Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Mort says Mangini in the lead

Mort says Mangini in the lead

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
38 Posts 15 Posters 3.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Y YtownBrownsBacker

    @gips said:

    Nothing wrong with mangini he needed to make his DC tighten his zone coverage up some but other than that he got a raw deal from the jets if mangini where the boss with a good personnel guy that could be a winner..

    Schwartz is an interesting guy as well..i still think randy is doing a good job of covering every possible option with the exception of Deadwieght McCrieght,chudumbski or tucker i would hire a gorilla from a zoo before even considering those monkeys....

    Randy needs to relieve a lot of people of their jobs to fix things right.. to bad he doesnt have the guts to do it himself so the new regime gets stuck with that right off the bat but if the new regime is good or better...the housecleaning will be done in less than a week..

    I'm sorry but what is it about McCreight that turns you off. Can you name one thing he personally screwed up or are you just lumping him together with Savage. The man did a fine job coordinating the scouting department and is a very fine evaluator of talent. Do you know it was TJ that talked Cribbs into coming here? Do you know was against bringing in Cory Williams for a 2nd round draft pick and told Savage not to sign Stallworth. He wanted to take that 2nd round pick and draft a LB. He sided with RAC and wanted to bring in Law before the season started.

    So, tell us all why he is a "Deadweight".

    Vegasdogg V
    • 1k Posts
    • 2 Reputation
    V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    I'm sorry but what is it about McCreight that turns you off. Can you name one thing he personally screwed up or are you just lumping him together with Savage. The man did a fine job coordinating the scouting department and is a very fine evaluator of talent. Do you know it was TJ that talked Cribbs into coming here? Do you know was against bringing in Cory Williams for a 2nd round draft pick and told Savage not to sign Stallworth. He wanted to take that 2nd round pick and draft a LB. He sided with RAC and wanted to bring in Law before the season started.

    So, tell us all why he is a "Deadweight".

    I have a feeling he is talking out his ass. As if Lerner interviewed TJ because he is a dumb shit, right?

    "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • rich4eagleR rich4eagle

      Schwartz is intriguing and has a several year track record of success as a D coord,,,,,,,,,,,may be a good choice

      Masters ?
      • Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      ? Masters wrote on last edited by
      #17

      @rich4eagle said:

      Schwartz is intriguing and has a several year track record of success as a D coord,,,,,,,,,,,may be a good choice

      He is just a coffee fetcher for Fisher.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • rich4eagleR rich4eagle

        @ytownbrownsbacker said:

        Did you really think the conversation would get better with Ghoolie and Rich posting their shit and stirring the pot.

        TELL US ALL AGAIN .................."IN SEWAGE WE TRUST" A THOUSAND...........TIMES....that was you genius get the courage to tell everyone HOW FRIGGING WRONG YOU HAVE BEEN ABOUT NEARLY EVERYTHING FOR THREE YEARS instead whining to everyone about rich and ghoolie.....it is too sad that a 60 year old man whines and crybabies like an infant baby without a bottle............you are a pathetic human I feel sorry for you..............disgusting

        Masters ?
        • Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        ? Masters wrote on last edited by
        #18

        @rich4eagle said:

        TELL US ALL AGAIN .................."IN SEWAGE WE TRUST" A THOUSAND...........TIMES....that was you genius get the courage to tell everyone HOW FRIGGING WRONG YOU HAVE BEEN ABOUT NEARLY EVERYTHING FOR THREE YEARS instead whining to everyone about rich and ghoolie.....it is too sad that a 60 year old man whines and crybabies like an infant baby without a bottle............you are a pathetic human I feel sorry for you..............disgusting

        Pot, I have the kettle on line 2 for you.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Earl34 E
          • 1k Posts
          • 11 Reputation
          E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
          #19

          I'm not sure that I agree with the logic that this time around...if the GM didn't hire the coach...then there's gonna be friction.

          Savage hired coaches that Crennel didn't want. Kokinis would be Mangini's choice especially since they are supposedly close. I don't see the same dynamic. Mangini definitely got a raw deal in NY. He was likely neither the genius nor the buffoon he was made out to be. He has a good track record with draft choices (Gholston notwithstanding). In three years, he drafted Mangold and Ferguson (Pro Bowlers). He drafted and developed Kerry Rhodes, Leon Washington and Darelle Revis. Dustin Keller has been a success and he was instrumental in getting Kris Jenkins and Thomas Jones on board with the Jets' program. Just because he isn't throwing stuff in the lockerroom and slamming his headset into the ground it doesn't mean he's "clueless". He's calm. Tony Dungy is calm. Belichick (like him or not) is calm. Tom Landry wasn't demonstrative. I think the NY media and fans were screaming too loudly for an owner who has a new stadium's PSLs to sell. Just my opinion. NY fans are full of baloney.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Aloysius ?
            • Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Mangini didn't draft Kerry Rhodes. He was already there when Mangini arrived in New York.

            But I'll agree with you that he & GM Mike Tannenbaum have brought a lot of talent to NY. Though he struggled this year, ILB David Harris would be another guy to add to the list.

            That said, have the Jets had any Day Two successes (other than Washington) since Mangini got there?

            Plus, those who complained about our getting rid of guy who didn't fit the 3-4 should note how Mangini got rid of Vilma & Dewayne Robertson.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Earl34 E
              • 1k Posts
              • 11 Reputation
              E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
              #21

              My bad on Rhodes.

              I agree about Harris too. Mangini/Tannenbaum's second day drafts are varied. In 2008, he did pick up Dwight Lowery who started for most of the season at CB. He faded a bit later in the year but he was sensational early on for a fourth rounder. Ainge is on IR. From the '07 draft, they picked up Chansi Stuckey in the 7th round who had several big catches and TDs this year. Jacob Bender is a 6th rounder who is still on the team. In their first draft ('06), Brad Smith was a 4th rounder and he was the third WR and special teams contributor. I'd say that's quite a bit of success on day 2. I'm not sure how to measure day 2 success though.

              Re: Vilma and Robertson. My inlaws have season tix to the Jets and I was never impressed with Dewayne Robertson no matter what front they were in (3 or 4 DL). Vilma has done well in NO this year and I can't argue with that but I think that I saw him take himself out of more plays by sloppy pursuit and tackling than any other player on defense.

              ? 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • OconRecon OconReconO Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 1k Posts
                • 2 Reputation
                OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                E rich4eagleR 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • OconReconO OconRecon

                  Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                  Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                  Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                  Earl34 E
                  • 1k Posts
                  • 11 Reputation
                  E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  @oconrecon said:

                  Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                  Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                  Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                  Squeezing would be exactly what the next GM would be doing. The market for DA is certainly an unknown at this point. It's hard to get a lot of new talent without draft picks because that's where championship teams are built.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • OconReconO OconRecon

                    Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                    Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                    Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                    rich4eagle rich4eagleR One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 2k Posts
                    • 39 Reputation
                    rich4eagleR rich4eagle wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    @oconrecon said:

                    Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                    Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                    Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                    can you amplify on the salary cap issues............that is very very important

                    Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes
                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • listercat listercatL
                      • 588 Posts
                      • 6 Reputation
                      listercatL listercat wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      Please enough talking about coffee fetching!!!! Sheesh! I LOVE coffee; the reference to those with less than a normal grasp on life 'fetching' it for me is....well odd

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • rich4eagleR rich4eagle

                        @oconrecon said:

                        Just read a fresh PD story. It sure sounds like Pioli is out and Mangini is in.

                        Also paints a grim picture of the upcoming salary cap issues and how Phil put the next guy in a hole with the trading away of future draft picks.

                        Man I'd love to squeeze a 3rd round pick out of DA.

                        can you amplify on the salary cap issues............that is very very important

                        Vegasdogg V
                        • 1k Posts
                        • 2 Reputation
                        V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        @rich4eagle said:

                        can you amplify on the salary cap issues............that is very very important
                        A source close to Pioli said he headed into the Browns interview with serious reservations. Multiple league sources have pointed to squandered Browns draft picks over the past few years -- including the third, fifth and seventh in 2009. The team is headed for salary cap trouble after giving huge bonuses to free agents over the past several years, and the contracts of a number of players are up after 2009.

                        One league source noted that the roster is in bad shape after the reign of fired general manager Phil Savage, and that only one current defensive player -- Shaun Rogers -- would be good enough to start for the Ravens or Steelers. Another said neither linebacker Beau Bell nor Martin Rucker, two players the Browns traded up to select in the 2008, will be able to cut it in the NFL.

                        L I N K

                        "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
                        ? R 2 Replies Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • V Vegasdogg

                          @rich4eagle said:

                          can you amplify on the salary cap issues............that is very very important
                          A source close to Pioli said he headed into the Browns interview with serious reservations. Multiple league sources have pointed to squandered Browns draft picks over the past few years -- including the third, fifth and seventh in 2009. The team is headed for salary cap trouble after giving huge bonuses to free agents over the past several years, and the contracts of a number of players are up after 2009.

                          One league source noted that the roster is in bad shape after the reign of fired general manager Phil Savage, and that only one current defensive player -- Shaun Rogers -- would be good enough to start for the Ravens or Steelers. Another said neither linebacker Beau Bell nor Martin Rucker, two players the Browns traded up to select in the 2008, will be able to cut it in the NFL.

                          L I N K

                          Masters ?
                          • Posts
                          • 0 Reputation
                          ? Masters wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          @vegasdogg said:

                          L I N K

                          I have read that. But I have also read the opposite.

                          Based on what I know about the cap, the recent contract with bonus haven't actually been that big, and only hurt if CLE actually kept every one of them, which they wouldn't. They have lots of outs to save the cap hit if they cut the guy.

                          OconReconO 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • dencyguy D
                            • 481 Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            D dencyguy wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            I really don't see the huge difference between the GM picking the coach and the coach saying who he wants making the personnel decisions. Seems like two sides of the same coin to me.

                            At the end of the day, it comes down to who Lerner thinks has the most potential to help the team. If it's a coach who can motivate and scheme the team to win, then hire him first and then bring in a GM to get him the players he needs. If it's a GM who can put together a team that can dominate, then hire him and let him pick the guy coach his players. I don't see why one is necessarily better than the other.

                            Dennis

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • E Earl34

                              My bad on Rhodes.

                              I agree about Harris too. Mangini/Tannenbaum's second day drafts are varied. In 2008, he did pick up Dwight Lowery who started for most of the season at CB. He faded a bit later in the year but he was sensational early on for a fourth rounder. Ainge is on IR. From the '07 draft, they picked up Chansi Stuckey in the 7th round who had several big catches and TDs this year. Jacob Bender is a 6th rounder who is still on the team. In their first draft ('06), Brad Smith was a 4th rounder and he was the third WR and special teams contributor. I'd say that's quite a bit of success on day 2. I'm not sure how to measure day 2 success though.

                              Re: Vilma and Robertson. My inlaws have season tix to the Jets and I was never impressed with Dewayne Robertson no matter what front they were in (3 or 4 DL). Vilma has done well in NO this year and I can't argue with that but I think that I saw him take himself out of more plays by sloppy pursuit and tackling than any other player on defense.

                              Aloysius ?
                              • Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              @earl34 said:

                              My bad on Rhodes.

                              I agree about Harris too. Mangini/Tannenbaum's second day drafts are varied. In 2008, he did pick up Dwight Lowery who started for most of the season at CB. He faded a bit later in the year but he was sensational early on for a fourth rounder. Ainge is on IR. From the '07 draft, they picked up Chansi Stuckey in the 7th round who had several big catches and TDs this year. Jacob Bender is a 6th rounder who is still on the team. In their first draft ('06), Brad Smith was a 4th rounder and he was the third WR and special teams contributor. I'd say that's quite a bit of success on day 2. I'm not sure how to measure day 2 success though.

                              Thanks for the response. But I think it actually brings up some of my concerns about Mangini.

                              First, bringing up Bender reminds me of the drama Mangini caused with Pete Kendall in early '07. Unwilling to consider giving Kendall a long-term deal, Mangini ended up provoking a huge training camp distraction, one that ended in the Jets trading away Kendall for a Day Two pick. Mangini first put Bender in the LG spot...and he failed miserably. The whole left side of their line collapsed, with Ferguson having a terrible second season. Both of their QB's got beat up and rush-weary, resulting in a veteran QB losing the fans (Pennington) and a young QB not earning their support (Clemens).

                              Had they kept Kendall, I'm guessing their '07 offense would have been much better. They may have never even gotten into the Favre sweepstakes.

                              Also, they may have been able to develop Bender as a future starter at their RT spot. Instead, they spent a ton of money on Faneca at LG & Woody at RT. And Bender ended up getting cut; he spent most of the year on the Patriots' practice squad, then was picked up by the Niners.

                              Brad Smith is another interesting example: after growing into the #3 receiver role last year, the Jets seemed more interested in mimicking the Dolphins' success with the WildDawg than with continuing that success at receiver. As a result, he didn't even have 100 receiving yards this year. He's becoming another Josh Cribbs: a great athlete with no real position on offense.

                              So while you may be right that they've drafted a lot of talent on Day Two, it seems like they're doing a poor job of developing said talent. Perhaps owner Woody Johnson took that into consideration when he fired Mangini & not the GM. The talent's there - both because of their drafts and their big spending spree last offseason - but Mangini couldn't get that team to the playoffs.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • ? Guest

                                @earl34 said:

                                My bad on Rhodes.

                                I agree about Harris too. Mangini/Tannenbaum's second day drafts are varied. In 2008, he did pick up Dwight Lowery who started for most of the season at CB. He faded a bit later in the year but he was sensational early on for a fourth rounder. Ainge is on IR. From the '07 draft, they picked up Chansi Stuckey in the 7th round who had several big catches and TDs this year. Jacob Bender is a 6th rounder who is still on the team. In their first draft ('06), Brad Smith was a 4th rounder and he was the third WR and special teams contributor. I'd say that's quite a bit of success on day 2. I'm not sure how to measure day 2 success though.

                                Thanks for the response. But I think it actually brings up some of my concerns about Mangini.

                                First, bringing up Bender reminds me of the drama Mangini caused with Pete Kendall in early '07. Unwilling to consider giving Kendall a long-term deal, Mangini ended up provoking a huge training camp distraction, one that ended in the Jets trading away Kendall for a Day Two pick. Mangini first put Bender in the LG spot...and he failed miserably. The whole left side of their line collapsed, with Ferguson having a terrible second season. Both of their QB's got beat up and rush-weary, resulting in a veteran QB losing the fans (Pennington) and a young QB not earning their support (Clemens).

                                Had they kept Kendall, I'm guessing their '07 offense would have been much better. They may have never even gotten into the Favre sweepstakes.

                                Also, they may have been able to develop Bender as a future starter at their RT spot. Instead, they spent a ton of money on Faneca at LG & Woody at RT. And Bender ended up getting cut; he spent most of the year on the Patriots' practice squad, then was picked up by the Niners.

                                Brad Smith is another interesting example: after growing into the #3 receiver role last year, the Jets seemed more interested in mimicking the Dolphins' success with the WildDawg than with continuing that success at receiver. As a result, he didn't even have 100 receiving yards this year. He's becoming another Josh Cribbs: a great athlete with no real position on offense.

                                So while you may be right that they've drafted a lot of talent on Day Two, it seems like they're doing a poor job of developing said talent. Perhaps owner Woody Johnson took that into consideration when he fired Mangini & not the GM. The talent's there - both because of their drafts and their big spending spree last offseason - but Mangini couldn't get that team to the playoffs.

                                Earl34 E
                                • 1k Posts
                                • 11 Reputation
                                E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                Aloysius said:

                                Thanks for the response. But I think it actually brings up some of my concerns about Mangini.

                                First, bringing up Bender reminds me of the drama Mangini caused with Pete Kendall in early '07. Unwilling to consider giving Kendall a long-term deal, Mangini ended up provoking a huge training camp distraction, one that ended in the Jets trading away Kendall for a Day Two pick. Mangini first put Bender in the LG spot...and he failed miserably. The whole left side of their line collapsed, with Ferguson having a terrible second season. Both of their QB's got beat up and rush-weary, resulting in a veteran QB losing the fans (Pennington) and a young QB not earning their support (Clemens).

                                Had they kept Kendall, I'm guessing their '07 offense would have been much better. They may have never even gotten in to the Favre sweepstakes.

                                Also, they may have been able to develop Bender as a future starter at their RT spot. Instead, they spent a ton of money on Faneca at LG & Woody at RT. And Bender ended up getting cut; he spent most of the year on the Patriots' practice squad, then was picked up by the Niners.

                                Brad Smith is another interesting example: after growing into the #3 receiver role last year, the Jets seemed more enamored with mimicking the Dolphins' success with the WildDawg than continuing that success at receiver. As a result, he didn't even have 100 receiving yards this year. He's becoming another Josh Cribbs: a great athlete with no real position on offense.

                                So while you may be right that they've drafted a lot of talent on Day Two, it seems like they're doing a poor job of developing said talent. Perhaps owner Woody Johnson took that into consideration when he fired Mangini & not the GM. The talent's there - both because of their drafts and their big spending spree last offseason - but Mangini couldn't get that team to the playoffs.

                                Can't say. I think that the Kendall thing was something that he learned from. Playing stuff like that out in the media is not his style. I see it sort of like the early Coughlin days with the Giants where he was the "disciplinarian-that-you-can't-please". I agree though that losing Kendall had serious repercussions. I don't think that they had a problem with Mangini's development of the talent. The impression I have is that they couldn't send this coach into the contract year as a lame duck all-the-while preparing to sell PSLs. They either needed to extend him or release him. They insist that it wasn't his management of the players. Tannenbaum has backtracked all over the place trying to avoid giving any good reason for firing him. Nonetheless, the telling thing to me about how the players feel is how readily they were ready to throw Favre under the bus after Mangini was gone. If that resentment was brewing, Mangini did a great job of keeping it in house.

                                My personal OPINION is that an 8-3 coach doesn't go from genius to idiot in five weeks if his QB doesn't start heaving up picks indiscriminately. Favre's rating over that stretch was horrible. He underthrew four wide open receivers downfield in Seattle and he threw three of the ugliest picks you'll ever see against the Dolphins. Just my opinion. It's not that simple obviously but I think it played a big part in the collapse. When they brought in Favre...Mangini was not too happy. This was a guy who hadn't participated in the offseason coming in in the 11th hour to pick up the offense and more importantly was a guy that no living coach, except perhaps Holmgren...would bench.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • E Earl34

                                  I'm not sure that I agree with the logic that this time around...if the GM didn't hire the coach...then there's gonna be friction.

                                  Savage hired coaches that Crennel didn't want. Kokinis would be Mangini's choice especially since they are supposedly close. I don't see the same dynamic. Mangini definitely got a raw deal in NY. He was likely neither the genius nor the buffoon he was made out to be. He has a good track record with draft choices (Gholston notwithstanding). In three years, he drafted Mangold and Ferguson (Pro Bowlers). He drafted and developed Kerry Rhodes, Leon Washington and Darelle Revis. Dustin Keller has been a success and he was instrumental in getting Kris Jenkins and Thomas Jones on board with the Jets' program. Just because he isn't throwing stuff in the lockerroom and slamming his headset into the ground it doesn't mean he's "clueless". He's calm. Tony Dungy is calm. Belichick (like him or not) is calm. Tom Landry wasn't demonstrative. I think the NY media and fans were screaming too loudly for an owner who has a new stadium's PSLs to sell. Just my opinion. NY fans are full of baloney.

                                  mcgi8nnis M
                                  • 10 Posts
                                  • 0 Reputation
                                  M mcgi8nnis wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @earl34 said:

                                  I'm not sure that I agree with the logic that this time around...if the GM didn't hire the coach...then there's gonna be friction.

                                  Savage hired coaches that Crennel didn't want. Kokinis would be Mangini's choice especially since they are supposedly close. I don't see the same dynamic. Mangini definitely got a raw deal in NY. He was likely neither the genius nor the buffoon he was made out to be. He has a good track record with draft choices (Gholston notwithstanding). In three years, he drafted Mangold and Ferguson (Pro Bowlers). He drafted and developed Kerry Rhodes, Leon Washington and Darelle Revis. Dustin Keller has been a success and he was instrumental in getting Kris Jenkins and Thomas Jones on board with the Jets' program. Just because he isn't throwing stuff in the lockerroom and slamming his headset into the ground it doesn't mean he's "clueless". He's calm. Tony Dungy is calm. Belichick (like him or not) is calm. Tom Landry wasn't demonstrative. I think the NY media and fans were screaming too loudly for an owner who has a new stadium's PSLs to sell. Just my opinion. NY fans are full of baloney.

                                  Was it the rat or the gm taanebaum

                                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • M mcgi8nnis

                                    @earl34 said:

                                    I'm not sure that I agree with the logic that this time around...if the GM didn't hire the coach...then there's gonna be friction.

                                    Savage hired coaches that Crennel didn't want. Kokinis would be Mangini's choice especially since they are supposedly close. I don't see the same dynamic. Mangini definitely got a raw deal in NY. He was likely neither the genius nor the buffoon he was made out to be. He has a good track record with draft choices (Gholston notwithstanding). In three years, he drafted Mangold and Ferguson (Pro Bowlers). He drafted and developed Kerry Rhodes, Leon Washington and Darelle Revis. Dustin Keller has been a success and he was instrumental in getting Kris Jenkins and Thomas Jones on board with the Jets' program. Just because he isn't throwing stuff in the lockerroom and slamming his headset into the ground it doesn't mean he's "clueless". He's calm. Tony Dungy is calm. Belichick (like him or not) is calm. Tom Landry wasn't demonstrative. I think the NY media and fans were screaming too loudly for an owner who has a new stadium's PSLs to sell. Just my opinion. NY fans are full of baloney.

                                    Was it the rat or the gm taanebaum

                                    Earl34 E
                                    • 1k Posts
                                    • 11 Reputation
                                    E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @mcgi8nnis said:

                                    Was it the rat or the gm taanebaum

                                    Considering that Tannenbaum has no scouting or personnel experience and is a lawyer by training...I'd say that Mangini probably had more than 50% of the personnel say (good or bad). Just a thought.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • E Earl34

                                      Aloysius said:

                                      Thanks for the response. But I think it actually brings up some of my concerns about Mangini.

                                      First, bringing up Bender reminds me of the drama Mangini caused with Pete Kendall in early '07. Unwilling to consider giving Kendall a long-term deal, Mangini ended up provoking a huge training camp distraction, one that ended in the Jets trading away Kendall for a Day Two pick. Mangini first put Bender in the LG spot...and he failed miserably. The whole left side of their line collapsed, with Ferguson having a terrible second season. Both of their QB's got beat up and rush-weary, resulting in a veteran QB losing the fans (Pennington) and a young QB not earning their support (Clemens).

                                      Had they kept Kendall, I'm guessing their '07 offense would have been much better. They may have never even gotten in to the Favre sweepstakes.

                                      Also, they may have been able to develop Bender as a future starter at their RT spot. Instead, they spent a ton of money on Faneca at LG & Woody at RT. And Bender ended up getting cut; he spent most of the year on the Patriots' practice squad, then was picked up by the Niners.

                                      Brad Smith is another interesting example: after growing into the #3 receiver role last year, the Jets seemed more enamored with mimicking the Dolphins' success with the WildDawg than continuing that success at receiver. As a result, he didn't even have 100 receiving yards this year. He's becoming another Josh Cribbs: a great athlete with no real position on offense.

                                      So while you may be right that they've drafted a lot of talent on Day Two, it seems like they're doing a poor job of developing said talent. Perhaps owner Woody Johnson took that into consideration when he fired Mangini & not the GM. The talent's there - both because of their drafts and their big spending spree last offseason - but Mangini couldn't get that team to the playoffs.

                                      Can't say. I think that the Kendall thing was something that he learned from. Playing stuff like that out in the media is not his style. I see it sort of like the early Coughlin days with the Giants where he was the "disciplinarian-that-you-can't-please". I agree though that losing Kendall had serious repercussions. I don't think that they had a problem with Mangini's development of the talent. The impression I have is that they couldn't send this coach into the contract year as a lame duck all-the-while preparing to sell PSLs. They either needed to extend him or release him. They insist that it wasn't his management of the players. Tannenbaum has backtracked all over the place trying to avoid giving any good reason for firing him. Nonetheless, the telling thing to me about how the players feel is how readily they were ready to throw Favre under the bus after Mangini was gone. If that resentment was brewing, Mangini did a great job of keeping it in house.

                                      My personal OPINION is that an 8-3 coach doesn't go from genius to idiot in five weeks if his QB doesn't start heaving up picks indiscriminately. Favre's rating over that stretch was horrible. He underthrew four wide open receivers downfield in Seattle and he threw three of the ugliest picks you'll ever see against the Dolphins. Just my opinion. It's not that simple obviously but I think it played a big part in the collapse. When they brought in Favre...Mangini was not too happy. This was a guy who hadn't participated in the offseason coming in in the 11th hour to pick up the offense and more importantly was a guy that no living coach, except perhaps Holmgren...would bench.

                                      Aloysius ?
                                      • Posts
                                      • 0 Reputation
                                      ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @earl34 said:

                                      Can't say. I think that the Kendall thing was something that he learned from. Playing stuff like that out in the media is not his style. I see it sort of like the early Coughlin days with the Giants where he was the "disciplinarian-that-you-can't-please". I agree though that losing Kendall had serious repercussions. I don't think that they had a problem with Mangini's development of the talent. The impression I have is that they couldn't send this coach into the contract year as a lame duck all-the-while preparing to sell PSLs. They either needed to extend him or release him. They insist that it wasn't his management of the players. Tannenbaum has backtracked all over the place trying to avoid giving any good reason for firing him. Nonetheless, the telling thing to me about how the players feel is how readily they were ready to throw Favre under the bus after Mangini was gone. If that resentment was brewing, Mangini did a great job of keeping it in house.

                                      Good points. And according to PFW, it was Tannenbaum who refused to give Kendall an extension, not Mangini.

                                      But their analysis of why Mangini was fired makes me even less enthusiastic about him becoming our coach:

                                      In 2007, Mangini’s rigidity in X's and O's led to much of his team’s undoing. A staunch proponent of the 3-4 system he honed while working as an assistant under Bill Belichick in New England, Mangini lacked Belichick’s resourcefulness to change up the scheme when it wasn’t working.

                                      In 2008, the problem was finding an appropriate offensive balance. At times, it seemed as though the Jets had too much confidence in their personnel, and other times it seemed they felt they needed to trick the opposition in order to move the ball. Certainly, offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer deserves much of the blame as well, but if there was one thing Mangini preached as head coach, it was that the buck stopped with him.

                                      Throughout his entire tenure, his stoic — almost passive-aggressive — persona made for an often contentious relationship with his players, which was only exacerbated by the Jets’ hard-line stance when it came to negotiating player contracts. Even in instances when a lukewarm resolution was made, such as was the case with TE Chris Baker and WR Laveranues Coles, the player-coach bond had already been fractured.

                                      Mangini may be a decent, even good coach, and Favre sure looks to be the real person to blame for their late-season collapse.

                                      But the trade-off for getting Mangini isn't just that we don't get a McDaniels or a Jim Schwartz; it's that we lose out on a great personnel man in Pioli, something that we desperately need.

                                      And if that's the case, going with the coach with poor interpersonal skills over a great personnel guy seems like a terrible idea.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • ? Guest

                                        @vegasdogg said:

                                        L I N K

                                        I have read that. But I have also read the opposite.

                                        Based on what I know about the cap, the recent contract with bonus haven't actually been that big, and only hurt if CLE actually kept every one of them, which they wouldn't. They have lots of outs to save the cap hit if they cut the guy.

                                        OconRecon OconReconO Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 1k Posts
                                        • 2 Reputation
                                        OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        Masters said:

                                        I have read that. But I have also read the opposite.

                                        Based on what I know about the cap, the recent contract with bonus haven't actually been that big, and only hurt if CLE actually kept every one of them, which they wouldn't. They have lots of outs to save the cap hit if they cut the guy.

                                        Thanks for posting the link. I would have, but ye ol' cell phone can't do it.

                                        Here's the part I was referring to:

                                        A source close to Pioli said he headed into the Browns interview with serious reservations. Multiple league sources have pointed to squandered Browns draft picks over the past few years -- including the third, fifth and seventh in 2009. The team is headed for salary cap trouble after giving huge bonuses to free agents over the past several years, and the contracts of a number of players are up after 2009.

                                        One league source noted that the roster is in bad shape after the reign of fired general manager Phil Savage, and that only one current defensive player -- Shaun Rogers -- would be good enough to start for the Ravens or Steelers. Another said neither linebacker Beau Bell nor Martin Rucker, two players the Browns traded up to select in the 2008, will be able to cut it in the NFL.

                                        Hey Masters, any link to your point? I want to say I've read the same thing, but its been a while.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • OconRecon OconReconO Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 1k Posts
                                          • 2 Reputation
                                          OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          If protecting the ball is the key to winning, here's an interesting stat.

                                          The two worst teams in INT% (interception percentage for passes thrown) in the league were the Browns and the Jets. BUT, the Jets just missed the playoffs and had 9 wins.

                                          I gotta believe if Favre had 1 or 2 less INT's down the stretch, Mangini would still be the Jets coach and taken them to the playoffs 2 out of his first 3 years in fairly tough division (unlike that pancake division Shannahan is in).

                                          Add in the fact that next year is supposed to be the best year to hire a coach in decades with the availability of Cowher, Shannihan, Parcells, Asshole, Shottenheimer, and Dungy, a 1 year "show us what you've got" contract seems to make a lot of sense for Mangini.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate