE. The Rams have basically nothing at TE except for very raw players with no experience, but with some potential. This is one point I failed to mention in the article.
Jake Delhomme could very well turn it around. But he kind of reminds me of Marc Bulger, except not as damaged. Bulger is completely shell-shocked and just no longer has any poise in the pocket, which causes a lot of stupid throws. I hope he works out for you guys, but I would easily take Bradford over Delhomme at this point, hands down. But that's just my opinion. Bradford's ceiling is at a point where Delhomme will never even sniff, we know Delhomme's ceiling (above average QB that can win with a good supporting cast). Bradford will make some rookie mistakes, but he just has a hell of an arm and killer accuracy.
I disagree with your point on the WR's. It doesn't matter if Amendola was a UDFA, he has shown more in this league than Robiskie. Until Robiskie proves me wrong, I'll take Amendola any day over him (if not for his ST value alone). And Donnie Avery (or Robinson, take your pick) is every bit of the receiver Massaquoi is. And then we got Mardy Gilyard who should be a deep ball threat. But the Rams are actually pretty crowded at WR this year, despite what you might have heard. We don't have that elite #1 WR right now (neither does Cleveland), but we certainly have an intense fight for roster spots going on, and we got some quality at that position. Your WR core kind of reminds me of our WR core last year. You have a guy or two that showed some promise the previous year, but the rest of the guys are somewhat unknowns when it comes to regular season performance (other than a play or two in a few games). Cribbs could very well help improve the WR position for you guys, but again, he is an unknown for the most part (not a whole lot of time at WR).
But you could certainly make a point about your team being much better at TE. The Rams have basically nothing at TE except for very raw players with no experience, but with some potential. This is one point I failed to mention in the article.
Jake Delhomme could very well turn it around. But he kind of reminds me of Marc Bulger, except not as damaged. Bulger is completely shell-shocked and just no longer has any poise in the pocket, which causes a lot of stupid throws. I hope he works out for you guys, but I would easily take Bradford over Delhomme at this point, hands down. But that's just my opinion. Bradford's ceiling is at a point where Delhomme will never even sniff, we know Delhomme's ceiling (above average QB that can win with a good supporting cast). Bradford will make some rookie mistakes, but he just has a hell of an arm and killer accuracy.
I think you'll change your mind on Robiskie tomorrow night, will see. He didn't get on the field much last year because Mangini has a philosophy of earning playing time through special teams. Doing that helps with player respect and competition, no matter where your drafted you gotta earn playing time. Even if it hurts the team short term its worth the long term gain.
Robo was targeted 21 times at WR and had 7 catches for a average of 15yds a catch (7th in the AFC) That's made him work extremely hard through the offseason on route running and understanding the offense. This training camp and preseason he's shown what everybody wanted to see last year from a 2nd round pick. He'll go into the season the starter and will be the target of alot more passes; accurately thrown passes at that.
I would take Bradford over Delhomme because of age and upside, but that doesn't mean Bradford is anywhere close the QB JD is right now. In the future he'll probably be better, if they get him an O-line, but right now not even close.
-
And make no mistake about it, I didn't heckle you cause I thought you were a troll. I did it cause you liked the rams. I expected some whitty comments back, but I guess not.
I misread your tone. But you seem to have a problem with me "coming into your house" and laying down smack...but little do you know that's exactly what the Rams are gonna be doing to the Browns Saturday. I hope your rookie CB's like the smell of burnt rubber.
I misread your tone. But you seem to have a problem with me "coming into your house" and laying down smack...but little do you know that's exactly what the Rams are gonna be doing to the Browns Saturday. I hope your rookie CB's like the smell of burnt rubber.
Now thats alot of talk for a team who got the first pick in the draft lol. You still going to show up Sunday to retract that statement after the Browns win 27-6?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login