Is This Racist? Didn't They Used To Call Bush A Chimp?
-
http://i.huffpost.co...IL-large570.jpg
SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) -- The California NAACP is demanding an apology from an Orange County GOP official who sent out an e-mail picturing President Barack Obama's face on the body of a baby chimpanzee.
In a statement Monday, the organization called on Marilyn Davenport to resign from the Orange County Republican Central Committee.
Several other black leaders were also holding a news conference to demand Davenport be thrown off the committee.
The message shows an image, posed like a family portrait, of chimpanzee parents and child, with Obama's face superimposed on the young chimp.
The text reads, "Now you know why no birth certificate."
Davenport's number rang busy on Monday. She has sent friends and supporters an email saying she won't resign.
-
Yeah, that's racist. Did you really have to ask?
-
LOL.
-
Yeah, that's racist. Did you really have to ask?
Yeah, that's racist. Did you really have to ask?
I'm pretty sure I know your answer, but would it be more acceptable were the head Bush's?
Wes
-
Yes! Of course.
Do I really have to explain why there are two standards here? Really? Why suggesting a black person is a monkey/chimp is different than saying that Bush looks a little like one?
Jesus. And you wonder why we find your views on race to be a little clueless.
You know, you guys seem to think these are liberal interpretations of race issues. But trust me. I'm sure I could bring Tupa in here and he'd be on my side, not yours. He'd have no problem telling you that an email where Obama is from a family of chimps is racist. No problem at all. Because he's not clueless about history.
Shall I retrieve him for you?
-
Heck translation:
"Senor' you want for me to go get my leetle attack chihuahua and we find out what he says?"
(ROF,L...)
-
Yes! Of course.
Do I really have to explain why there are two standards here? Really? Why suggesting a black person is a monkey/chimp is different than saying that Bush looks a little like one?
Jesus. And you wonder why we find your views on race to be a little clueless.
You know, you guys seem to think these are liberal interpretations of race issues. But trust me. I'm sure I could bring Tupa in here and he'd be on my side, not yours. He'd have no problem telling you that an email where Obama is from a family of chimps is racist. No problem at all. Because he's not clueless about history.
Shall I retrieve him for you?
Yes! Of course.
Do I really have to explain why there are two standards here? Really? Why suggesting a black person is a monkey/chimp is different than saying that Bush looks a little like one?
Jesus. And you wonder why we find your views on race to be a little clueless.
We? Actually you Heck. And I think this is a great example of the faux progressive playbook that keeps the division as wide as it is. I also don't doubt that you know it.
WSS
You know, you guys seem to think these are liberal interpretations of race issues. But trust me. I'm sure I could bring Tupa in here and he'd be on my side, not yours. He'd have no problem telling you that an email where Obama is from a family of chimps is racist. No problem at all. Because he's not clueless about history.
Shall I retrieve him for you?
Actually I'm wondering why you think Toop and I are kindred souls?
He's a bright guy but besides respecting his opinions I owe him no other allegiance.
WSS
-
Steve, it's not fun watching you sink. The progressive playbook? That's funny.
Things aren't racist because they're expressions of textbook racism (i.e. blacks are sub-human/monkeys) but because progressives make up that they're racist. And it's not the racism that's divisive; it's that progressives make up that it's racist. That's the real problem. And every progressive knows it! Which is why we speak to each other in code so no one gets wise to the con!
This is submental.
And I bring up Tupa not because you're supposed to have an allegiance with him (what?) but as an example of what a sane conservative would think when asked if a photo of Obama as a member of a family of chimps with the line "Now you know why - no birth certificate!" underneath it is an expression of racism. I have no doubt that he'd agree with me.
Or look at it this way, grumpy: It's precisely because you're dismissing this as something out of the a "progressive playbook" that I can show you how it isn't something only progressives would think is racism. All you have to have is a little sense of history.
Honestly, if you can't see how a joke with "blacks are monkeys" as the punchline isn't racism, we can stop discussing what is and isn't racism now. ...And I thought you were lost before.
-
Steve, it's not fun watching you sink. The progressive playbook? That's funny.
Things aren't racist because they're expressions of textbook racism (i.e. blacks are sub-human/monkeys) but because progressives make up that they're racist. And it's not the racism that's divisive; it's that progressives make up that it's racist. That's the real problem. And every progressive knows it! Which is why we speak to each other in code so no one gets wise to the con!
This is submental.
And I bring up Tupa not because you're supposed to have an allegiance with him (what?) but as an example of what a sane conservative would think when asked if a photo of Obama as a member of a family of chimps with the line "Now you know why - no birth certificate!" underneath it is an expression of racism. I have no doubt that he'd agree with me.
Or look at it this way, grumpy: It's precisely because you're dismissing this as something out of the a "progressive playbook" that I can show you how it isn't something only progressives would think is racism. All you have to have is a little sense of history.
Honestly, if you can't see how a joke with "blacks are monkeys" as the punchline isn't racism, we can stop discussing what is and isn't racism now. ...And I thought you were lost before.
Steve, it's not fun watching you sink. The progressive playbook? That's funny.
Things aren't racist because they're expressions of textbook racism (i.e. blacks are sub-human/monkeys) but because progressives make up that they're racist. And it's not the racism that's divisive; it's that progressives make up that it's racist. That's the real problem. And every progressive knows it! Which is why we speak to each other in code so no one gets wise to the con!
This is submental.
And I bring up Tupa not because you're supposed to have an allegiance with him (what?) but as an example of what a sane conservative would think when asked if a photo of Obama as a member of a family of chimps with the line "Now you know why - no birth certificate!" underneath it is an expression of racism. I have no doubt that he'd agree with me.
Or look at it this way, grumpy: It's precisely because you're dismissing this as something out of the a "progressive playbook" that I can show you how it isn't something only progressives would think is racism. All you have to have is a little sense of history.
Honestly, if you can't see how a joke with "blacks are monkeys" as the punchline isn't racism, we can stop discussing what is and isn't racism now. ...And I thought you were lost before.
Grumpy?
Adfter this tirade?
Gee whiz.
I guess the point is yeah it's racist.
So what?
"Billy called me a monkey."
Are you a monkey?
"No!"
Then Billy's an asshole.
There's no slur, no insult too hurtful or vile for your team to hurl at those you hate as long as they're part of what you see as opposition.
We get it.
And no group but one who'd be takern seriously were they to protest or litigate that.
Sorry Heck (or anyone you call as a witness) there's no God given or constitutional protection from assholes.
And as long as you single out one group you've added to the chasm.
You know it. I'm not even sure who you think you're showing off for.
WSS
-
That made me laugh.
Again, it's not the racism that's the problem; it's the people who point out racism. If someone starts a thread asking if calling black people monkeys is racist and you say yes, you're the problem, not to mention showing off.
Also: if you imagine there's a Constitutional right to be protected from assholes, or that that's what this is about, you're wrong. Even if I don't think that and it isn't.
But I think we got your opinion on racism:
"...yeah it's racist.
So what?
Sounds about right.
-
"There's no slur, no insult too hurtful or vile for your team to hurl at those you hate as long as they're part of what you see as opposition."
Let's just get this out of the way: I don't mind insults, even some that are crass or vile or hurtful, if they make a real point. If I think they make a worthwhile point, I don't generally care about hurt feelings.
I'm just not a big fan of racism. Or a few other of the "-isms."
If you can show me a similar example of left-wing racism, I'd be happy to say, "Yep, that's racist." If you can show me something you think is "vile" or "hurtful" or over the line, go right ahead. But off hand, I don't know what you're referring to.
-
That made me laugh.
Again, it's not the racism that's the problem; it's the people who point out racism. If someone starts a thread asking if calling black people monkeys is racist and you say yes, you're the problem, not to mention showing off.
Also: if you imagine there's a Constitutional right to be protected from assholes, or that that's what this is about, you're wrong. Even if I don't think that and it isn't.
But I think we got your opinion on racism:
"...yeah it's racist.
So what?
Sounds about right.
But I think we got your opinion on racism:
"...yeah it's racist.
So what?
Sounds about right.
Pretty much.
Yes Heck there are some assholes in the world.
Always have been; al
ways will be.
So what?
WSS
-
"There's no slur, no insult too hurtful or vile for your team to hurl at those you hate as long as they're part of what you see as opposition."
Let's just get this out of the way: I don't mind insults, even some that are crass or vile or hurtful, if they make a real point. If I think they make a worthwhile point, I don't generally care about hurt feelings.
I'm just not a big fan of racism. Or a few other of the "-isms."
If you can show me a similar example of left-wing racism, I'd be happy to say, "Yep, that's racist." If you can show me something you think is "vile" or "hurtful" or over the line, go right ahead. But off hand, I don't know what you're referring to.
If you can show me something you think is "vile" or "hurtful" or over the line, go right ahead. But off hand, I don't know what you're referring to.
http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/george_w__bush_-_world_s_leadi.html
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article4703539.ece
http://www.rense.com/general57/newbook.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushchimpanzee.htm
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/T68F2Q3IRSHMPGJAV
http://www.mooreexposed.com/swm.html
And...
That took a minute.
WSS
-
If you can show me something you think is "vile" or "hurtful" or over the line, go right ahead. But off hand, I don't know what you're referring to.
http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/george_w__bush_-_world_s_leadi.html
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article4703539.ece
http://www.rense.com/general57/newbook.htm
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushchimpanzee.htm
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/T68F2Q3IRSHMPGJAV
http://www.mooreexposed.com/swm.html
And...
That took a minute.
WSS
http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html
http://www.tvnewslie...ld_s_leadi.html
http://entertainment...icle4703539.ece
http://www.rense.com...l57/newbook.htm
http://politicalhumo...hchimpanzee.htm
http://www.topix.com...8F2Q3IRSHMPGJAV
http://www.mooreexposed.com/swm.html
http://www.city-data...ders-white.html
http://mediatakeout....people_of_color
And...
That took a minute.
WSS
But it's okay. It's about Bush. And he is white.
-
So the NBPP were the guys "guarding" the polling stations.
Ya suppose there'd have been a bigger outcry if it was Klan members or is this "double standard" OK too?
-
Okay. Louis Farrakhan, Michael Moore, Russell Brand. All saying ridiculous stuff I don't agree with.
The New Black Panthers don't like white people so much. They're anti-white organization, one that's also essentially powerless. They shouldn't be wearing batons on their belt in front of polling stations.
Point being, Steve, is that you think this stuff is bad. And some of it is. Because it's against Republicans or white people. When it's against black people you say, "Who cares?" And then ask me why I'm not upset when it happens to Republicans or white people, like you are. And then you accuse me of having a double standard.
None of this really has to do with what we're talking about in this thread. Racism is a problem. And it's not the same thing as being an asshole. (Come on now.) When applied, racism denies people equal opportunity. It's also the lingering problem from the most sordid part of our history that's worth eliminating to the extent that you can eliminate it. It's also completely counter to what we stand for as a nation. That's "So what?"
Forwarding a racist email isn't the worst example of racism I can think of in 2 seconds or less, but if the question is, "Is likening black people to monkeys racist?" the answer is clearly yes. It's textbook racism - the belief that blacks are sub-human race. That's practically the definition of racism.
The question then becomes what should be the price for racism, particularly for a public or political official who represents something larger than their personal opinion. This woman, for instance, just said she wouldn't resign because she thinks that email is satire. (Again, probably not all that familiar with what satire is, or that satire can be racist, too.)
So before you go all off on one your tangents (though you already have) about racism and the left and everything else that bugs you, if you really want to ask "So what?" about this incident, then you should probably stick to the incident instead of cramming everything else that bugs you into the discussion.
So, what should happen to a political official who sends around a "black people are monkeys - haha!" email? What do you think?
-
Okay. Louis Farrakhan, Michael Moore, Russell Brand. All saying ridiculous stuff I don't agree with.
The New Black Panthers don't like white people so much. They're anti-white organization, one that's also essentially powerless. They shouldn't be wearing batons on their belt in front of polling stations.
Point being, Steve, is that you think this stuff is bad. And some of it is. Because it's against Republicans or white people. When it's against black people you say, "Who cares?" And then ask me why I'm not upset when it happens to Republicans or white people, like you are. And then you accuse me of having a double standard.
None of this really has to do with what we're talking about in this thread. Racism is a problem. And it's not the same thing as being an asshole. (Come on now.) When applied, racism denies people equal opportunity. It's also the lingering problem from the most sordid part of our history that's worth eliminating to the extent that you can eliminate it. It's also completely counter to what we stand for as a nation. That's "So what?"
Forwarding a racist email isn't the worst example of racism I can think of in 2 seconds or less, but if the question is, "Is likening black people to monkeys racist?" the answer is clearly yes. It's textbook racism - the belief that blacks are sub-human race. That's practically the definition of racism.
The question then becomes what should be the price for racism, particularly for a public or political official who represents something larger than their personal opinion. This woman, for instance, just said she wouldn't resign because she thinks that email is satire. (Again, probably not all that familiar with what satire is, or that satire can be racist, too.)
So before you go all off on one your tangents (though you already have) about racism and the left and everything else that bugs you, if you really want to ask "So what?" about this incident, then you should probably stick to the incident instead of cramming everything else that bugs you into the discussion.
So, what should happen to a political official who sends around a "black people are monkeys - haha!" email? What do you think?
Okay. Louis Farrakhan, Michael Moore, Russell Brand. All saying ridiculous stuff I don't agree with.
Uh so what?
If I say I don't agree with those who think Negroes are monkeys or interracial marriage should be illegal how many brownie points does it buy me?
The New Black Panthers don't like white people so much.
LOL No shit.
Isn't that like saying the American Nazi Party doesn't like Jews so much?
They're anti-white organization, one that's also essentially powerless.
So they're cool.
I see.
They shouldn't be wearing batons on their belt in front of polling stations.
Duh.
But they were.
And the outcry was minimal.
Imagine the Klan guarding polling stations.
Point being, Steve, is that you think this stuff is bad. And some of it is. Because it's against Republicans or white people.of cramming everything else that bugs you into the discussion.
No Heck that's not the point at all.
The point is that you softpedal shitty behavior for groups that vote Democrat.
And demonize me for thinking that it happens on both sides.
So, what should happen to a political official who sends around a "black people are monkeys - haha!" email? What do you think?
Oh gee Heck. Public execution of some kind?
Hanging, beheading or burned at the stake?
What do you think?
Should Diehard lose his job?
Be fined?
Jailed?
ps
"about this incident, then you should probably stick to the incident instead of cramming everything else that bugs you into the discussion."
You did challenge me to give examples.
And the "so what" is valid at least until I call for some kind of retribution to Moore Farrakhan et al..
WSS
-
Let's try that again: in this instance, where you have a woman who works for the Republican Party in California passing along a clearly racist email, what should be her sanction, if any? What would you do?
Here's what Scott Baugh, the County GOP leader, thinks: he considered it "dripping with racism and in very poor taste." He wants her to resign from her elected post on the county's central committee. (Must be one of those liberal race-baiters who uses race issues to divide us and buy votes.)
What would you do in this situation if you were her superior? Don't pretend that someone wants the woman burned at the stake. What would you do?
-
To me, the worst thing about the e-mail is that it trivializes the tremendous harm Obama is doing to our democracy. We're going to look a lot like Libya by the time he's through with us.
Paxton
*********************
Exactly. And Heck bickering about side issues.... also trivializes the damage that Obamao is doing...
in perfect liberal avoidance of reality form.
Liberalism is a dangerous cult. Dangerous to our country.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login