Gun control
-
There are already laws and restrictions that don't seem to do any good.
The reason is criminals are going to break laws.
We don't need any more laws or restrictions, we need fewer criminals.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
There are already laws and restrictions that don't seem to do any good.
The reason is criminals are going to break laws.
We don't need any more laws or restrictions, we need fewer criminals.
There are already laws and restrictions that don't seem to do any good.
The reason is criminals are going to break laws.
We don't need any more laws or restrictions, we need fewer criminals.
Oh I agree Peen.
I'm not saying less guns I'm just saying more responsibility for those who want em.
WSS
-
There are already laws and restrictions that don't seem to do any good.
The reason is criminals are going to break laws.
We don't need any more laws or restrictions, we need fewer criminals.
Oh I agree Peen.
I'm not saying less guns I'm just saying more responsibility for those who want em.
WSS
Oh I agree Peen.
I'm not saying less guns I'm just saying more responsibility for those who want em.
WSS
Oh, I know....it was a general reply and not directed towards your reply.
Sorry I didn't make that clear.
-
I'm for more criminals. And against working families.
-
I'm for more criminals. And against working families.
I'm for more criminals. And against working families.
No you're not.
It's not my fault you want to rehash the same stuff, expecting a new angle is somehow going to get a different opinion.
-
At least he jokingly stated what he believes in.
heh... maybe he is serious...
"I'm for more criminals. And against working families. "
LOL
-
Just not a big fan of meaningless platitudes like "I'm for fewer criminals." Or "I'm for working working families." Or "I support the troops."
None of those statements is for anything, or against anything. They're just things people say because nobody disagrees with them.
-
If you aren't a convicted Felon, mentally disabled or sick, you should be able to own a normal weapon. (Rifle, shotgun or pistol). No restrictions period. I don't personally see the need for a civilian to own a 30 round clip so I can see limiting it to 10 rounds. I see no need for a civilian to own an automatic weapon.
-
You dont shoot much do you diehard?
30 round mags and clips are great when your shooting, you dont have to reload as often.
The 2nd amendment is a worthy of protecting.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
keyword here is infringed, so all of the old ladies can silence themselves now.
-
When I go to the driving range, I don't think they should give me those little baskets of balls. I should be able to take the whole pile of range balls with me. That way I don't have to go back to the clubhouse so often.
-
Our woods are pretty dense around the bog - I want one of these:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/11/24/...se-afghanistan/
-
When I go to the driving range, I don't think they should give me those little baskets of balls. I should be able to take the whole pile of range balls with me. That way I don't have to go back to the clubhouse so often. Heck
******************************
BTW, you know those golf clubs kill people? They should all be banned. Those golf balls are a menace, too.
That's why golfers can only have a basket at a time - to prevent mass murders.
You golfers should just go find a stick, and use big bur oak acorns in place of those dangerous golf balls, from in the woods.
That's all you need. We don't need those golf clubs - you never know when somebody might use one to kill somebody.
Sure, "people kill people", but it is way too easy to use a golf club.
That, and any leftwing hater's violent criticism of golf is going to cause certain people to go berserk and murder someone
on the course...
-
When I go to the driving range, I don't think they should give me those little baskets of balls. I should be able to take the whole pile of range balls with me. That way I don't have to go back to the clubhouse so often.
When I go to the driving range, I don't think they should give me those little baskets of balls. I should be able to take the whole pile of range balls with me. That way I don't have to go back to the clubhouse so often.
Oh no, you should have to get one ball at a time.
plus fill out a seperate receipt every time.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
I really don't see what can be improved upon, as it is now. I mean, more thorough background checks, and if there's any hint of mental instability, and I mean ANY, you shouldn't be allowed to own a gun.
Granted, I have no idea what exactly I mean by that. I'd say anyone that has a history of depression, maybe, but isn't that like a fifth of the nation? Probably wouldn't fly. As long as it's legal to own a gun, and it always will be, if a depressed, but otherwise normal person snaps, there's nothing anyone can do about it. There's no way to catch them preemptively.
As for fully automatic weapons... I mean. Hell yeah, I'd love to own a Glock 18, but if EVERYONE owned one of those, and was allowed to use them in self-defense, good Christ, that'd be scary. I think it should be limited to semi-auto, just for the fact that you can selectively kill people with it. If you hold the trigger like an idiot, which you know some people would do, you have no idea where the rest of the bullets are gonna go, and the ability to select a target with each bullet goes away.
-
So you have a take or not Heck ?
WSS
-
Mine's not all that different than Cal's. I'm further to the right than you on this. The Constitution clearly says you can have a gun. As long as that essential right is protected, common sense restrictions are fine with me.
It's a big country. Gun laws in Vermont or Montana can and should be different than they are in Los Angeles or Washington DC.
-
Mine's not all that different than Cal's. I'm further to the right than you on this. The Constitution clearly says you can have a gun. As long as that essential right is protected, common sense restrictions are fine with me.
It's a big country. Gun laws in Vermont or Montana can and should be different than they are in Los Angeles or Washington DC.
Mine's not all that different than Cal's. I'm further to the right than you on this. The Constitution clearly says you can have a gun. As long as that essential right is protected, common sense restrictions are fine with me.
Fook that, T is going to buy a grenade launcher to hunt.
Politics are so 80's. They are so predictable it's funny.
-
I hunt whales with depth charges. The Japanese ain't got shit on me.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login