Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. My Take On The First Day

My Take On The First Day

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
24 Posts 19 Posters 1.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LCDawgFan13 LCDawgFan13L One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 461 Posts
    • 8 Reputation
    LCDawgFan13L LCDawgFan13 wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Agree completely on the Taylor take. It could pan out to be a great pick...but there were some real good players still on the board at 21. Not that upset though. Not totally on board with your plan for the 2nd round though. Yes, I agree that sometime today we need that pass rushing DE. But I really think we need to get one of the WR still on the board. I really wanted Julio Jones on this team, but I applaud the trade to get more picks this year and next. But we have a young QB with no big play threat to throw to. His leading receiver was a TE we got out of someone else's garbage. Don't get me wrong, Watson is a hell of a TE, but he was done in N.E. If we expect Colt to succeed, then we need to at least attempt to give him someone to throw to that can stretch the field and make a big play. MoMass and Robiskie are not that guy...at least not from what we've seen to this point. And Cribbs, although he has shown vast improvement at WR, likely will never be that guy as a WR...he's more suited to run the ball and handle returns. So I think we still need that WR in the 2nd.

    ClevelandFanForLifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • LCDawgFan13L LCDawgFan13

      Agree completely on the Taylor take. It could pan out to be a great pick...but there were some real good players still on the board at 21. Not that upset though. Not totally on board with your plan for the 2nd round though. Yes, I agree that sometime today we need that pass rushing DE. But I really think we need to get one of the WR still on the board. I really wanted Julio Jones on this team, but I applaud the trade to get more picks this year and next. But we have a young QB with no big play threat to throw to. His leading receiver was a TE we got out of someone else's garbage. Don't get me wrong, Watson is a hell of a TE, but he was done in N.E. If we expect Colt to succeed, then we need to at least attempt to give him someone to throw to that can stretch the field and make a big play. MoMass and Robiskie are not that guy...at least not from what we've seen to this point. And Cribbs, although he has shown vast improvement at WR, likely will never be that guy as a WR...he's more suited to run the ball and handle returns. So I think we still need that WR in the 2nd.

      ClevelandFanForLife ClevelandFanForLifeC One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 100 Reputation
      ClevelandFanForLifeC ClevelandFanForLife wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @lcdawgfan13 said:

      Agree completely on the Taylor take. It could pan out to be a great pick...but there were some real good players still on the board at 21. Not that upset though. Not totally on board with your plan for the 2nd round though. Yes, I agree that sometime today we need that pass rushing DE. But I really think we need to get one of the WR still on the board. I really wanted Julio Jones on this team, but I applaud the trade to get more picks this year and next. But we have a young QB with no big play threat to throw to. His leading receiver was a TE we got out of someone else's garbage. Don't get me wrong, Watson is a hell of a TE, but he was done in N.E. If we expect Colt to succeed, then we need to at least attempt to give him someone to throw to that can stretch the field and make a big play. MoMass and Robiskie are not that guy...at least not from what we've seen to this point. And Cribbs, although he has shown vast improvement at WR, likely will never be that guy as a WR...he's more suited to run the ball and handle returns. So I think we still need that WR in the 2nd.

      I completely agree that we need a WR. You have to figure that at least 1, probably 2, of the WRs left will be very good, but it's a crap shoot to as who it is. I would much rather try to acquire one in free agency than take a chance in the draft.

      once a fan, always a fan. married to a steeler fan. aaaaaaaaah! --andy
      1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
        • 3k Posts
        • 241 Reputation
        Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I say we only take WR in the 2nd round if one of the really good DE's don't fall to our second pick. Houston from Georgia is on a free fall and heck maybe Bowers keeps falling. DE should be our first pick, if not one of the top CB's like Williams or Harris. WR should not be looked at until the 4th or 5th.

        I think the reason the Taylor pick looks crazy was that we all went in with the feeling that if a DT was taken, it was going to be a smaller guy with good pass rush. I think the fact of the matter is we have a group of DT's right now who are more undersized (they played DE's last year) who can be put in for the under DT pass rush every now and then (Shafering doesn't do too bad of a job). Plus for standard 4-3's you see one big DT and one smaller one, and one bigger DE and one smaller or quicker one. Now we have to big DT's, not making it much of a stretch to say that we are going for two smaller, quicker DE's in the system.

        I know alot of you guys wanted Paea in the second, well Taylor is the same thing as Paea, a run stopper.

        Ruining threads since 1897.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • 1 more season 1 more season1
          • 659 Posts
          • 30 Reputation
          1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I'm a bit disappointed the Browns didn't take an impact player and opted for warm bodies but it's hard to tell at this time. Really thought they would look for a game changer and try to compete in 2011. Anyway hope there will be some WR's taken in the 2nd.

          Kure Beach, Ft. Fisher and most all of the OBX is barreling so I'm off for the weekend. Gotta keep my high from a week on the North Shore going. Maholo, Aloha!!!

          Soccer, Futball, Fusball, Futsal, Foosball, Europe ... Mods are all gay.
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • BrownsKidd BrownsKiddB Very Popular Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 1k Posts
            • 102 Reputation
            BrownsKiddB BrownsKidd wrote on last edited by
            #6

            I have thought that we have needed help on Defense more so than on Offense. I know I know I know that it seems that our offense we putrid at times, but I don't think we had a very offensive minded OC and HC. Prior to the season we heard about all these new formations and what not, and how Cribbs was going to be utilized. How did that work out for us? It didn't and we saw a very mediocre year for Cribbs. That's coaching IMO.

            We had some very good offensive games against, the Saints and the Pats, but it seemed like we got over conservative with lesser teams. I think our WR's are a decent bunch of guys, but I don't think we had and Offense that utilized them correctly and under utilized guys like Evan Moore. I have a feeling that H&H see something in our Offense that Mangini and Daboll did not use properly.

            Time will tell, but I think securing our D is a good way to go. We have some talent in offense, let's just see it put to use this year.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #7

              I was all in favor of taking DL with Browns first pick. The Browns were highly vulnerable against the run, and this guy certainly fills the bill of being a young Shaun Rogers type run stuffer. But a pass rusher definitely needs to be addressed.

              runyon27R 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • The GipperT The Gipper

                I was all in favor of taking DL with Browns first pick. The Browns were highly vulnerable against the run, and this guy certainly fills the bill of being a young Shaun Rogers type run stuffer. But a pass rusher definitely needs to be addressed.

                runyon27 runyon27R Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                • 713 Posts
                • 180 Reputation
                runyon27R runyon27 wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @the-gipper said:

                I was all in favor of taking DL with Browns first pick. The Browns were highly vulnerable against the run, and this guy certainly fills the bill of being a young Shaun Rogers type run stuffer. But a pass rusher definitely needs to be addressed.

                Yes we do need a pass rusher, more DL help is needed. It looks like the plan the front office has they are going to stop the run and make people pass against us. With Rubin and Taylor clogging the middle it should make running against us a lot harder. Be interesting to see how today shakes out.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • ClevelandBigDawg C
                  • 571 Posts
                  • 8 Reputation
                  C ClevelandBigDawg wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  DE and a WR today. You can count on that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • BrownIndian BrownIndianB
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 39 Reputation
                    BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    My Take - Optimistic but not satisfied.

                    Iam worried about the foot problems that Phil has been associated with esp. since Hardesty has been on the same boat. Does us taking him mean we are slowly moving away from Big Baby ? I hoper we do not draft WR's in the second round and just get an established solid one through the free agency. Hopefully we concentrate more on solidifying our Offensive line as far as the Offense side of things goes.

                    The GipperT Harry BuffaloH 2 Replies Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • BrownIndianB BrownIndian

                      My Take - Optimistic but not satisfied.

                      Iam worried about the foot problems that Phil has been associated with esp. since Hardesty has been on the same boat. Does us taking him mean we are slowly moving away from Big Baby ? I hoper we do not draft WR's in the second round and just get an established solid one through the free agency. Hopefully we concentrate more on solidifying our Offensive line as far as the Offense side of things goes.

                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                      • 57k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @brownindian said:

                      My Take - Optimistic but not satisfied.

                      Iam worried about the foot problems that Phil has been associated with esp. since Hardesty has been on the same boat. Does us taking him mean we are slowly moving away from Big Baby ? I hoper we do not draft WR's in the second round and just get an established solid one through the free agency. Hopefully we concentrate more on solidifying our Offensive line as far as the Offense side of things goes.

                      Shaun Rogers is no longer on the Browns roster, so we are not moving "slowly" away from him. We sprinted away and left him in the dust. In fact, I think he is now on the Saints roster.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • WRREBEL WRREBELW
                        • 2k Posts
                        • 87 Reputation
                        WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Listen, our first day couldn't have been better. We got a ton of value with trading with the falcons.

                        As a browns fan it is about time we did one of these trades. As fans we always want that sexy pic. This puts our team in great position to add a butt load of talent this year and next..

                        Plus, and this isn't what I'm hoping for but let's say colt mccoy doesn't look like he is the guy after this year. This gives us ammunition to go up and get an andrew luck!

                        LoyaltyL 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • WRREBELW WRREBEL

                          Listen, our first day couldn't have been better. We got a ton of value with trading with the falcons.

                          As a browns fan it is about time we did one of these trades. As fans we always want that sexy pic. This puts our team in great position to add a butt load of talent this year and next..

                          Plus, and this isn't what I'm hoping for but let's say colt mccoy doesn't look like he is the guy after this year. This gives us ammunition to go up and get an andrew luck!

                          Loyalty LoyaltyL
                          • 283 Posts
                          • 10 Reputation
                          LoyaltyL Loyalty wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @wrrebel said:

                          Listen, our first day couldn't have been better. We got a ton of value with trading with the falcons.

                          As a browns fan it is about time we did one of these trades. As fans we always want that sexy pic. This puts our team in great position to add a butt load of talent this year and next..

                          Plus, and this isn't what I'm hoping for but let's say colt mccoy doesn't look like he is the guy after this year. This gives us ammunition to go up and get an andrew luck!

                          I was afraid of this... I really don't want anything to do with Luck.

                          "A winner never whines." Paul Brown
                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • BrownIndianB BrownIndian

                            My Take - Optimistic but not satisfied.

                            Iam worried about the foot problems that Phil has been associated with esp. since Hardesty has been on the same boat. Does us taking him mean we are slowly moving away from Big Baby ? I hoper we do not draft WR's in the second round and just get an established solid one through the free agency. Hopefully we concentrate more on solidifying our Offensive line as far as the Offense side of things goes.

                            Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
                            • 3k Posts
                            • 241 Reputation
                            Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @brownindian said:

                            My Take - Optimistic but not satisfied.

                            Iam worried about the foot problems that Phil has been associated with esp. since Hardesty has been on the same boat. Does us taking him mean we are slowly moving away from Big Baby ? I hoper we do not draft WR's in the second round and just get an established solid one through the free agency. Hopefully we concentrate more on solidifying our Offensive line as far as the Offense side of things goes.

                            His foot issues turned out to be false rumors from everything I have heard. Heckert said that not only did the NFL give his foot a clean bill or healthy, but the team doctors found nothing wrong with it after all the x-rays and mri's.

                            Ruining threads since 1897.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • USFBrown USFBrownU Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 2k Posts
                              • 270 Reputation
                              USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              The only thing I didn't like about Phil is his Twitter saying "Washington DC/Waco, TX gonna go get that money, ya dig?". To me, that's a big problem. Let's hope the guy has his head and heart in the right place.

                              hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • mcbrownies23 M
                                • 23 Posts
                                • 1 Reputation
                                M mcbrownies23 wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                yeah heckert seems to like smaller DEs trent cole for example. So I think there just trying to get the biggest wall of meat up the middle they can so they can have those quicker DEs, Justin Houston maybe? he has more of a 34 olb body just like cole did

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • USFBrownU USFBrown

                                  The only thing I didn't like about Phil is his Twitter saying "Washington DC/Waco, TX gonna go get that money, ya dig?". To me, that's a big problem. Let's hope the guy has his head and heart in the right place.

                                  hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 20k Posts
                                  • 5k Reputation
                                  hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @usfbrown said:

                                  The only thing I didn't like about Phil is his Twitter saying "Washington DC/Waco, TX gonna go get that money, ya dig?". To me, that's a big problem. Let's hope the guy has his head and heart in the right place.

                                  Yeah, I couldn't help but notice that watch he was wearing- loan money from an agent? That toy had to cost at least 10 grand.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • LoyaltyL Loyalty

                                    @wrrebel said:

                                    Listen, our first day couldn't have been better. We got a ton of value with trading with the falcons.

                                    As a browns fan it is about time we did one of these trades. As fans we always want that sexy pic. This puts our team in great position to add a butt load of talent this year and next..

                                    Plus, and this isn't what I'm hoping for but let's say colt mccoy doesn't look like he is the guy after this year. This gives us ammunition to go up and get an andrew luck!

                                    I was afraid of this... I really don't want anything to do with Luck.

                                    pizzadeliveryguy P
                                    • 632 Posts
                                    • 15 Reputation
                                    P pizzadeliveryguy wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @loyalty said:

                                    I was afraid of this... I really don't want anything to do with Luck.

                                    Luck is as close to a sure thing as you get in the NFL.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                      • 14k Posts
                                      • 5k Reputation
                                      nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Im dissapointed because there where better players at the pick available on the board and why they took a guy whose a 3 tech stance 3-4 guy made absoluetly no sense whatsover. hes a 3-4 NT not a 4-3 DE/DT. and upon listening to him talk...He sounds like a dumb bag of rocks. Book it "BUST"

                                      Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                                      The GipperT Harry BuffaloH 2 Replies Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • nickersN nickers

                                        Im dissapointed because there where better players at the pick available on the board and why they took a guy whose a 3 tech stance 3-4 guy made absoluetly no sense whatsover. hes a 3-4 NT not a 4-3 DE/DT. and upon listening to him talk...He sounds like a dumb bag of rocks. Book it "BUST"

                                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                        • 57k Posts
                                        • 4k Reputation
                                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @nickers said:

                                        Im dissapointed because there where better players at the pick available on the board and why they took a guy whose a 3 tech stance 3-4 guy made absoluetly no sense whatsover. hes a 3-4 NT not a 4-3 DE/DT. and upon listening to him talk...He sounds like a dumb bag of rocks. Book it "BUST"

                                        You know what: Oddly, I will trust Heckert and Holmgren's judgment on talent evaluation more than I will trust yours. Can you possibly imagine why that would be?

                                        Canton MikeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        👍
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • nickersN nickers

                                          Im dissapointed because there where better players at the pick available on the board and why they took a guy whose a 3 tech stance 3-4 guy made absoluetly no sense whatsover. hes a 3-4 NT not a 4-3 DE/DT. and upon listening to him talk...He sounds like a dumb bag of rocks. Book it "BUST"

                                          Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
                                          • 3k Posts
                                          • 241 Reputation
                                          Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @nickers said:

                                          Im dissapointed because there where better players at the pick available on the board and why they took a guy whose a 3 tech stance 3-4 guy made absoluetly no sense whatsover. hes a 3-4 NT not a 4-3 DE/DT. and upon listening to him talk...He sounds like a dumb bag of rocks. Book it "BUST"

                                          Considering that he HAS PLAYED IN A 4-3 HIS WHOLE COLLEGE CAREER I think he will do fine. And please name who was a better player to play 4-3 DT at not just 21 but spot 27. There was Cam Jordan, who is too big for a 4-3 DE and too small for a 4-3 DT (not to mention that he never played DT in college so there would be a learning curve) and then there is that dude from Temple who is just 15 pounds lighter that Taylor (but played in a much weaker league against much weaker competition) and then there was Cameron Heyward who could have moved into DT (but he is coming off a serious injury and would still have to put on at least 10 to 20 pounds since he is only like 290). Oh and you know what else I read. Taylor is still losing weight, and Shurmer said that when he shows up to the facility that he is going to tell him to stop losing weight and keep it where it currently is. Cause apparently THEY WANTED A GUY HIS SIZE!!!

                                          Ruining threads since 1897.
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate