Tyranny Must Always Control The Message. By Any Means Necessary
-
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's KaganWe-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! You don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya? We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros! Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there. So Here is what I wrote to Snopes: Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it. That being said, I’ll bet you didn't know this. Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics: and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out! Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there. Here are some web sites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama! Check out these examples:<><><>If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete. However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution; by all means, PASS it ON! There truly is tyranny afoot.
-
I am confused so Kagan at the time of the those law suits was the Solicitor General, the person who represents the white house(president in these cases) in front of the Supreme Court is that what you are ranting about? Or that Snoops said she wasn't the person who's previous position was the Solicitor General? Or your lack of reading/research skills since the snopes article sites all of the cases you mentioned and provides links to the original cases that are not related to his birth certificate?
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/417/417.F3d.1172.-.04-15848.html
http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/417/417.F3d.1172.-.04-15848.html
http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/081977.P.pdf
*edit*
Adding the link to the snopes.com article that cal was refering too(I think)
-
Sorry, I did forget the link to the article.
It is very, very concerning though, that every person Obamao puts in place,
is openly, or secretly, a radical on his side. and Soros' money,
is on Obamao's side.
I really do wonder what we are going to come to, with them wanting
to get rid of our way of life.
They really have to be considered dangerous to our freedoms, and our country.
-
If someone is secretly radical how would you know?
-
Sorry, I did forget the link to the article.
It is very, very concerning though, that every person Obamao puts in place,
is openly, or secretly, a radical on his side. and Soros' money,
is on Obamao's side.
I really do wonder what we are going to come to, with them wanting
to get rid of our way of life.
They really have to be considered dangerous to our freedoms, and our country.
Sorry, I did forget the link to the article.
It is very, very concerning though, that every person Obamao puts in place,
is openly, or secretly, a radical on his side. and Soros' money,
is on Obamao's side.
I really do wonder what we are going to come to, with them wanting
to get rid of our way of life.
They really have to be considered dangerous to our freedoms, and our country.
You know not everyone who has a different opinion of how to run the country is an evil overload intent on destroying the US?
-
#1. A secret radical, is one who had been found out. Like Holder. It's an "after they've been found out" lable. Get up to speed, Woody.
#2. You call getting rid of our Constitution, our economic and electoral systems, just a "different opinion of how to run thecountry" ???
Freedom. It's guaranteed. Libs don't like freedom, when they feel like it. Which means, for other people.
They are the only ones to get their desired, guaranteed freedoms. But others have different guaranteed freedoms,
and they don't like those? Well, those others should just lose theirs.
Libs pout, whine and bitch more than any other creatures in the universe, I think.
And that's even if there are millions of inhabited planets.
-
Cal, prove anything u just said
-
That's easy, but tedious.
Look at history - and see for yourself.
-
That's easy, but tedious.
Look at history - and see for yourself.
This seems to be a pattern, you didn't defend anything in the original post that is just false information and just fell back on calling people a radical and trying to destroy our way of life. Seriously its as if you watch Fox News.
-
No, it's because you libs emotionally FEEL instead of thinking. Been there, done that thing about "proving" and researching and posting
and explaining.
Then, after all that, and it REALLY proves your point,... a poutyface lib goes "haha" and changes the subject.
The # of posts is gone, but several of us have been there often in the past. It does no good to "prove".
It gets ignored, and whatever source it was, even CNN, gets blasted, and then the personal attacks start.
Ask around it that sounds familiar.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login