Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Walterfootball Mocks

Walterfootball Mocks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
13 Posts 8 Posters 722 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ColtMyBoy C
    • 7 Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    C ColtMyBoy wrote on last edited by
    #3

    He ran a pro-style offense under Mike Sherman at A&M. Might give him a leg up especially if Sherman is still being considered for the OC job here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Nw220 N
      • 1k Posts
      • 27 Reputation
      N Nw220 wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Hes a development QB he will take some time and is very raw, IMO if we miss RG3 at 4 forget about QB and just load up on playmakers for McCoy and take it from there...

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

        When it comes to mock draft I mostly follow Walterfootball cause over that past two years it has been them, not ESPN, who have most accurately predicted where players would go. This week is a great update cause they have predicted that Washington trades down with the Rams to take RGIII, leaving us to take Blackmon. Take a look of the whole thing yourself.

        http://walterfootball.com/draft2012.php

        More notible than us getting Blackmon is their prediction that we will take QB Ryan Tannehill from Texas A&M. I don't know much about this guy except for the fact he was a WR turned QB halfway though last season and ended this year with decent yardage, 61% completion percentage, and a 2:1 TD to INT ratio. Can anyone elaborate more on this guy such as the system he runs or just personal opinion.s

        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @harry-buffalo said:

        When it comes to mock draft I mostly follow Walterfootball cause over that past two years it has been them, not ESPN, who have most accurately predicted where players would go. This week is a great update cause they have predicted that Washington trades down with the Rams to take RGIII, leaving us to take Blackmon. Take a look of the whole thing yourself.

        http://walterfootball.com/draft2012.php

        More notible than us getting Blackmon is their prediction that we will take QB Ryan Tannehill from Texas A&M. I don't know much about this guy except for the fact he was a WR turned QB halfway though last season and ended this year with decent yardage, 61% completion percentage, and a 2:1 TD to INT ratio. Can anyone elaborate more on this guy such as the system he runs or just personal opinion.s

        Do you know why there may be credibility to the Tannehill acquisition possibility?: Because our new offensive coordinator may very well be Mike Sherman....and Mike Sherman was the Texas A&M HC who recruited Tannehill to A&M.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
          • 3k Posts
          • 241 Reputation
          Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Honestly if Tannehill was an option, I would still rather take Minnefield with the second 1st round pick or a DE and then take Tannehill if he fell to us in the second. I think taking him in the first is just too soon.

          Ruining threads since 1897.
          The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

            Honestly if Tannehill was an option, I would still rather take Minnefield with the second 1st round pick or a DE and then take Tannehill if he fell to us in the second. I think taking him in the first is just too soon.

            The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
            • 57k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
            #7

            @harry-buffalo said:

            Honestly if Tannehill was an option, I would still rather take Minnefield with the second 1st round pick or a DE and then take Tannehill if he fell to us in the second. I think taking him in the first is just too soon.

            I agree.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Unsympathetic U Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 4k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I wouldn't spend a high pick on a QB this year unless that QB is RG3.

              Tannehill is NOT better than McCoy; he's at best equivalent. We would see much greater performance as a team if we improved any position other than QB with those picks.

              Don't forget that the 2013 QB draft is stacked. If we luck into Blackmon this year, we should wait until 2013 to take the QB.

              Spending 22 on one of the top DE's [branch, Ingram, Montgomery] or OL [Martin, DeCastro] would be amazing. I wouldn't hate a CB[ Kirkpatrick, Dennard] at that spot either. Sanders the OT from FSU might be 5-10 picks too soon.

              If everyone's taken, we could implement The Ghoolie Principle and take Wright at 22 after Blackmon at 4.

              The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

                When it comes to mock draft I mostly follow Walterfootball cause over that past two years it has been them, not ESPN, who have most accurately predicted where players would go. This week is a great update cause they have predicted that Washington trades down with the Rams to take RGIII, leaving us to take Blackmon. Take a look of the whole thing yourself.

                http://walterfootball.com/draft2012.php

                More notible than us getting Blackmon is their prediction that we will take QB Ryan Tannehill from Texas A&M. I don't know much about this guy except for the fact he was a WR turned QB halfway though last season and ended this year with decent yardage, 61% completion percentage, and a 2:1 TD to INT ratio. Can anyone elaborate more on this guy such as the system he runs or just personal opinion.s

                DawginIT D
                • 278 Posts
                • 22 Reputation
                D DawginIT wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @harry-buffalo said:

                When it comes to mock draft I mostly follow Walterfootball cause over that past two years it has been them, not ESPN, who have most accurately predicted where players would go. This week is a great update cause they have predicted that Washington trades down with the Rams to take RGIII, leaving us to take Blackmon. Take a look of the whole thing yourself.

                http://walterfootball.com/draft2012.php

                More notible than us getting Blackmon is their prediction that we will take QB Ryan Tannehill from Texas A&M. I don't know much about this guy except for the fact he was a WR turned QB halfway though last season and ended this year with decent yardage, 61% completion percentage, and a 2:1 TD to INT ratio. Can anyone elaborate more on this guy such as the system he runs or just personal opinion.s

                I keep up on this site constantly and saw this earlier today. I have to say this would excite the hell out of me. We need another quarterback to have in waiting if/when McCoy can't get the job done and I have serious doubts about RGIII.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                  • 64k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Trouble is, with the fourth round pick.... they take Adcock as the RT.

                  NFLdraftscout says: "He doesn't look very good when asked to get nasty and overwhelm defenders in run blocking, though."

                  I would rather pick the kid I picked in the third round.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • BrownIndian BrownIndianB
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 39 Reputation
                    BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    I like the size of Tannenhill, but how is his arm strength and accuracy and release ? What is with the foot injury ? Why cant we go after an LB like Burflict ? Is Tannenhill an upgrade over Colt ?

                    Somehow I was hoping for a FA QB

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                      • 64k Posts
                      • 8k Reputation
                      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Tannehil is a project. At the next level, I don't have much confidence he is able to start for a few years.

                      He has skills. but I'd take Wilson this year? or next over him, no question.

                      He isn't any upgrade over Colt, except maybe a stronger arm. But his decision making

                      in the pros is a worry.

                      Burfict is Suh with less self awareness and discipline. He may not be all that smart.

                      He's such a loose cannon with outrageous, self and team destructive plays....

                      I don't know. A lot rides on his combine interviews. His stock would be way higher,

                      if he only had some smarts and character. He has been benched for hurting his team

                      with really stupid, outrageously cheapshot plays. Forget him.

                      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • C calfoxwc

                        Tannehil is a project. At the next level, I don't have much confidence he is able to start for a few years.

                        He has skills. but I'd take Wilson this year? or next over him, no question.

                        He isn't any upgrade over Colt, except maybe a stronger arm. But his decision making

                        in the pros is a worry.

                        Burfict is Suh with less self awareness and discipline. He may not be all that smart.

                        He's such a loose cannon with outrageous, self and team destructive plays....

                        I don't know. A lot rides on his combine interviews. His stock would be way higher,

                        if he only had some smarts and character. He has been benched for hurting his team

                        with really stupid, outrageously cheapshot plays. Forget him.

                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                        • 57k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @calfoxwc said:

                        Tannehil is a project. At the next level, I don't have much confidence he is able to start for a few years.

                        He has skills. but I'd take Wilson this year? or next over him, no question.

                        He isn't any upgrade over Colt, except maybe a stronger arm. But his decision making

                        in the pros is a worry.

                        Burfict is Suh with less self awareness and discipline. He may not be all that smart.

                        He's such a loose cannon with outrageous, self and team destructive plays....

                        I don't know. A lot rides on his combine interviews. His stock would be way higher,

                        if he only had some smarts and character. He has been benched for hurting his team

                        with really stupid, outrageously cheapshot plays. Forget him.

                        I don't know. I don't think it would hurt the Browns to get a little "nasty"....if the guy has the talent to go with it.

                        I mean, as much as we do bitch about Harrison, you would want a guy like that on your team....if you could coach the stupid out of him.

                        It is possible to reign in highly talented players who have attitude issues. It is not possible to infuse talent into a player that doesn't have it.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate