Our 80 Million Dollar Oline
-
Defensive and Offensive rankings of recent Super Bowl winners:
2000 Ravens Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 1
2002 Bucs Offense rank: 24, Defense rank: 1
2003 Pats Offense rank: 17, Defense rank: 1
2004 Pats Offense rank: 7, Defense rank: 2
2005 Steelers Offense rank: 15, Defense rank: 4
2006 Colts Offense rank: 2, Defense rank: 23
2007 Giants Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 7
2008 Steelers Offense rank: 22, Defense Rank: 1
2009 Saints Offense rank: 1, Defense rank: 20
2010 Packers Offense rank: 10, Defense rank: 5
Also, 2010 Steelers SB losers: Offense rank: 14, Defense rank: 2
Thus, having a mediocre offense and an outstanding defense gives a team a title much more frequently than the other way around. The Saints and Colts were far more the abberation.
the saints defense was actually pretty good and the stats dont show that. they scored so often that the defense spent a ton of time on the field.
the colts defense was better than the stats said too. freeney, mathis, bob sanders, antoine bethea, gary brackett etc
the saints defense was actually pretty good and the stats dont show that. they scored so often that the defense spent a ton of time on the field.
the colts defense was better than the stats said too. freeney, mathis, bob sanders, antoine bethea, gary brackett etc
Yes, these stat rankings don't account for turnover ratio which was very important for the Saints.
And Indy's defense stepped it up in the playoffs, but they weren't all that during the season.
-
We drafted O'Hara cut him to draft Faine Rich4nothin
********************************************
Come on, now, old buddy Rich - the Browns never drafted O'Hara. El Wrongo again and again.
O'Hara was a good solid guy, but.... that's about the extent of the Browns drafting an offensive line.
They signed him as a FA.
That means he was overlooked in the draft, Rich. That means he was undrafted.
And that was the crux of the Browns' problems. They didn't value the oline,
and rarely drafted offensive linemen to build their offense.
They just spend their high draft picks on flashy prima donna's, and qb who got the (*^(*% beaten out of him.
And they rarely could ever gain a yard for a first down.
Cam Newton went to Carolina, where he enjoys a talented, completely Carolina drafted oline.
Rapistbooger went to a complete offense with a complete offensive line, and a top five defense.
The Jags and stupid stinkin ratbirds last night? Two highly drafted qbs'. You'd never know it by how they played.
Bad. Really, really, really pitiful. I'll gladly keep Colt over them and several others in the league.
Btw, Rich - go look up how your squeelers and ratbirds have drafted offensive linemen over the years.
Then look at how the Browns didn't do it, but rarely.
That's the story. It will be a different story when the Browns draft a RT early on, and an OG, or sign one.... next spring.
Meanwhile, when did it become "cool" to start a dumb ghoolie type thread?
-
I dont know what you league you have been watching but what team won the Super Bowl with OL making tds and or the defense kiilling offense
right now average score for winning team is 31 points ....................s.o much for the defense wins stupidity
and OH yeah NO ! greatest pick ever Joe Thomas never played in a playoff game so much for dime a dozen OL guys]
and BTW the Big Ben with NO OL has been in three super bowls and won two
smoke that up your crack pipe
'
Obviously since you ignored my point you agreed with it. There have been several teams with mediocre offenses and great defenses that have won the title. There are no ifs and or buts about it and if you disagree you are fricking nuts.
And yea, Big Ben with a questionable offensive line at times has won a couple and been to another SB. My point exactly. Mediocre offense....outf**kingstanding defense.
.
Obviously since you ignored my point you agreed with it. There have been several teams with mediocre offenses and great defenses that have won the title. There are no ifs and or buts about it and if you disagree you are fricking nuts.
And yea, Big Ben with a questionable offensive line at times has won a couple and been to another SB. My point exactly. Mediocre offense....outf**kingstanding defense.
.
Oh, I have not ignored your previous. I have not taken the time to answer how you turn a defunct offensive team to a juggernaut in mid season, which really says you question has no answer starting in November 2011 but does starting next year..
Meanwhile, I will restate again what all of you geniuses who think defense wins championships NEVER answer
If defense wins Championships why is the average score of the winning team in the Super Bowl 31 points, because the loser sucked on defense or the winner had a really good offense..
Go ahead make up answer that defeats the FACT
-
Obviously since you ignored my point you agreed with it. There have been several teams with mediocre offenses and great defenses that have won the title. There are no ifs and or buts about it and if you disagree you are fricking nuts.
And yea, Big Ben with a questionable offensive line at times has won a couple and been to another SB. My point exactly. Mediocre offense....outf**kingstanding defense.
.
Oh, I have not ignored your previous. I have not taken the time to answer how you turn a defunct offensive team to a juggernaut in mid season, which really says you question has no answer starting in November 2011 but does starting next year..
Meanwhile, I will restate again what all of you geniuses who think defense wins championships NEVER answer
If defense wins Championships why is the average score of the winning team in the Super Bowl 31 points, because the loser sucked on defense or the winner had a really good offense..
Go ahead make up answer that defeats the FACT
If defense wins Championships why is the average score of the winning team in the Super Bowl 31 points, because the loser sucked on defense or the winner had a really good offense..
Go ahead make up answer that defeats the FACT
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
-
If defense wins Championships why is the average score of the winning team in the Super Bowl 31 points, because the loser sucked on defense or the winner had a really good offense..
Go ahead make up answer that defeats the FACT
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
Winner. Why haven't the Colts gone back to the Super Bowl? Because Bob Sanders is done and their defense isn't good enough.. Manning is good enough to take his team to the playoffs, but defense wins championships..
-
If defense wins Championships why is the average score of the winning team in the Super Bowl 31 points, because the loser sucked on defense or the winner had a really good offense..
Go ahead make up answer that defeats the FACT
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes -
This thread is so amusing OL is the key despite the losing and defense wins Super Bowls even if the winner scores 31 points on average against those august useless defenses.......................and the beat goes on........................the herd drinking cool aid of losers keeps spouting the dumbmess amd yet Ghoolie and I Correctomundo going a dozen years have been correctomundo all dozen............................but the herd swills the cool aid and never gets it
and maybe that is why Brownstown is where it is .......................LOSERS
meantime losers we spent way more money on OL guys the last twelve years than any other team but we keep losing famously
Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes -
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
WTF is it about the statistics you were given that you don't understand? Why have the SB winners averaged 31 ppg as you say (I will take your word for that stat)?
Yea, maybe because the winner had a good offense and the loser a lousy defense. I never claimed that a championship team didn't need a good to great offense. I think they do. But the fact is....more often than not, the team with the superior defense is the team that wins. That is what the stats showed. I am not married to those stats....its just that those are the facts and nothing I made up. You cannot ignore them.
(Also...by the way, how do we know that the prime consideration for these great Super Bowl winning offenses you profess is the fact that they had great offensive lines? Take the two aberrations: Colts/Saints. Great skill players on offense? yes. But also outstanding O Lines)
-
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
WTF is it about the statistics you were given that you don't understand? Why have the SB winners averaged 31 ppg as you say (I will take your word for that stat)?
Yea, maybe because the winner had a good offense and the loser a lousy defense. I never claimed that a championship team didn't need a good to great offense. I think they do. But the fact is....more often than not, the team with the superior defense is the team that wins. That is what the stats showed. I am not married to those stats....its just that those are the facts and nothing I made up. You cannot ignore them.
(Also...by the way, how do we know that the prime consideration for these great Super Bowl winning offenses you profess is the fact that they had great offensive lines? Take the two aberrations: Colts/Saints. Great skill players on offense? yes. But also outstanding O Lines)
WTF is it about the statistics you were given that you don't understand? Why have the SB winners averaged 31 ppg as you say (I will take your word for that stat)?
Yea, maybe because the winner had a good offense and the loser a lousy defense. I never claimed that a championship team didn't need a good to great offense. I think they do. But the fact is....more often than not, the team with the superior defense is the team that wins. That is what the stats showed. I am not married to those stats....its just that those are the facts and nothing I made up. You cannot ignore them.
(Also...by the way, how do we know that the prime consideration for these great Super Bowl winning offenses you profess is the fact that they had great offensive lines? Take the two aberrations: Colts/Saints. Great skill players on offense? yes. But also outstanding O Lines)
Read your post............................you admit maybe the Offense was good.......................but question the FACT the winner of the bowl averaged 31 points.........................NOT HARD TO VERIFY.....................and then go onto to idiocy saying maybe the loser had a bad D..........................
DAH, Winners have a great D as prospered by you and the cool aid drinkers .......................but in the Bowl the D goes to shiet
Blow gas your way out of those two facts the Winners score 31 on average and the loser got their with great D
-
Rich, we already answered that one for you. Teams with great defenses force a lot of three and outs, giving their respective offenses more chances to score, as well as superior field position. Count in special teams scores, turnovers- stuff like that.
I'll leave it up to Gipper to look it up, as I don't have the time to- but I'd be willing to bet the losing Super Bowl team- with very few exceptions- defense had the inferior stats, both in the game and for the season.
BTW, the Colts won their Super Bowl because of their defense and Bob Sanders, not Peyton Manning who had a very pedestrian game.
You think the Bears won their Super Bowl because of Jim McMahon? The Redskins won theirs with Doug Williams because the Donkeys had perhaps the worst defense ever to play in a Super Bowl, resulting in a mega blowout.
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
Here's the most amazing stat of all Rich.
The team that scores the most points wins!!! 100% of the time!!!
You're using a ONE GAME (too small a sample size) to feebly attempt to prove your point. Using your flawed logic I could just as easily say the Saints ( who just racked up 62 points against the Colts) are the greatest offensive juggernaut in the last 15 years. Gipper's numbers clearly showed it's easier to get to (and win) the Super Bowl with a great defense and so-so offense. Yeah, 95 percent of the time you don't even GET to the Super Bowl without at least a decent, and more often than not- GREAT defense.
I had to look up some SB history too. The average score in the Super Bowl is 30-15. So why is that? Mainly because there's been an inordinate number of blowouts in the game. (I'll count a blowout as a win by more than 10 points- there's been 21 of the 45 SBs that qualify.) And if you bother to look at those blowout games in more detail, the team that got blown out was horribly overmatched from the get-go, or happened to have an atypical horrible game. See above- you think if the Colts played the Saints again, they'd have another 62 points racked up on them? Don't think so.
I for one am done arguing the point with you. There's still people who believe the government is hiding an alien spaceship in Roswell.
-
rich4eagle is nothing more than a Fing follower. he has no clue what to do with his life if he doesn't have someone telling him what to do, where to go, who to suck off......
you are an embarrassment to any person that has a spine.
does your grandmother hear you in the basement when you cry?
-
Defensive and Offensive rankings of recent Super Bowl winners:
2000 Ravens Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 1
2002 Bucs Offense rank: 24, Defense rank: 1
2003 Pats Offense rank: 17, Defense rank: 1
2004 Pats Offense rank: 7, Defense rank: 2
2005 Steelers Offense rank: 15, Defense rank: 4
2006 Colts Offense rank: 2, Defense rank: 23
2007 Giants Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 7
2008 Steelers Offense rank: 22, Defense Rank: 1
2009 Saints Offense rank: 1, Defense rank: 20
2010 Packers Offense rank: 10, Defense rank: 5
Also, 2010 Steelers SB losers: Offense rank: 14, Defense rank: 2
Thus, having a mediocre offense and an outstanding defense gives a team a title much more frequently than the other way around. The Saints and Colts were far more the abberation.
09 colts had the #1 postseason defense thoDefensive and Offensive rankings of recent Super Bowl winners:
2000 Ravens Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 1
2002 Bucs Offense rank: 24, Defense rank: 1
2003 Pats Offense rank: 17, Defense rank: 1
2004 Pats Offense rank: 7, Defense rank: 2
2005 Steelers Offense rank: 15, Defense rank: 4
2006 Colts Offense rank: 2, Defense rank: 23
2007 Giants Offense rank: 16, Defense rank: 7
2008 Steelers Offense rank: 22, Defense Rank: 1
2009 Saints Offense rank: 1, Defense rank: 20
2010 Packers Offense rank: 10, Defense rank: 5
Also, 2010 Steelers SB losers: Offense rank: 14, Defense rank: 2
Thus, having a mediocre offense and an outstanding defense gives a team a title much more frequently than the other way around. The Saints and Colts were far more the abberation.
-
Give it up, Rich. You are out to lunch with a nickle in your pocket, as usual, in this "argument".
But you certainly do blather well. It just doesn't make any sense.
And you still do better than Ghoolie............
-
Give it up, Rich. You are out to lunch with a nickle in your pocket, as usual, in this "argument".
But you certainly do blather well. It just doesn't make any sense.
And you still do better than Ghoolie............
Give it up, Rich. You are out to lunch with a nickle in your pocket, as usual, in this "argument".
But you certainly do blather well. It just doesn't make any sense.
And you still do better than Ghoolie............
Sorry Cal, I am the winner in this argument the Browns have spent more money on OL guys than any other team and stank for 11 years. We wasted three first round choices on OL guys and gave up bundles for the likes of Road Grader Garmon and tatoo man Russ whatever and the great RG on IR.....and the great Andruzzi and the great Lomas Brown and the great Jim Pyne and on and on...................hell we drafted six centers the last 11 years and two with a number one pick
But we still stink and cannot score because our great trenchmen got zilch behind them and proves that O line is dime a dozen
Still waitling for a retort the shows how an OL won jack in the NFL .....................BTW in the Browns first twenty NFL years most of them competing for playoffs and winning four championships they drafted exactly ONE OL in the first round and he never made the team
and none of you wizards full of factless rhetoric and cool aid will or can retort what I just said ...................because it is fact instead of your BS.....................in the trenches to nowhere
and worse is the idiotic belief here in Brownstown that defense wins Championships when it is proven otherwise ......................31 points proven
-
rich4eagle is nothing more than a Fing follower. he has no clue what to do with his life if he doesn't have someone telling him what to do, where to go, who to suck off......
you are an embarrassment to any person that has a spine.
does your grandmother hear you in the basement when you cry?
rich4eagle is nothing more than a Fing follower. he has no clue what to do with his life if he doesn't have someone telling him what to do, where to go, who to suck off......
you are an embarrassment to any person that has a spine.
does your grandmother hear you in the basement when you cry?
...............your post is what your are a punk and sniveling jackass................bring it............ only childish fool would bring up anothers person grandmother.........and blowjobs..
if you had an ounce of character you would apologize for that abomination of post which had nothing to do with how win football games which is all that I detailed in depth with acumen while you are focused on blowjobs and grandmothers and gutlessness........
I I surmise that you are 12 going on 13 because no adult would have posted the garbage you did PUNK
Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes -
NO you did not if defense wins why does offense win Super Bowls..31 points given up is not defense
It is amusing to see us want to cling onto losing despite reality and statistics
Here's the most amazing stat of all Rich.
The team that scores the most points wins!!! 100% of the time!!!
You're using a ONE GAME (too small a sample size) to feebly attempt to prove your point. Using your flawed logic I could just as easily say the Saints ( who just racked up 62 points against the Colts) are the greatest offensive juggernaut in the last 15 years. Gipper's numbers clearly showed it's easier to get to (and win) the Super Bowl with a great defense and so-so offense. Yeah, 95 percent of the time you don't even GET to the Super Bowl without at least a decent, and more often than not- GREAT defense.
I had to look up some SB history too. The average score in the Super Bowl is 30-15. So why is that? Mainly because there's been an inordinate number of blowouts in the game. (I'll count a blowout as a win by more than 10 points- there's been 21 of the 45 SBs that qualify.) And if you bother to look at those blowout games in more detail, the team that got blown out was horribly overmatched from the get-go, or happened to have an atypical horrible game. See above- you think if the Colts played the Saints again, they'd have another 62 points racked up on them? Don't think so.
I for one am done arguing the point with you. There's still people who believe the government is hiding an alien spaceship in Roswell.
Here's the most amazing stat of all Rich.
The team that scores the most points wins!!! 100% of the time!!!
You're using a ONE GAME (too small a sample size) to feebly attempt to prove your point. Using your flawed logic I could just as easily say the Saints ( who just racked up 62 points against the Colts) are the greatest offensive juggernaut in the last 15 years. Gipper's numbers clearly showed it's easier to get to (and win) the Super Bowl with a great defense and so-so offense. Yeah, 95 percent of the time you don't even GET to the Super Bowl without at least a decent, and more often than not- GREAT defense.
I had to look up some SB history too. The average score in the Super Bowl is 30-15. So why is that? Mainly because there's been an inordinate number of blowouts in the game. (I'll count a blowout as a win by more than 10 points- there's been 21 of the 45 SBs that qualify.) And if you bother to look at those blowout games in more detail, the team that got blown out was horribly overmatched from the get-go, or happened to have an atypical horrible game. See above- you think if the Colts played the Saints again, they'd have another 62 points racked up on them? Don't think so.
I for one am done arguing the point with you. There's still people who believe the government is hiding an alien spaceship in Roswell.
Lets go over this again......................average winning score of the Super Bowl is 31 points................does than mean the loser Defense sucked??????????????? There is no way out of this Larry either the winners had great offense or the losers sucked on defense in which both defeat the stupid argument that defense wins super bowls And yes indeed please go again and tell me how the OL caused any team to win jack...............or in our case STANK
you can be done arguing wrong headed but denial of reality is a fault of losers and your belief as is Brownstown is the belief of losers and record supports it
-
rich4eagle is nothing more than a Fing follower. he has no clue what to do with his life if he doesn't have someone telling him what to do, where to go, who to suck off......
you are an embarrassment to any person that has a spine.
does your grandmother hear you in the basement when you cry?
...............your post is what your are a punk and sniveling jackass................bring it............ only childish fool would bring up anothers person grandmother.........and blowjobs..
if you had an ounce of character you would apologize for that abomination of post which had nothing to do with how win football games which is all that I detailed in depth with acumen while you are focused on blowjobs and grandmothers and gutlessness........
I I surmise that you are 12 going on 13 because no adult would have posted the garbage you did PUNK
...............your post is what your are a punk and sniveling jackass................bring it................go for it jerk...............get some balls call the place and time.......................and I will kick your ass
further you moron anyone with substance would never bring up anothers person grandmother...............but a punk like YOU does that and the stupid fellatio COMMENT among other stupidity
I will enjoy beating the living stuffing out of you....................PUNK...............get some balls and lets rumble.................PUNK
TEST MY SPINE PUNK
better yet punk just send me your address and I will be there.......................spinless and all
now if you have an ounce of character apologize for that abomination of post which had nothing to do with how win football games which is all that I detailed in depth with acumen while you are focused on blowjobs and grandmothers and gutlessness................but I will indeed kick the snot out you and pleasurably you balless baboon
I do surmise that you are 12 going on 13 because no adult would have posted the garbage you did PUNK
Watch out Mik. Rich is a real bad ass. When I was working in Sterling VA, he challenged me. Meet him at the Washington MT in DC. The old fooking pussy never showed. Him and Ghoolie are pieces of garbage.
-
rich4eagle is nothing more than a Fing follower. he has no clue what to do with his life if he doesn't have someone telling him what to do, where to go, who to suck off......
you are an embarrassment to any person that has a spine.
does your grandmother hear you in the basement when you cry?
...............your post is what your are a punk and sniveling jackass................bring it............ only childish fool would bring up anothers person grandmother.........and blowjobs..
if you had an ounce of character you would apologize for that abomination of post which had nothing to do with how win football games which is all that I detailed in depth with acumen while you are focused on blowjobs and grandmothers and gutlessness........
I I surmise that you are 12 going on 13 because no adult would have posted the garbage you did PUNK
wow i bet he's in the basement now listening to tina turner applying lipstick and stroking it to everyone's avatar. I could only come up with four centers since 99. 2 of em went to pro bowls and a third will go to a few im sure. Sorry we didn't spring on jamarcus Russell, peter warrick, Charles rogers, Kyle boller, or Ron dayne. Would one of them playmakers have made u cheer up and pick up your toys so grandma doesn't fall down the stairs bringing ya nanas and sippy cup...............your post is what your are a punk and sniveling jackass................bring it................go for it jerk...............get some balls call the place and time.......................and I will kick your ass
further you moron anyone with substance would never bring up anothers person grandmother...............but a punk like YOU does that and the stupid fellatio COMMENT among other stupidity
I will enjoy beating the living stuffing out of you....................PUNK...............get some balls and lets rumble.................PUNK
TEST MY SPINE PUNK
better yet punk just send me your address and I will be there.......................spinless and all
now if you have an ounce of character apologize for that abomination of post which had nothing to do with how win football games which is all that I detailed in depth with acumen while you are focused on blowjobs and grandmothers and gutlessness................but I will indeed kick the snot out you and pleasurably you balless baboon
I do surmise that you are 12 going on 13 because no adult would have posted the garbage you did PUNK
"We are Americans. We don't quit doing something because it's wrong. We just keep doing the wrong thing till it turns out right." Browns maybe the most American Football team ever.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login