Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Let The Mike Holmgren Era Officially Begin

Let The Mike Holmgren Era Officially Begin

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
19 Posts 7 Posters 1.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jjbjeff

    Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

    There. Fixed it for you.

    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
    • 57k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @jjbjeff said:

    Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

    There. Fixed it for you.

    Yea, the guy is terrible. He merely took two different franchises to the Super Bowl and He was the mentor for the only coach that took your Bucs to the Super Bowl. (and who, by some accounts could become the Browns next HC if Mangini doesn't work out) Your real question should be "Why ain't he working for us?"

    Speaking of which, who DOES run the Bucs? At least we now have a guy that is respected league wide.

    Your owners are much like ours: too interested in their English futbol team to pay proper attention to their NFL team.

    That has hurt the Browns over the years and cause organizational instability. Have the Glazer's gotten wise like Lerner and put a football man in charge of operations? Or not?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • J jjbjeff

      Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

      There. Fixed it for you.

      pizzadeliveryguy P
      • 632 Posts
      • 15 Reputation
      P pizzadeliveryguy wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @jjbjeff said:

      Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

      There. Fixed it for you.

      tumblr_l8fpxipklL1qzvqipo1_500.jpg

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • J jjbjeff

        Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

        There. Fixed it for you.

        NewEraDawg NewEraDawgN
        • 645 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        NewEraDawgN NewEraDawg wrote on last edited by NewEraDawg
        #5

        @jjbjeff said:

        Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

        There. Fixed it for you.

        You are a twerp

        For your convenience I will supply you with the definition for ya since I doubt you are smart enough to know it .

        A twerp is a guy that sits in the bathtub and farts and bites the bubbles .

        Have at it bubble boy πŸ™„

        NewEraDawg
        1 Reply Last reply
        ❀
        Quote Reply
        • SJ_Browns S
          • 1k Posts
          • 12 Reputation
          S SJ_Browns wrote on last edited by
          #6
          He has players that believe in what he’s trying to accomplish. He has management on the same page and get this concept, a franchise that has a game plan and finally a direction in which they are heading.

          😎

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • slowburn slowburnS
            • 2k Posts
            • 116 Reputation
            slowburnS slowburn wrote on last edited by slowburn
            #7

            I think he wants to coach again. Should mangini step on his dck this season I see the walrus on the sidelines in 2011. I reallly wany to see EM succeed this year but I am afraid he is not going to have a lot of

            wiggle room. just throwing it out there....

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • The GipperT The Gipper

              @jjbjeff said:

              Let The Mike Holmgren error Officially Begin, By Fred Greetham / FOX Sports Ohio.com

              There. Fixed it for you.

              Yea, the guy is terrible. He merely took two different franchises to the Super Bowl and He was the mentor for the only coach that took your Bucs to the Super Bowl. (and who, by some accounts could become the Browns next HC if Mangini doesn't work out) Your real question should be "Why ain't he working for us?"

              Speaking of which, who DOES run the Bucs? At least we now have a guy that is respected league wide.

              Your owners are much like ours: too interested in their English futbol team to pay proper attention to their NFL team.

              That has hurt the Browns over the years and cause organizational instability. Have the Glazer's gotten wise like Lerner and put a football man in charge of operations? Or not?

              jjbjeff J
              • 53 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              J jjbjeff wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @the-gipper said:

              Yea, the guy is terrible. He merely took two different franchises to the Super Bowl and He was the mentor for the only coach that took your Bucs to the Super Bowl. He did all that as a GM? That's news to me. (and who, by some accounts could become the Browns next HC if Mangini doesn't work out) What happened to all the Mangina love? Your real question should be "Why ain't he working for us?" More like 'thank God he isn't working for us'

              Speaking of which, who DOES run the Bucs? At least we now have a guy that is respected league wide. Mark Dominik is the GM. He has done an amazing job of drafting talented players in his short two years as GM. I could go down the list, but they won't become household names for a few more years.

              Your owners are much like ours: too interested in their English futbol team to pay proper attention to their NFL team. No argument there.

              That has hurt the Browns over the years and cause organizational instability. Have the Glazer's gotten wise like Lerner and put a football man in charge of operations? Or not?

              Mark Dominik has been involved in football operations in Tampa since the mid-90's most recently as director of pro personnel.
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Yea, the guy is terrible. He merely took two different franchises to the Super Bowl and He was the mentor for the only coach that took your Bucs to the Super Bowl. He did all that as a GM? That's news to me.

                Don't play dumb. You know the facts. He took one to the SB as HC of the Packers, and the Seahawks as HC/GM. I think in NFL history only Bill Parcells has had similar accomplishments. (though, I don't think he was ever a HC/GM in either NY or NE, was he?)

                (and who, by some accounts could become the Browns next HC if Mangini doesn't work out) What happened to all the Mangina love?

                Note the word "IF" in there. IF Mangini can't coach this team to competitiveness, sure, it is possible he could be shown the door. I don't think you can find a single Browns fan that isn't cognizant of that possibility.

                Your real question should be "Why ain't he working for us?" More like 'thank God he isn't working for us'

                You mean "thank God because he might ruin our franchises loser image"?

                Speaking of which, who DOES run the Bucs? At least we now have a guy that is respected league wide. Mark Dominik is the GM. He has done an amazing job of drafting talented players in his short two years as GM. I could go down the list, but they won't become household names for a few more years.

                Your owners are much like ours: too interested in their English futbol team to pay proper attention to their NFL team. No argument there.

                That has hurt the Browns over the years and cause organizational instability. Have the Glazer's gotten wise like Lerner and put a football man in charge of operations? Or not? Mark Dominik has been involved in football operations in Tampa since the mid-90's most recently as director of pro personne

                OK, well we shall see how he does....in any way, it will take a few years.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • jjbjeff J
                  • 53 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  J jjbjeff wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  The difference between Holmgren and Parcells is night and day. Holmgren is a one and done type guy and Parcells is known to build real teams. What has Holmgren done other than two Superbowl appearances? What great teams has he left behind? I thought both stops ended with franchises that were in need of a total rebuild when he left? And you are comparing him to Bill Parcells? I guess it makes sense. You all seem to think Jake Delhomme is the next coming of Joe Freaking Montana. LMAO.

                  P Kosar_For_PresidentK 2 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • J jjbjeff

                    The difference between Holmgren and Parcells is night and day. Holmgren is a one and done type guy and Parcells is known to build real teams. What has Holmgren done other than two Superbowl appearances? What great teams has he left behind? I thought both stops ended with franchises that were in need of a total rebuild when he left? And you are comparing him to Bill Parcells? I guess it makes sense. You all seem to think Jake Delhomme is the next coming of Joe Freaking Montana. LMAO.

                    pizzadeliveryguy P
                    • 632 Posts
                    • 15 Reputation
                    P pizzadeliveryguy wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @jjbjeff said:

                    What great teams has he left behind? I thought both stops ended with franchises that were in need of a total rebuild when he left?

                    The Packers went

                    8-8

                    9-7

                    12-4

                    12-4

                    10-6

                    10-6

                    In the 6 years after Holmgren's departure. I don't think I would call that a rebuild.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    ❀
                    Quote Reply
                    • P pizzadeliveryguy

                      @jjbjeff said:

                      What great teams has he left behind? I thought both stops ended with franchises that were in need of a total rebuild when he left?

                      The Packers went

                      8-8

                      9-7

                      12-4

                      12-4

                      10-6

                      10-6

                      In the 6 years after Holmgren's departure. I don't think I would call that a rebuild.

                      jjbjeff J
                      • 53 Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      J jjbjeff wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @pizzadeliveryguy said:

                      The Packers went

                      8-8

                      9-7

                      12-4

                      12-4

                      10-6

                      10-6

                      In the 6 years after Holmgren's departure. I don't think I would call that a rebuild.

                      I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                      P Kosar_For_PresidentK 2 Replies Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • J jjbjeff

                        @pizzadeliveryguy said:

                        The Packers went

                        8-8

                        9-7

                        12-4

                        12-4

                        10-6

                        10-6

                        In the 6 years after Holmgren's departure. I don't think I would call that a rebuild.

                        I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                        pizzadeliveryguy P
                        • 632 Posts
                        • 15 Reputation
                        P pizzadeliveryguy wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @jjbjeff said:

                        I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                        Nothing like changing strategies when presented with facts.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • J jjbjeff

                          @pizzadeliveryguy said:

                          The Packers went

                          8-8

                          9-7

                          12-4

                          12-4

                          10-6

                          10-6

                          In the 6 years after Holmgren's departure. I don't think I would call that a rebuild.

                          I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                          Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                          • 6k Posts
                          • 221 Reputation
                          Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by Kosar_For_President
                          #14

                          @jjbjeff said:

                          I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                          #1 in defense and #1 in special teams. Desmond Howard (Superbowl MVP), Reggie White (Pro Bowl), Robert Brooks, Keith Jackson (Pro Bowl), Frank Winters (Pro Bowl), LeRoy Butler (Pro Bowl), The Dotsons, Antonio Freeman, Dorsey Levens. Yea they only had Farve.

                          A 2007 panel of football experts at ESPN ranked the 1996 Packers the 6th-greatest team to ever play in the Super Bowl.

                          I can't describe how wrong you are. OWNED

                          Besides the Browns and living in Wisconsin for some time, the Pack is my secondary team.

                          Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • J jjbjeff

                            The difference between Holmgren and Parcells is night and day. Holmgren is a one and done type guy and Parcells is known to build real teams. What has Holmgren done other than two Superbowl appearances? What great teams has he left behind? I thought both stops ended with franchises that were in need of a total rebuild when he left? And you are comparing him to Bill Parcells? I guess it makes sense. You all seem to think Jake Delhomme is the next coming of Joe Freaking Montana. LMAO.

                            Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                            • 6k Posts
                            • 221 Reputation
                            Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            @jjbjeff said:

                            What has Holmgren done other than two Superbowl appearances?

                            Isn't that the point to win? We got a smart one here.

                            Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President

                              @jjbjeff said:

                              I'd call it Brett Favre. He's the only reason Holmgren ever got to the SB in GB to begin with.

                              #1 in defense and #1 in special teams. Desmond Howard (Superbowl MVP), Reggie White (Pro Bowl), Robert Brooks, Keith Jackson (Pro Bowl), Frank Winters (Pro Bowl), LeRoy Butler (Pro Bowl), The Dotsons, Antonio Freeman, Dorsey Levens. Yea they only had Farve.

                              A 2007 panel of football experts at ESPN ranked the 1996 Packers the 6th-greatest team to ever play in the Super Bowl.

                              I can't describe how wrong you are. OWNED

                              Besides the Browns and living in Wisconsin for some time, the Pack is my secondary team.

                              jjbjeff J
                              • 53 Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              J jjbjeff wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              @kosar_for_president said:

                              A 2007 panel of football experts at ESPN ranked the 1996 Packers the 6th-greatest team to ever play in the Super Bowl.

                              I believe it. Holmgren should have probably won 5 or 6 Superbowls with Green Bay with all the talent the GM brought in for him to coach..

                              Kosar_For_PresidentK 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • J jjbjeff

                                @kosar_for_president said:

                                A 2007 panel of football experts at ESPN ranked the 1996 Packers the 6th-greatest team to ever play in the Super Bowl.

                                I believe it. Holmgren should have probably won 5 or 6 Superbowls with Green Bay with all the talent the GM brought in for him to coach..

                                Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                                • 6k Posts
                                • 221 Reputation
                                Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by Kosar_For_President
                                #17

                                @jjbjeff said:

                                I believe it. Holmgren should have probably won 5 or 6 Superbowls with Green Bay with all the talent the GM brought in for him to coach..

                                He won a Superbowl you f*cking idiot. Offensive architect of San Francisco's four-time Super Bowl champions. I know you are happy to move from line cook to the drive through window at McDonalds, but normally when someone performs well at their position (like being integral in 5 Superbowl wins) you learn and get promoted. Please put the headphones down and tell your wife (I mean cousin) to take her teeth out, it's going to be a bumpy ride.

                                owned_black_baby.jpg

                                Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President

                                  @jjbjeff said:

                                  I believe it. Holmgren should have probably won 5 or 6 Superbowls with Green Bay with all the talent the GM brought in for him to coach..

                                  He won a Superbowl you f*cking idiot. Offensive architect of San Francisco's four-time Super Bowl champions. I know you are happy to move from line cook to the drive through window at McDonalds, but normally when someone performs well at their position (like being integral in 5 Superbowl wins) you learn and get promoted. Please put the headphones down and tell your wife (I mean cousin) to take her teeth out, it's going to be a bumpy ride.

                                  owned_black_baby.jpg

                                  jjbjeff J
                                  • 53 Posts
                                  • 0 Reputation
                                  J jjbjeff wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @kosar_for_president said:

                                  owned_black_baby.jpg

                                  Why do you put your family portrait up here?

                                  Kosar_For_PresidentK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • J jjbjeff

                                    @kosar_for_president said:

                                    owned_black_baby.jpg

                                    Why do you put your family portrait up here?

                                    Kosar_For_President Kosar_For_PresidentK
                                    • 6k Posts
                                    • 221 Reputation
                                    Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @jjbjeff said:

                                    Why do you put your family portrait up here?

                                    Weak.

                                    Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply

                                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                    With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                                    Register Login
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    Theme
                                    • System
                                    • Light
                                    • Dark
                                    The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                    The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Forums
                                    • Recent
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Donate