Obamao's Bias Towards Arabs/muslims Sets Israel Up
-
Obama wants Hamas to be closer so that their mortar fire can be more destructive.
Maybe if Obama gets his way he can become a Jew killer like Hitler was.
Rocket Attacks Continue in Israelβs South
Thousands of residents of southern Israel spent the weekend in bomb shelters, as militants from the Hamas-controlled Gaza region continued firing rockets at Israeli targets in the Negev.
Since Thursday, Gaza militants have fired over 100 mortar shells and Kassam rockets at Israeli targets, with fifty fired since early Saturday.
The rockets hit not only locations near Gaza but also the Ashkelon region further away. Four Grad-style Katyusha rockets hit areas near the city, but no injuries or damage were reported. Several people were, however, hospitalized for shock and, as of Saturday night, three were still undergoing treatment.
Major damage was reported in several towns, including in a kibbutz in the Shaβar Hanegev Regional Council where a water pipe was destroyed. Residents expressed that they felt a return to the days of Operation Cast Lead, when Hamas had fired hundreds of rockets at Israeli towns.
The costly Iron Dome system reportedly registered a number of successes, intercepting several rockets aimed for Ber Sheva and Ofakim. The system has intercepted eight rockets since Thursday.
Israel has meanwhile began to strike back at Hamas forces. Overnight Friday, IDF planes targeted several sites in the Gaza region, with precise targeting of several cells in the midst of preparing to fire rockets.
-
How about giving the Philistines part of Jordan?
The UN can do anything, right?
WSS
-
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
-
How about giving the Philistines part of Jordan? WSS
**************************
You mean, Palestinians?
How ya doin, Steve? Need me to bring you some homemade veggie health juice? GGG
I hope you are doing fine. Let me know if I can some visit and bug you for a while, later, after you
are out of ICU.....
-
If Mexicans started terrorist activities in america, would Obama want to give them back Texas and the whole Southwest so they could have there own state?
Its funny how Obama will stand up and shout out that he single handedly killed Osama Ben Laden with his light saber
and then the next week he shows his yellow belly and gives in to terrorists demands. -
In theory the giving back of this land would solve all the Mid East problems. If this did happen, I don't believe giving back the land would be outlandish.
However, I believe these people hate Israel and giving back the land would do little to molify the situation.
I don't believe Obama used good judgment in making these statements to the public.
IMHO, there is no question who Obama favors in this situation. This either shows naivetee (sp) or a true lack of understanding.
-
True, John -
If it were possible for Israel to finally live in peace - I believe they would be the first to offer to go back to the 1967 borders.
But "Death to the Jews" and "Wipe Israel off the Map" chants are heard by Arab radicals across the Mid East. Israel tried giving back
the Sinai - that backfired.
Obamao, for his fraudulent? alleged (by lib worshippers) intelligence, should release his school records, so we can see if he
EVER took ONE class on the history of Europe during WWII and the MidEast. I doubt he's ignorant of it.
Which leads me to conclude, he is more and more openly biased with the Arab/Muslim world.
Oddly, the LAST "worst president in our U.S. history", was Jimmy "cricketbrain" Carter - who also favored the Palestinians.
All too sadly, possibly tragicly, for Israel:
ObaMao sees himself as Anwar Sadat, but he is coming across like Yasser Arafat.
-
In theory the giving back of this land would solve all the Mid East problems. If this did happen, I don't believe giving back the land would be outlandish.
However, I believe these people hate Israel and giving back the land would do little to molify the situation.
I don't believe Obama used good judgment in making these statements to the public.
IMHO, there is no question who Obama favors in this situation. This either shows naivetee (sp) or a true lack of understanding.
In theory the giving back of this land would solve all the Mid East problems. If this did happen, I don't believe giving back the land would be outlandish.
However, I believe these people hate Israel and giving back the land would do little to molify the situation.
I don't believe Obama used good judgment in making these statements to the public.
IMHO, there is no question who Obama favors in this situation. This either shows naivetee (sp) or a true lack of understanding.
John, come on. This is the same outline proposal from the Clinton administration, the Bush administration, and now the Obama administration. How is that evidence that there's "no question who Obama favors" in this situation? By your logic, that means George Bush favored the Palestinians, and so did Bill Clinton. It's not a very good argument.
The reality is that all three of these administrations have favored getting a peace deal in place that creates a Palestinian state, based on the 67 borders, with negotiated tweaks, because we believe it's best for America's security, and for Israel's.
Nobody imagines it's going to "solve all the Mid East problems" or end the hatred of Israel. That's not the goal.
-
In theory the giving back of this land would solve all the Mid East problems. If this did happen, I don't believe giving back the land would be outlandish.
However, I believe these people hate Israel and giving back the land would do little to molify the situation.
I don't believe Obama used good judgment in making these statements to the public.
IMHO, there is no question who Obama favors in this situation. This either shows naivetee (sp) or a true lack of understanding.
John, come on. This is the same outline proposal from the Clinton administration, the Bush administration, and now the Obama administration. How is that evidence that there's "no question who Obama favors" in this situation? By your logic, that means George Bush favored the Palestinians, and so did Bill Clinton. It's not a very good argument.
The reality is that all three of these administrations have favored getting a peace deal in place that creates a Palestinian state, based on the 67 borders, with negotiated tweaks, because we believe it's best for America's security, and for Israel's.
Nobody imagines it's going to "solve all the Mid East problems" or end the hatred of Israel. That's not the goal.
Nobody imagines it's going to "solve all the Mid East problems" or end the hatred of Israel. That's not the goal.
Then what is the goal?
Israel has occupied this land for 44 years and progressives want them to give it back?
Whats next do we give our land back to the native Indians?
It doesn't work like that, if you bring a knife to a gun fight your going to lose.
-
I'll wait to engage John/someone more sane.
-
John, come on. This is the same outline proposal from the Clinton administration, the Bush administration, and now the Obama administration. How is that evidence that there's "no question who Obama favors" in this situation? By your logic, that means George Bush favored the Palestinians, and so did Bill Clinton. It's not a very good argument. HECK
*****************
BfreakinS.
In fact, the Bush admin sent a letter clearly contradicting Obamao's stupidity, in 1994. There surely has NEVER been a dirtbag "president" who came out
and threw Israel under the bus before. Hell, not even Carter did that.
BTW, Heck, your ignorant, childish personal attacks are boring. Perhaps you should rethink what "intelligent conservation" really means. (Hint: it isn't what
you've been taught by moveonupObamao'sgroin.org)
-
Here, Heck, is proof that you are talking out your dumbest orifice:
http://www.zionismontheweb.org/zionism_commentary/Israel_secure_and_recognised_borders.htm
-
Come on back at ya Heck.
I was talking about Obama, not Clinton or Bush.
Sometimes it's not what you do but how and when you do it.
I don't believe, unfortunately,that giving back the land would truly ease tensions.
You mentioned the 'goal' and what would be the goal - this would be a learning for me.
PS Just to clarify your statement about my sanity - you did say MORE sane, not sane.
If a third temple is built.........................................
-
It isnt' JUST that you are wrong, Heck. It's that you put other people down for opinions you don't share.
Here is another link. If you don't read it, well,
the rest of us will continue to have a intelligent conservation about FACTS and REAL OPINIONS.
-
Never mind.
-
How about the US stops sending $ to Israel and then they can do whatever they want.
-
I meant Philistines Cal.
The region was named after the Israelites sworn enemies by Roman conquerors.
It incorporated most if not all of Jordan.
As long as we want to revert to historical borders.....
WSS
-
I'll wait to engage John/someone more sane.
I'll wait to engage John/someone more sane.
In other words you are saying that you will engage John because he will allow you to be a liar and you cannot defend your statements because they are only made up from liberal fantasies.
-
How about the US stops sending $ to Israel and then they can do whatever they want. PE
******************
No. If the US bails on Israel, they will be overrun, and a mideast war would be inevitable,
and all hell would break loose, and, if Obamao isn't president, we'd have to go help them.
How about we quit giving 1.3 billion to Pakistan and several other countries that thumb their nose at us.
Israel has never done that to us, ever.
Israel's very survival is on the line, and the UN won't do squat about Egypt, Syria, Iran and Lebannon declaring war on them,
and going for broke.
And, if Israel must, they will bring out a few nukes, as a last resort.
IOW's, we need to keep helping our huge western friend in Israel.
-
I meant Philistines Cal.
The region was named after the Israelites sworn enemies by Roman conquerors.
It incorporated most if not all of Jordan.
As long as we want to revert to historical borders.....
WSS
***************************
Ah. well, it went right past me, bro. I am not worthy. LOL (how ya doin?)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login