Greg Little Wr A Beast That Can Yac!
-
Guys,
I, too, like the pick of Little (although I wanted Smith). I love the hands and the sheer power this kid runs with. I am a little concerned though that his "highlights" are loaded with three yard crosses and end-arounds. This is the NFL. The end-around is not a staple play of an NFL offense. As for three yard crosses, we seem to specialize in those
-
If we could get Sidney Rice via FA, and then drop all the WRs except for momass, cribbs, haggerty. We would have such a dominate team on O just like that. No more 8-11 ppl in the box.
-
If we could get Sidney Rice via FA, and then drop all the WRs except for momass, cribbs, haggerty. We would have such a dominate team on O just like that. No more 8-11 ppl in the box.
If we could get Sidney Rice via FA, and then drop all the WRs except for momass, cribbs, haggerty. We would have such a dominate team on O just like that. No more 8-11 ppl in the box.
WTF?! Rice is a down the field guy not coming here. Stick to what you know, which presumably is getting high.
-
He catches with his hands!!!!!! All I wanted was a big WR that goes after the ball rather than waiting for it. We got that, and he's physical and looks for the end zone every time. i love this pick. I like the entire draft. We have a lot of young talent and I really hope the lockout ends. Now more than ever before.
-
If we could get Sidney Rice via FA, and then drop all the WRs except for momass, cribbs, haggerty. We would have such a dominate team on O just like that. No more 8-11 ppl in the box.
WTF?! Rice is a down the field guy not coming here. Stick to what you know, which presumably is getting high.
WTF?! Rice is a down the field guy not coming here. Stick to what you know, which presumably is getting high.
Oh so we dont need adown the field guy. My bad I forgot we had Robo for that job.
-
Sydney Rice is a WCO WR, he has down field threat which is a huge bonus.
-
Agreed. Rice comes from a same styling of the WCO. The Vikings run the WCO as do the Eagles and Packers who throw LONG passes each run the WCO. I'm not sure why i see posters think the WCO is strictly short passes with small speedy receivers. the WCO is more of a philosophy of putting a premium on passing the ball first to open up the run and LONG passes. It's not a set system of patterns and calls. Not sure how will ever be a Super Bowl team if we never sign "down the field" guys.
-
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
-
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
So you are saying we should never get any fast WR's because we are not going to use them to streak down the field.
-
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
one too many brews perhaps?
the Colt criticisms are fair though.
Greg Little looks to be a good pickup, talent-wise. considering he already knows the terminology he might have an easier transition than the rest of the team as well.
to think about a rookie being better than our entire wr core is...um...kinda bittersweet.
only up from here.
-
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Ruining threads since 1897. -
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
-
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
True, but the verdict is still our on some of last years 3-6 round picks (Lauvou, McCoy, Mitchel) and who know how this years picks will go. For all we know right now we could have 6 starters or 6 guys riding the bench. It all remains to be seen.
-
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
All good point. I don't want Luck because I want Colt to succeed, plus when you think about it, 4 our of 5 teams that pick at #1 normally needs a QB. That team would have to be set at the position and then we would have to give the best offer to move up. Lets just hope colt has a 2-1 TD to INT ratio this year and shows real improvement so that we can spend our two firsts next year on something other than QB.
-
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
Ruining threads since 1897.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login