Mel Kiper Jrs First Rd Mock
-
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
-
I believe a lot of backroom mock drafters who barely break a hundred bucks a month from the web traffic they get on their site than the two dumb asses for ESPN who get payed a six figure salary to feed us a load a bullshit.
-
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
-
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
-
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
-
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
Walterfootball got about 8 right last year including the first 5 picks, technically the 6th pick too cause he had us taking Jones and we traded the pick to Atlanta and they took him there.
-
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
the reason i threw up the link was i wanted people to look at themselves and read all the gibberish accompanied with each pick. the amount of time he spent writing up this mock and then to get 3 out of 32.
hey i enjoy everything football. i enjoy reading mocks and commenting on them BUT just because a couple of guys make a mock with us taking RGlll doesn't mean it's set in stone.
-
Why don't you tell us how many he got right.
the reason i threw up the link was i wanted people to look at themselves and read all the gibberish accompanied with each pick. the amount of time he spent writing up this mock and then to get 3 out of 32.
hey i enjoy everything football. i enjoy reading mocks and commenting on them BUT just because a couple of guys make a mock with us taking RGlll doesn't mean it's set in stone.
the reason i threw up the link was i wanted people to look at themselves and read all the gibberish accompanied with each pick. the amount of time he spent writing up this mock and then to get 3 out of 32.
hey i enjoy everything football. i enjoy reading mocks and commenting on them BUT just because a couple of guys make a mock with us taking RGlll doesn't mean it's set in stone.
I agree.....who foresees what happens in a draft. Who could have predicted that the Falcons would have moved up so far last year.
Who can foresee if someone will jump to get RGIII? Actually, a lot of people see that happening...especially the Redskins or the Dolphins.
The Browns, however, have no business giving up draft picks to take what I think is a question mark. If he is there with our pick and they want him, OK. But with all our needs, to give up a pick to move up? NYET. If RGIII is gone, go for Blackmon. If both Blackmon and RGIII are gone, go for Claiborne....or go for a trade down to give us more high picks. When you have needs at: QB, WR, DE, RT, RG OLB1, OLB2, FS, CB, RB maybe you go get more picks, not fewer.
-
Mel Kiper sux dix.
-
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
Actually my final mock draft last year got several more correct than Kiper.
Just like almost all mocks out there have you guys taking RGIII, im wondering if you think Cleveland absolutely HAS to trade up with St. Louis to get him? At this point, and with the whole Rookie Wage Scale, im saying that almost HAVE to. I think if St. Louis is on the clock and no one trades with them, there will be guys on the phone with Minnesota. I think Cleveland has to trade up or theyll lose out on RGIII.
-
Zombo said:
Lions fan, you are a homo.
Z
Thanks, I appreciate the cut down. Didnt know what I did wrong, but whatever.
-
All else fails Richardson is there and we take him. He's NFL ready and runs with purpose kinda like Peterson. He'd fill a hole and would be the best available.
-
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
yeah here's his first mock from last year. tell me how many he got right? HA!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/579050-mel-kipers-2011-nfl-mock-draft-a-pick-by-pick-critique
Um this link has a Jan 20, 2011 date on it so I hardly doubt that this was Mels final mock before the draft. The freaking complete draft order wasn't even set etc. Its fair to criticize Kiper but at least do so with his final mock.
-
Zombo said:
You had us trading up.
Z
I dont understand?
-
I just checked. He got 3 out of 32 right.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
Gips, it's not just one year- compared to some other mock guys Kiper has consistently sucked in his predictions.
-
That is probably no worse than anyone else who does a mock draft would do.
I will say this: last year he had the Browns taking AJ Green. The Browns WOULD have taken AJ Green if he were there. But the Bengals snatched Green first. It is the whole butterfly effect. One move throws off the entire rest of the draft from the perspective of someone doing a mock.
Think what the Browns situation would have been if AJ Green were there. They take him, which means they don't trade down. No Phil Taylor, no Greg Little....it is quite possible that not a single player that they got would have been taken by them.
Actually my final mock draft last year got several more correct than Kiper.
Just like almost all mocks out there have you guys taking RGIII, im wondering if you think Cleveland absolutely HAS to trade up with St. Louis to get him? At this point, and with the whole Rookie Wage Scale, im saying that almost HAVE to. I think if St. Louis is on the clock and no one trades with them, there will be guys on the phone with Minnesota. I think Cleveland has to trade up or theyll lose out on RGIII.
Actually my final mock draft last year got several more correct than Kiper.
Just like almost all mocks out there have you guys taking RGIII, im wondering if you think Cleveland absolutely HAS to trade up with St. Louis to get him? At this point, and with the whole Rookie Wage Scale, im saying that almost HAVE to. I think if St. Louis is on the clock and no one trades with them, there will be guys on the phone with Minnesota. I think Cleveland has to trade up or theyll lose out on RGIII.
So we should take RG III just because a bunch of mock drafts say we should? AND trade up to do so? All depends on what kind of offers the Rams get for that pick. Let 'em trade out of it- to have Blackmon fall right in our lap.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login