Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. You be the GM. Who do you draft with the #5 pick for the Browns?

You be the GM. Who do you draft with the #5 pick for the Browns?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
62 Posts 32 Posters 4.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Lenin L
    • 14 Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    L Lenin wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Malcolm Jenkins.

    I have wanted him all year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • JewDago J
      • 837 Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      J JewDago wrote on last edited by JewDago
      #12

      the shelf life of a RB is far too short to justify using a top-10 pick on one. RBs play until they're 30, while guys at pretty much every other position can play five years longer than that.

      a good LB is definitely worth a top-5 pick. if there's a sure-fire DE, he's likely the best option, but so many DEs flop in the NFL that it's, i think, too risky of a position to draft that high.

      you have to play both ends of risk/reward when you're drafting high enough that it necessitates a sizable financial comittment.

      and patrick willis is the highest impact player on the niners. dude's an animal, really the only guy they have that opposing OCs need to account for on every play and work to minimize.

      S P 2 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • S Sony Reed

        @sez.ej said:

        If Seattle does not take Crabtree you gotta get him.. otherwise it make for a very tough pick.. too high to take beanie at #5 though.. Without knowing if we will be in a 3-4 or 4-3 it's tough to pick.. I really like Malcom Jenkins.. the secondary would be sweet to add him to the mix, curry.. hmmm I don't know maybeeeeee Maybin , Brown.. choices choices.. fact is we have to get stronger against the run.... Ok trade down.. get Beanie and another pick on a DT or DE OR LB..... yeah..that's the ticket

        I would be afraid to take any Ohio State player that high

        Vernon Gholston, A.J Hawk, Ted Ginn..........Have any of these guys produced for where they were drafted

        No thanks to the overrated Ohio State players

        Maybe Taylor Mays could be our Troy Palamalu?

        We need a playmaker with this picks, not just a good NFL player a guy who will be a SUPERSTAR

        mz. ?
        • Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        ? mz. wrote on last edited by
        #13

        @sony-reed said:

        Maybe Taylor Mays could be our Troy Palamalu?

        We need a playmaker with this picks, not just a good NFL player a guy who will be a SUPERSTAR

        You make an extremely interesting and convincing case for Mays...but does he fill a need? Crabtree is absolutely awesome, but you are right about all the $ tied up in WRs. Well, AZ does have Boldin and Fitz...so I guess there are exceptions to the rule.

        So....neither Jones nor Pool are in Mays' class, but both are very decent players IMO. Our linebackers are meh, at best.

        Personally, I'd rather draft Curry/Maualuga and resign Jones than draft Mays, lose Jones and continue on with Davis/Bell/Williams at ILB.

        But you have given me something to think about RE: Mays and even Crabtree.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • J JewDago

          the shelf life of a RB is far too short to justify using a top-10 pick on one. RBs play until they're 30, while guys at pretty much every other position can play five years longer than that.

          a good LB is definitely worth a top-5 pick. if there's a sure-fire DE, he's likely the best option, but so many DEs flop in the NFL that it's, i think, too risky of a position to draft that high.

          you have to play both ends of risk/reward when you're drafting high enough that it necessitates a sizable financial comittment.

          and patrick willis is the highest impact player on the niners. dude's an animal, really the only guy they have that opposing OCs need to account for on every play and work to minimize.

          Sony Reed S
          • 213 Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          S Sony Reed wrote on last edited by
          #14

          @jewdago said:

          the shelf life of a RB is far too short to justify using a top-10 pick on one. RBs play until they're 30, while guys at pretty much every other position can play five years longer than that.

          a good LB is definitely worth a top-5 pick. if there's a sure-fire DE, he's likely the best option, but so many DEs flop in the NFL that it's, i think, too risky of a position to draft that high.

          you have to play both ends of risk/reward when you're drafting high enough that it necessitates a sizable financial comittment.

          and patrick willis is the highest impact player on the niners. dude's an animal, really the only guy they have that opposing OCs need to account for on every play and work to minimize.

          Did Patrick Willis turn the 49ers defense into a good or dominant defense? NO, How many stuffs did he have this year or sacks, Willis is a good player but not dominant, not a game changer.

          So you would rather have a good player who you hope will play 10 years rather than a player who could be a Superstar because he plays running back because is shelf life is supposed to be only 5 years

          I remember people on this board bragging about how Savage took advantage of Ozzie Newsome by trading with him to draft Wimbley because Ngata would only last a few years, now Savage is gone is Wimbley is a complete bust, so much for that theory of Wimbley would still be playing great for 10 years when Ngata would be done in 5, looks like Ngata will be playing while Wimbley is a backup LB or out of football.

          This team has to draft a guy with this pick that will start from day 1 and be a star player in his rookie season, if we miss on this pick it will setback this franchise even more

          ? J 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • yeahDAisafuturehofer... Y
            • 339 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            Y yeahDAisafuturehofer... wrote on last edited by
            #15

            With that high of a pick the positions usually taken are Left OT, QB, or a DE/OLB. You got Quinn and QB (plus no qbs worth taking that high) and Joe Thomas at left tackle (plus no OL worth taking at that pick). Your D needs a good stud so Curry or Ray at linebacker. Another good option is to trade down for a few good 1st and 2nd round picks. I guarantee if you take a reciever with the 5th pick you will end up 0-16 within two years. (Just like the lions....) I think the best option is trade down for multiple picks becuase picking that high is overrated. Players get larger salaries then veteran All-Pro players and they have never even played in the NFL.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Y yeahDAisafuturehofer...

              With that high of a pick the positions usually taken are Left OT, QB, or a DE/OLB. You got Quinn and QB (plus no qbs worth taking that high) and Joe Thomas at left tackle (plus no OL worth taking at that pick). Your D needs a good stud so Curry or Ray at linebacker. Another good option is to trade down for a few good 1st and 2nd round picks. I guarantee if you take a reciever with the 5th pick you will end up 0-16 within two years. (Just like the lions....) I think the best option is trade down for multiple picks becuase picking that high is overrated. Players get larger salaries then veteran All-Pro players and they have never even played in the NFL.

              mz. ?
              • Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              ? mz. wrote on last edited by
              #16

              @yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:

              I think the best option is trade down for multiple picks becuase picking that high is overrated. Players get larger salaries then veteran All-Pro players and they have never even played in the NFL.

              Let's say you think Aaron Curry or Rey Maualuga is the next great NFL linebacker, you have to draft him at 5. Let's say you don't. That's when you trade down. Picking someone at 5 when you feel nobody holds #5 value is the only dumb thing to do.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Mr. T Mr. TM
                • 7k Posts
                • 184 Reputation
                Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
                #17

                we could always trade DA to KC or Detroit for a first round pick

                Head or Gut?
                ? Y 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • TK39 T
                  • 39 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  T TK39 wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  I can completely understand not picking up a WR with the #1 pick for the Browns....

                  ....but how sweet would it be for Quinn to have weapons like Edwards, Winslow, & Crabtree????

                  I'm drooling just at thinking of the possibilities.

                  Go Browns! Go Rams! - http://tksc.forumcircle.com/portal.php
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • S Sony Reed

                    @jewdago said:

                    the shelf life of a RB is far too short to justify using a top-10 pick on one. RBs play until they're 30, while guys at pretty much every other position can play five years longer than that.

                    a good LB is definitely worth a top-5 pick. if there's a sure-fire DE, he's likely the best option, but so many DEs flop in the NFL that it's, i think, too risky of a position to draft that high.

                    you have to play both ends of risk/reward when you're drafting high enough that it necessitates a sizable financial comittment.

                    and patrick willis is the highest impact player on the niners. dude's an animal, really the only guy they have that opposing OCs need to account for on every play and work to minimize.

                    Did Patrick Willis turn the 49ers defense into a good or dominant defense? NO, How many stuffs did he have this year or sacks, Willis is a good player but not dominant, not a game changer.

                    So you would rather have a good player who you hope will play 10 years rather than a player who could be a Superstar because he plays running back because is shelf life is supposed to be only 5 years

                    I remember people on this board bragging about how Savage took advantage of Ozzie Newsome by trading with him to draft Wimbley because Ngata would only last a few years, now Savage is gone is Wimbley is a complete bust, so much for that theory of Wimbley would still be playing great for 10 years when Ngata would be done in 5, looks like Ngata will be playing while Wimbley is a backup LB or out of football.

                    This team has to draft a guy with this pick that will start from day 1 and be a star player in his rookie season, if we miss on this pick it will setback this franchise even more

                    Aloysius ?
                    • Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    @sony-reed said:

                    Did Patrick Willis turn the 49ers defense into a good or dominant defense? NO, How many stuffs did he have this year or sacks, Willis is a good player but not dominant, not a game changer.

                    Okay, this is incredibly sloppy work. Your assumptions are

                    1. The Niners had a good defense before Willis
                    2. They added Patrick Willis, with no other personnel changes
                    3. They should now have a dominant defense
                    The reality is:
                    1. The year before Willis was drafted, the Niners' defense was ranked 26th in the league. Not good - borderline terrible.
                    2. They've had a lot of personnel move in & out since then - Justin Smith & Nate Clements signed, Bryant Young retired, etc. Their overall talent on D may have increased slightly, but they've also lost some great run defenders. And until recently, the coaching has been terrible.
                    3. The Niners' defense is now ranked 13th in the league. They've made a significant jump, at least in part due to Willis's dominant play.
                    LB's can make huge impacts on a defense. Hence the obsession with guys like Ray Lewis & Brian Urlacher.

                    So I don't buy your argument.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • S Sony Reed

                      @jewdago said:

                      the shelf life of a RB is far too short to justify using a top-10 pick on one. RBs play until they're 30, while guys at pretty much every other position can play five years longer than that.

                      a good LB is definitely worth a top-5 pick. if there's a sure-fire DE, he's likely the best option, but so many DEs flop in the NFL that it's, i think, too risky of a position to draft that high.

                      you have to play both ends of risk/reward when you're drafting high enough that it necessitates a sizable financial comittment.

                      and patrick willis is the highest impact player on the niners. dude's an animal, really the only guy they have that opposing OCs need to account for on every play and work to minimize.

                      Did Patrick Willis turn the 49ers defense into a good or dominant defense? NO, How many stuffs did he have this year or sacks, Willis is a good player but not dominant, not a game changer.

                      So you would rather have a good player who you hope will play 10 years rather than a player who could be a Superstar because he plays running back because is shelf life is supposed to be only 5 years

                      I remember people on this board bragging about how Savage took advantage of Ozzie Newsome by trading with him to draft Wimbley because Ngata would only last a few years, now Savage is gone is Wimbley is a complete bust, so much for that theory of Wimbley would still be playing great for 10 years when Ngata would be done in 5, looks like Ngata will be playing while Wimbley is a backup LB or out of football.

                      This team has to draft a guy with this pick that will start from day 1 and be a star player in his rookie season, if we miss on this pick it will setback this franchise even more

                      JewDago J
                      • 837 Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      J JewDago wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      @sony-reed said:

                      Did Patrick Willis turn the 49ers defense into a good or dominant defense? NO, How many stuffs did he have this year or sacks, Willis is a good player but not dominant, not a game changer.

                      So you would rather have a good player who you hope will play 10 years rather than a player who could be a Superstar because he plays running back because is shelf life is supposed to be only 5 years

                      willis' impact doesn't show up in obvious ways because he doesn't play a obvious, glory-type position. he's not a DE/OLB or CB, so his impact isn't measured in INTs or sacks. his number this year were 141 tackles, one INT, one fumble forced and 7 stuffs.

                      and i'd rather have someone who's a good player and can be good for 10 years than someone whose potential is questionable and has a short shelf life. there's more than one reason that i want curry over wells.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Mr. TM Mr. T

                        we could always trade DA to KC or Detroit for a first round pick

                        mz. ?
                        • Posts
                        • 0 Reputation
                        ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        @mr.-t said:

                        we could always trade DA to KC or Detroit for a first round pick

                        So you're saying Detroit is willing to trade the #1 overall pick for Derek Anderson?

                        ...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Mr. TM Mr. T

                          we could always trade DA to KC or Detroit for a first round pick

                          yeahDAisafuturehofer... Y
                          • 339 Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          Y yeahDAisafuturehofer... wrote on last edited by yeahDAisafuturehofer...
                          #22

                          @mr.-t said:

                          we could always trade DA to KC or Detroit for a first round pick

                          The Lions are probably trying to avoid another 0-16 so I doubt the give up a first round pick for him. I don't see DA getting anything more then a 3rd round pick if your lucky.

                          I notice all you guys are trying to determine DA's trade/FA value so you are comparing him to other QBs who will be free agents this offseason. Make sure you add Bryon Leftwhich to that discussion. As a Steelers fan I would love for him to dedicate himself to the Steelers as a life long back-up but I know that won't happen. He is pretty servicable and could do well on quite a few teams.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Aloysius ?
                            • Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Aaron Curry.

                            And I'd take Jenkins over Maualuga - I wouldn't be comfortable giving Maualuga top 5 money; he's the kind of guy you need to keep motivated, which may not happen if he's already got so much money that earning a second contract won't be important to him.

                            If he goes top 5, I think there's a greater chance that he'll be a bust/underachiever.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • T TK39

                              I don't think anybody expected the Browns to be picking 5th this year in the draft (raises hand) but now that the season is over, we have to look at the positives...which is now getting a very good player that can help the team right away (hopefully).

                              So, if you were the GM of the Browns today, who would you pick in the 1st Rd.

                              For the 5th pick in the 2009 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select.................?

                              Here are some of the prospects that SHOULD be available by the 5th pick in the 1st round.

                              Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech

                              Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC

                              Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas

                              Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech

                              Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss

                              James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State

                              Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State

                              Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest

                              Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State

                              I think we can safely say that QB, WR, TE will not be chosen in the 1st Round (eventhough Crabtree is unbelievable).

                              So, who do you pick?

                              Poll results from the old forum

                              Brown's Draft Posibilities

                              • Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech: 0 votes
                              • Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC: 19 votes
                              • Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas: 5 votes
                              • Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss: 5 votes
                              • Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State: 5 votes
                              • Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech: 10 votes
                              • James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State: 4 votes
                              • Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest: 23 votes
                              • Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State: 3 votes
                              Ghoolie ?
                              • Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              ? Ghoolie wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              @tk39 said:

                              I don't think anybody expected the Browns to be picking 5th this year in the draft (raises hand) but now that the season is over, we have to look at the positives...which is now getting a very good player that can help the team right away (hopefully).

                              So, if you were the GM of the Browns today, who would you pick in the 1st Rd.

                              For the 5th pick in the 2009 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select.................?

                              Here are some of the prospects that SHOULD be available by the 5th pick in the 1st round.

                              Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech

                              Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC

                              Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas

                              Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech

                              Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss

                              James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State

                              Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State

                              Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest

                              Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State

                              I think we can safely say that QB, WR, TE will not be chosen in the 1st Round (eventhough Crabtree is unbelievable).

                              So, who do you pick?

                              Duh, let's see, the Browns don't have a deep threat, Duh, Aye Don't Know..............

                              Crabtree. He is a play maker, we don't have a SINGLE playmaker.

                              WInslow and Edwards need to be gone.

                              hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • mz. ?
                                • Posts
                                • 0 Reputation
                                ? mz. wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                [quote name='Ghoolie' date='Dec 29 2008, 08:42 PM' post='25206

                                we don't have a SINGLE playmaker.

                                Let's play Name That Playmaker, G!

                                Year Team Games Starts Receptions Yards Average Touchdowns

                                2007 Cleveland 16 16 80 1,289 16.1 16

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                  • 14k Posts
                                  • 5k Reputation
                                  nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  I'll take Maualuga or Curry...we need to stop the run and hopefully hall and bell turn into something....

                                  Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • damajuki D
                                    • 475 Posts
                                    • 0 Reputation
                                    D damajuki wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    I said Curry, because Al has me watching those damn clips every other day.

                                    But as usual, I'm pussing out by disclaiming like a mofo but I have to keep saying it:

                                    Give me the biggest bang for the buck, regardless of position. Whoever we think WILL START is the guy we should draft, PERIOD.

                                    Top 10 picks MUST BE starters, from Day One.

                                    So, based on history, LBs translate best to the pros. If you know where to be, get there fast and hit hard, you will play immediately. To me, Curry looks like the SAFEST pick at what happens to be a major need for us.

                                    But, again, that being said, you MUST take the sure thing at #5. If Crabtree is that good, you take him.

                                    You just better be damn sure he's that good if you are going to skip a guy like Curry for him or you risk becoming the next Detroit.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Herman M H
                                      • 125 Posts
                                      • 0 Reputation
                                      H Herman M wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      i noticed a lot of votes for Curry, why? he plays like Wimbly to dumb to be taught anything new.

                                      i would pick Laurinaitis, Matthews, or Maualuga before I would even look at Curry.

                                      "Recycling and speed limits are bullshit," "They're like someone who quits smoking on his deathbed." Tyler
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • T TK39

                                        I don't think anybody expected the Browns to be picking 5th this year in the draft (raises hand) but now that the season is over, we have to look at the positives...which is now getting a very good player that can help the team right away (hopefully).

                                        So, if you were the GM of the Browns today, who would you pick in the 1st Rd.

                                        For the 5th pick in the 2009 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select.................?

                                        Here are some of the prospects that SHOULD be available by the 5th pick in the 1st round.

                                        Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech

                                        Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC

                                        Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas

                                        Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech

                                        Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss

                                        James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State

                                        Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State

                                        Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest

                                        Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State

                                        I think we can safely say that QB, WR, TE will not be chosen in the 1st Round (eventhough Crabtree is unbelievable).

                                        So, who do you pick?

                                        Poll results from the old forum

                                        Brown's Draft Posibilities

                                        • Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech: 0 votes
                                        • Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC: 19 votes
                                        • Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas: 5 votes
                                        • Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss: 5 votes
                                        • Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State: 5 votes
                                        • Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech: 10 votes
                                        • James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State: 4 votes
                                        • Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest: 23 votes
                                        • Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State: 3 votes
                                        BigBrownsFan B
                                        • 534 Posts
                                        • 6 Reputation
                                        B BigBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @tk39 said:

                                        Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech

                                        Rey Maualuga, ILB, USC

                                        Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas

                                        Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech

                                        Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss

                                        James Laurinaitis, ILB, Ohio State

                                        Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State

                                        Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest

                                        Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State

                                        So, who do you pick?[/font]

                                        Well I crossed off the ones above.... I am telling you, drop down a few slots, take Curry or Mauluga. Then get Shon Greene or Javon Ringer in the 2nd Round if you really, really want a RB. I would take the other kid from Vandy as a CB as well. There is NO WAY IN HELL we take Laurinitis that high.... Jenkins is intriguing, but no thanks to a CB at #5.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • The Italian DawgPound The Italian DawgPoundT
                                          • 478 Posts
                                          • 18 Reputation
                                          The Italian DawgPoundT The Italian DawgPound wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          Malcolm Jenkins.

                                          We desperately need a pro level CB.

                                          (Well...we need desperately more than a CB but it would be a good start)

                                          All the way from Torino to Cleveland: GO BROWNS!!!!!!!
                                          hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate