Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form

More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form

The Browns Board
11 9 685
  • C calfoxwc wrote on
    #1

    Any extenuating circumstances involved for picking #2 on any of the questions, let us know.🙄

  • C calfoxwc wrote on
    #2

    don't screw up my point. I meant to START the game.

    Dammit, Zombo. LOL

    I fixed it.😠

  • chocoC choco wrote on
    #3

    at the start, you already have a queen. guve me 2, and ill destroy ya.

  • USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on
    #4

    Too bad RG3 is worth only a Bishop and not a Queen.

  • hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #5

    Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player.

    B 1 Reply
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on
    #6

    Hey guys, would you trade every player on your football team for RGIII?

    Oh you wouldn't? Well that proves my point we shouldn't trade up for RGIII

    sound logic...

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
  • C calfoxwc wrote on
    #7

    Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player. Mr. Hoorta

    ***************************************

    "sigh" ....

    That's what I get for being in a hurry before I left to go buy a combine. Agricultural, that is. 😉

  • Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on
    #8

    Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
  • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

    Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?

    Mike

    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on
    #9

    @canton-mike said:

    Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?

    Mike

    poker-hand-rankings.jpg

    What will it take for us to get a royal flush?

    Head or Gut?
  • Mr. TM Mr. T

    @canton-mike said:

    Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?

    Mike

    poker-hand-rankings.jpg

    What will it take for us to get a royal flush?

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #10

    @mr.-t said:

    poker-hand-rankings.jpg

    What will it take for us to get a royal flush?

    I always wondered why a flush is considered to beat a straight. I think it should be the other way around. I think a straight is harder to achieve than a flush. Especially in a game like Texas Hold 'em.

  • hoortaH hoorta

    Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player.

    B bringbackbrownie2 wrote on
    #11

    @hoorta said:

    Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player.

    True, but using the chess analogy, the queen is only worth 9 points. A bishop, rook, knight, and 2 pawns is worth 13 points - certainly not worth the trade unless it gives you a superior position that will win you the game..

Log in to reply