Greg Little Wr A Beast That Can Yac!
-
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Ruining threads since 1897. -
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
-
Stupid?... Wow...
I don't remember saying anything to insult you. Thanks for the intelligent reply though.
I was referring to using the two 1st Rd picks... Sorry I wasn't making it super obvious for you.
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Well then I don't understand who 2 first round picks = our whole draft next year. Minus our 2 first round picks, we have 7 more with two 4ths and two 6ths and no 7th. I don't call turning our two 1st into one high 1st giving away our draft.
Sorry for the stupid comment, I've been on edge today.
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
No worries...
I guess I am still not really convinced that we know what we are doing in rounds 3-7. Looking at our past drafts you will see the decade of futility...
True, but the verdict is still our on some of last years 3-6 round picks (Lauvou, McCoy, Mitchel) and who know how this years picks will go. For all we know right now we could have 6 starters or 6 guys riding the bench. It all remains to be seen.
-
McCoy is going to be a 3-Year stop gap QB that the fans enjoy for toughness and professionalism...
Why do I feel like we are going to trade our entire draft for Andrew Luck next year?
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Probably because you are stupid, and that's not a statement saying McCoy's our guy because who knows at this point. It's a statement of you under estimate the value we have. With two first round picks next year there is a chance that we could just trade those and a late round pick to move up for Luck.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
I've already pointed out unless the Browns are drafting in the top 3 next year, it would cost too much to move up to #1 to take Luck- and if a quarterback needy team is sitting at #1, we're not getting Luck regardless of what we offer them.
So can that idea right now, unless you want the Browns to go 0-16 this year.
All good point. I don't want Luck because I want Colt to succeed, plus when you think about it, 4 our of 5 teams that pick at #1 normally needs a QB. That team would have to be set at the position and then we would have to give the best offer to move up. Lets just hope colt has a 2-1 TD to INT ratio this year and shows real improvement so that we can spend our two firsts next year on something other than QB.
-
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
Ruining threads since 1897. -
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
I want to see him match up with an occasional LB and actually OUTRUN them... MoMass and Robo are SLOWWWW...
I like Little as a possible future #1 WR, but would love to seem him burn someone.
That would be a Cleveland Browns first.
-
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Why does everyone want to see every single WR in the slot? That's all I heard before the draft "He we need this guy in the 2nd round, he would be great in the slot." The slot position is for slow or short WR's. The brought Little in the possibly be the #1 guy, not so he could be the slot WR.
I don't worry about where he plays or what his perceived role will be....my gut tells me he will play a lot and be a primary target 6-7 times a game.
If he gets open and catches the ball, he will catch 65 passes.
-
On the NFL channel, it was said by somebody, that Little pretty much might have the *best hands in the draft*, and that Atlanta trading up to get
Jones was surprising, since the two wr's are similar, except Jones was faster at the combine. They said there was NOT that much difference,
(number of picks between them)
Jerry Rice had a bit of trouble catching passes early on... and he was not a "fast" wr.
Little could be a "steal" ? I look for great things from him.
-
My opinion of the Little after watching some highlights is that he will fit in nicely with a WCO. He's a big target, with what appears to be great hands and he also appears to be able to block so he will compliment the running game as well (as long as he doesn't conjure up some offensive holding penalties). He doesn't seem to shy away from contact and looks like he will fight to catch the ball. I like that. I think he is the type of receiver that a QB can have faith in to throw that ball into coverage and know that he is going to go up and make the effort and come down with the ball. Last year I felt that all our QB were a little gun shy and weren't willing to make a throw that you would see a Tom Brady or a Peyton manning make.
I like the pick and he seem to have that attitude to play and play hard. Hopefully he doesn't turn into a Braylon Edwards and thinks more about the image than the game, but only time will tell.
I read recently that Holmgren feels that our WR crew was underated and I agree with that statement, but I think Little will be a great addition. Let's spread that field this year boys.
-
On the NFL channel, it was said by somebody, that Little pretty much might have the *best hands in the draft*, and that Atlanta trading up to get
Jones was surprising, since the two wr's are similar, except Jones was faster at the combine. They said there was NOT that much difference,
(number of picks between them)
Jerry Rice had a bit of trouble catching passes early on... and he was not a "fast" wr.
Little could be a "steal" ? I look for great things from him.
On the NFL channel, it was said by somebody, that Little pretty much might have the *best hands in the draft*, and that Atlanta trading up to get
Jones was surprising, since the two wr's are similar, except Jones was faster at the combine. They said there was NOT that much difference,
(number of picks between them)
Jerry Rice had a bit of trouble catching passes early on... and he was not a "fast" wr.
Little could be a "steal" ? I look for great things from him.
One thing that made Jerry Rice probably the best ever IMO, was his work ethic. The guy trained and trained hard to do what he could do, plus the fact that he also had Joe Montana throwing to him for most of his career doesn't hurt either. But your right, I don't think Jerry was ever known for "Blazing" speed, but man, the guy could catch anything thrown to him.
-
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
So you are saying we should never get any fast WR's because we are not going to use them to streak down the field.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
So you are saying we should never get any fast WR's because we are not going to use them to streak down the field.
No, but not a free agent who wants top reciever money where we can use our money more wisely
-
Sorry to saw ( I like the kid ) but colt doesn't have the arm strength and/or down the field accuracy to be able tonuse Rice at the fullest
one too many brews perhaps?
the Colt criticisms are fair though.
Greg Little looks to be a good pickup, talent-wise. considering he already knows the terminology he might have an easier transition than the rest of the team as well.
to think about a rookie being better than our entire wr core is...um...kinda bittersweet.
only up from here.
one too many brews
I don't condone such activities
-
He is on the show Gamechanger on NFL Network right now..predraft show with him and AJ Green..
He is on the show Gamechanger on NFL Network right now..predraft show with him and AJ Green..
Compared to AJ he looks HUGE! This dude is jacked, hopefully he'll be able to push defenders around and get open!
Every day I get more excited about this pick, and Steve Mariucci said that whatever team drafts him will be very, very happy...
-
He better be jacked he had a whole year to work out lol. Honestly one he gets to camp and workout I can see him putting off 5ish pounds and getting some of his speeds back, because he is a little bit fast than a 4.5.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login