Skip to content

ANDERSON gets the last laugh?

The Browns Board
146 36 15.4k
  • I wish Anderson was still here so we could be 1-0 right now.

  • DA wasnt an accurate passer for the browns

    the difference is that the browns dont have a WR that jumps miles into the air and can catch a ball that is 10 feet out of reach

    Larry Fitz is better than any other WR the brownies have or had while DA played here

    braylon was about as close as it gets but hes about to be a 2nd WR in new york

    DA has a strong arm but his accuracy is lacking greatly......lots of QBs could throw it up to the cards WRs

    and dont forget......who is in the rams secondary again?

    @cantonlegend said:

    DA wasnt an accurate passer for the browns

    the difference is that the browns dont have a WR that jumps miles into the air and can catch a ball that is 10 feet out of reach

    Larry Fitz is better than any other WR the brownies have or had while DA played here

    braylon was about as close as it gets but hes about to be a 2nd WR in new york

    DA has a strong arm but his accuracy is lacking greatly......lots of QBs could throw it up to the cards WRs

    and dont forget......who is in the rams secondary again?

    He wasn't accurate when he was here and he wasn't accurate yesterday either..22 of 41 is barely over 50% completions. It was good enough to win yesterday but it was hardly a great performance.

    I'd still take Jake/Seneca over Anderson/Quinn.

  • @cantonlegend said:

    DA wasnt an accurate passer for the browns

    the difference is that the browns dont have a WR that jumps miles into the air and can catch a ball that is 10 feet out of reach

    Larry Fitz is better than any other WR the brownies have or had while DA played here

    braylon was about as close as it gets but hes about to be a 2nd WR in new york

    DA has a strong arm but his accuracy is lacking greatly......lots of QBs could throw it up to the cards WRs

    and dont forget......who is in the rams secondary again?

    He wasn't accurate when he was here and he wasn't accurate yesterday either..22 of 41 is barely over 50% completions. It was good enough to win yesterday but it was hardly a great performance.

    I'd still take Jake/Seneca over Anderson/Quinn.

    @mark-o said:

    He wasn't accurate when he was here and he wasn't accurate yesterday either..22 of 41 is barely over 50% completions. It was good enough to win yesterday but it was hardly a great performance.

    I'd still take Jake/Seneca over Anderson/Quinn.

    Amen to that. Although Jake/Anderson is better combo and not necessarily in that order.

    Why so much faith in Wallace? Just mind boggling...

  • @gmp said:

    Maybe...but at least give him his props when he deserves it..He got a road win yesterday and was just given the starting gig a week ago.....It seems to kill Browns fans to see this guy do anything good.....

    See the problem is ...you either have to be a HOF (QB in Cleelin or you suck)...the bar is set just a bit too high ya think...

    If Jake doesn't get the win this week at home...he's gonna be the next victim........ trust me..

    Let the games begin... 😵

    Dude Anderson sucks. Look at his career numbers and tell me he doesn't suck. Sipe, Kosar and Testeverde are not HOF's but they were solid QB's who got the job done. I'd rather have the bar set high than set low. I'm glad Anderson is off our team. He is much worse than Tim Couch or Kelly Holcomb.

    @websterslaughter said:

    Dude Anderson sucks. Look at his career numbers and tell me he doesn't suck. Sipe, Kosar and Testeverde are not HOF's but they were solid QB's who got the job done. I'd rather have the bar set high than set low. I'm glad Anderson is off our team. He is much worse than Tim Couch or Kelly Holcomb.

    I'm not comparing DA to anybody!!!...The guy went out on Sunday, got the job done and walked away with a win......

    That's what it's all about...of course he's not Joe Montana...but it'll be interesting to see how he responds being the man without a Queen and all Queens fans bashing him...week after week.

    I'll give you Bernie and SIpe..but c'mon..Vinnie was an interception machine...

    Cards 1-0

    Browns 0-1 and counting...

  • G gmp

    @websterslaughter said:

    Dude Anderson sucks. Look at his career numbers and tell me he doesn't suck. Sipe, Kosar and Testeverde are not HOF's but they were solid QB's who got the job done. I'd rather have the bar set high than set low. I'm glad Anderson is off our team. He is much worse than Tim Couch or Kelly Holcomb.

    I'm not comparing DA to anybody!!!...The guy went out on Sunday, got the job done and walked away with a win......

    That's what it's all about...of course he's not Joe Montana...but it'll be interesting to see how he responds being the man without a Queen and all Queens fans bashing him...week after week.

    I'll give you Bernie and SIpe..but c'mon..Vinnie was an interception machine...

    Cards 1-0

    Browns 0-1 and counting...

    @gmp said:

    I'm not comparing DA to anybody!!!...The guy went out on Sunday, got the job done and walked away with a win......

    That's what it's all about...of course he's not Joe Montana...but it'll be interesting to see how he responds being the man without a Queen and all Queens fans bashing him...week after week.

    I'll give you Bernie and SIpe..but c'mon..Vinnie was an interception machine...

    Cards 1-0

    Browns 0-1 and counting...

    At least Vinnie made the playoffs something Anderson has never done and probably never will do. I don't understand why so much love for a quarterback who had only 5 good games as a Brown. He sucks way worse than Couch ever did. Get it through your thick skulls. Andersuck got benched for Quinn last year and couldn't even complete 50% of his passes. Then people are applauding that he used a playoff roster to barely beat the worst team in the league. Browns will have a better record by years end.

  • @mark-o said:

    He wasn't accurate when he was here and he wasn't accurate yesterday either..22 of 41 is barely over 50% completions. It was good enough to win yesterday but it was hardly a great performance.

    I'd still take Jake/Seneca over Anderson/Quinn.

    Amen to that. Although Jake/Anderson is better combo and not necessarily in that order.

    Why so much faith in Wallace? Just mind boggling...

    @pikeym27 said:

    Amen to that. Although Jake/Anderson is better combo and not necessarily in that order.

    Why so much faith in Wallace? Just mind boggling...

    You're ignorant

  • G gmp

    @websterslaughter said:

    Dude Anderson sucks. Look at his career numbers and tell me he doesn't suck. Sipe, Kosar and Testeverde are not HOF's but they were solid QB's who got the job done. I'd rather have the bar set high than set low. I'm glad Anderson is off our team. He is much worse than Tim Couch or Kelly Holcomb.

    I'm not comparing DA to anybody!!!...The guy went out on Sunday, got the job done and walked away with a win......

    That's what it's all about...of course he's not Joe Montana...but it'll be interesting to see how he responds being the man without a Queen and all Queens fans bashing him...week after week.

    I'll give you Bernie and SIpe..but c'mon..Vinnie was an interception machine...

    Cards 1-0

    Browns 0-1 and counting...

    @gmp said:

    I'm not comparing DA to anybody!!!...The guy went out on Sunday, got the job done and walked away with a win......

    That's what it's all about...of course he's not Joe Montana...but it'll be interesting to see how he responds being the man without a Queen and all Queens fans bashing him...week after week.

    I'll give you Bernie and SIpe..but c'mon..Vinnie was an interception machine...

    Cards 1-0

    Browns 0-1 and counting...

    If he keeps playing the way he did Sunday he will be hearing the name Max Hall instead of Brady Quinn. It tends to happen when you continuously perform well below standards.

  • @pikeym27 said:

    Amen to that. Although Jake/Anderson is better combo and not necessarily in that order.

    Why so much faith in Wallace? Just mind boggling...

    You're ignorant

    @joker-boy said:

    You're ignorant

    O that's what my problem is. Thanks doctor!

    Did you watch any Seahawks games with Wallace starting? I'm guessing no. But you're here to tell me I'm ignorant. Did they fill stupid people quota on Steelers forum, so you came here? Try again. They might be expanding.

  • @joker-boy said:

    You're ignorant

    O that's what my problem is. Thanks doctor!

    Did you watch any Seahawks games with Wallace starting? I'm guessing no. But you're here to tell me I'm ignorant. Did they fill stupid people quota on Steelers forum, so you came here? Try again. They might be expanding.

    @pikeym27 said:

    O that's what my problem is. Thanks doctor!

    Did you watch any Seahawks games with Wallace starting? I'm guessing no. But you're here to tell me I'm ignorant. Did they fill stupid people quota on Steelers forum, so you came here? Try again. They might be expanding.

    Now you just proved your ignorance, wallace had a higher qb rating and completion percentage every single year compared to anderson (2006-2009).

    Lifetime INTs thrown

    Wallace: 14

    Anderson: 45 (wallace has been ion the league 1 year longer too and yes I added that extra year to wallace's INT stat)

    Of course there are areas in which andersons stats beat wallace like TD's and yards but the TD comparison is only won by anderson due to his 2007 season where he had 29.

    You're ignorant and bias.

  • @pikeym27 said:

    O that's what my problem is. Thanks doctor!

    Did you watch any Seahawks games with Wallace starting? I'm guessing no. But you're here to tell me I'm ignorant. Did they fill stupid people quota on Steelers forum, so you came here? Try again. They might be expanding.

    Now you just proved your ignorance, wallace had a higher qb rating and completion percentage every single year compared to anderson (2006-2009).

    Lifetime INTs thrown

    Wallace: 14

    Anderson: 45 (wallace has been ion the league 1 year longer too and yes I added that extra year to wallace's INT stat)

    Of course there are areas in which andersons stats beat wallace like TD's and yards but the TD comparison is only won by anderson due to his 2007 season where he had 29.

    You're ignorant and bias.

    @joker-boy said:

    Now you just proved your ignorance, wallace had a higher qb rating and completion percentage every single year compared to anderson (2006-2009).

    Lifetime INTs thrown

    Wallace: 14

    Anderson: 45 (wallace has been ion the league 1 year longer too and yes I added that extra year to wallace's INT stat)

    Of course there are areas in which andersons stats beat wallace like TD's and yards but the TD comparison is only won by anderson due to his 2007 season where he had 29.

    You're ignorant and bias.

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

  • @joker-boy said:

    Now you just proved your ignorance, wallace had a higher qb rating and completion percentage every single year compared to anderson (2006-2009).

    Lifetime INTs thrown

    Wallace: 14

    Anderson: 45 (wallace has been ion the league 1 year longer too and yes I added that extra year to wallace's INT stat)

    Of course there are areas in which andersons stats beat wallace like TD's and yards but the TD comparison is only won by anderson due to his 2007 season where he had 29.

    You're ignorant and bias.

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

    @pikeym27 said:

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

    Hoe many games has Andersuck won in the last 2 years?

  • @pikeym27 said:

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

    Hoe many games has Andersuck won in the last 2 years?

    @websterslaughter said:

    Hoe many games has Andersuck won in the last 2 years?

    1 for 1 with Az. Won 6 of the 8 Cleveland wins the last two years, despite starting less than half the games.

  • @joker-boy said:

    Now you just proved your ignorance, wallace had a higher qb rating and completion percentage every single year compared to anderson (2006-2009).

    Lifetime INTs thrown

    Wallace: 14

    Anderson: 45 (wallace has been ion the league 1 year longer too and yes I added that extra year to wallace's INT stat)

    Of course there are areas in which andersons stats beat wallace like TD's and yards but the TD comparison is only won by anderson due to his 2007 season where he had 29.

    You're ignorant and bias.

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

    @pikeym27 said:

    Hmm. May be. But have you considered a slight possibility that Seneca's numbers are better because he was a back-up all this time. And when he did play, he played low risk offense similar to Ken Dorsey, Charlie Fry, Brady Quinn, Matt Leinart, etc.

    Think about this: When AZ coach was asked what made difference in his choice of starting QB, he said: First downs. Now I'm sure he's stupid cuz you gots to look at the stats, but that's how most of the employed coaches think.

    Jake will throw INT's but he will also get 1st downs and TD's. You won't have that with Seneca, he'll play safe. His QB rating will be great too. He just won't win any games.

    ...and thanks for calling me ignorant. It means a lot coming from someone like you.

    Wallace is a #2 that was my point and anderson has played like a #3 qb his entire career except for 2007. You actually said that you'd rather have delhomme/anderson here and not in that order necessarily. A qb who makes smart (safe) choices as opposed to taking a risk every throw and forcing something that isn't there will in fact win more games. This is rather pointless you're obviously an anderson fan boy still to this day.

  • Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

  • We are in a division that has top notch defense. JD played is a less intense division with some good goto receivers. DA in 07 had KW JR, Joe J and Braylon Edwards who atleast can stretch the defense.

    Let us first find a team WR's and TE's as good as the one we had in 07 before we talk DA or JD. Right now it is a moot point.

  • Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    @atenears said:

    Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    Agree. Although I don't know why Garcia played so bad with the Browns he was a good with some other teams and there were many.

  • Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    @atenears said:

    Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    One good year. Couch was the best, when he wasn't buried under 3 linebackers.

  • Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    @atenears said:

    Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    You obviously know nothing about football. Tim Couch was a much better QB than Anderson. Anderson has posted some of the worst numbers in NFL history. 2 for 17? Less than 50% completion percentage? Sucking so bad he was benched in favor or crappy Quinn? Throwing INT after INT to lose to the Bengals and miss the playoffs? How does that make him the best? You sir are pathetic.

  • @atenears said:

    Anderson is the best QB the BRowns had in the new era ... there is no debate.

    One good year. Couch was the best, when he wasn't buried under 3 linebackers.

    @kosar_for_president said:

    One good year. Couch was the best, when he wasn't buried under 3 linebackers.

    I think Couch suffered from the same thing that hurt Linhart. College was fairly easy for them then they got the keys to the castle.

    I was at a Browns raiders game way back when couch was still the starter 01' I think. The Browns came to Oakland at 2-0 on the opening drive went down the field and scored then after the Raiders scored a few processions later the Browns went 3 and out Couch walked off the field while the rest of the offence jogged he shrugged his shoulders and I swear the season went down hill from there.

  • In fact Tim Couch is one of the biggest busts ever yet his career passer rating is still higher than Andersucks. Andersuck is a franchise wrecker. People fall in love with his rocket arm and are fooled into thinking he is good. He's a joke.